‘It is towards the end of last year, Tony. November 22nd, to be precise. A patient testing VMN-negative has been sent in to see you for counselling. You’re holding his computer card in your hands. The codename at the top right-hand corner of the file card is “Ludwig Wittgenstein”. Tell me if you can see it.’
Chen breathed deeply and then nodded.
‘I want to hear your voice, Tony. Speak to me.’
Some words emptied from Chen’s slackened mouth. Jake understood none of them.
‘English, Tony. We’re speaking English now. Tell me if you can see the name.’
He frowned as his subconscious bent itself to Doctor Cleobury’s suggestion. ‘Yes,’ he said. ‘I can see it.’
‘Now I want you to look at the man who is sitting opposite you. The man codenamed Wittgenstein. Do you see him?’
‘Yes.’
‘Do you see him clearly?’
‘Clearly yes, I see him.’
Jake’s heart leaped at the thought of what Chen’s unconscious mind was looking at: the face of the killer himself. The possibility that she might obtain his description in this way might even make a subject for a future paper.
‘Can you describe the man to us?’
Chen grunted.
‘Tell us about Wittgenstein, Tony.’
Chen smiled. ‘He is a very logical, passionate sort of man. Argumentative, but intelligent.’
‘What about his physical appearance? Can you tell us something about that please?’
‘To look at - ?’ Chen’s frown deepened. ‘Medium to tall in height. Brown, wavy hair. Large, quick blue eyes. Thoughtful brow: I mean, his forehead constantly bends itself to thought. Sharply featured. The nose is a little hooked. And the mouth, a bit petulant, perhaps a bit effeminate, as if he looks in the mirror a great deal. Lean-looking, but not fit: it’s not exercise but lack of food that keeps him slim. Intense ...’ He was silent for several seconds.
‘Any distinguishing features?’
Chen shook his head slowly. ‘Nothing, except maybe his voice. He speaks very properly. Without an accent. Like on the BBC.’
‘What does he say to you, Tony? Does he tell you anything about himself?’
‘He’s angry. And scared he says.’
‘They usually are,’ Professor Gleitmann whispered to Jake.
‘When I told him what the test meant, he asked me to explain how he could know this to be true. I said I could show him the PET scan we had taken of the inside of his head. He said that I might just as well show him the inside of a rhinoceros head, for all the difference it would make to him. Whatever I told him was merely a concept derived from experience and he couldn’t accept it as a fact, only as an asserted proposition.’ Chen’s head began to nod again.
‘Ask him if he gave any indication of his identity,’ said Jake. ‘What sort of job he does, where he drinks, that kind of thing.’
‘Listen to me, Tony,’ said Doctor Cleobury. ‘Listen to me. Did Wittgenstein say anything about himself? Did he tell you what kind of job he does, where he lives?’
Chen shook his head. ‘He said he didn’t much care about himself, that’s all.’
‘Clothes,’ prompted Jake. ‘What was he wearing?’
‘Tony, can you tell us what he’s wearing?’
‘A tweed sports jacket, white polo-necked sweater, brown corduroy trousers, sturdy sort of brown shoes which look expensive. A beige raincoat on his lap.’
‘Age.’
‘What age is he, Tony?’
‘Late thirties, maybe.’
‘Tony, I want you to tell me how you counselled him. Tell me about that, will you?’
‘We made an appointment to discuss his future psychotherapy. And some drugs. I gave him a course of oestrogen tablets, and some Valium.’
‘All right, Tony. Let’s move forward in time now. It’s the day of the patient, codenamed Wittgenstein’s first appointment. Tell me what happens.’
Chen shrugged. ‘He doesn’t show up, that’s all. He never called to cancel. Just doesn’t come.’
Doctor Cleobury looked at Jake. ‘Is there anything more you would like to ask, Chief Inspector?’
‘No,’ she said, ‘but when you’re ending the trance I’d be grateful if you could tell Doctor Chen to remember everything he can of Wittgenstein’s appearance. When he’s fully conscious I’d like him to spend some time with one of our ComputaFit artists. Maybe we can work with something more tangible than just a verbal description.’
Jake switched off her discrecorder and dropped it into her bag. Doctor Cleobury started to count Chen out of hypnosis. Professor Gleitmann followed Jake to the door.
‘I wonder if I might have a brief word with you in my office,’ he said, holding the door open for her with one of his impossibly hairy hands. ‘There’s something I’d like you to see.’
They took the lift up to the top floor, and from one of his cherrywood bookshelves, Gleitmann removed a book which he opened and laid on the conference table in front of Jake. There was a photograph of a man. Jake glanced at it and then at Gleitmann.
‘I don’t know whether or not you noticed it,’ he explained, nodding at the picture, ‘but just about everything Doctor Chen said could equally apply to him, the real Ludwig Wittgenstein.’
‘I don’t quite follow you.’
‘Well you see, Chief Inspector, the unconscious mind doesn’t always distinguish things with any degree of precision. It is quite possible for Doctor Chen to have lied under hypnosis, albeit without culpability. I’m not at all certain that he did manage to distinguish between the man codenamed Wittgenstein by our Lombroso computer and the real one, the philosopher. It’s quite possible that he may have merged them both together in his subconscious mind. For instance, take Chen’s description of the patient’s physical appearance: brown wavy hair, large blue eyes, petulant mouth, sharp features: all that could be said of the real Ludwig Wittgenstein.
‘And do you remember that remark that the patient supposedly made about how nothing empirical is knowable, or words to that effect - how he would admit only to the existence of asserted propositions?’ Gleitmann shrugged awkwardly. ‘Well I don’t remember much of what Wittgenstein actually wrote, but that sort of thing is pretty close to the man’s general — Weltanschaung.’
‘Yes, I see what you mean, Professor.’
‘I’m sorry, Chief Inspector. It was a bold idea you had there, but the mind can play tricks on us.’
‘What if Chen knows nothing about the real Wittgenstein? Wouldn’t that make it more likely that his unconscious mind was speaking the truth?’
‘It’s a possibility. But Chen is an educated man, Chief Inspector. I can’t see him not knowing something about Wittgenstein, can you? Good Lord, he read Psychology at Cambridge.’
Jake shrugged. ‘So did I, Professor, and to be quite frank with you until a couple of days ago, you could have written what I knew about Wittgenstein on the back of a postage stamp.’
For a long time Jake had known the name merely as something of emblematic power, a name that was replete with intellectual symbolism, like the name of Einstein. Perhaps after all it was that Semitic suffix which helped to explain the exotic power of the name. But now that she had read Wittgenstein’s shortest and most explosive book, the Tractatus, she had a better idea why he had been such an influential figure in philosophy. Quite apart from the enigmatic, almost hermetic quality of his writing, there was the subject of his investigation: how is language possible? It was something people, especially policemen, tended to take for granted, even though it provided the very stuff of man’s inner life. Even more important than Wittgenstein’s attempt to explain what language was capable of - or so it seemed to Jake — had been his attempt to explain what language was incapable of. This touched something deep within her soul, something that even bordered her own sexuality.
‘Knowledge is a queer phenomenon,’ said Jake. ‘At least that’s Wittgenstein’s opinion.’
‘Well I see you haven’t wasted any time in filling in the gaps,’ said Gleitmann.
‘Filling in the gaps is my job,’ said Jake. ‘But there is one other possibility, of course. That this killer may actually resemble Wittgenstein in more than just a name spewed out by your computer. Suppose for one minute that he is indeed an intelligent, well-educated sort of man. Suppose for instance that he has read about Wittgenstein before, perhaps even been impressed by his thinking. Now isn’t it possible that the shock of being tested VMN-negative might have triggered some kind of psychopathological disorder? A paranoid schizophrenic delusion, perhaps?’
Gleitmann rubbed his blue jaw thoughtfully. ‘I suppose it might be possible. But as quick as that? I don’t know.’
‘Suppose he already had a diathesis, a predisposition towards the illness. All that would then be required would be some kind of stress situation to transform the potentiality into an actuality. A stress situation such as being told that you were VMN-negative perhaps.’
‘That might do it, I suppose.’
Jake smiled thinly at Gleitmann’s reluctance to admit the possibility of what was to her increasingly obvious.
‘Come on, Professor,’ she said. ‘You know damned well it would.’
When their meeting was over, Jake left the building. Outside the Institute, she found a yawn turning quickly into a stretch that demanded some kind of greater response than a brief flexing of neck and shoulder muscles. Exercise. Air: even the combusted air of Victoria. She decided not to take her car back to the Yard and having collected her gun from the glove compartment, she dismissed her driver and set off up Victoria Street.
Most Londoners, finding themselves in Jake’s position, would soon have turned northwards in the direction of St James’s Park. But the pull of the river was too strong for someone who had lived most of her life beside the river.
Even so, the view from Westminster Bridge was fraught with danger, there were so many beggars and petty thieves along the embankments, and the gun was a necessary precaution.
It was a sight which always managed to touch her soul, although the smog-laden air prevented the sun from lighting the saloon-bar boats, the glass tower-blocks, the satellite mushrooms, theatres and mosques. A feeling of calm overcame Jake as she watched the muddy brown Thames glide underneath her feet. She wondered if Doctor Cleobury’s trance-through-relaxation technique might not have also worked a part of its spell on her.
Traffic was lighter than normal and she crossed from one side of the bridge to the other, stepping coolly over the supine form of a drunk sleeping in the gutter. Even the Houses of Parliament seemed to be asleep. She smiled as she tried to imagine the lies that were probably even now being told in that heart of democracy by the likes of Grace Miles.
This sense of calm refused to desert Jake despite the drunk waking up and, with an almost complete lack of consonants, demanding money of her. She reached into her bag and keeping one hand on the 30-shot automatic, she took out a five dollar bill with the other and gave it to him. The man stared dully at it for a moment, nodded, grumbled a reply, and then, thinking better of snatching the tall woman’s shoulder bag, moved on, unaware of how close he had come to being shot.
Jake watched this majestic piece of work as he walked unsteadily along the pavement, towards the nearest off-licence, and felt nothing but contempt, for him and all men. She would as soon have blown his head off as rewarded his menacing demand for money.
It was the sight of the river, not the man, which had moved her.
I keep two notebooks. Particularly beautiful books, with smooth, creamy paper, a little yellowed by age, but of a kind that has not been manufactured for many years.
There is this one, containing my journal, which I call my Brown Book. And there is another, containing the details of those few individuals whom I have executed, or am planning to execute, which I call my Blue Book. I write with an old fountain pen. I’m not very used to it. Like most people I normally write something straight onto the computer, however I feel that that would be to remove me from the immediacy, the improvised character of these, my thoughts, which only a pen can translate.
Neither of these two books is particularly good, but they are about as good as I can make them. I dare say that they will only be finished when I am. In other words, their publication (about which I am having a few misgivings) will not be an event in my life.
Of course, it is not without the realms of possibility that, taken together, it should be the fate of these two humble volumes, in their poverty and in the darkness of this time, to bring illumination into one brain or another. But then, how things are in this world is a matter of complete indifference for what is higher.
Next to each other, these two books amount to a sort of a system. This is what is important for logic. Because the only necessity that exists is logical necessity. And the idea that there is some kind of natural explanation for everything, and that this natural law is something inviolable is, frankly, nonsense.
Turning to the Blue Book for a moment, you will see how, for each individual, a series of pictures serves to represent precisely how I will carry out his execution. (All right, I did depart from this in the case of Bertrand Russell, but that was a mistake; anyone can make a mistake.) These are simple, childlike drawings, such as might be made when completing an accident-claim form from a motor insurance company.
As a picture of a possible state of affairs, it’s all logical enough. Of course it’s not every picture that corresponds with reality in this way. You just have to take a walk around the Tate Gallery to appreciate that. In there are a great many pictures on view in which an arrangement of objects bears no relation to a state of affairs. This is the freedom of Art. It is what is sometimes called artistic licence, almost as if you had to write away to Swansea in order to get one.
As well as my Brown Book and my Blue Book which, taken together, represent my system, there is the approximate reality of my work.