CANCER'S CAUSE, CANCER'S CURE (2 page)
In accordance with Dr. Beljanski’s beliefs, he searched for ways to restore good health in the general population through cellular balance, and his research tended towards the use of available natural substances instead of turning to synthetic compounds such as prescribed medications, over-the-counter drugs, or any other type of chemicalized synthetic therapies.
As the ultimate man of science, he was holistic in his orientation and believed in alternative forms of healing from natural and non-toxic sources. He represented the scientific method in its truest form. Work began for him at the Pasteur Institute with his pioneering studies in RNA (ribonucleic acid), one of the basic building blocks of a cell and thus of all life. Over his professional career of more than forty-five years, Dr. Beljanski brought to light the negative impact environmental pollution has on human, animal, and plant health at the DNA level. He discovered what happens to a cell at the molecular level, thereby discovering the DNA of cancer. Once he understood how a cell becomes cancerous, he was able to find and perfect the application of anticancer and antiviral botanical approaches which, if used properly, can handle most cancers.
Yes, you read that correctly—I believe these botanical approaches can cure most cancers. I do not say that lightly because I know of what I speak. As a medical journalist, I have dedicated my life to bringing to the public important discoveries in holistic medicine. I have published ninety-one other books on consumer health, and I believe this book you’re reading, number ninety-two, is my most momentous. I came out of retirement because I know that what Dr. Mirko Beljanski discovered could save millions of lives. His discoveries could put an end to the war on cancer.
My Introduction to Dr. Beljanski’s Concepts
Dr. Beljanski’s discoveries need to be brought to broad public attention so that we all can be better informed if we or someone we love develops cancer or contracts an incurable virus. If we understand how cancer develops in our bodies, we can better understand why Beljanski’s breakthrough discoveries are so effective.
My introduction to Mirko Beljanski happened in the spring of 2003, when I attended the semi-annual scientific conference of the American College for Advancement in Medicine (ACAM), an organization of twenty-five hundred holistic medical practitioners. There I listened to a lecture by Michael B. Schachter, M.D., of Suffern, New York. Trained in a form of holistic psychiatry which uses nutrients rather than drugs for treating mental illness, Dr. Schachter works as a holistic physician with alternative methods of healing and has administered to thousands of patients for close to forty years. He is renowned among his colleagues, loved by his patients, and has vast experience with therapies that do no harm when overcoming serious infirmities. Most of his patients consult him, not for mind-related disturbances, but for cancer, cardiovascular, and peripheral vascular diseases (blood clots), in addition to other serious health issues. His patients usually need no hospitalization and no drug prescriptions. Typically they take nutritional supplements in addition to following wholesome diets.
I knew Dr. Schachter from when my wife, Joan, came down with breast cancer and suffered its subsequent required mastectomy in 1987; Dr. Schachter kept her healthy, beautiful, and thriving for over thirteen years. Joan taught nutrition, diet, weight control, and positive thinking to thousands of women throughout Connecticut. She was their mentor, and I was never more proud of my beautiful wife.
It was not ordinary breast cancer that killed my wife eventually but rather something much worse—inflammatory breast disease. Because I was unaware of Dr. Beljanski’s products, I like everyone else believed that no treatment of any kind had ever been found for her illness. The condition killed her within ten months of its diagnosis. Cancer is an indiscriminate grim reaper, and I was destined to suffer more loss at its menacing hands. Three months after Joan’s funeral, my mother, Rachel Walker, was diagnosed with gastric carcinoma (cancer of the stomach). Having no knowledge that she was afflicted, I had left the country. With a heavy heart, I was required to fly home at once to arrange for her burial.
After living the lonely life of a widower for three years, I received a call. It was Dr. Schachter, inviting me to come to the 2003 ACAM conference. My respect for Dr. Schachter has been immense for as long as I’ve known him—at least twenty-seven years—and I knew that any medical topic he would present in a lecture was worthwhile to hear. So when he invited me to listen to his talk on the cancer-causation concepts of Dr. Mirko Beljanski, I sensed in advance that my time spent at the ACAM conference would be significant.
The holistic physician introduced me to Monique and Sylvie Beljanski, the wife and the daughter of Dr. Beljanski. They had also listened to Dr. Schachter’s presentation. In turn, the two women invited me to a beautiful part of France called Charente to attend a picnic, scheduled for September 5, 2003, conducted by the “Center of Innovation, Research and Scientific Information” (
Centre d’Innovation, de Recherches et d’Information Scientifiques
: CIRIS). CIRIS is an organization with a membership between thirty-five hundred and five thousand French men and women, all of whom had been saved from cancer or AIDS by application of Dr. Beljanski’s discoveries and the concept of cancer causation surrounding them.
By April 2003, Dr. Schachter had informed CIRIS and the Beljanski women that my publishing score was eighty-six distributed consumer health books to my credit. Their idea was that I might become intrigued with the knowledge I acquired in La Rochelle, France, and write a book on the professional life and work of Dr. Mirko Beljanski. I was astounded by what I found and believed I had come across knowledge about the most viable weapons to date to fight cancer.
Shortly after I returned from the picnic in France where I learned of Beljanski’s work, I discovered my sister, Phyllis Greene, had lung cancer. She suffered terrible discomforts arising from undergoing the usual oncological (the branch of medicine dealing with cancer) treatments of radiation and chemotherapy. Radiation therapy causes burns to the skin and/or brings on diarrhea of the gastrointestinal tract. Chemotherapy commonly produces nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, weight loss, depression, fatigue, low red-blood cell counts that lead to anemia and low white blood-cell counts that promote the risk of infection. From receiving chemotherapy, people often lose their hair or experience inflammation or ulcers of the mucous membranes, such as the mouth lining, which makes eating difficult. Phyllis experienced all of these until she longed for death, whereupon she entered a hospice in anticipation of the end.
I brought Beljanski’s products for my sister to ingest. She took them gratefully and benefited from them. The various formulas derived from nature reduced my sister’s awful chemotherapeutic side effects. I visited her weekly, even though the round trip to see her was an eight-hour drive. Her oncologist took credit for his patient’s improvement, and neither my sister nor I corrected his taking such credit.
When the local chapter of Hospice in Sebring, Florida, learned that Phyllis’ improvement came from the herbals I was leaving, her hospice nurses and aides took them away. I was outraged and discovered that the Institution of Hospice requires that nothing be done for the dying patient to allow his or her lingering in this life on earth. Everything is done to ease the patient into the next life. Even the removal of cancer treatment that gives comfort seems to be mandatory.
My sister quickly succumbed to the lung cancer. I believe that she would be with us still if she had continued to take Beljanski’s botanicals. I vowed at her death that I would make sure the world knew about this amazing man and the potential his anti-cancer botanicals, developed through meticulous microbiological research, held for humanity. I never wanted to see another loved one suffer. But that was not to be. Before my sister died, I met a kind and attractive woman, and having been a widower for three years, I opened myself to love again. We dated for several months, and then we took a tour together to nine cities in Spain. I traveled there with an engagement ring in my pocket.
We planned to be married within the early months of 2005. Instead, during the late fall and early winter of 2004, I frequented the reception areas and consultation rooms of Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), a major teaching institution in Boston, because my fiancé had been admitted to this hospital with pancreatic cancer. Such cancer is an illness with a devastating prognosis, for it has no screening technique; therefore less than 7 percent of cases are detected early. The rest are spotted when pain or other symptoms appear. Some 37,680 new cases of pancreatic cancer occurred in 2008, with a mere 2 percent experiencing a five-year survival rate.
During meetings with some oncologists and radiotherapists who were responsible for the care of this woman to whom I had newly proposed marriage, I was astounded at how distorted the physicians’ presentations were when they discussed the side effects of their treatments.
The doctors appeared to become almost like used-car salesmen in a pitch for their surgery, radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy. I know something about medical practices and oncology from my work as a medical researcher and as a former practicing podiatrist. In my opinion, the information the oncologists gave my fiancé was hardly an honest assessment of the relative benefits and risks associated with the recommended treatments.
My financé her two educated, middle-age sons, and I consulted twice with a group of oncological specialists employed by the hospital. The decision was made that this sixty-six-year-old woman, diagnosed with an aggressive pancreatic cancer, required immediate surgery employing the Whipple’s operation triad. The Whipple’s is a very extensive operative procedure that involves the excision of at least three internal organs, including a majority of the victim’s pancreas.
To prepare the woman’s internal cancerous tissues, preoperative radiation was recommended for her, and following operative recovery, postoperative chemotherapy was also mandatory. Both radiation and chemotherapy oncologists went about selling their separate treatments to the patient, her sons, and me. When I asked about the residual side effects of the typical treatment, her oncologists told us that there were none. My fiancé, her sons, and I were astounded. “No side effects? How could that be?” The oncologists were steadfast in their declarations. I knew they were lying.
When my fiancé and I arrived for her required preoperative radiation, I observed literally hundreds of bald-headed women waiting in the radiotherapy and chemotherapy hospital areas for commencement of their next treatments. I thought, with no small amount of disgust, “Isn’t the loss of hair with resultant baldheadedness a side effect of one or both of these cancer therapies?” All of us know that it is. I was also dismayed as I watched these unfortunate people running into the conveniently placed toilets—one toilet bowl for approximately every twelve reception room chairs—to vomit.
I was opposed to the radiation therapy, but that’s what this patient and her two sons elected for her to do. I tried to convince her to check into a program run by a friend, a holistic oncologist named Nicholas J. Gonzalez, M.D., of New York City. Dr. Gonzalez was ready to take her into the program. The Gonzalez patient investigations had been funded by the U.S. Government as a successful clinical-research program that uses certain types of enzymes derived from New Zealand lambs. She refused Dr. Gonzalez’s offer. (Please see Appendix A for more information about Dr. Gonzalez’s pancreatic cancer-reversal program.)
I also had Beljanski’s supplements. I was not forceful in pressing for use of those holistic products. I cooperated with the others’ treatment decision. When I finally encouraged my fiancé to take Dr. Beljanski’s botanicals, I was hopeful, but they were soon abandoned. Her two sons, a stock broker and a computer programmer, would have none of my recommendations. My fiancé and her sons did not understand how and why they worked. Beljanski’s herbals ended up being flushed down the hospital room’s toilet. They considered holistic-type therapies outright quackery.
Condemned by these young men, I was literally ordered to leave the hospital scene. In fact, they insisted I leave Massachusetts altogether. They said, “Get out of our mother’s life! Go home to Connecticut!” She died within two months of her sons sending me away.
Granted, the track record for pancreatic cancer is poor for virtually all known treatments, whether conventional or alternative. However, I éersonally have met scores of former cancer patients taking Beljanski’s very safe supplements who had been given short-term death sentences by their doctors years prior, including pancreatic cancer. So it is my belief that if my former fiancé had accepted and tried Dr. Beljanski’s natural and non-toxic discoveries, she might still be with us today. I am certain that most of you who are reading this book have lost someone you loved—a family member, a friend, a beloved teacher or mentor—to cancer. Don’t we all deserve to know about a way to treat cancer effectively, without pain, and for extended periods of time?
An Integrative Approach
The traditional treatment for cancer is well-known. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy are designed to kill the cancerous cells. The problem is that the treatment oftentimes kills the patient. Radiation and harsh chemicals do not discriminate between good and bad cells—the treatments kill all cells. Three renown oncologists reporting in the peer-reviewed medical journal
Clinical Oncology
declared that “the benefit of cytotoxic (a substance having a fatal effect on cells) chemotherapy may have been overestimated for cancers of the esophagus, stomach, rectum, and brain with a minimal impact of cytotoxic chemotherapy on five-year survival, and a lack of any major progress over the last twenty years.” In other words, doctors who are trained to treat cancer are saying that the conventional treatments they use are not working—at least not as well as some would like everyone to believe.
