Authors: Paget Toynbee
                       Â
“Se Dio ti lasci, Lettor, prender frutto Di tua lezion.”
Inf
. xx. 19
   Â
Origin of the namesâDistinguishing principles of the two parties in ItalyâIntroduction of the parties into FlorenceâThe Ghibellines with the aid of Frederick II expel the Guelfs from FlorenceâReturn of the Guelfs after the Emperor's death, and pacification between the two parties
   Â
Renewed hostilitiesâAdoption of distinctive banners by the two parties in FlorenceâThe Ghibellines intrigue with Manfred and are forced to leave FlorenceâThey retire to Siena and persuade Manfred to send them helpâGreat Ghibelline victory at Montaperti
   Â
Flight of the Guelfs from FlorenceâFarinata degli Uberti saves Florence from destructionâThe Ghibellines supreme in TuscanyâDefeat of Manfred at Benevento by Charles of AnjouâFlight of Guido Novello and the Ghibelline allies from FlorenceâGuy de Montfort arrives in Florence as Charles's vicarâGuelf supremacy finally re-established
   Â
Dante's birth and ancestryâHis father and motherâCacciaguidaâGeri del BelloâBeatrice PortinariâEpisodes in the
Vita Nuova
âFolco PortinariâDeath of BeatriceâPoetical correspondence with Cino da Pistoja, Guido Cavalcanti, and Forese Donati
   Â
Military serviceâWar with ArezzoâBattle of CampaldinoâVictory of Florentine GuelfsâBuonconte da MontefeltroâSiege of Capronaâ“Quomodo sedet sola civitas!”
   Â
Early studiesâBrunetto LatinoâClassical acquirementsâMarriageâGemma DonatiâChildrenâ-Public lifeâEmbassy to San GemignanoâPriorate
   Â
Blacks and Whites in PistojaâIn FlorenceâCerchi and Donati May Day, 1300âDante in officeâEmbassy to RomeâCharles of Valois in FlorenceâTriumph of the BlacksâCondemnation and exile of DanteâHis possessions and debts
   Â
WanderingsâDante's fellow-exilesâHenry VII in ItalyâHis deathâFresh sentence against DanteâHis retirement to RavennaâAlleged visits to Mantua, Verona, and PiacenzaâReputed a sorcererâDeath and burialâHis tomb and epitaphsâElegies
   Â
Boccaccio's rebuke to the FlorentinesâEfforts of Florence to get possession of Dante's remainsâLeo X grants permission for their removalâDisappearance of the remainsâTheir accidental discovery during the commemoration of the sixth centenary of Dante's birth- Public exhibition of them at Ravenna, and subsequent re-interment
   Â
Boccaccio's account of Dante's person and characterâHis love of fameâHis failingsâAccount of him by his contemporary, Giovanni Villani
   Â
Portraits of DanteâThe Giotto portrait in the BargelloâNorton's account of the Bargello portraitâIts disappearance and re-discoveryâThe death-maskâIts relation to the portraitâThe Naples BronzeâPortrait by Taddeo GaddiâThe Riccardi portraitâThe picture by Domenico di Michelino
   Â
Anecdotes of DanteâDante and Can Grande della ScalaâBelacqua and DanteâSacchetti's storiesâDante and the blacksmithâDante and the donkey-driverâDante's creedâDante and King Robert of NaplesâDante's reply to the boreâDante and the Doge of VeniceâDante a kleptomaniacâDante and Cecco d' Ascoli
   Â
Italian WorksâLyrical PoemsâThe
Vita Nuova
âThe
Convivio
   Â
The
Divina Commedia
âIts origin, subject, and aimâDate of compositionâScheme of the poemâBoccaccio's story of the lost cantosâWhy it was written in ItalianâDante and his rhymesâManuscripts and printed editionsâEnglish editions and translationsâCommentaries
   Â
Latin WorksâThe
De Monarchia
âThe
De Vulgari Eloquentia
âThe
Letters
âThe
Eclogues
âThe
Quaestio de Aqua et Terra
âApocryphal Works
                                                  Â
Â
   Â
Appendix AâGenealogical Table of the Family of Dante
   Â
Appendix BâLetter of Frate Ilario to Uguccione della Faggiuola
   Â
Appendix EâBibliographical Note of the Earliest Biographies and Biographical Notices of Dante
   Â
Index
 Â
1.  Bronze bust of Dante
 Â
2.  Florence and the Arno
 Â
3.  The city of Florence
 Â
5.  Dante's house in Florence
 Â
6.  The Baptistery of San Giovanni at Florence
 Â
8.  Cast of Dante's face taken after death
 Â
9.  Dante's tomb at Ravenna
10.  Chest in which Dante's remains were found at Ravenna in 1865
11.  Portrait of Dante (
from Codex
1040
in the Riccardi Library at Florence
)
12.  Portrait of Dante by Giotto in the Bargello at Florence
(from a drawing by Seymour Kirkup)
14.  Bronze bust of Dante at Naples
15.  Dante and his book
(from the picture by Domenico di Michelino, in the Duomo at Florence)
16.  Dante Alighieri
(from the painting by Andrea del Castagno, in the Museo Nazionale at Florence)
           Â
Thou know'st perchance how Phoebus' self did guide
           Â
Our Tuscan D
ANTE
up the lofty side
           Â
Of snow-clad Cyrrha; how our Poet won
           Â
Parnassus' peak, and founts of Helicon;
           Â
How with Apollo, ranging wide, he sped
           Â
Through Nature's whole domain, and visited
           Â
Imperial Rome, and Paris, and so passed
           Â
O'er seas to B
RITAIN'S
distant shores at last.
(
Boccaccio to Petrarch
)
                                       Â
“the gretë poete of
Ytaille That highte Dant.”
C
HAUCER
,
Monk's Tale
DANTE ALIGHIERI
His Life and Works
FLORENCE AND THE ARNO
   Â
Origin of the namesâDistinguishing principles of the two parties in ItalyâIntroduction of the parties into FlorenceâThe Ghibellines with the aid of Frederick II expel the Guelfs from FlorenceâReturn of the Guelfs after the Emperor's death, and pacification between the two parties.
N
ORTHERN ITALY
in the middle of the thirteenth century, at the time of Dante's birth,
1
was divided into two great political parties, of which the one, known by the name of Guelfs, looked to the Pope as their head, while the others, the Ghibellines, looked to the Emperor. The distinctive titles of these two parties were of German origin, being merely Italianized forms (
Guelfo
and
Ghibellino
) of the two German names
Welf and Weiblingen
. The former of these was the name of an illustrious family, several members of which had successively been Dukes of Bavaria in the tenth and eleventh centuries. The heiress of the last of these intermarried with a younger son of the house of Este; and from them sprang a second line of Guelfs, from whom the royal house of Brunswick is descended.
   Â
Weiblingen was the name of a castle in Franconia, belonging to Conrad the Salic, who was Emperor from 1024 to 1039, and was the progenitor, through the female line, of the Swabian emperors. By the election of Lothair in 1125 in succession to Henry V (Emperor from 1106 to 1125) the Swabian family were ousted from what they had come to regard almost as an hereditary possession; and at this time a hostility appears to have commenced between them and the house of Welf, who were nearly related to Lothair. In 1071 the Emperor Henry IV had conferred the Duchy of Bavaria upon the Welfs; and in 1080 the Duchy of Swabia had been conferred upon the Counts of Hohenstaufen, who represented the Franconian line.
   Â
The accession in 1138 of Conrad III of Swabia to the Imperial throne, and the rebellion of Henry the Proud, the Welf Duke of Bavaria, gave rise to a bloody struggle between the two houses; and at the battle of Weinsberg, fought on 21 December, 1140, in which the Welf Duke was defeated by Conrad, the names
Welf and Weiblingen
were for the first time, it is said, adopted as warcries.
   Â
These names, which in Germany, as we have seen, distinguished the two sides in the conflict between the Welfs and the Imperial Swabian or Hohenstaufen line, in Italy acquired a different meaning, and became identified respectively with the supporters of the Church and the supporters of the Empire. Their first appearance in Italy seems to have been quite at the beginning of the thirteenth century, when they were adopted by the two leading parties which divided the towns of Lombardy during the struggle for the Imperial throne between Philip, Duke of Swabia (brother of the Emperor Henry VI), and the Welf Otto of Brunswick, many important
Italian towns sympathizing with the latter, who after his rival's death in 1208 became Emperor as Otto IV.
   Â
The division between the opposing factions rapidly deepened, till not only rival towns, but also the leading families within the towns themselves, became involved in party strife, the citizens ranging themselves, ostensibly at least, under the chiefs on either side.
   Â
The main outlines of the principles which actuated the two parties in Italy, during the period covered by this book, have been ably sketched by the late Dean Church. “The names of Guelf and Ghibelline,” he writes, “were the inheritance of a contest which, in its original meaning, had been long over. The old struggle between the priesthood and the Empire was still kept up traditionally, but its ideas and interests were changed. It had passed over from the mixed region of the spiritual and temporal into the purely political. The cause of the Popes was that of the independence of Italyâthe freedom and alliance of the great cities of the north, and the dependence of the centre and south on the Roman See. To keep the Emperor out of Italy, to create a barrier of powerful cities against him south of the Alps, to form behind themselves a compact territory, rich, removed from the first burst of invasion, and maintaining a strong body of interested feudatories, had now become the great object of the Popes. The two parties did not care to keep in view principles which their chiefs had lost sight of. The Emperor and the Pope were both real powers, able to protect and assist; and they divided between them those who required protection and assistance. Geographical position, the rivalry of neighbourhood, family tradition, private feuds, and above all private interest, were the main causes which assigned cities, families, and individuals to the Ghibelline or Guelf party. One party called themselves
the Emperor's liegemen, and their watchword was authority and law; the other side were the liegemen of Holy Church, and their cry was liberty; and the distinction as a broad one is true. But a democracy would become Ghibelline, without scruple, if its neighbour town was Guelf; and among the Guelf liegemen of the Church and liberty the pride of blood and love of power were not a whit inferior to that of their opponents.