Read Erased: Missing Women, Murdered Wives Online
Authors: Marilee Strong
Tags: #Violence in Society, #General, #Murderers, #Case studies, #United States, #Psychology, #Women's Studies, #Murder, #Uxoricide, #Pregnancy & Childbirth, #True Crime, #Social Science, #Crimes against, #Pregnant Women, #Health & Fitness
E R A S E D
At other times he couldn’t resist a display of bravado, flipping the
bird at his pursuers, clapping his hands in glee at a particularly clever
maneuver, or pulling up alongside one of the unmarked cars and
smirking at the driver.
When they finally pulled him over at the entrance to Torrey
Pines Golf Course, where he was scheduled to play a round a golf
with his family earlier that morning, the officers found evidence that
seemed to indicate that Scott was planning a run for the border or
some attempt to live off the grid. The car was packed with a huge
amount of survival gear, including a tent, water purifier, camp ax,
hunting knives, folding saw, cooking implements, and fishing gear.
They also found four cell phones, his brother John’s driver’s license,
credit and gas cards belonging to several relatives, and nearly $15,000
in cash. The cash came mostly from Jackie Peterson, who gave a
convoluted explanation, claiming that Scott’s brother was actually
buying the truck from Scott and that she was advancing the money,
‘‘accidentally’’ making a large withdrawal from Scott’s account and
then a duplicate withdrawal from her own to reimburse him.
He also had with him a stash of Viagra. It seems amazing that
Scott could contemplate a game of golf while waiting to find out if
life as he knew it was over for him, but the fact that sex was also
on his mind at a time like that is probably even more revealing
of his ability to compartmentalize and the compulsiveness of his
narcissistic drives. Two weeks after his wife went missing, Peterson
called his cable company and added the Playboy channel to his
subscription. However, that apparently was not enough for him. Four
days later he called back, switching to two harder-core pornography
channels—which he abruptly had disconnected while police were in
the midst of searching his home in mid-February.
Perhaps the most disturbing discovery on the day of his arrest was
a map inside the car with directions to Amber’s workplace, the result
of a MapQuest search Scott had performed that very day. At trial, the
defense claimed that Scott was simply planning to return a book to
Amber,
The Purpose-Driven Life
, a spiritual book she had sent him
in February just before asking him to stop calling her. The gift was a
last-ditch attempt on her part to elicit some kind of self-examination
from Scott. She had tried to get him to confess to her, had tried to
talk him into submitting to a polygraph. With this final gesture she
hoped to provoke his conscience.
Sex, Lies, and Audiotape
2 7 5
Unfortunately, psychopaths have no conscience. Scott did try to
exploit this last ray of hope from Amber, shape-shifting himself once
more in a way that he hoped would impress her. He immediately
began using a new e-mail address—[email protected]—and writing her claiming he had discovered his life’s purpose. He
would dedicate himself to his family, which he said would include a
wife and child, and strive ‘‘to be positive in people’s lives.’’
If Scott was simply planning to mail the book back to her, as
the defense contended, why did he print out driving directions? And
why did he suddenly decide to do so two months after she broke
off contact with him, during what had to be the most stressful week
of his life? Police believe he may have been planning to see Amber,
perhaps even to do her harm.
Modesto detectives had been so concerned for Amber’s safety that
they refused to let her meet with him in person. In response to her
demands that Scott take a polygraph to prove his innocence, he had
finally agreed, but only if it was not administered by the police and if
she accompanied him. On the day of the scheduled test, even before
he realized that Amber was not coming, he fled after spotting Det.
Al Brocchini in a parking lot near the polygrapher’s office. He called
Amber, angrily accused her of betraying him, of working with the
cops to set him up.
In their final conversations, Scott had begun to sound desperate,
begging to see her in person. A week after the aborted polygraph, he
tried to talk her into meeting him at a remote cabin in the mountains
outside Los Angeles. The cabin belonged to Anne Bird’s parents, and
he had been staying there increasingly since the news of his affair with
Amber had broken. He became very emotional, saying he needed to
look into her eyes, say things he could not say over the phone.
‘‘There’s so many things I want to tell you—God, it’s unbeliev-able,’’ he said, and for once his crying sounded genuine. Worried that
his phone was being tapped, he began calling her from pay phones.
He offered to send her on a vacation, presumably somewhere he
could then show up. On her February 10 birthday, which was also
Laci’s due date, he left a shopping bag full of presents for her in
the parking lot of a children’s hospital near her home: a necklace
with an amber stone, a decorative box with a moon-and-stars motif
reminiscent of their night of stargazing, and the Norah Jones CD
Come Away with Me
.
2 7 6
E R A S E D
Was Scott, on his very last day of freedom, going to surprise Amber
and try to talk her into ‘‘coming away’’ with him? Or was he planning
to make her disappear, too? Other items found in his car at the time
of his arrest—rope, duct tape, and a shovel—made detectives worry
that he may have had the latter scenario in mind.
Q
The words of Scott Peterson himself on the tape recording were
the most emotionally powerful part of the case against him. Even
though Scott Peterson never took the stand it felt as if he had, and he
had only offered lies and obfuscations. But there was also powerful
physical and scientific evidence pointing to his guilt.
From the moment Al Brocchini arrived at the Peterson home to
investigate a report of a missing wife, he feared that something very
bad had happened to her. A mop and bucket propped outside the
kitchen door made him wonder if someone had attempted to clean
up a crime scene. Scott’s explanation that his nearly eight months
pregnant wife was mopping the kitchen the day after the maid’s visit
only made him more suspicious, as did Scott’s account of showering
and laundering the clothes he had worn that day before reporting his
wife missing. Scott’s claim of having spent the day fishing in a boat
about which none of the dozens of friends and family gathered at the
house that night knew anything set his gut on edge even more, as
did Scott’s showing more concern about the detective’s accidentally
dinging his car door than he did about his wife and child’s being in
peril.
Following his instincts, Brocchini asked to see the boat, a task
Scott purposely made more difficult by pretending that the power
was out in his warehouse where the boat was stored. Forced to use
his headlights and a flashlight to illuminate the space while he took
some photographs, Brocchini was nonetheless able to preserve two
critical pieces of physical evidence.
Unlike the Peterson home, which was neat as a pin, the warehouse
was a mess, with white powdery residue spilled all over the top
of a flatbed trailer Peterson used as a work surface. When police
returned with a search warrant two days later and took a better
look at the residue, which turned out to be quick-dry cement, they
could make out numerous circular voids or rings that matched up
perfectly in circumference with the pitcher Peterson said he used
Sex, Lies, and Audiotape
2 7 7
to mold a cement anchor for his boat, then shook out onto the
flatbed top. Although he was insistent that he made only one anchor,
the rings indicated that he had made at least five—weights that the
prosecution argued he used to sink his pregnant wife to the bottom
of San Francisco Bay.
Equally significant, the photographs Brocchini shot that night
revealed a pair of yellow-handled pliers wedged beneath one of
the seats in the boat. This was important because a hair matching
Laci’s was collected from inside the teeth of those pliers during the
search two days later. Laci was never supposed to have been in
that boat, so how did some of her hair wind up there? In a tactic
reminiscent of the O.J. case, the defense implied that an overzealous
Detective Brocchini planted the hair months later after coming to
a dead end in the investigation. But photos taken during the search
of the warehouse clearly show the hair sticking out of the nose of
the pliers.
The victims themselves, however, provided the most unimpeach-able evidence of guilt. That their bodies were found within a mile
and in the tidal path of where Scott Peterson told police he had gone
fishing the day his wife disappeared was so damning that before he
was hired to represent Peterson, Mark Geragos declared on Greta van
Susteren’s
On the Record
that ‘‘it would just be the most phenomenal
coincidence of all time’’ if Scott was not their killer.
Two days later, on the day Peterson was arrested, Geragos went
even further in an appearance on
Larry King Live
, using words
that would come back to haunt him after he decided to mount an
all-or-nothing innocence defense.
‘‘The man is a sociopath if he did this crime,’’ Geragos said.
‘‘There’s no other way to put it. This is his wife, his unborn baby.
If he’s the one who took the two of them up there and put concrete
around them and threw them into the ocean and concocted and
went onto Diane Sawyer and gave that impassioned plea with the
tears—that’s not somebody that generally you’re going to give . . .
manslaughter to.’’
The only other possible explanation for the bodies ending up in
that precise location was for Peterson to have been framed. Who
would have a motive to pin the crime on the victim’s husband, not
to mention the knowledge of exactly where he claimed to have gone
fishing, and the means to get her body not only to the bay but out
into the water? The defense put forth no viable suspects.
2 7 8
E R A S E D
Geragos seemed to rest his entire defense on the scientifically
specious theory that Conner had been born alive. If so, Scott was
innocent, as he was under near-constant surveillance at the time
Laci was scheduled to give birth. He based his contention on a few
cobbled-together facts: bone measurements of the corpse, which fell
within the range of full-term fetuses, and the pathologist’s inability,
due to the wet and decomposing condition of Conner’s lungs, to rule
out that the child had ever taken a breath.
For such a theory to hold up, however, Conner would have had to
have been cut out of Laci’s womb and kept alive for at least a month
and a half until he reached full term, or Laci had to have been held
somewhere for a month and a half until she gave birth. Then both
mother and son were killed and transported to the bay, even as police
divers were searching it on a nearly daily basis, for the sole purpose
of pinning the crime on Scott Peterson.
But judging from the markedly more intact condition of Conner’s
remains as compared to Laci’s, Brian Peterson (no relation), the
pathologist who performed the autopsy, firmly believed that Conner
had been released from his mother’s womb only a day or so before
he washed ashore. ‘‘If he would have spent substantial unprotected
time in the water as Laci did, he would have been eaten,’’ Peterson
testified. ‘‘There simply wouldn’t have been anything left.’’
Laci had been in the water so long that every organ in her body was
missing except for her uterus. She had protected Conner from the
elements as long as she could, even after death. Her uterus remained
enlarged from having been pregnant, but the cervix was still closed,
proving that she never gave birth naturally. There were no cuts
indicating that she had undergone a cesarean section. Over time,
however, animal feeding and tidal action had eroded an opening at
the top of her uterus through which, Dr. Peterson believed, the baby
emerged.
Furthermore, the pathologist also found meconium in the baby’s
bowels, a substance that is expelled within a day or two after birth in
the child’s first stool.
The forensic anthropologist who calculated the fetus’s age based on
bone measurements conceded that it was difficult to get an accurate
measurement, as the marine environment had partially liquefied the
corpse.
By the time Geragos put on his own expert, OB-GYN Charles
March, the defense was no longer pushing the contention that
Sex, Lies, and Audiotape
2 7 9
Conner had been born at full term, simply that he had lived at least
five days past Christmas. March, however, proved to be a terrible
witness. After he was eviscerated on cross-examination for basing his
methodology on unsubstantiated assumptions about the earliest date
Laci could have gotten pregnant, the defense seemed to implode.
It was a shocking reversal of fortune, considering that for the first
several months of the trial, most of the media and legal analysts
were predicting a defense victory, or at the very least a mistrial.
Mark Geragos dominated the courtroom as though he owned it,
neutralizing witness after witness with his superb cross-examination
skills. He seemed to think that he could bulldoze the prosecution’s
case by knocking down their witnesses like cascading dominoes. But
when it came time to put on his own case, to back up all the allegations
and assertions he had gotten in through questions and hearsay, he
had nothing to present.
Mark Geragos was one of the most media-savvy attorneys in
the country, having represented pop star Michael Jackson, actress
Winona Ryder, President Clinton’s brother Roger, Whitewater scan-dal figure Susan McDougal, and former Modesto-area congressman
Gary Condit— the latter when he was being investigated regarding
the disappearance of a Washington intern he had been secretly dating,
Chandra Levy.
Geragos tried the Peterson case as much outside as inside the
courtroom, waging criminal defense like a political campaign geared
to shaping the news and planting doubt in the minds of potential
jurors. When he first assumed the case, he held a press conference
outside the Modesto courthouse at which he vowed he would not
only ‘‘prove’’ his client’s innocence but also find the ‘‘real’’ killer. It
was a foolhardy bit of showmanship. The defense doesn’t have to
prove anything. Why would he offer to take on that burden?
He called a later news conference asking a ‘‘mystery witness’’
to come forward, who he claimed held information that would
exonerate Scott, and another to announce adding two of the nation’s
foremost forensic experts, Henry Lee and medical examiner Cyril
Wecht, to the Peterson defense team.
He floated numerous theories in the press about who might
have killed Laci: from a Satanic cult to a ring of methamphetamine
tweakers, from dark-skinned men seen near a van in the Petersons’
neighborhood (who may simply have been a team of gardeners) to
a pair of burglars who robbed a home across the street from the
2 8 0