painstakingly. According to him and his lovers, he is the incarnation of the Life Force, "the self of the night ... that creature of engorged delight" who, like the trickster, is "irrational, uncontrolled, universal, shameful" (p. 16). It is Leslie Beck's utter lack of consciousness that makes him irresistible to the bored neighborhood women who, like the narrator Nora, need to believe they are capable of being more than good wives to good husbands.
|
Like the archetypal trickster, Leslie is at times more animal than human, and this animal aspectemphasized by his ten-inch penisdraws the women to him. As Nora says, "Leslie Beck brandishes his giant phallus and women lie wounded all around" (p. 142). His lover Marion likens him to the trickster's bestial alter ego, the fox:
|
| | Once [his teeth had] put me in mind of some small, agreeable, nuzzling animal, or, as he became more imperative, something dangerous, some glossy fox, perhaps, rooting around and above mea vision which would occasionally change, even in the middle of lovemaking, to one of the fox loose in the hen-house, tearing and slavering, blood and feathers everywhere. [P. 8]
|
As Marion's and Nora's comments indicate, Leslie's animal nature is linked closely to his dangerous, even deadly, yet nevertheless "imperative" sexuality. Like Ruth, Leslie Beck seems to possess a supernatural ability to manipulate any situation. The neighborhood women who succumb to the Life Force are driven by an urgent desire, though, like Marion and Nora, they are aware of the risks they face, the least of which is losing their families. As Nora admits, "copulating with other women's husbands in secret, no matter how the self esteem rises, no matter how exciting secrets are, is also in some way to lower the self" (p. 84).
|
According to Nora, Leslie's Life Force is rooted in the present in the same way that Ruth's true she-devil can forget her past:
|
| | The Life Force is not about futures; it is all here and now. Leslie Beck could plan a building, plan a marriage, plan a site for a seduction, and achieve his plan simply because he didn't worry about the consequences. He looked ahead but never too far ahead. [P. 99]
|
This ability to exist completely in the present, with no thought to future consequences or past responsibilities, characterizes the trickster figure in traditional archetypal criticism. Statements like these by Nora and by Leslie himself invite us to read Leslie as a clear representation of a trickster figure. Yet just as Ruth veers from this paradigm by obsessing about her past and her future revenge, so does Leslie have a side to him that is driven by more than immediate pleasure. Though Nora says that Leslie could "plan a marriage" because he never considered the consequences, she ad-
|
|