Government Zero: No Borders, No Language, No Culture (16 page)

These values grew out of America’s Western European, Judeo-Christian heritage. That’s one reason white people and religion are demonized. American culture must be ripped out by the roots. They want to transform American culture into belief in socialism, central planning, and dependency. Inciting racial tension through demonization of successful white people helps accomplish that.

Self-loathing liberals want to transform America into a self-loathing, guilt-ridden, atheist culture they can wallow in, with a tax-subsidized life of luxury to help ease their “pain.” It is crony capitalism and luxury for them, socialism and misery for everyone else. Hillary Clinton is their perfect spokeswoman, a fabulously wealthy, Gulfstream liberal who condemns other wealthy people who actually earned their money.

She and the Progressive-Islamist alliance are waging war on our culture in every medium they can, including public school, movies, music, business, politics, and religion. In every conceivable space, capitalism, individual liberty, patriotism, nationalism, and religion are under attack.

I used to stop in at a coffee shop around the corner from my house and buy a cup of coffee for fifty cents. That was quite a few years ago. For two quarters I got a hot cup of coffee, some friendly service, and maybe a newspaper left on the counter by the last customer. If I talked to the guy behind the counter, it was about the weather or some other small talk.

Today, I walk into a Starbucks and pay four dollars for a cup of coffee. Instead of a secondhand newspaper, I’m handed a questionnaire seeking to determine just how much white privilege I’m guilty of. This is all done under the pretense of “stimulating empathy and compassion for one another,” but we all know that’s nonsense. It’s about reminding white people how evil they are.

Consider the questions: “I have _____ friends of a different race.” “My parents had ________ friends of a different race.” “In the past year, someone of a different race has been in my home __________ times.”
¹⁶

Can you believe this? This is what it has come to. One of the most successful corporations in America peddling the most pedestrian liberal white-guilt trash to its paying customers. Instead of working to develop new products or cut their exorbitant costs, they want to make white people feel guilty if
they haven’t had a person of a different race over to their house in the past year.

For those suffering from acute liberalism, allow me to apply a therapy called “reality.” The reality is that 72 percent of Americans are Caucasian. Twelve percent are African Americans, about 5 percent are Asians, and every other race comprises the final 10 percent.

So, in your everyday interactions with people in this country, the odds are overwhelming that most of them are going to be Caucasian. Outside of large, cosmopolitan cities, the odds that you will have the opportunity to strike up a friendship with someone of another race are quite low.

This isn’t something to feel guilty about. It isn’t something to feel anything about. Most Nigerians don’t have white people over to their houses on a regular basis. Most Inuit people will never have a Hispanic family over to their house. That’s not because Nigerians or Inuit are racist. It’s because there just aren’t many white or Hispanic people around where they live.

This may seem like common sense, but it’s not as common as you think. Peddling white guilt is part of the liberal agenda, but a lot of liberals actually buy into it. They truly feel guilty themselves, just for being who they are.

Movies and television help create this irrational guilt by portraying American society in a completely fictional manner. Every television show whose cast includes a group of children portrays the group as not only multiracial and multicultural, but equally represented by every race and culture on the planet.

No matter where the show takes place, you can expect every group of childhood friends to include a Caucasian child, a black child, a Hispanic child, an Asian child, and an Indian child. Despite the hard numbers that seven in every ten children are
Caucasian, one would have to conclude from watching children’s television shows that no group of childhood friends in this country includes three or more Caucasian children.

I’m not saying there is anything wrong with showing children of different races playing together. What I do object to is portraying a false picture of American society, which contributes to the irrational guilt I was just talking about. If you are accepting of other people regardless of their skin color, you have nothing to feel guilty about, even if you don’t have occasion to develop relationships with people of other races.

These contrived plots in which there are virtually no all-white groups of children plant the seed in children that there is something wrong if they don’t have friends of other races. Instead, children should learn that race doesn’t matter—character does.

Western Civilization reached its apex in the United States of America, the freest, most prosperous, and most powerful nation in the history of the world. That civilization was built upon principles derived from English common law and tradition, Judeo-Christian morality, and the uniquely American principles of individualism and self-reliance.

What are Western values today? Shooting junk at night and taking a coffee enema in the morning? Sleeping with fifteen people at night and doing an herbal bath cleansing routine the next day? Are those our values now? Is this why everyone is into detoxing, because they know their souls are polluted?

Here we are, fifty years after the 1960s, when we were told
to eliminate all repression, to let it all hang out. If it feels good, do it. Why don’t we do it in the road? Can anyone really say that has worked out well? We hear a lot about how repressed American society was before the 1960s, but not much about how much more well ordered and civilized it might have been.

John Adams famously said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.” He was right. There has always been a protection against any federal-government-mandated religion in this country, as there should be. But religion or some equivalent moral set of principles is a responsibility that goes along with freedom. We can see the consequences of abandoning that responsibility all around us.

Americans barely notice as a rogue president runs roughshod over the Constitution, takes over the health-care system, floods the country with illegal aliens, and alienates our allies overseas. As long as the beer is flowing, football is available three nights a week, and porn is available 24/7, they’ll stay fat, dumb, and happy.

One would be hard-pressed to answer whether the United States is still a land of opportunity or a land of dependency. One in eight Americans are receiving food stamp assistance.
¹⁷
Over one-third of Americans have government-subsidized health insurance.
¹⁸

We have two opposing forces fighting in the world right now. We have the extremely religious Muslim fanatics who interpret their religion from a ninth-century point of view and are willing to kill for it. They’ll kill boys for watching soccer, believing that watching a soccer game is the first step on a slippery slope to becoming transgendered. That is how insane these fanatics are.

The West is exactly the opposite. It has no values left. The
left destroyed the church. They’ve destroyed all semblance of religion and morality. They’ve destroyed the American principles of private property, free enterprise, self-reliance, and personal responsibility. They’ve replaced them with atheism, hedonism, dependency, and political correctness. Man in the West today has no soul.

The Islamofascists are using this to their advantage. While they’re conquering Afghanistan and Iraq militarily, they’re conquering America with propaganda. They are spreading disinformation through academia and the media, including Hollywood. They’re smearing as racist anyone who stands up to radical Islam.

They’re using the same tactics against those who recognize the danger of Islamofascism as liberals used against McCarthy and others who recognized the dangers of communism sixty years ago. Even self-described feminist Dr. Phyllis Chesler, emerita professor of psychology and Women’s Studies at the City University of New York, agrees with me on this.
¹⁹

They’ll even attack their own. When Bill Maher had a moment of clarity and hosted Sam Harris to talk about the real problems within Islam itself,
²⁰
the progressive jackals descended on both of them, calling them racists and Islamophobes. Ben Affleck, a guest on the same episode, nearly burst a blood vessel, calling Harris’s arguments “gross” and “racist.” One blogger at the
Huffington Post
went so far as to level the ultimate slander at Maher, at least to the progressive mind. He called him “conservative.”
²¹

What do we stand for and what will we fight with? Our strength was built upon our values. When we were a moral and religious people, dedicated to individual liberty, personal responsibility, private property, and limited government, we
were invincible. Those principles were the reason we had the mightiest economy and the most powerful military on earth.

Now those values are gone. They’re all but extinct. The Islamofascists may be wrong, but they are dedicated to their creed and willing to die for it. We’ve abandoned our creed. What exactly are our soldiers supposed to die for today?

I certainly wouldn’t want to put my life on the line for a lot of what I see around me. I don’t even know what to say to a soldier who comes home from Afghanistan after defending a society which curses his service and protests movies celebrating his heroism.

Soldiers used to return from war to a society of high culture, innovation, and free enterprise, where institutions like private property, churches, and traditional marriage ensured a level of civility and prosperity that made their service worth the sacrifice and risk.

Today, they return to an increasingly unrecognizable caricature of that bastion of freedom they thought they were defending.

This is partly the result of Government Zero. When you have Zero Leadership, you can expect people to be led astray. But don’t forget cause and effect. The government is largely a reflection of the people. The people elected it. The people decide what they want to ask it to do. Ultimately, it is the people who must take responsibility. The government can force them to buy health insurance, but not to abandon their values.

Any reform of the government must be preceded by a rebirth of American culture. Only a moral and religious people, who once again dedicate themselves to American values, can find the strength to defeat America’s enemies, both without and within.

Obama has flooded America with Africans, Middle Easterners, and Chinese over the past three years. Europeans need not apply for citizenship. You can see now what he meant when he promised to “transform America.”

While Mexicans remain the largest immigrant population in the United States, the Progressive-Islamist administration has managed to increase immigration from the Middle East, Asia, and the Caribbean the most. Overall, the number of immigrants living in the United States, legally and illegally, is at an all-time high of 41.3 million.
¹

It wasn’t too long ago that America was still a First World nation that led the world in commerce and military might. Despite decades of progressive assault, private property, free enterprise, Judeo-Christian values, and respect for law and order still dominated American culture.

English was the first and only language, and immigrants enthusiastically learned to read, write, and speak it in an
attempt to become
Americans
. Upon these pillars was built the freest, richest, most powerful nation in human history.

Today, the entire foundation of American society is under assault by a Progressive-Islamist alliance that hasn’t neglected reshaping our entire immigration policy. We’re no longer a land of opportunity for ambitious, talented immigrants looking to escape social democracies with large welfare states. We’re now a land of government handouts for waves of immigrants, both legal and illegal, who come here for the generous welfare benefits our progressive government keeps increasing.

We’re also a target for Islamofascists who are actively infiltrating our free and open society for the express purpose of destroying American civilization. Turkey’s former prime minister and now president, Recep Tayyip Erdog˘an, once said, “We will ride the train of democracy to our ultimate goal,” meaning a new caliphate based upon sharia law. He was talking about Turkey.

The Islamofascists want to ride our American democratic train to the same goal here. What they don’t blow up they could eventually rule by voting.

Look at what the immigration policies of just a few decades have done. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Hispanics made up 8.9 percent of the electorate as of November 2012.
²
We have to assume that number is even higher now. Immigrants in general, including these, largely vote Democrat.

Unlike previous waves of immigrants, this current wave coming from south of our border doesn’t consider learning English or assimilating into American culture a responsibility that goes along with immigrating. They have demanded and received accommodations in their own language. Today,
Americans have to “press 1 for English” if they want service in the language in which their Constitution is written.

Some of them even consider their immigration here a Reconquista, meaning they are reclaiming the land which once belonged to their Spanish-speaking ancestors. Regardless of what you might think of their claims, they are open and honest about one thing: They aren’t looking to assimilate into American culture. They are looking to assimilate the territory they settle into Mexican or Spanish culture.

Language is only the tip of the iceberg. Along with language, we’re importing people with different political ideas. They come from largely socialist countries and are unlike previous waves of immigrants in that they don’t necessarily come to get away from socialism. On the contrary, their voting patterns suggest they are attracted to the more generous welfare benefits than are available at home.

Instead of escaping socialist countries and oppressive governments to take advantage of free enterprise and individual liberty here, they are coming here to transform America into the image of the countries they left and plunder the accumulated wealth of America’s freer past. How else could one explain their uniform support for the Democratic Party?

The other half of the Progressive-Islamic takeover is occurring through the federal government’s Refugee Resettlement Program. Admitting largely Muslim refugees from war-torn and terrorism-plagued countries in the Middle East, the progressives are creating self-contained Muslim communities in virtually every state. These groups of refugees are riddled with terrorists that even the FBI says they cannot screen out. Those who aren’t violent nevertheless represent a completely foreign culture that in no way shares our values.

This is all the result of legal immigration, assuming there is still any distinction between legal and illegal. Illegal immigrants are having an even worse effect. At best, they are illiterate in their own language and have grim prospects for employment. At worst, they are hardened criminals or terrorists themselves who are a grave threat to public safety.

Those of us who remember the America of not so long ago wake up every day and ask, “What country is this?” Those of you who don’t will nevertheless ask the same question just a few years from now, unless the Progressive-Islamist takeover is stopped.

While illegal immigrants continue to pour over our southern borders carrying potentially deadly diseases, socialist values, and no discernible benefit to American society, the progressives in control of the White House are also importing one hundred thousand Muslims per year as refugees.
³
Under the pretense of humanitarianism, these useless academics are creating the very sleeper cells FBI counterterrorism chief Michael Steinbach says now exist in forty-nine states.

The White House sorority and the useful idiots who parrot them constantly downplay the threat of radical Islam by saying there is no way for Islamofascist armies like ISIS to breach our borders. “It’s not like we’re going to wake up one day and find ISIS in New York,” they sneer. They refer to the farcical prospect of ISIS invading the United States in a conventional military operation.

They’re right about one thing. ISIS won’t have to wait for
the progressives to weaken our military to that extent. ISIS is already here. But they didn’t land Normandy-style in amphibious landing craft. They were brought in by our government as refugees and secretly resettled all over America.

Earlier this year, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) sent John Kerry a letter. He wanted more information about the dozens of foreign refugees from Syria, North Africa, and elsewhere coming into South Carolina.
⁴
It was the first time I know of that a congressman actually called the federal government to account for its unilateral decisions while bringing in seventy thousand refugees a year on average over the past few years.
⁵

Congressman Gowdy asked all the questions one would expect from a conscientious representative of his constituents. Who in Congress or the state and local governments were consulted before the decision was made to resettle these people in Spartanburg, South Carolina? What services will taxpayers be obliged to provide these refugees? How many have criminal records? How many more are coming?

As glad as I was to see somebody in Congress actually pushing back, there are a few questions I’d like to ask Mr. Kerry myself.

First, why is the administration granting asylum mostly to Muslims from Syria, Somalia, Afghanistan, and Iraq, when a full-fledged holocaust is being perpetrated against Christians? Second, how do we know that ISIS agents posing as refugees are not among those the administration has admitted and put on a fast track to citizenship, just as the FBI has warned?

I know the answer to my first question, although I wouldn’t expect the Islamophillic administration to answer it. Bringing in Muslims, even legitimate refugees, is consistent with the Progressive-Islamist takeover of America. These ready-made
communities are just more pockets of anti-American, unassimilated foreigners who will eventually become citizens and vote Democrat. They further dilute Christianity as the dominant religion in America, English as the dominant language, and American values as the dominant culture.

As far as my second question, the FBI has already told us they aren’t screening refugees for links to terrorism. As
World Net Daily
reported, “The U.S. simply does not have the resources to stop Islamic radicals in Syria from slipping into the country through the State Department’s refugee-resettlement program, said Michael Steinbach, deputy assistant director of the FBI’s counter terrorism unit.”
⁶

While we know the progressives want to do anything but bring more Christians into America, it is unconscionable that they would allow their political agenda to deter them from taking immediate, emergent action to address the genocide of Christians in the Middle East. While the Muslim in chief refuses to say the word
Islamic
when referring to the Islamic State, that very group is systematically exterminating the most ancient population of Christians in the world.

You wouldn’t know this from listening to the president. Just like the Jews murdered by Islamic terrorists in a kosher Jewish deli in Paris became merely some “folks” randomly murdered by “zealots,” the 147 Christians murdered by Islamic terrorists were nondescript “innocent men and women” murdered by “terrorists.”
⁷

There isn’t any doubt that these were Muslims targeting
Christians. They were members of the Somali-based al-Shabab terror group, and they specifically asked the victims if they were Christian or Muslim before murdering them. Christians attempting to impersonate Muslims to save their lives were asked to recite a Muslim prayer. If they could not, they were killed.
⁸

Similarly, Obama referred to the twenty-one Coptic Christians beheaded by Islamofascists in Libya merely as “Egyptian citizens.” Yet, when ISIS kills Muslims they believe aren’t practicing the faith properly in their insane opinion, Obama openly recognizes the religious identity of the victims, as he did “Ismailis and Alawites” in Syria.
⁹

The president is always quick to remind us that ISIS has killed more Muslims than members of any other religion. He truly has a keen eye for the obvious. Most people in the region are Muslims, so it isn’t surprising ISIS has killed more Muslims overall than Christians.

The difference is that Muslims are not targeted because they are Muslim. On the contrary, demonstration of one’s dedication to orthodox Islam can save one’s life and property in territories under ISIS control. Christians, on the other hand, are without exception dispossessed and exiled, if they’re lucky, or summarily executed if they’re not.

The president knows all of this, but he and the sorority have made up their minds to pretend the extermination of Christians isn’t happening. That makes it a certainty Christians can expect little help from U.S. Immigration as long as the progressives control the White House.

Believe it or not, this is exactly what the so-called bleeding-heart liberals did during the original Holocaust. Their patron saint, that great “man of the people” Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and the Democratic Congress were in a similar position to help
Jews during the 1930s. But despite repeated pleas to increase the quota for German immigrants, the Democrats failed to do so.

As Kristallnacht and Auschwitz loomed, FDR’s government kept the limit on German immigration at just over 27,000 immigrants per year. They failed to significantly raise the limit even after Jews were declared noncitizens in 1935. From late 1938 through June 1939, over 300,000 German refugees applied for visas, but most were unsuccessful.
¹⁰

Even after the Holocaust was under way, the progressive FDR administration refused to believe the truth about it, although admittedly less deliberately than Obama appears to be denying the new holocaust.

Worst of all, the FDR administration didn’t even admit all of the Jews the quotas would have allowed. Between 1933 and 1937, only 30,000 refugees entered the United States. The quotas would have allowed almost 130,000.
¹¹
That means FDR could have admitted 100,000 more Jews without even fighting the political battle to have quotas raised, but he didn’t.

You’ll never believe the reason given for not admitting more Jews fleeing the Holocaust. They were afraid the refugees would be a burden on the welfare system. Can you believe that, coming from the Democrats? The same people who want to bring in tens of millions who can’t read or write in their own language were suddenly afraid that Jews fleeing the Holocaust would be a burden on taxpayers. It would be funny if it weren’t so tragic.

So much for the great defenders of the oppressed. If you’re African, Muslim, or socialist, progressives will spare no expense to defend you against the slightest infringement of your rights. But if you’re Jewish, Christian, or capitalist, they will look the other way even in the face of mass murder. They protested every war the United States fought against communism, but
actively supported Clinton’s intervention into Kosovo. Why? Because Clinton took the side of the Muslims against the Christian Serbians. Suddenly, the peaceniks were war hawks.