Keeper Of The Mountains (2 page)

She has been a woman in a world of men – athletic, focused, de­voted, egocentric, powerful men. Most of these men seem to be either in awe of her or terrified. At least one has thought of using her as a thinly veiled character in a novel. He describes this character as the ultimate schoolmarm type from the 1930s or '40s, with an aura of fear and terror radiating around her. Others are more prosaic: “She's just Liz. She's blustery and opinionated and outspoken and eccentric and, to many people, rude.” Some have learned to “keep their mouths shut” and stay out of her line of fire.

Sir Edmund Hillary describes her as “a bit of a terror. If you get on the wrong side of Liz, it can be a bit difficult, but if you befriend her, you have a good friend and one for life.” He wonders if perhaps the only people who are not afraid of her are himself and his wife. One
author muses, “It's always fun to speculate what Liz is doing when she's not terrorizing people.” British author Ed Douglas agrees that people are afraid of her, but he thinks she is a “sexy old gal.”

American climber Conrad Anker describes her as a diminutive, fragile, wickedly witty person exuding confidence and a no-nonsense authority. She is known far and wide as Miss Hawley. He has seen her on a regular basis for 14 years, but on his last visit in 2002, he said, “She was definitely getting older and frailer. She's still beautiful and athletic, although a bit stooped.” And he smiles as he observes, “She likes climbers, especially guys!” He admits he has always been curious about her private life – particularly the rumours of affairs with famous climbers.

In fact, many people are prone to speculating about the kind of fabulous private life Elizabeth might have had – mysterious men, maybe a broken heart in New York, royal family connections and so on. Himalayan climber and writer Greg Child is one of these. After post-expedition interviews with her, he and other climbers have discussed her in private, imagining and speculating. “What's she doing? Who has she been with? What's she hiding from?” There have been a lot of theories, especially about potential lovers, among them Col. Jimmy Roberts, Eric Shipton and Sir Edmund Hillary.

American climber and physician Charles Houston was convinced that Elizabeth was not the marrying type. She was too independent. There are many stories about how and why she came to Kathmandu, including one in which a boyfriend leaves her, another where she stays in Kathmandu when she runs out of money while travelling. Italian alpinist Reinhold Messner agrees that she is a completely independent woman, free and modern – and has been since the 1960s. He believes she knew exactly what she wanted and she went out and got it. But if this is true, she is also a woman of contradictions. He has seen her prudishness first-hand and cites an incident when she was talking with a climber who told her about having children with his girlfriend, whom he hoped to marry at some point in the future. She scolded him that it should be the other way around: marry first and then have children.

British filmmaker Leo Dickinson interviewed Elizabeth in 1990 when he was in Nepal to fly over Everest in a balloon, as well as to work on a film about British climber Don Whillans. Dickinson
remembers her as “inscrutable” and “buxom,” and found her difficult to interview. Others who knew her during the same period described her as short and stocky, a busy woman who didn't bother much with her appearance. Others said she was tall, slender, well groomed and elegant. One climber remembers her as standing 6 feet 7 inches tall and weighing 90 pounds – at least that's the impression she made. Could they all be talking about the same person?

According to Dickinson, Elizabeth sticks to facts and figures like an encyclopedia. He felt a barrier descend when he attempted a more personal line of questioning, comparing the experience to a medieval moat: “you can go in one way, but you can't get out the other way.” He is convinced she thinks that what others are doing is much more interesting than anything about her. He thought – but didn't dare ask – that she agreed to do the interview about Don Whillans because she and Whillans had had a romantic fling.

British climber Doug Scott agrees there may be something in the Whillans romance theory. He remembers an interview with Elizabeth, Whillans, Hamish MacInnes and himself in the early 1970s in which she singled Whillans out and, Scott believes, was enamoured of him. Whillans thought so, too. After she left, he commented to the others, “I think she likes me … I think I'll follow this up.…” Scott doesn't know what happened, and he can't help but chuckle at the incongruous image of the two of them together – the “buxom” Miss Hawley, and Whillans, who was 5 feet 2 inches and somewhat round at belly height. Another story has Elizabeth arriving in Kathmandu in the early 1960s with a man who was a climber and a scientist. Probably the most persistent rumour about love affairs with climbers is one that almost every Himalayan climber believes – that Elizabeth and Sir Edmund had a long-standing romantic relationship. Doug Scott sums it up: “Of course, Ed's the one!” Elizabeth has been an ardent Hillary defender throughout her years in Kathmandu, and there is a story that she physically stood up for him at the Tiger Tops lodge when something disparaging was said about him. Observers claim she took a swing at the heckler with her fists. Elizabeth vehemently denies the incident.

Romantic theories aside, Scott is sure that most mountaineers and countless others are interested in Elizabeth's knowledge and opinions on the inside dealings of mountaineering in Nepal. Ed Viesturs agrees.
Every climber he knows who has met and worked with her wants to know the story – and opinions – of Elizabeth Hawley. After all, she has interviewed climbers and reported on expeditions to Nepal for more than 40 years. She has seen and heard some amazing stories, yet her seasonal mountaineering reports have stuck to the facts, without overt opinion. What did she really think?

After interviewing dozens of climbers and friends, and reading thousands of her letters lent to me by Elizabeth's nephew, it was time to go to Kathmandu and meet her in person. I was warned “there's a side of her that's very robotic.” Several people advised me to have a drink with her first to “take the edge off.” Anything from whisky to wine would do.

I was further advised to do my homework. “You need to know the big events … the epochal events” because “if you don't know your stuff, she will arch her eyebrows.” I was told that when I asked a question, a typical response would be for her to turn the question around and make me feel ridiculous for posing such a silly question. I was repeatedly instructed to “never, ever, call her anything but Miss Hawley.” Friends cautioned me to be emotionally prepared for a belligerent, antagonistic, rude woman. I was urged to be patient, to work with her, to not go on the offensive. Many advised me to bring whisky.

But there was positive reinforcement as well. Lady Hillary urged, “Just be yourself.” Elizabeth had called the Hillarys about this project, and, despite being reticent in the beginning, was now said to be somewhat “chuffed” about the idea. Elizabeth was flattered, but still couldn't understand why I'd want to do it and wondered aloud who on earth would want to read it. Sir Edmund encouraged me by saying that it was high time her story was told, and he was confident she would cooperate.

Climbers regaled me with stories about how, upon their arrival in Kathmandu, they would no sooner be checking into their hotels, or unpacking their bags, or jumping into the shower, when they would receive a call from Elizabeth Hawley asking to set up a meeting as soon as possible. I found this to be encouraging – maybe she'd be eager to meet me too. But the difference was that they had something she wanted – information about a climb – and I didn't. Yet she had something I wanted – her life story.

I left my home in the Canadian Rockies and started the long journey:
Calgary, London, Frankfurt, Bangkok and, finally, Kathmandu. A couple of days of bad meals, long lineups, important bits of paper, cramped seats and ever-rising temperatures. The Kathmandu airport was crowded and steaming. I crammed myself into a taxi and rumbled off to my hotel, located conveniently near Elizabeth Hawley's residence. I was in the hotel just long enough to unpack my suitcase and brush my teeth when the phone rang – it was her! I took it as a good omen.

She gave me directions to her house and wanted to meet immediately, so I stuffed the whisky into my briefcase and headed out. I didn't follow her directions well enough, though, and ended up walking an extra hour in the late-afternoon monsoon heat. The streets were packed with postage-stamp-sized shops selling everything from bathroom fixtures to silk fabric to aspirin, while vendors crowded the sidewalks hawking fresh vegetables and roasting corn. The pungent smells were overwhelming – a sensation intensified by unrelenting traffic and billowing clouds of black diesel smoke. Two narrow driving lanes were choked with rattling buses and sleek
SUV
s, as well as what seemed like thousands of clanging motor scooters, all pouring into town with horns blaring. The sidewalks presented an obstacle course of unexpected drop-offs and ankle-bending steps, piles of rotting garbage, and giant open sewage holes. Attractive, traditional, three-storey brick buildings stood juxtaposed to four- and five-storey cement monstrosities. Beautifully carved, ancient wooden doorframes leaned into the street, providing stark contrast to their aluminum and concrete neighbours. It appeared a cityscape in transition, from the traditional to the modern, from medieval times to the twenty-first century. It bordered on mayhem.

At last, I came to a gated black iron fence on the north side of the street. To the right of the open gate was an official-looking brass plaque reading “Himalayan Trust, Miss Elizabeth Hawley, Honorary Consulate of New Zealand.” The sign suggested order in a world of chaos. I walked through the gate, greeted the guard, wandered down a slight incline and found myself in a courtyard surrounded by flowering trees and shrubs and a small plot of green grass. Everything was suddenly, unbelievably, quiet.

Within the courtyard were several houses. Elizabeth Hawley's home for more than 45 years occupies the central position. A ground-floor
entrance leads to the headquarters office of the Himalayan Trust, an organization founded by Sir Edmund Hillary to provide educational and health support to the Sherpas of the Khumbu region of Nepal. I walked around to the left and up a short set of stairs leading to an unlocked screen door adorned with a string of bells, presumably to announce visitors.

On the other side of the screen door, a steep set of stairs ascended to a small landing, from where it was possible to see into a neat, orderly office. And there she was, at her desk playing solitaire on the computer.

Glancing over her reading glasses, she turned her head to greet me: “Did you get lost? Don't worry, everyone does.” She rose from her desk and strode over to shake my hand, still peering over her glasses. She was smaller than I expected, thin and well groomed. Her 80-year-old eyes were clear and dark, never wavering as she looked me over. We moved to the sitting area, where she offered a cool drink. Within the first half hour of meeting Miss Hawley, she asked me to call her Elizabeth. And so we began.

The puzzle remains unsolved, and her tenacity won't allow her to let it go.

T
he next day, I watched as Elizabeth, Sherpa Pemba Dorje and two companions engaged in the kind of investigative cross-examination that perpetuates Elizabeth's reputation as being honest, relentless and not easily fooled. Pemba, a wiry, sun-blasted, super-confident athlete, perched on her couch like a coiled spring, there only as long as it would take to convince her of his latest climbing feat, which was being contested by other climbers.

For the 27-year-old speed climber, this was a matter of pride, as well as his place in history. He had made a splash in the climbing world, appearing in the “Breaking News” section of
Rock & Ice
magazine, as well as in
Gripped.
But was this new exploit true? Did Elizabeth believe him? Pemba claimed to have climbed 3500 vertical metres from base camp on the Khumbu Glacier to the summit of Mount Everest in 8 hours and 10 minutes during the night of May 20–21, 2004. He climbed alone, using artificial oxygen above the last camp at around 7900 metres. The announcement of this astonishing climb was met with skepticism from other climbing Sherpas, however, and was challenged by his rival Lhakpa Gelu Sherpa, who had beaten Pemba's time from the previous year.

It did seem amazing that Pemba could lop four and a half hours off his time from just one year ago, and it was this that Elizabeth was probing. But he had a plausible explanation for her: on May 16, just a few days before his historic climb, he had climbed the mountain completely without bottled oxygen. That ascent had prepared him mentally and physically for the May 20 speed ascent – with bottled oxygen. Others on the team said he had used oxygen intermittently on the earlier climb, however, and any discrepancy in his story aroused Elizabeth's curiosity.

One of the problems with his claim was that he reached the summit
in the middle of the night, on a night when nobody else was on the upper part of the mountain. Since his camera malfunctioned, there was no summit photograph. She asked him what he could tell her that would prove he was there. He answered that, when he was on the summit, he saw headlamps coming up from the north side. She double-checked his statement to ensure she had heard it correctly, making a note to cross-reference her other sources and records.

After an hour of questions, answers, repeat questions, more elaborate answers and copious note taking, Elizabeth concluded with, “Congratulations, you have made an admirable effort.” Pemba and his team stood up with an audible sigh of relief and bade this formidable, investigative force of a woman goodbye. For Elizabeth Hawley, this was but the first of many interviews concerning this ascent. It would occupy much of her attention and sleuthing abilities during the weeks to come.