Authors: Dr Paul Offit
By the last installment of “The Great American Fraud,” in
February 1906, Samuel Adams had exposed 264 companies and individuals, listed scores of people who had died from dangerous drugs, and shown that many patent medicines had caused diseases rather than treated them. “Every man who trades in this market, whether he pockets the profits of the maker, the purveyor, or the advertiser, takes [his] toll of blood,” wrote Adams. “Here the patent medicine business is its nakedest, most cold-hearted. Relentless greed sets the trap, and death is partner in the enterprise.” More than 500,000 Americans read “The Great American Fraud.”
W
ith the public up in arms about Adams's publication, Harvey Wiley felt the time was right. He proposed a federal law to “cover every kind of medicine for external and internal use,” which would require manufacturers to list all ingredients and prohibit them from selling narcotics without a prescription. Wiley's proposal angered the Proprietary Association of America, lobbyists for the industry. “Such a law,” advised its Committee on Legislation, “would practically destroy the sale of proprietary remedies in the United States.” Industry executives successfully lobbied to kill the bill.
And that would have been the end of it had it not been for a die-hard socialist who, if anything, wanted less government, not more.
U
pton Sinclair was an unknown journalist who railed against the sins of American capitalism. In the early 1900s, he traveled to Chicago to write a fictional work about the plight
of immigrant workers in the meatpacking industry. With
The Jungle
, Sinclair wanted to inspire his readers; instead he nauseated them. “There would be meat that had tumbled on the floor, in the dirt and sawdust, where the workers had tramped and spit uncounted billions of consumption germs,” wrote Sinclair. “There would be meat stored in great piles in rooms; and the water from leaky roofs would drip over it, and thousands of rats would race about on it. It was too dark in these storage places to see well, but a man could run his hand over these piles of meat and sweep off handfuls of the dried dung of rats. These rats were nuisances, and the packers would put poisoned bread out for them; they would die and then rats, bread and meat would go into the hoppers together.” Sinclair described how employees occasionally slipped into steaming vats, later emerging as Durham's Pure Leaf Lard. Wanting to hit Americans in their hearts, he hit them in their stomachs. Sales of meat dropped by half. Following publication of
The Jungle
, Theodore Roosevelt ordered Congress to create legislation guaranteeing clean meat and pure food.
T
he bill that President Roosevelt signed into law, the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, was a watered-down version of what Harvey Wiley had wanted. If a patent medicine contained alcohol, cocaine, opium, chloroform, or other potentially harmful drugs, manufacturers had to print it on the label. They could still sell narcotics and dangerous drugs; they just had to tell consumers they were doing it. Most important, no statement could be made that was “false or misleading.” Although the law didn't ask manufacturers to prove that their medicines
were safe or effective, it was a start. The federal government now had a hand in regulating the drug industry.
Enforcement of the Pure Food and Drug Act fell to the USDA's Bureau of Chemistry. In 1927, the newly minted Food, Drug, and Insecticide Administration took over; three years later, it changed its name to the Food and Drug Administration.
T
he next federal law was born of the worst pharmaceutical disaster in United States history. It involved one of the first antibiotics: sulfanilamide. In the early 1930s, six companies made sulfa drugs: Squibb, Merck, Winthrop, Eli Lilly, Parke-Davis, and the S. E. Massengill Company of Bristol, Tennessee. Massengill made it poorly. To make sulfa more palatable for children, Harold Watkins, Massengill's chief chemist, suspended it in diethylene glycol. The final preparationâcalled Elixir Sulfanilamideâcontained diethylene glycol, sulfanilamide, water, and small amounts of raspberry extract, saccharin, caramel, and amaranth, which gave the drug a deep reddish purple color. Unlike other sulfa preparations, Massengill's tasted greatâperfect for children. The drug, however, was far from perfect, and Massengill knew it. Ten months before marketing the mixture, chemists at Massengill found that a 3 percent solution of diethylene glycol caused fatal kidney failure in rats; Elixir Sulfanilamide contained 72 percent.
In September 1937, Massengill distributed 240 gallons of its elixir in the United States. Three hundred fifty people drank it and immediately suffered heartburn, nausea, cramps, dizziness, vomiting, diarrhea, and difficulty breathing. Even worse, more
than a hundred people died from kidney failure, thirty-four of them young children. Following the tragedy, the president of Massengill said, “My chemists and I deeply regret the fatal results, but there was no error in the manufacture of the product. We have been supplying legitimate professional demand and not once could have foreseen the unlooked-for results. I do not feel there was any responsibility on our part.” Massengill's president, knowing that his company had acted within the law, wasn't particularly remorseful. Harold Watkins, the chemist who had formulated the product, was. Soon after the incident he killed himself.
The Elixir Sulfanilamide disaster led to the next major drug law: the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938. Now the FDA required safety testing
before
drugs were sold. The newer, stronger law stated that drugs, cosmetics, and therapeutic devices had to be proved safe; manufacturing plants had to be registered and inspected by the FDA every two years; and foods sold across state lines had to be pure and wholesome, safe to eat, and produced under sanitary conditions. Violators could be imprisoned for a year, with longer sentences for second offenses or fraud.
Although the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 tightened the reins, manufacturers still didn't have to prove that their products worked before selling them. It took another tragedy to make that happen.
O
n October 1, 1957, Chemie Grünenthal, a West German pharmaceutical company, distributed a sedative called thalidomide. Advertisements claimed that it was safe, even for
pregnant women. Within three years, hundreds of women in Europe had delivered babies whose hands and feet were attached directly to their bodiesâa disorder called phocomelia (cruelly referred to by the press as “flipper babies”). As many as 24,000 fetuses were damaged by thalidomide; half died before birth. Although Chemie Grünenthal had submitted its drug for licensure in the United States, Dr. Frances Kelsey, an FDA physician, turned it down, believing that the first few reports of phocomelia following the introduction of thalidomide weren't a coincidence.
Because of Kelsey, thalidomide was never marketed in the United States. Still, the disaster led to the next important federal drug law: the 1961 Kefauver-Harris Amendment to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The amendment included several new regulations: manufacturers now had to show that drugs were not only safe but
effective
before licensure (even though the thalidomide disaster had nothing to do with the drug's effectiveness); previously licensed drugs could be withdrawn if they were found to be unsafe; manufacturers had to obtain consent from patients before testing experimental drugs; prescription drug advertisements had to include a summary of possible side effects; product labels had to list exact quantities of
all
ingredients; and manufacturers had to adhere to the code of Good Manufacturing Practices in testing, processing, packaging, and storing drugs. For the first time in history, it appeared that America's Magical Miracle Medicine Show would be closing its tent.
Then drug regulation took a giant step backward.
I
n 1970, Linus Pauling published his book advising people to take 3,000 milligrams of vitamin C every day, about fifty
times the recommended amount. Although the FDA didn't mind people taking vitamins, Pauling's advice scared them; no one really knew whether massive doses were safe. In December 1972, the FDA announced its plan to regulate vitamins containing more than 150 percent of the recommended amount; those containing larger quantities would require proof of safety before sale. Vitamin makers saw this as a threat to their $700 million-a-year business. Represented by the National Health Federation (NHF), the industry set out to destroy the bill. In the end, it did far more than that.
T
he NHF was (and is) enormously influential. Founded in 1955 and headquartered in Monrovia, California, it consisted of vitamin industry executives and their lobbyists. The list of NHF founders, officers, and board members reads like a who's who of American quackery:
In addition to lobbying for the unrestricted sale of megavitamins, the NHF also campaigned against pasteurization, vaccination, and fluoridation.
A
lthough Linus Pauling was a key to blocking the FDA's attempt to regulate megavitamins, industry executives knew they needed a political insider to win the dayâsomeone who would not only defeat the bill requiring safety studies of megavitamins but free them from FDA regulation entirely. It didn't take long for the NHF to find its man: Senator William Proxmire, a Democrat from Wisconsin. Proxmire was best known for his Golden Fleece Awards, given to federally funded science programs he considered wasteful. One winner, the Aspen Movie Map project, spawned a technology that enabled soldiers to familiarize themselves quickly with new territory. Although Proxmire later apologized to several award winners, his name became a verb: “to Proxmire” meant to obstruct scientific research for political gain. In 1975, William Proxmire introduced a bill banning the FDA from regulating megavitamins. Bob Dole, William Fulbright, Barry Goldwater, Hubert Humphrey, George McGovern, and Sam Nunn were cosponsors.
On the morning of August 14, 1974, Senator Edward Kennedy, chair of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, called the meeting to order. “The Food and Drug Administration, in my opinion, has an obvious and important responsibility to protect the American consumer against foods and drugs [that] are potentially harmful,” he said. “It must make certain that Americans are not led to believe that dietary products are therapeutic or in some way beneficial, when
in fact they may be worthless and a waste of money.” Proxmire was the first to defend his bill, claiming that the recommended daily allowance for vitamins was far too low: “What the FDA wants to do is to strike the views of its stable of orthodox nutritionists into tablets and bring them down from Mount Sinai where they will be used to regulate the rights of millions of Americans. The real issue is whether the FDA is going to play God.”
Others rose in support of Proxmire's bill. Bob Dole, who would later appear in television ads for Viagra, said, “I would like to be on record as absolutely opposing any action by the FDA to regulate the retail sale of vitamin and mineral nutrients. In fact, it's a little inconceivable to me that such restrictions should ever have been promulgated in the first place.” Milton Bass, a lawyer proficient in the doublespeak of his industry, said, “The Proxmire bill is designed for one purpose. It is designed to permit the customer to buy a safe food product honestly labeled.” Bass failed to explain how defeating legislation requiring proof of safety made products safer.
Representing the FDA was its commissioner, Dr. Alexander Schmidt. Kennedy asked Schmidt to respond to Proxmire's contention that vitamins weren't harmful at any dosage. “Well, the word
harm
is relative,” said Schmidt. “What is overlooked by a great many people is that while there is not a lot of evidence that very large doses of water-soluble vitamins are harmful, there is not a lot of information that large doses of water-soluble vitamins are safe either.” Absence of evidence, argued Schmidt, wasn't evidence of absence.