Read Oxford Handbook of Midwifery Online

Authors: Janet Medforth,Sue Battersby,Maggie Evans,Beverley Marsh,Angela Walker

Oxford Handbook of Midwifery (25 page)

BOOK: Oxford Handbook of Midwifery
10.36Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads
  • Screening tests other than those performed in normal midwifery care are likely to reveal information that parents need to be prepared
    for, and to result in decisions being made about the future of the pregnancy.
  • If, on consideration, parents decide not to take up the offer of tests, then this should be respected.
  • In practice, it is difficult to ensure that clients are aware of all the ramifications of tests, especially when so many are on offer.
  • Where informed consent has not been obtained, and a positive result to a screening test is returned, the practitioner is vulnerable to litigation.
  • If a client’s language barrier or intellect makes understanding difficult, it may not be professionally acceptable to go ahead with tests.
  • The use of interpreters is problematic, but there is usually a protocol, and advice can be sought from a specialist midwife.
  • If the client is not mentally competent, then she cannot effectively give consent as an autonomous person. The principle of beneficence
    could be invoked to provide care that is in the best interests of the
    client. Paternalism may be justified in any number of circumstances, notwithstanding the limited mental capacity of the client.
    1. Grayson A (1996). Fetal screening. The triple test decision.
      Modern Midwife
      6
      (8), 16–19
      .
    2. Marteau TM, Drake H. (1995). Attributions for disability: the influence of genetic screening.
      Social Science and Medicine
      40
      (8), 1127–32.
      CHAPTER 4
      Antenatal care
      56‌‌
      Screening for risk in pregnancy
      Risk screening during pregnancy aims to identify those women at risk, so that a suitable pattern of care can be planned for the pregnancy with the appropriate professional.
      For women deemed to be healthy and at low risk, midwife or midwife/ GP care, based in the community, is a suitable alternative to consultant- or hospital-based care programmes.
      Assessment of risk should be ongoing, so that deviations from the normal or the development of complications can be identified at any stage of pregnancy and referral to appropriate care arranged. This assessment starts at the booking interview or initial appointment. For many women this takes place in their own home and is conducted by the community midwife.
      Women with any of the following need care over and above that recommended for low-risk healthy women by the NICE guidelines:
      1
      • Cardiac disease including hypertension
      • Renal disease

        Endocrine disorder or diabetes requiring insulin
      • Psychiatric disorder (on medication)
      • Haematological disorder (including thrombo-embolic disease)
      • Epilepsy requiring anticonvulsant medication
      • Malignant disease
      • Severe asthma
      • Drug misuse (heroin, cocaine, ecstasy)
      • HIV or hepatitis B
      • Autoimmune disorders
      • Obesity: BMI 30kg/m
        2
        or above (or underweight – BMI <18kg/m
        2)
      • Women at higher risk, e.g. age >40 or <14 years
      • Women who are particularly vulnerable or who lack social support.
        Women who have experienced any of the following in previous pregnancies are at higher risk:
      • Recurrent miscarriage (three or more)
      • Preterm birth
      • Severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, or HELLP syndrome
      • Rh isoimmunization or other significant blood group antibodies
      • Uterine surgery—caesarean section, myomectomy, or cone biopsy
      • Ante- or postpartum haemorrhage on two occasions
      • Puerperal psychosis
      • Grand multiparity (>6)
      • A stillbirth or neonatal death
      • A small for gestational age infant (<5th centile)
      • A large for gestational age infant (>95th centile)
      • A baby weighing <2.5kg or >4.5kg
      • A baby with a congenital anomaly (structural or chromosomal).
    1
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2008). Antenatal care: Routine care for the healthy pregnant mother. Clinical guideline 62. London: NICE. Available at: M www.nice.org.
    uk/cg62.
    ANTENATAL SCREENING
    57‌‌
    Antenatal screening
    The Department of Health has published standards to support the UK Antenatal Screening Programme on screening for infectious diseases in pregnancy.
    1
    These standards are both generic and specific and are part of a wider initiative to establish a quality assured national screening programme. Responsibilities in the trust/strategic health authority, clinic, or laboratory are clarified in the standards. The information below con- centrates on the responsibilities at clinical level.
    Generic standards for infectious diseases
    All pregnant women are offered screening for rubella antibody, syphilis, HIV, and hepatitis B as an integral part of their antenatal care during their first and all subsequent pregnancies. Repeat testing during pregnancy is not usually necessary. The women have a right to decline screening.
    Pregnant women arriving in labour who have not had antenatal care elsewhere are to be offered screening, priority being given to HIV and hepatitis B, and presumptive action is taken on a preliminary positive result
    until such time as the result is confirmed. If an HIV test result will not be
    available in time, appropriate preventive measures should be offered. Use
    of rapid test devices may be appropriate in this context.
    Screening is only performed with documented consent, though this does not require a signature from the patient and the usual standards of confidentiality apply.
    Screening for rubella antibodies
  • Congenital rubella syndrome was first described in 1941.
  • If the rubella virus is contracted during the first 8 weeks of pregnancy there is an 80% risk of malformations, microcephaly, and severe learning difficulties.
  • If the virus is contracted after 9 weeks of gestation there is a 20% risk of deafness and brain damage. Handicap is rare after the 16th week.
  • In order to prevent congenital rubella syndrome all children are offered protection from the virus with the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine.
  • Women are screened during early pregnancy, usually at the time of the other routine blood tests, to record their immune status.
  • All non-immune women, and women with an antibody titre <10IU are recommended a further vaccine dose in the early postnatal period.
  • If a pregnant woman reports recent contact with an infected individual her immune status is confirmed. A titre >10IU suggests immunity.
  • If the titre is <10IU the test is repeated 2–3 weeks later. A fourfold increase in the titre suggests a recent infection.
  • If a woman presents more than 10–14 days after exposure a high IgM titre indicates viraemia in the last 4 weeks.
  • If infected in early pregnancy with a high risk of abnormality, termination of pregnancy would be offered.
    1
    Department of Health (2003). Screening for infectious diseases in pregnancy: Standards to support the UK Antenatal Screening Programme. Available at: M
    www.dh.gov.uk (accessed 2.4.10).
    CHAPTER 4
    Antenatal care
    58‌‌
    Screening for syphilis
    Syphilis can seriously complicate pregnancy and result in spontaneous abor- tion (commonly at around 18–20 weeks’ gestation), stillbirth, intrauterine growth restriction, and perinatal death.
    • Antenatal screening for syphilis is well established, forming part of the routine screening of all pregnant women during the first or early second trimester.
      • As the prevalence of this infection is very low, continuation of the screening programme has recently been questioned, notably by Kiss
        et al
        .
        1
        whose survey of the prevalence in Austria seemed to suggest no economic benefit from universal antenatal screening.
      • Connor
        et al
        .
        2
        carried out an epidemiological survey in the UK which suggested that targeting the screening to at-risk groups or stopping the screening programme would save relatively little money, and recommended that the current universal antenatal screening for syphilis should continue.
    • Women who are at risk will be retested in the late second to early
      third trimester, as infection acquired during pregnancy still poses a
      significant risk to the fetus.
    • Women who screen positive for the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test will have this result confirmed by retesting with a
      Treponema
      -specific assay (
      Treponema pallidum
    haemagglutination test, TPHA test) and will be treated with antibiotics such as amoxycillin.
    1. Kiss H, Widhalm A, Geusau A, Husslein P (2004). Universal antenatal screening for syphilis: is it still justified economically? A 10-year retrospective analysis.
      Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
      112
      (1): 24–8.
    2. Connor N, Roberts J, Nicoll A (2000). Strategic options for antenatal screening for syphilis in the United Kingdom: a cost effectiveness analysis.
      J Med Screen
      7
      (1): 7–13.
    HIV SCREENING
    59‌‌
    HIV screening
    Pregnant women should be offered screening for HIV infection early in antenatal care because appropriate antenatal interventions can reduce mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection. A system of clear referral paths should be established in each unit or department so that pregnant women who are diagnosed with an HIV infection are managed and treated by the appropriate specialist teams.
    1
    The Department of Health
    2
    has pro- duced guidelines for the management of HIV screening during pregnancy and the following information is taken from this report.
BOOK: Oxford Handbook of Midwifery
10.36Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

Other books

Hope Springs by Sarah M. Eden
The Gift by Danielle Steel
A Breath Away by Rita Herron
Manly Wade Wellman - John the Balladeer SSC by John the Balladeer (v1.1)
Wendy Perriam by Wendy Perriam
Falling for Finn by Jackie Ashenden
Saving Abby by Steena Holmes