Singled Out (13 page)

Read Singled Out Online

Authors: Virginia Nicholson

BOOK: Singled Out
2.56Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub

deafeningly noisy, grim and dangerous factory. She never forgot those years, nor the friends she made then: Polly, Rose, Martha . . . poor women whose jobs required them to stand all day at a machine, whose calloused feet had

worn holes in their shoes, who worked at Tankard’s all their lives, who

never married, and who died young. The injustice of their lot affected

Florence for the rest of her life.

But their lot was not hers. Florence had inherited her father’s mercurial

streak; bossy and driven, all her life she was given to temper tantrums and

excesses, though her nieces were also to remember her as deeply thoughtful

and generous, funny and warm-hearted. When she was eighteen, in ,

something gave way, and she broke down. She never went back to the mill.

The family now managed to move to a slightly larger house belonging to

an uncle, where Florence and Annie started dressmaking and giving piano

lessons. This was a step up the social ladder, and the moderate success of their business gave the sisters a new-found freedom. Leaving their uneducated mother to mind the house, Florence and Annie would gad off on outings to

Blackpool and Ilkley; they took an interest in local politics and the suffrage movement. Their relationship was quarrelsome but deeply affectionate.

Florence White had a wartime love affair, but the information on it is

scanty. She was already thirty when she and Albert Whitehead became

engaged in . Any hopes she had for wifehood or motherhood must

have rested on this relationship, but he and Florence were doomed to join

the grievous statistics. Albert was sent home from France to a military hospital, presumably to recover from wounds. There he died from pneumonia in .

Florence’s sister Annie had a boyfriend too, a plumber called Charles.

But Florence had become used to having things her own way in the White

household, where, as eldest daughter, she ruled the roost. Charles was seen

as unacceptable and Florence jealously did everything in her power to kill

off the romance. Despite engineering secret assignations with Charles,

Annie’s will failed her, and the unfortunate young man was left to languish.*

* Annie got her revenge years later when Florence, in her fifties, showed signs of fancying a train driver from Bournemouth. Annie wasn’t going to let her get away with it, and this time it was Florence who caved in.

‘A world that doesn’t want me . . .’



Thus the pair settled in for long-term spinsterhood. Florence was stout

with gig-lamp glasses; she certainly neglected her hair and most probably

she adopted inelegant poses. Annie and she were well into their thirties

now, and marriage hopes had waned. In the early s their mother died.

Their nieces, the daughters of their brother, were living with them, and

the dressmaking business was keeping them modestly. Florence and Annie

might have drifted into the twilight zone of aunthood had it not been for

Florence’s restless nature, which drove her to seek out causes. Ideas were

seething in her busy little brain.

She did not have far to look. On her doorstep, at Tankard’s Mill, were

many women unluckier than her, unmarried and living in poverty – women

like her friends, the three sisters Polly, Rose and Martha Jackson. Worn

out, all three of them died before they were sixty-five, before they were

eligible for a retirement pension.* It was their deaths that galvanised

Florence. Already working for the Liberal Party, in the early s she set

up a sub-committee to look at women’s pensions: Florence had finally

found her life’s work. Stop feeling sorry for the widows and orphans, was

her message. Think about the spinsters! In , in a church hall in Bradford, more than  single working-class women attended a public meeting addressed by Florence. By the end of the evening the National Spinsters

Pensions Association was born to fight for their rights, with rules, membership, officials and subscriptions, and Miss Florence White at its head.

*

In  when Muriel Spark wrote
The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie
she was able to look back twenty-five years and finally give the image of the interwar spinster her most enduring, if retrospective, incarnation. The

character of Miss Brodie is the antithesis of the maiden aunt. She is sexy,

romantic and subversive; wrong and ruthless, but inescapably influential.

Her ‘set’, five schoolgirls growing into young women, are mesmerised by

their liberated schoolmistress. Far from looking on her as a pathetic specimen, Rose, Eunice, Sandy, Jenny and Mary are enraptured by Jean Brodie’s exhilaratingly different approach to lessons. An English grammar session

is replaced by Miss Brodie’s stirring reminiscences of her dead lover, one

of the ‘Flowers of the Forest’, who ‘fell like an autumn leaf, though he

was only twenty-two years of age’. They are equally obsessed by their

* Lloyd George first introduced old age pensions for those over seventy in ; in 

this was updated to entitle anyone earning less than £ a year to ten shillings a week from the age of sixty-five, provided they had paid their contributions.



Singled Out

teacher’s sex life, by her bosom – sometimes flat and straight, on other days ‘breast-shaped and large, very noticeable’ – and by her talk of Shakespeare, Cimabue and Mussolini. Inevitably, Miss Brodie’s seditious educational methods bring her into conflict with the school’s principal; while her

amours provoke jealousy and, eventually, betrayal. But in her prime, Miss

Jean Brodie is irresistibly dangerous and different: ‘Safety does not come

first,’ she tells the girls. ‘Goodness, Truth and Beauty come first. Follow

me.’ And they do.

Though Muriel Spark asserts in
The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie
that her heroine was by no means unique as a type of ‘war-bereaved spinster’, and that there were indeed ‘legions of her kind during the nineteen-thirties’,

still it took time and distance to turn the thwarted spinster into such an

icon. A few decades on, Helen Fielding has given us urban u¨ber-singleton

Bridget Jones as a role model for our own times – drunk, nicotine-addicted,

modern, funny and, along with her angry-young-woman friend Sharon,

determined not to be squashed by the Smug Marrieds:

‘. . . I’m not married because I’m a
Singleton
, you smug, prematurely ageing, narrow-minded morons,’ Shazzer ranted. ‘And because there’s more than one bloody way to live: one in four households are single, the nation’s young men have been proved by surveys to be completely unmarriageable, and as a result there’s a whole generation of single girls like me with their own incomes and homes who have lots of fun and don’t need to wash anyone else’s socks. We’d be as happy as sandboys if people like you didn’t conspire to make us feel stupid just because you’re jealous.’

‘Singletons!’ I shouted happily. ‘Hurrah for the Singletons!’

The Surplus Woman has come a long way – but Ms Bridget Jones only

echoes the anonymous correspondent who wrote to the editor of the
Daily
Mail
back in February , remonstrating with the author of that alarming article entitled A MILLION WOMEN TOO MANY: Sir, – A million women too many; it is indeed a bombshell that Dr Murray Leslie has hurled among the women who are so valiantly striving to take and hold ‘a place in the sun’.

But there are consolations. No girl, anyway, until she is well past girlhood, considers that
she
is one of those excess females.

All the same, if a woman would definitely decide to be ‘in excess’ then she

should enter a profession or business with no fear that marriage would ruin her career. She could help in the world’s work in another sphere.

‘A world that doesn’t want me . . .’



Why should not some of us bury our hopes and form a Union of Surplus

Women who mean to succeed? Why should we be downcast? The more of us the

merrier – and we are a goodly company.

   

.
On the Shelf

Husbands

A MILLION WOMEN TOO MANY –  HUSBAND HUNT,

proclaimed the
Daily Mail
headline reporting Dr Murray Leslie’s lecture to the London Institute of Hygiene on  February . The report stood alongside other stories – Princess Alice had visited the Ideal Homes Exhibition, Brinsmead’s famous piano factory in Kentish Town had closed, and the price of petrol had increased by d a gallon.

The
Daily Mail
’s story covered the main points of Dr Leslie’s lecture, and reported his grave concerns regarding the disturbing excess of women over men (which, as the Census was to show the following year, was an

underestimate of almost a million).

Dr Leslie could see no redeeming features; on the contrary, he observed

only the disadvantages. Social stability was threatened by female discontent.

The disproportion led to young women having greater freedom, and failures

in discipline and parental supervision permitted sexual licence. ‘The old

ethical standards’ were crumbling, he noted; there was ‘a lowered standard

of morality’, and a collapse of marriage and family life brought about

by infidelity among married men, who readily availed themselves of the

numerous unattached women. Economically, inflation meant that single

daughters were forced out of the home and into the workplace, where

market competition ensured that our most able women got jobs, leaving

only the unskilled lower orders to breed for the nation. Meanwhile ‘jazzing

flappers’ with their claws out, desperately displaying their nubile bodies in over-revealing garments, fought like cats over ‘the scarce and elusive male’.

Spellbound by the availability of sex, young men ‘with dance invitations

four and five deep’ were becoming jaded and spoiled. In short, the country

was going to the dogs. Reassuringly, there was still space at the foot of the column for a comforting advertisement placed there by a convenience food manufacturer: ‘In these days of changing and uncertain values, there is one

article which has remained standardised in quality – Symington’s Soups.’

The
Daily Mail’s
correspondents, however, took Dr Leslie’s comments to heart. The majority of them were women; over the next few days they wrote in with their reactions to this calamitous state of affairs, and recounted
On the Shelf


their own experiences: ‘Most of us are looking for husbands, and the

competition is keen . . .’; ‘To attract men, girls will dress daringly, and

generally try to appear very bold and dashing and knowing . . .’; ‘I want to get married, but my chances do not seem very bright . . .’; ‘There are just not enough men to go round . . .’ Never mind the effect on the nation, Dr

Leslie’s lecture had clearly touched a sore nerve with Britain’s ‘matchless

maidens’. The letters told of their blighted hopes, their sense of having

been cheated of a prize owed to all. Marriage was woman’s crown, her

glory and her birthright. If there were a few dissenting voices whispering

that a husband represented anything other than a happy ending, the
Daily
Mail
did not think fit to report them.

*

And yet in the early years of the twentieth century marriage was being

scrutinised and redefined as never before. Plainly, for the majority of

women, wifehood fell short of the joyful ideal. All too often, once the

confetti had settled, the new bride had little to look forward to beyond a

life of drudgery, oppression and ennui. No matter what their social class,

women found themselves condemned to a kind of house-arrest, sentenced

to a lifetime of food preparation, needlework and childcare. There was no

escape.

When young Frances Graham set up home in County Durham with her

miner husband Jim in  she had no hot water, no electricity and no

bathroom. She had been trained by her mother for a lifetime of housework:

‘I don’t know what made us like this but when I was married, that day I

swept the confetti out of the lobby myself.’ Frances generally worked from

. in the morning till . at night, on her feet. Scrubbing, washing and fetching hot water were back-breaking tasks; life was a permanent battle with soot, bugs and coal-dust. If you had only a distant outside toilet, there was the necessity of emptying chamber-pots; sanitary towels, too, had to be soaked and washed by hand. Cooking, laundry, dusting and scrubbing

were the tyrannical, never-ending reality of the housewife’s day. The

unlucky ones also had to endure drunkenness, savagery, abuse and infidelity

by their husbands.

Even by , when the birth control campaigner Margery Spring Rice

published
Working-Class Wives: Their Health and Conditions
, little had improved for the sample of over , wives interviewed: My life for many years consisted of being penned in a kitchen  feet square, every fourteen months a baby, as I had five babies in five years at first, until what with 

Singled Out

the struggle to live and no leisure I used to feel I was just a machine . . . Our men think we should not go out until the children are grown up . . . It isn’t the men are unkind. It is the old idea we should always be at home.

I pay s d for two rooms I have a sheet board ceiling when it rains it runs halfway along this ceiling and then drips on the floor we have a bath in the middle of the room to catch the rain . . . the council people offered us a flat at / per week . . . how they think we could pay that out of / when my husband is out of work I don’t know. I have just had my th baby . . .

Other books

A Wreath Of Roses by Elizabeth Taylor
Alone by Kate L. Mary
Night Soldiers by Alan Furst
Into the Wind by Anthony, Shira
Vrin: Ten Mortal Gods by John Michael Hileman
Taking a Shot by Catherine Gayle