Authors: Arthur Hailey
Tags: #Fiction, #General, #Fiction - General, #Medical, #drugs, #Fiction-Thrillers, #General & Literary Fiction, #Thrillers
"the project we now have is timely, damned exciting, and with big
commercial possibilities; therefore we should concentrate on it."
No public fanfare was made about the Harlow opening. "The time for
fanfare," declared Sam, who had flown over for the occasion, "is when we
have something positive to show, and that isn't yet."
When would there be something positive?
"Allow me two years," Mar-tin told Sam and Celia during a relaxed private
moment. "There ought to be some progress to report by then."
After the institute's opening, Celia's visits to Britain became fewer and
shor-ter. For a while she went, as Sam's representative, to help smooth cut
initial working problems. But, mostly, Nigel Bentley seemed to be
justifying the confidence placed in him by his appointment as
administrator. From Martin, as months went by, there was no specific news
except, via Bentley, that research was continuing.
At Felding-Roth's New Jersey headquarters, Celia continued as special
assistant to the president, working on other projects Sam gave her.
It was during this period that, on the national scene, the putrescent boil
of Watergate burst. Celia and Andrew, like millions of others worldwide,
watched the parade of events nightly on television and were caught up in
the unfolding drama's fascination. Celia reminisced ab,,)ut how, a year
earlier when driving to Harlow with
199
Sam, she had dismissed the first published report of a Watergate burglary as
insignificant.
Near the end of April, while tension mounted, two haughty presidential
aides--Haldeman and Ehrlichman-were thrown to the wolves by President Nixon
in an attempt to save himself Then, in October, adding to Nixon's and the
nation's misery, Vice President Agnew was ejected from office for other
corruption, unconnected with Watergate. Finally, ten months later, Nixon
himself reluctantly became the first American President to resign. As
Andrew remarked, "Whatever else history may say, at least he'll be in The
Guinness Book of Records. "
Nixon's successor promptly granted his predecessor a pardon-inadvance
against criminal prosecution and, when asked if it was all tit-for-tat
pol&cs, proclaimed, "There was no deal."
Watching and hearing the statement on TV, Celia asked Andrew, "Do you
believe that?"
"No.,'
She said emphatically, "Nor do L"
Around the same time-less significant on the larger scene, but important to
the Jordan family-Bruce, too, left home to enter prep school-the Hill
School, at Pottstown, Pennsylvania.
Through the entire period and into 1975 the fortunes of FeldingRoth, while
not spectacular, maintained an even keel. They were helped by two products
developed in the company's own laboratories-an anti-inflammatory for
rheumatoid arthritis and a betablocker called Staidpace, a medicine to slow
heartbeat and reduce blood pressure. The arthritis drug was only moderately
successfui but Staidpace proved an excellent, lifesaving product which
became widely used.
Staidpace would have contributed even more to Felding-Roth revenues had its
United States approval not been delayed by the Food and Drug Administration
for what seemed an unconscionable time-in the company's view, two years
longer than necessary.
At FDA's Washington headquarters there seemed, in the frustrated words of
Felding-Roth's research director, Vincent Lord, "an infectious
unwillingness to make a decision about anything." The opinion was echoed by
other drug firms. Reportedly, one senior FDA official exhibited proudly on
his desk a plaque with the famed promise of France's Marshal P6tain in
World War 1, "They shall not pass. " It appeared to sum up neatly the
attitude of FDA's staff to any new drug application.
200
It was about this time that the phrase "drug lag"--describing the
non-availability in the United States of beneficial drugs in use else-
where-began to be used and gain attention.
Yet, always, a routine reply to any plea for faster action on new drug
approvals was: "Remember Thalidomide!"
Sam Hawthorne tackled this attitude head-on in a speech to an industry
convention. "Strong safety standards," he declared, "are necessary in the
public interest, and not long ago, too few of them existed. But pendulums
swing too far, and bureaucratic indecision has now become a national
disservice. As to critics of our industry who point back to Thalidomide,
I point forward to this: The number of Thalidomide-deformed babies is now
exceeded by the number of those who have suffered or died because
effective drugs, held back by American regulatory delays, are failing to
reach them in their time of need."
It was tough talk and the beginning of what would be a fiercely argued,
pro-and-con debate extending over many years.
At Felding-Roth, one keenly anticipated project was now on "hold.,,
The deal made by Sam for the American rights to a new French drug,
Montayne, still had not reached a point where tests for safety and
efficacy, as required by law, could begin in the United States. Thus
there was a long way to go even before a new drug application could be
made to FDA.
Montayne was a drug to combat morning sickness in pregnant women; it held
great promise, especially for working women whom it would free from a
burden that made life difficult and sometimes threatened their
employment. The drug's discoverersLaboratoires Gironde-Chimie, a
reputable house-were convinced they had something of highest quality and
safety, as shown by unusually extensive tests on animals and volunteer
humans. The tests, the Paris-based firm informed Felding-Roth, had so far
produced excellent results and no adverse side effects. Still, as the
head of Gironde-Chimic explained in a personal letter to Sam:
Because of past occurrences, and the nature fragile of this
drug, we have need of being extremely prudent. Therefore we
have decided to make a few more series of tests on different
types of animals, and also more humans. This will take a little
more of time.
201
In the climate of the times, Sam agreed, the additional precautions
seemed wise. Meanwhile, Felding-Roth continued to wait for a green light
from the French before beginning their own work on Montayne.
202
THREE
1975-1977
I
While Dr. Vincent Lord had some problems which were imaginary, he also had
others that were real.
One was the FDA.
The Food and Drug Administration, with headquarters just outside
Washington, D.C., represented a labyrinthine obstacle course which any
new pharmaceutical drug and its sponsors had to run before the drug was
approved for general use. Some drugs were never approved; they failed to
complete the course. And since sponsors of drugs were almost always the
companies which discovered, manufactured, and eventually sold them to the
public, the big drug firms and FDA were, more often than not, locked in
a combative state. That state ranged, according to the issue of the
moment, from intellectual-scientific skirmishing to all-out war.
As far as Vince Lord was concerned, it was war.
Part of his jot) at Felding-Roth was to deal, or supervise dealings, with
the FDA. He loathed it. He also disliked, and in some cases despised, the
people who worked there. Adding to his problem was that, to achieve
anything at all at FDA, he had either to subdue those feelings or keep
them to himself. He found both things difficult, at times impossible.
Of course, Dr. Lord was prejudiced. So were others, from other drug
firms, who dealt with FDA.
Sometimes that prejudice was justified. Sometimes not.
This was because laws and custom required the FDA to be several things
at once.
It was a guardian of the public's health, its duty to protect the
innocent from excessive avarice, incompetence, indifference, or
carelessness, all of which sins were at times committed by pharmaceutical
companies whose bottom line was profit. The reverse of that was FDA's
function as a ministering angel: the covenant to make available, with
utmost speed, those new and splendid drugs-
205
from the samc pharmaceutical companies-which lengthened life or shortened
pain.
Another agency role was to be a whipping boy for critics--drug firms,
consumer groups, journalists, authors, lawyers, lobbyists, other special
interests-who accused FDA of being either too rigid or too lenient,
depending on what camp the critics lived in. As well, the FDA was used
regularly as a political platform by self-serving and self-righteous
congressmen and senators who sought an easy way to get their names in print
and on TV.
Coupled with all this, the FDA was a bureaucratic mess-overcrowded, in
critical areas understaffed, its medical and scientific experts overworked
and underpaid.
Yet the amazing thing was, amid all these roles, hindrances, and critics,
the FDA did its job-on the whole-remarkably weU.
But without question there were glitches, and the so-called drug lag was
one of them.
Just how bad the drug lag was depended, like so much else surrounding the
FDA, on your point of view. But that it existed, even the FDA itself
conceded.
Vincent Lord suffered through an example of the drug lag during the attempt
by Felding-Roth to gain approval for United States marketing of Staidpace,
a heart and blood-pressure medicine already in use in Britain, France, West
Germany and several other countries.
The FDA required that before Staidpace could go on American drugstore
shelves and be prescribed by doctors, there must be additional, thorough,
American testing of the product's safety and efficacy. And it was a good
requirement. Nobody argued against it, including Vincent Lord and others at
Felding-Roth.
What they did protest-after all the required testing had been done
successfully, and results submitted to the FDA-was two extra years of
petty, indecisive quibbling by the government agency.
In 1972 Felding-Rotb delivered its Staidpace NDA-new drug application-to
FDA headquarters in a truck. The NDA consisted of 125,000 printed pages,
contained in 307 volumes, enough to fill a small room. All this material
was required by law and included information covering two years of U.S.
testing on animals and humans.
Although the information supplied was as complete as anyone could make it,
there was an unspoken awareness on both sides that no one at FDA could
possibly read it all. Similar amounts of mate-
206
rial were received, with great frequency, from other manufacturers seeking
approval of other drugs.
From the FDA's medical-scientific staff, a reviewer was selected to
oversee and adjudicate the Staidpace submission. He was Gideon R. Mace,
M.D., who had been with FDA a year.
Dr. Mace would be assisted by scientific specialists in the agency -that