R. P. Draper, 1989), Barbara Hardy distinguishes between R. S. Thomas's occasionally strained relation to Wales and Dylan Thomas's relaxation into "a deep sense of region." Certainly a bitter nuance in R. S. Thomas's poetry represents Welsh nonconformist culture as materialistic, hypocritical, and puritanical.
|
There is a mismatch between his "prototypical" hill farmer Iago Prytherch ("something frightening in the vacancy of his mind"), and the ''bright hill" that symbolizes the nation. This may be both the prejudice of an Anglican priest and the disappointed romanticism of a newcomer to rural Wales. Dylan Thomas, on the other hand, was happy to call himself "a border case," and his deepest imaginative topography roots him in Anglo-Welsh Swansea: an "ugly lovely" sea town, English-speaking but close to the Welsh language and to the countryside (Ann Jones's farm at Fernhill). His poetry is also rooted in the nonconformism that R. S. Thomas views from an Anglican distance. Dylan Thomas's highly wrought rhetoric mediates the Bible through the hwyl and hellfire of evangelical preaching, for instance in "The Crucifixion":
|
| | This was the crucifixion on the mountain, Time's nerve in vinegar, the gallow grave As tarred with blood as the bright thorns I wept: The world's my wound, God's Mary in her grief, Bent like three trees and bird-papped in her shift, With pins for tear-drops is the long wound's woman.
|
Thomas's poetry is itself crucified by dualisms of life and death, body and soul, sex and sin, world and wound. Insofar as these dualisms are intrinsic to Thomas's Welsh religious identity, they complicate his relations to Wales and to cultural borders. His unease abroad, cloaked by excessive alcohol and excessive eloquence, partook of unease at home.
|
Karl Shapiro in In Defense of Ignorance (1955) argues that "Like D. H. Lawrence [Thomas] is always hurling himself back into childhood and the childhood of the world." Thus his more truly "relaxed" Welsh poems are Edenic reconstructions"Fern Hill," "Poem in October"written in the mid-1940s. These poems wonderfully but wistfully restore a primal universe in which human beings, animals, birds, plants, "the trees and the stones and the fish in the tide"locality and cosmos, then and now, male and female, word and thing, word and wordhave not undergone separation and differentiation:
|
|