with heroic poetry. One is the claim to write with poetic authority. The conclusion of sonnet 45 shows that the "forcibleness or energia " of these poems turns persuasion of a mistress into an authoritative mode of self-presentation. The sonnet presents the irony, as Astrophel sees it, between Stella's failure to take pity on her woebegone lover and her shedding tears when she heard "a fable, which did show / Of lovers never known, a grievous case." The octave narrates the situation, and the sestet directly addresses Stella:
|
| | Alas, if Fancy drawn by imaged things, Though false, yet with free scope more grace doth breed Than servant's wrack, where new doubts honor brings; Then think, my dear, that you in me do read Of lover's ruin some sad tragedy: I am not I, pity the tale of me.
|
There is more to this ending than the teasingly witty persuasion that the mistress can acknowledge her lover if she will pretend to ignore his actual social existence. The final line has a stronger force. With a definitively paradoxical formula, it is a self-declaration of alienation from self. In so presenting "the tale of me," Astrophel becomes not simply a courtly guise of Philip Sidney, but a representative lover. The very names Stella (Latin, star) and Astrophel (Greek, star-lover) suggest the potentialities of human nature that engage some of the most impressive sonnets (like 71, or 25, which tests a Platonic intuition that humans can view "those skies / Which inward sun to heroic mind displays"). In other poems Astrophel represents himself as not only similar to mythological demigods (Morpheus in sonnet 32 and, most remarkably, the moon, made masculine, in sonnet 31), but also as being, in his plight, the source of their meaning. A series of sonnets (3840) on the lover's sleeplessness is distinguished from other poets' performances on this theme by the feeling of moral and psychological consequence that comes from representating humanly definitive conflicts played out in the lover's psyche. In the poems just alluded to, the speaker tends to be larger than (courtly) life, but even the courtly Astrophel is consistently defiant, setting himself against the world, as he claims to weigh all issues of human conduct and value in the balance of his love.
|
The lover's represented presence, combined with its poetic and rhetorical brilliance, gave Astrophel and Stella its literary authority. Its posthumous publication in 1591 set off a vogue of sonneteering to
|
|