The Complete Four Just Men (31 page)

BOOK: The Complete Four Just Men
9.55Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

It seemed for a while that Manfred did not intend availing himself of the opportunity, for he made no sign, then he rose to his feet, and, resting his hands on the inkstand ledge before him, ‘My lord,’ he said, and turned apologetically to the jury, ‘and gentlemen.’

The court was so still that he could hear the scratchings of the reporters’ pens, and unexpected noises came from the street outside.

‘I doubt either the wisdom or the value of speaking,’ he said, ‘not that I suggest that you have settled in your minds the question of my guilt without very excellent and convincing reasons.

‘I am under an obligation to Counsel for the Treasury,’ he bowed to the watchful prosecutor, ‘because he spared me those banalities of speech which I feared would mar this trial. He did not attempt to whitewash the man we killed, or to exonerate him from his gross and sordid crimes. Rather, he made plain the exact position of the law in relation to myself, and with all he said I am in complete agreement. The inequalities of the law are notorious, and I recognize the impossibility, as society is constituted, of amending the law so that crimes such as we have dealt with shall be punished as they deserve. I do not rail against the fate that sent me here. When I undertook my mission, I undertook it with my eyes open, for I, too,’ he smiled at the upturned faces at the counsels’ bench, ‘I too am learned in the law – and other things.’

‘There are those who imagine that I am consumed with a burning desire to alter the laws of this country; that is not so. Set canons, inflexible in their construction, cannot be adapted according to the merits of a case, and particularly is this so when the very question of “merit” is a contentious point. The laws of England are good laws, wise and just and equitable. What other commendation is necessary than this one fact, that I recognize that my life is forfeit by those laws, and assent to the justice which condemns me’?

‘None the less, when I am free again,’ he went on easily, ‘I shall continue to merit your judgment because there is that within me, which shows clearly which way my path lies, and how best I may serve humanity. If you say that to choose a victim here and a victim there for condemnation, touching only the veriest fringe of the world of rascaldom, I am myself unjust – since I leave the many and punish the few – I answer that for every man we slew, a hundred turned at the terror of our name and walked straightly; that the example of one death saved thousands. And if you should seriously ask: Have you helped reform mankind, I answer as seriously – Yes.’

He talked all this time to the judge.

‘It would be madness to expect a civilized country to revert to the barbarism of an age in which death was the penalty for every other crime, and I will not insult your intelligence by denying that such a return to the bad days was ever suggested by me. But there has come
into existence a spurious form of humanitarianism, the exponents of which have, it would appear, lost their sense of proportion, and have promoted the Fear of Pain to a religion; who have forgotten that the Age of Reason is not yet, and that men who are animal in all but
human semblance share the animal’s obedience to corrective discipline, share too his blind fear of death – and are amenable to methods that threaten his comfort or his life.’

He flung out his hand toward the judge.

‘You, my lord,’ he cried, ‘can you order the flogging of a brute who has half killed one of his fellows, without incurring the bleating wrath of men and women, who put everything before physical pain – honour, patriotism, justice? Can you sentence a man to death for a cruel murder without a thousand shrieking products of our time rushing hither and thither like ants, striving to secure his release? Without a chorus of pity – that was unexcited by the mangled victim of his ferocity? “Killing, deliberate, wolfish killing by man”, say they in effect, “is the act of God; but the legal punishment of death, is murder.” That is why I expect no sympathy for the methods the Four Just Men adopted. We represented a law – we executed expeditiously. We murdered if you like. In the spirit and the letter of the laws of England, we did murder. I acknowledge the justice of my condemnation. I do not desire to extenuate the circumstances of my crime. Yet none the less the act I cannot justify to your satisfaction I justify to my own.’

He sat down.

A barrister, leaning over the public prosecutor’s back, asked: ‘What do you think of that?’

Sir William shook his head.

‘Bewildering,’ he said in despair.

The judge’s summing up was one of the briefest on record.

The jury had to satisfy their minds that the prisoner committed the crime with which he was charged, and must not trouble themselves with any other aspect of the case but that part plainly before them. Was the man in the dock responsible for the killing of Lipski?

Without leaving the box, the jury returned its verdict.

‘Guilty!’

Those used to such scenes noticed that the judge in passing sentence of death omitted the striking and sombre words that usually accompany the last sentence of the law, and that he spoke, too, without emotion.

‘Either he’s going to get a reprieve or else the judge is certain he’ll escape,’ said Garrett, ‘and the last explanation seems ridiculous.’

‘By the way,’ said his companion as they passed slowly with the crowd into the roadway, ‘who was that swell that came late and sat on the bench?’

‘That was his Highness the Prince of the Escorial,’ said Charles, ‘he’s in London just now on his honeymoon.’

‘I know all about that,’ said Jimmy, ‘but I heard him speaking to the sheriff just before we came out, and it struck me that I’d heard his voice before.’

‘It seemed so to me,’ said the discreet Charles – so discreet indeed that he never even suggested to his editor that the mysterious mask who gave evidence on behalf of George Manfred was none other than his Royal Highness.

Chapter 20

Chelmsford

They took Manfred back to Wandsworth Gaol on the night of the trial. The governor, standing in the gloomy courtyard as the van drove in with its clanking escort, received him gravely.

‘Is there anything you want?’ he asked when he visited the cell that night.

‘A cigar,’
said Manfred,
and
the governor handed
him the case.
Man-fred selected with care, the prison-master watching him wonderingly.

‘You’re an extraordinary man,’ he said.

‘And I need to be,’ was the reply, ‘for I have before me an ordeal which is only relieved of its gruesomeness by its uniqueness.’

‘There will be a petition for reprieve, of course,’ said the governor.

‘Oh, I’ve killed that,’ laughed Manfred, ‘killed it with icy blast of satire – although I trust I haven’t discouraged the “Rational Faithers” for whom I have made such handsome posthumous provision.’

‘You are an extraordinary man,’ mused the governor again. ‘By the way, Manfred, what part does the lady play in your escape?’

‘The lady?’ Manfred was genuinely astonished.

‘Yes, the woman who haunts the outside of this prison; a lady in black, and my chief warder tells me singularly beautiful.’

‘Ah, the woman,’ said Manfred, and his face clouded. ‘I had hoped she had gone.’

He sat thinking.

‘If she is a friend of yours, an interview would not be difficult to obtain,’ said the governor.

‘No, no, no,’ said Manfred hastily, ‘there must be no interview – at any rate here.’

The governor thought that the interview ‘here’ was very unlikely, for the Government had plans for the disposal of their prisoner, which he did not feel his duty to the State allowed him to communicate. He need not, had he known, have made a mystery of the scheme.

Manfred kicked off the clumsy shoes the prison authorities had provided him with – he had changed into convict dress on his return to the gaol – and laid himself down dressed as he was, pulling a blanket over him.

One
of the
watching
warders
suggested
curtly
that he
should
undress.

‘It is hardly worth while,’ he said, ‘for so brief a time.’

They thought he was referring again to the escape, and marvelled a little at his madness. Three hours later when the governor came to the cell, they were dumbfounded at his knowledge.

‘Sorry to disturb you,’ said the Major, ‘but you’re to be transferred to another prison – why, you aren’t undressed!’

‘No,’ said Manfred, lazily kicking off the cover, ‘but I thought the transfer would be earlier.’

‘How did you know?’

‘About the transfer – oh, a little bird told me,’ said the prisoner, stretching himself. ‘Where is it to be – Pentonville?’

The governor looked at him a little strangely.

‘No,’ he said.

‘Reading?’

‘No,’ said the governor shortly.

Manfred frowned.

‘Wherever it is, I’m ready,’ he said.

He nodded to the attendant warder as he left and took an informal but cheery farewell of the governor on the deserted railway station where a solitary engine with brake van attached stood waiting.

‘A special, I perceive,’ he said.

‘Goodbye, Manfred,’ said the governor and offered his hand.

Manfred did not take it – and the Major flushed in the dark.

‘I cannot take your hand,’ said Manfred, ‘for two reasons. The first is that your excellent chief warder has handcuffed me, behind – ’

‘Never mind about the other reason,’ said the governor with a little laugh, and then as he squeezed the prisoner’s arm he added, ‘I don’t wish the other man any harm, but if by chance that wonderful escape of yours materializes, I know a respected officer in the Prison Service who will not be heartbroken.’

Manfred nodded, and as he stepped into the train he said: ‘That lady – if you see her, tell her I am gone.’

‘I will – but I’m afraid I may not tell her where.’

‘That is at your discretion,’ said Manfred as the train moved off. The warders drew down the blinds, and Manfred composed himself to sleep.

He woke with the chief warder’s hand on his arm and stepped out on to the platform as the day was breaking. His quick eye searched the advertisement boards on the station. He would have done this ordinarily, because they would tell him where he was, supposing for some reason the authorities had wished to keep his destination a secret from him. But he had a particular interest in advertising just then. The station was smothered with the bills of a travelling cheap jack – an unusual class of advertisement for the austere notice boards of a railway station. Huge flaming posters that said ‘Everything is Right’, and in smaller type underneath ‘Up to-date’. Little bills that said, ‘Write to your cousin in London . . . and tell her that Gipsy Jack’s bargain,’ etc. ‘Go by the book!’ said another. Marching down the stairs he observed opposite the station yet further evidence of this extravagant cheap jack’s caprice, for there were big illuminated signs in evidence, all to the same effect. In the shuttered darkness of the cab, Manfred smiled broadly. There was really no limit to the ingenuity of Leon Gonsalez. Next morning when the governor of Chelmsford Gaol visited him, Manfred expressed his intention of writing a letter to his cousin – in London.

* * *

‘Did you see him?’ asked Poiccart.

‘Just a glimpse,’ said Leon. He walked over to the window of the room and looked out. Right in front of him rose the grim façade of the gaol. He walked back to the table and poured himself out a cup of tea. It was not yet six o’clock, but he had been up the greater part of the night.

‘The Home Secretary,’ he said between gasps as he drank the scalding hot liquid, ‘is indiscreet in his correspondence and is generally a most careless man.’

It was apropos of Manfred’s coming.

‘I have made two visits to the right honourable gentleman’s house in this past fortnight, and I am bursting with startling intelligence. Do you know that Willington, the President of the Board of Trade, has had an “affair”, and that a junior Lord of the Admiralty drinks like a sponge, and the Chancellor hates the War Secretary, who will talk all the time, and – ’

‘Keeps a diary?’ asked Poiccart, and the other nodded.

‘A diary full of thousands of pounds’ worth of gossip, locked with a sixpenny-ha’penny lock. His house is fitted with the Magno-Sellie system of burglar alarms, and he keeps three servants.’

‘You are almost encyclopedic,’ said Poiccart.

‘My dear Poiccart,’ said Leon resentfully, ‘you have got a trick of accepting the most wonderful information from me without paying me the due of adopting the following flattering attitudes: primary, incredulous surprise; secondary, ecstatic wonder; tertiary, admiration blended with awe.’

Poiccart laughed outright: an unusual circumstance.

‘I have ceased to wonder at your cleverness, illustrious,’ he said, speaking in Spanish, the language these two men invariably used when alone.

‘All these things are beyond me,’ Poiccart went on, ‘yet no man can say for all my slow brain that I am a sluggard in action.’

Leon smiled.

The work of the last few weeks had fallen heavily on them both. It was no light task, the preparation of
Three Months in Morocco
. The first word of every seventh paragraph formed the message that he had to convey to Manfred – and it was a long message. There was the task of printing it, arranging the immediate publication, the placing of the book in the list, and generally thrusting it under the noses of an unappreciative public. As sailors store life-belts for possible contingencies, so, in every country had the Four Just Men stored the equipment of rescue against their need. Poiccart, paying many flying visits to the Midlands, brought back with him from time to time strange parts
of machinery.
The lighter he
carried
with his luggage,
the heavier parts he smuggled into Chelmsford in a strongly-built motor-car.

The detached house facing the prison was fortunately for sale, and the agent who conducted the rapid negotiations that resulted in its transfer had let fall the information that the clients hoped to establish a garage on the Colchester Road that would secure a sensible proportion of the Essex motor traffic. The arrival of two rough-painted chassis supported this view of the new owners’ business. They were enterprising people, these new arrivals, and it was an open secret ‘on the road’, that Gipsy Jack, whose caravan was under distress, and in the hands of the bailiff, had found financial support at their hands. Albeit Jack protested vigorously at the ridiculous suggestion that he should open in Chelmsford at an unpropitious
season, and sniffed contemptuously at the extravagant billing of the town. Nor did he approve of the wording of the posters, which struck him as being milder than the hilarious character of his
business-entertainment called for.

‘Them Heckfords are going to make a failure,’ said Mr Peter Sweeney in the bosom of his family. He occupied ‘Faith Home’, an ornate villa on the Colchester Road. Before his momentous conception of the ‘Rational Faithers’, it had borne the more imposing title of ‘Palace Lodge’, this by the way.

‘They’ve got no business ability, and they’re a bit gone on the sherbet.’ For a high-priest of a new cult, Peter’s language was neither pure nor refined. ‘And they haven’t got the common politeness of pigs,’ he added ambiguously. ‘I took the petition there today,’ Peter went on indignantly, ‘and the chap that come to the door! Oh, what a sight! Looked as if he’d been up all night, eyes red, face white, and all of a shake.’

‘“Good mornin’, Mr Heckford,” says I, “I’ve come about the petition.”


“What petition?” says he.


“The petition for the poor creature now lyin’ in Chelmsford,” says I, “under sentence of death – which is legal murder,” I says.

‘“Go to the devil” he says; they were his exact words, “Go to the devil.” I was that upset that I walked straight away from the door – he didn’t even ask me in – an’ just as I got to the bottom of the front garden, he shouts, “What do you want him reprieved for – hasn’t he left you a pot of money?”’

Mr Peter Sweeney was very much agitated as he repeated this callous piece of cynicism.

‘That idea,’ said Peter solemnly and impressively, ‘Must Not be Allowed to Grow.’

It was to give the lie to the wicked suggestion that Peter arranged his daily demonstration, from twelve to two. There had been such functions before, ‘Mass’ meetings with brass bands at the very prison gates, but they were feeble mothers’ meetings compared to these demonstrations on behalf of Manfred.

The memory of the daily ‘service’ is too fresh in the minds of the public, and particularly the Chelmsford public, to need any description here. Crowds of three thousand people were the rule, and Peter’s band blared incessantly, whilst Peter himself grew hoarse from the effect of railing his denunciation of the barbarous methods of a medieval system.

Heckford Brothers, the new motor-car firm, protested against the injury these daily paraders were inflicting on their business. That same dissipated man, looking more dissipated than ever, who had been so rude to him, called upon Peter and threatened him with injunctions. This merely had the effect of stiffening Peter Sweeney’s back, and next day the meeting lasted three hours.

In the prison, the pandemonium that went on outside penetrated even to the seclusion of Manfred’s cell, and he was satisfied.

The local police were loath to interfere – and reopen the desperate quarrel that had centred around such demonstrations before.

So Peter triumphed, and the crowd of idlers that flocked to the midday gathering grew in proportion as the interest in the condemned man’s fate arose.

And the augmented band blared and the big drum boomed the louder and Rational Faith gained many new converts.

A sightseer, attracted by curiosity, was standing on the fringe of the crowd one day. He could not see the band from where he stood but he made a remarkable observation; it was nothing less than a gross reflection upon a valued member of the orchestra.

‘That chap,’ said this unknown critic, ‘is beating out of time – or else there’s two drums going.’

The man to whom he addressed his remarks listened attentively, and agreed.

The crowd had swayed back to the railings before the premises of the motor manufacturers, and as it dispersed – Peter’s party ‘processed’ magnificently to the town before breaking up – one of the new tenants came to the door and stood, watching the melting crowd. He overheard this remark concerning the big drummer’s time, and it vexed him. When he came back to the sitting-room, where a pallid Poiccart lay supinely on a couch, he said: ‘We must be careful,’ and repeated the conversation.

Until six o’clock these men rested – as men must rest who have been working under a monstrous pressure of air – then they went to clear away the results of their working.

At midnight they ceased, and washed away the stains of their labours.

‘Luckily,’ said Poiccart, ‘we have many rooms to fill yet; the drawing-room can hold little more, the dining-room we need, the morning-room is packed. We must start upstairs tomorrow.’

As the work proceeded, the need for caution became more and more apparent; but no accident marred their progress, and three days before the date fixed for the execution, the two men, coming to their barely furnished living-room, looked at each other across the uncovered table that separated them, and sighed thankfully, for the work was almost finished.

‘Those fellows,’ said Mr Peter Sweeney, ‘are not so Bad as I thought they was. One of ’em come to me today and Apologized. He was lookin’ better too, and offered to sign the petition.’ Peter always gave you the impression in speaking that he was using words that began with capital letters.

‘Pa,’ said his son, who had a mind that dealt in material issues, ‘what are you going to do with Manfred’s money?’

His parent looked at him sternly.

‘I shall Devote it to the Cause,’ he said shortly.

‘That’s you, ain’t it?’ asserted the innocent child.

Peter disdained to answer.

BOOK: The Complete Four Just Men
9.55Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

Other books

The Attic by Prior, Derek
Sarah's Key by Tatiana De Rosnay
Dear Gabby by Mary Suzanne
In Bed with the Wrangler by Barbara Dunlop
Shepherd's Moon by Stacy Mantle
Anyone? by Scott, Angela