19 For Wyatt see Thomson, Sir Thomas Wyatt and his Background ; Muir, The Life and Letters of Sir Thomas Wyatt, and pp. 67-80 above.
20 Wyatt, Poems, CV, lines 56-64. Wyatt was reworking a recently published Provençal satire on court life. For this and Wyatt’s modifications see Collected Poems of Sir Thomas Wyatt , ed. K. Muir and P. Thomson (Liverpool, 1969), pp. 347-50: ‘colours of device’ = deceptions; ‘join the mean’ etc. = accept outrageous behaviour as normal; ‘as to purpose likewise’ = and likewise as it shall be opportune.
21 Ibid., CV, lines 14-16. ‘me list’ etc. = I do not wish to criticize honour and seek it at the same time.
23 For a discussion of this satire see David Starkey, ‘The Court: Castiglione’s ideal and Tudor reality’, in Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 45 (1982), 232-9.
25 He probably had some legal training also: LP, i.438 (3 m.7). For his career generally see G. E. C., Peerage and Dictionary of National Biography (1885-1900), v.321. For Boleyn and Erasmus see below, p. 270. For his linguistic ability see LP, viii, p. 71.
26 G. E. C., Peerage, x.140-2; Tottel’s Miscellany, ed. H. E. Rollins (Cambridge, Mass., 1965), ii.83. For George’s translations see pp. 271-2.
27 LP, i.App.9; Anglo, Great Tournament Roll, p. 55.
28 On tournaments and court festivals generally see ibid., pp. 19-40; Anglo, Spectacle, pp. 108-23.
37 For the debt of the English court to Burgundy see Kipling, Triumph of Honour.
38 For this and the following paragraph see A. R. Myers, The Household of Edward IV (Manchester, 1959); Starkey, thesis, and ‘Intimacy and Innovation’ in The English Court from the Wars of the Roses to the Civil War , ed. David Starkey (1987), pp. 71-118
39 The ordinance promulgated at Eltham in 1526 was directed towards reform in the management of the royal household, but Wolsey used the opportun ity to remove several courtiers from their privileged positions in the privy chamber: thesis, pp. 133-81. Dr Starkey has identified the importance of privy chamber office - it gave access to the king ex officio and promised predictability of contact with him; hence the constant and almost irresistible demand for places. Yet many privy chamber appointees made little mark, and in any discussion of privy chamber influence allowance has to be made for royal cronies without formal posts.
53 Herbert, Henry VIII , p. 399; Sander, Schism , p. 25; William Camden, Annales (1612), p. 2. The weight of argument favoured 1507, see J. H. Round, The Early Life of Anne Boleyn (1886), pp. 12-23; Brewer, Henry Vlll, ii.170; J. Gairdner, ‘Mary and Anne Boleyn’, and ‘The Age of Anne Boleyn’, in EHR, 8 (1893), 53-60; 10 (1895), 104. Friedmann’s conjecture of 1503 or 1504 [Anne Boleyn , ii.315] was based on a fallacious pictorial identification.
54 Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, MS 119, f. 21.
55 For the following see Paget, in BIHR, 54, 162-70 and pp. 19, 26-7 above.
56 Warnicke, Rise and Fall, pp. 9, 12-16. The attempted analogy with Anne Brandon [ibid. p. 12] is unhelpful as her date of birth is uncertain and so too her status at Brussels.
63 Du Bellay, Correspondance, i.105. George was married by the end of 1525 and so must have been born no later than 1511 [ LP , iv.1939(14)]. His part in the Christmas revels of 1514 — 15 [ LP, ii.1501] was obviously as a child.
64 Ibid., xii(2), 952. See also Friedmann, ii.325-6.
66 Later Catholic writers got round this problem by alleging that Anne was conceived in 1509 during the absence of Thomas Boleyn on a supposed embassy to France lasting two years: e.g. Trumble MS 5 (Berkshire Record Office), ‘La vie de Anne Boulein ou de Bouloigne’, and Eyston MS vii g15 (private collection), ‘The Character and Life of the Lady Anne Boulen’. I am indebted to Messrs T. M. and E. Eyston for access to the latter.
68 Most recently R. M. Warnicke, ‘Anne Boleyn’s childhood and adolescence’, in Historical Journal, 28 (1985), 942-3, and Rise and Fall, pp. 9, 258.
69 Warnicke claims that Anne was the elder on the ground that priority is implied by her being appointed at Brussels [ibid. p. 9]. This is unconvincing since Mary, if the elder, would have been too old for appointment, to say nothing of her evident inferior potential. The description of Anne being brought up as a child in the royal nurseries of Burgundy and France [ibid, 12-13, 17-23] is entirely suppositious. Her alleged childhood companion, Renée, duchess of Ferrara, (b. 1510) remembered Anne as a maid of honour. ibid, p 41. Furthermore, Mary was no landed heiress, so a marriage in 1520, when she was not yet 12, would have been exceptional; pace Warnicke, Rise and Fall, pp. 34-5. This would also make her Henry’s mistress at the latest in her very early teens.
71 Marriage would normally signal the end of a royal amour with a single woman. Elizabeth was Lady Tailbois at the latest by June 1522 but could have been married as early as the second half of 1519, following the birth of Richmond: Murphy, Bastard Prince, pp. 31-3. In that case any liaison with Mary prior to her marriage would have been a very brief fling, but cf. the date of the royal grants. My suggestion [Anne Boleyn, p. 20] that there is significance in The Mary Boleyn being part of the royal fleet in 1523 was mistaken; she was originally a Boleyn vessel. LP, iii.3358.
72 LP, x.450: ‘per una grandissima ribalda et infame sopre butte’. But if Mary was younger than Anne, she could not have been more than 12 in 1514.
74 LP, iii.510; xii(i).822. Gardiner was in post by 1528: William Dugdale, Monasticon (1817-30), iii.307.
75 Her first child, Henry Carey, was born in March 1526. The story that he was the king’s son was spread about by supporters of Katherine: LP, viii.567. For Henry’s fertility see pp. 190-1.
78 Cal. Close Rolls, Henry VII (1955 — 63), ii.179.
79 See the brasses at Hever and Penshurst: M. Stephenson, List of Monumental Brasses (1926), ii.236, 251.
Chapter 2 A European Education
1 De Boom, Marguerite d‘Autriche, p. 118. For this chapter see also T. Kren, ‘Flemish Manuscript Illumination’, and Janet Backhouse, ‘French Manuscript Illumination’ in Renaissance Painting in Manuscript, ed. T. Kren (1983), pp. 69-78, 147-92; de Iongh, Margaret of Austria; Otto Pacht, The Master of Mary of Burgundy (1948); Sterling, Master of Claude; The New Grove Dictionary of Music (1980), passim .
2 Warnicke argues that the queen in question was Henry’s sister Mary: Rise and Fall, p.15. It is difficult to see why, if this was the case, Anne should need to learn French to converse with her: see below, n.5.
3 Neither the copy of Margaret’s letter reporting the arrival of Anne, nor Anne’s own letter, is dated. She could not have gone before Boleyn had established himself at the Burgundian court, where he arrived in May 1512, and the letter recalling her to England is dated 14 August 1514. The summer of 1513 looks the most likely date within this period, because Margaret’s letter shows that Boleyn was then back in England, and he was in the Low Countries continuously from 26 June 1512 to early May 1513. Margaret was expecting Boleyn back, and thus earlier end-date is the arrival of new English ambassadors in February 1514: Paget, in BIHR, 54, 164-5; LP, i.2655.