Read The Oxford History of World Cinema Online
Authors: Geoffrey Nowell-Smith
moment of the distinction between documentary and fiction film-making, given that the
Lumières for the most part filmed 'real' events and Mélièlis staged events. But such
distinctions were not a part of contemporary discourse, since many pre-1907 films mixed
what we would today call 'documentary' material, that is, events or objects existing
independently of the film-maker, with 'fictional' material, that is, events or objects
specifically fabricated for the camera. Take, for example, one of the rare multi-shot films
of the period, The Execution of Czolgosz with Panorama of Auburn Prison ( Edison,
1901), a compilation of four self-contained individual shots dealing with the execution of
the assassin of President William McKinley. The first two shots are panoramas of the
exterior of the prison, the third shows an actor portraying the condemned man in his cell,
and the fourth re-enacts his electrocution. Given films of this kind, it is more useful to
discuss very early genres in terms of similarities of subject-matters rather than in terms of
an imposed distinction between fiction and documentary.
Many turn-of-the-century films reflected the period's fascination with travel and
transportation. The train film, established by the Lumières, practically became a genre of
its own. Each studio released a version, sometimes shooting a moving train from a
stationary camera and sometimes positioning a camera on the front of or inside the train
to produce a travelling shot, since the illusion of moving through space seemed to thrill
early audiences. The train genre related to the travelogue, films featuring scenes both
exotic and familiar, and replicating in motion the immensely popular postcards and
stereographs of the period. Public events, such as parades, world's fairs, and funerals, also
provided copious material for early cameramen. Both the travelogue and the public event
film consisted of self-contained, individual shots, but producers did offer combinations of
these films for sale together with suggestions for their projection order, so that, for
example, an exhibitor could project several discrete shots of the same event, and so give
his audience a fuller and more varied picture of it. Early film-makers also replicated
popular amusements, such as vaudeville acts and boxing matches, that could be relatively
easily reenacted for the camera. The first Kinetoscope films in 1894 featured vaudeville
performers, including contortionists, performing animals, and dancers, as well as scenes
from Buffalo Bill's Wild West show. Again, the shots functioned as self-contained units
and were marketed as such, but exhibitors had the option of putting them together to form
an evening's entertainment. By 1897 the popular filmed boxing matches could potentially
run for an hour. The same was true of another of the most popular of early genres, Passion
plays telling the life of Christ, which were often filmed recordings of theatrical
companies' performances. A compilation of shots of the play's key events could last well
over an hour. A third group of films told one-shot mini-narratives, most often of a
humorous nature. Some were gag films, resembling the Lumières' Watering the Gardener,
in which the comic action takes place in the pro-filmic event, as for instance in Elopement
by Horseback ( Edison, 1891), where a young man seeking to elope with his sweetheart
engages in a wrestling match with the girl's father. Others relied for their humour upon
trick effects such as stop action, superimposition, and reverse action. The most famous are
the Mélièlis films, but this form was also seen in some of the early films made by Porter
for the Edison Company and by the film-makers of the English Brighton school. These
films became increasingly complicated, sometimes involving more than one shot. In
Williamson's film The Big Swallow ( 1901), the first shot shows a photographer about to
take a picture of a passer-by. The second shot replicates the photographer's viewpoint
through the camera lens, and shows the passerby's head growing bigger and bigger as he
approaches the camera. The man's mouth opens and the film cuts to a shot of the
photographer and his camera falling into a black void. The film ends with a shot of the
passer-by walking away munching contentedly.
1902/3-1907
In this period, the multi-shot film emerged as the norm rather than the exception, with
films no longer treating the individual shot as a self-contained unit of meaning but linking
one shot to another. However, film-makers may have been using a succession of shots to
capture and emphasize the highpoints of the action rather than construct either a linear
narrative causality or clearly establish temporal-spatial relations. As befits the 'cinema of
attractions', the editing was intended to enhance visual pleasure rather than to refine
narrative developments.
One of the strangest editing devices used in this period was overlapping action, which
resulted from film-makers' desire both to preserve the pro-filmic space and to emphasize
the important action by essentially showing it twice. Georges Mélièli's A Trip to the
Moon, perhaps the most famous film of 1902, covers the landing of a space capsule on
the moon in two shots. In the first, taken from 'space', the capsule hits the man in the
moon in the eye, and his expression changes from a grin to a grimace. In the second shot,
taken from the 'moon's surface', the capsule once again lands. These two shots, which
show the same event twice, can disconcert a modern viewer. This repetition of action
around a cut can be seen in an American film of the same year, How They Do Things on
the Bowery, directed by Edwin S. Porter for the Edison Manufacturing Company. An irate
waiter ejects a customer unable to pay his bill. In an interior shot the waiter throws the
man out and hurls his suitcase after him. In the following exterior shot, the customer
emerges from the restaurant followed closely by his suitcase. In a 1904 Biograph film The
Widow and the Only Man, overlapping action is used not to cover interior and exterior
events but to show the same event a second time in closer scale. In the first shot a woman
accepts her suitor's flowers and smells them appreciatively. Then, rather than a'match cut',
in which the action picks up at the beginning of the second shot from where it left off at
the end of the first, as would be dictated by present-day conventions, a closer shot shows
her repeating precisely the same action.
While overlapping action was a common means of linking shots, film-makers during this
period also experimented with other methods of establishing spatial and temporal
relations. One sees an instance of this in Trip to the Moon: having landed on the moon,
the intrepid French explorers encounter unfriendly extraterrestrials (who remarkably
resemble those 'hostile natives' the French were encountering in their colonies at this very
time!). The explorers flee to their spaceship and hurry back to the safety of Earth, their
descent covered in four shots and twenty seconds of film time. In the first shot, the
capsule leaves the moon, exiting at the bottom of the frame. In the second shot, the
capsule moves from the top of the frame to the bottom of the frame. In the third the
capsule moves from the top of the frame to the water, and in the fourth the capsule moves
from the water's surface to the sea-bed. This sequence is filmed much as it might be today,
with the movement of the spaceship following the convention of directional continuity,
that is, an object or a character should appear to continue moving in the same direction
from shot to shot, the consistent movement serving to establish the spatial and temporal
relationships between individual shots. But while a modern film-maker would cut directly
from shot to shot, Mélièlis dissolved from shot to shot, a transitional device that now
implies a temporal ellipsis. In this regard, then, the sequence can still be confusing for a
modern viewer.
Linking shots through dissolves was not in fact unusual in this period, and one can see
another example in Alice in Wonderland ( Hepworth, 1903). However, another English
film-maker, James Williamson, a member of the Brighton school, made two films in
1901, Stop Thief! and Fire!, in which direct cuts continue the action from shot to shot.
Stop Thief! shows a crowd chasing a tramp who has stolen a joint from a butcher,
motivating connections by the diagonal movement of characters through each of the
individual shots; the thief and then his pursuers entering the frame at the back and exiting
the frame past the camera. The fact that the camera remains with the scene until the last
character has exited reveals how character movement motivates the editing. Film-makers
found this editing device so effective that an entire genre of chase films arose, such as
Personal ( Biograph, 1904), in which would-be brides pursue a wealthy Frenchman. Many
films also incorporated a chase into their narratives, as did the famous 'first' Western The
Great Train Robbery ( Edison, 1903), in which the posse pursues the bandits for several
shots in the fllm's second half.
Early editing: two adjacent shots from G. A. Smith's As Seen through a Telescope ( 1900). The view through the telescope (achieved
by using a mask) shows a girl's ankle being stroked, thereby 'explaining' the previous shot
In Fire!, Williamson uses a similar editing strategy to that employed in Stop Thief!, the
movement of a policeman between shots 1 and 2 and the movement of fire engines
between shots 2 and 3 establishing spatial-temporal relations. But in the film's fourth and
fifth shots, where other film-makers might have used overlapping action, Williamson
experiments with a cut on movement that bears a strong resemblance to what is now
called a match cut. Shot 4, an interior, shows a fireman coming through the window of a
room in a burning house and rescuing the inhabitant. Shot 5 is an exterior of the burning
house and begins as the fireman and the rescued victim emerge through the window.
Although the continuity is 'imperfect' from a modern perspective, the innovation is
considerable. In his 1902 film Life of An American Fireman, undoubtedly influenced by
Fire!, Porter still employed overlapping action, showing a similar rescue in its entirety
first from the interior and then from the exterior perspective. A year later, however,
Williamson's compatriot G. A. Smith also created an 'imperfect' match cut, The Sick
Kitten ( 1903), cutting from a long view of two children giving a kitten medicine to a
closer view of the kitten licking the spoon.
During this period, film-makers also experimented with cinematically fracturing the space
of the pro-filmic event, primarily to enhance the viewers' visual pleasure through a closer
shot of the action rather than to emphasize details necessary for narrative comprehension.
The Great Train Robbery includes a medium shot of the outlaw leader, Barnes, firing his
revolver directly at the camera, which in modern prints usually concludes the film. The
Edison catalogue, however, informed exhibitors that the shot could come at the beginning
or the end of the film. Narratively non-specific shots of this nature became quite common,
as in the British film Raid on a Coiner's Den ( Alfred Collins , 1904), which begins with a
close-up insert of three hands coming into the frame from different directions, one
holding a pistol, another a pair of handcuffs, and a third forming a clenched fist. In
Porter's own oneshot film Photographing a Female Crook, a moving camera produces the
closer view as it dollies into a woman contorting her face to prevent the police from
taking an accurate mug shot.
Even shots that approximate the point of view of a character within the fiction, and which
are now associated with the externalization of thoughts and emotions, were then there
more to provide visual pleasure than narrative information. In yet another example of the
innovative film-making of the Brighton school, Grandma's Reading Glasses ( G. A.
Smith, Warwick Trading Company, 1900), a little boy looks through his grandmother's
spectacles at a variety of objects, a watch, a canary, and a kitten, which the film shows in
inserted close-ups. In The Gay Shoe Clerk ( Edison/ Porter, 1903) a shoeshop assistant