The President's Call: Executive Leadership From FDR to George Bush (17 page)

BOOK: The President's Call: Executive Leadership From FDR to George Bush
13.56Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
 
Page 49
charged off to war in the Persian Gulf, playing "madcap golf" (eighteen holes in an hour and a half) as he went (ibid., 30). Bush's random impulsiveness alarmed and shocked Republican elders on occasion, such as when he chose the barely known, untested, and not highly regarded Dan Quayle as his running mate, seemingly displaying an almost juvenile willfulness in the face of opposition from the party regulars. Then he nominated John Tower for Defense against their advice and stuck with him through a losing confirmation battle. Similarly, he ignored the advice of James Baker and others who urged him to adopt the triumvirate model of senior aides, rather than the strong chief-of-staff model that had proven so disastrous for Nixon with Haldeman and Ehrlichman and for Reagan with Don Regan in his first term. Instead, Bush chose John Sununu as his chief of staff, who operated in a hierarchical manner to similar negative results. While Sununu ostensibly ran an open and informal shop, characterized by face-to-face meetings and informal conversations rather than memoranda, his hierarchical style peeked through as he "placed himself as the final judge of whether aides could proceed with what they proposed or Sununu should first consult with the president." Indeed, aides with opposing viewpoints could be easily shut out of the policy process with no direct access to the president (Campbell 1991, 199).
Sununu's problems stemmed in part from his hierarchical style and in part from his insistence on a streamlined staff, another dimension of his overbearing style, a small staff being easier to control. Several trial balloons landed with the thud of lead: the early attempt to levy a tax on deposits in bank accounts in an attempt to stave off the crisis in the savings and loan industry caused a hail of protest and a hasty retreat; a barnstorming trip to mark the first one hundred days of the administration created no storm; the proposed reduction in the capital gains tax rate caused tumult among Republicans on the Hill. Other issues, such as Medicare catastrophic coverage, funding of abortions, and clean air legislation, caused him grief; all these events and issues were marked by inadequate staff work and hasty mop-up operations of damage control within the president's own party (ibid., 200-01).
In the fall of 1989, a strong secrecy motif emerged in the administration. For example, Bush did not tell his defense secretary, Richard Cheney, or CIA director, William H. Webster, about the planned Malta Summit between Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev. In December 1989 protests about inconsistencies in his China policy stemming from a visit to China by foreign adviser Brent Scowcroft, and Deputy Secretary of State Lawrence S.
 
Page 50
Eagleberger, led to the embarrassing admission that Bush had secretly sent the pair to Beijing one month after the massacre in Tienanmen Square. The national security process [came up short in the] October 1989 attempted coup against Manuel Antonio Noriega of Panama when the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Colin Powell, was kept out of the loop. Some suggest that Powell's "pique (at this turn of events) tipped the scales toward an invasion that caught many insiders by surprise."
In the wake of these revelations during fall 1989, articles about Bush's penchant for secrecy and distrust of open discussion-even within the administration-of key foreign policies began to supplant those purveying the previous conventional wisdom. This had breezily argued that Bush held foreign policy so closely to his chest only because he preferred to serve as his own secretary of state. One Republican knowledgeable about both the Reagan and Bush administrations suggested that the president's secrecy amounted to an obsession that distorted other values: "A lot of the way the White House operates is based on the leaks thing . . . I think you know how obsessed George Bush is about leaks. What you don't know is the fullness of the obsession. It's right up there as one of his core values. You know, service, family, religion, leaks." (Ibid., 201-08)
One recurring theme of the administrative strategy is the centralization of power in the EOP at the expense of the cabinet. George Bush's administrative strategy was no exception to the rule. According to Campbell, the Bush White House more often than Reagan's bypassed the cabinet council system in resolving key issues. It did the same with the interagency process when it would not yield what the prime shakers in the White House sought. "A former Reagan official who worked closely with Bush asserted that his secretiveness stemmed from his impatience with the messiness of democratic processes: '[the president] thinks our system-with an excess of Congress and Press involvement-has made it impossible to do what is right"' (ibid., 208).
Thus, OMB chief Richard Darman was able to establish himself as the champion of cutting spending, holding back the demands of the agencies. Sununu established himself as the champion of conservative and business causes: he was unusually successful at supplanting Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady during the negotiations over the deficit (ibid., 211).
One final word about presidential personality is in order. A key aspect of any president's public persona is the image his First Lady projects. Rockman notes that the First Ladies Bush and Reagan were the opposites of their husbands (Rockman 1991, 9). Barbara Bush was the warm and supportive wife who played the part of the country's favorite grand-
 
Page 51
mother, disclaiming any policy interest or role, talking about hearth and home, and displaying her large and happy family before the American public. Even Millie Bush, the family dog, having authored her own book (ghosted by Barbara Bush), was part of the four-year family photo opportunity that marked Bush's term.
In contrast, Nancy Reagan was widely feared in the White House for her behind-the-scenes power to dispatch aides who displeased her or threatened her husband's image and to protect those whom she favored. In her fierce defense of her husband and what she perceived to be his best interests and his place in history, she modified his more radical positions on issues such as abortion and relations with the Soviet Union (Campbell 1991, 192); she also consulted astrologers to plan her husband's schedule. A former actor like her husband, Nancy Reagan carried an innate bandbox fashion sense and was seen by many insiders as petty, tyrannical, vengeful, and extravagant. Both Reagans had been divorced and rarely attended church. The children of the president who so effectively preached family values, promoted prayer in the public schools, and was the hero of the Christian Right were in various stages of alienation from their parentsthe Reagans had never even seen one of their grandchildren until he was nearly eighteen months old. The Reagan dogs rarely entered the public consciousness.
Conclusion
As observed above, the personality and style of the president significantly influence his approach to the presidency, whether he emerges as a paranoid schemer who suggests vandalizing his own party's headquarters to frame the Democrats, as did Nixon,
12
or as a Tory who claims office by virtue of his personal and political lineage. The administrative presidency has held particular attraction for presidents of the modern era who practiced it with varying degrees of success in an attempt to break gridlock and have their way with public policy. However, it is clear that the separation of powers, the politics-administration dichotomy, and the administrative presidency weigh heavily on the ability of government to function efficiently and effectively. Responsibility for the gridlock that many deplore must in some measure be laid at the door of the Constitution, with its mandated separation of powers. While some collaboration between the executive and legislative branches is, to a certain extent and fortunately, unavoidable, jealously guarded prerogatives resulting from the separation of powers incline both sides more toward competition than cooperation.

Other books

In the Moment: Part One by Rachael Orman
Fierce September by Fleur Beale
Dead Set by Richard Kadrey
Love Is My Reason by Mary Burchell
Our Kind of Traitor by John le Carré
Lycan Unleashed by Tiffany Allee
From Russia With Claws by Jacey Conrad, Molly Harper