The number of Senate-confirmed political appointees (PASs) who took the time to complete the Bush PAS Survey, sent notes of apology if they were late in returning it, called me for clarification, or signed their names indicating a willingness to be interviewed (35 percent of the respondents) was most heartening. Clearly, this project could not have been completed without their cooperation and I extend to them my most sincere thanks.
|
I am especially indebted to the PASs who allowed themselves to be interviewed in connection with this research. They each gave me as much as an hour and a half of uninterrupted time and were, to a person, gracious, attentive, and forthcoming. Some requested anonymity or asked that parts of the interview be kept off the record, but most felt able to be open and were willing to be quoted by name. Those who did not want direct attribution often provided very useful insights into "behind the scenes" politics.
|
That all these PASs, at the highest levels of government and living under the stress of incredible responsibilities and time pressures, were so candid and accessible was, to me, a reassuring indication of the health of our nation's system of governance. They made a significant contribution to this study and are listed by name, title, executive level, and agency in appendix 5.
|
Thanks are due also to the many persons (careerists, congressional staff, appointees, and others) in various agencies who assisted in this study, from its initial conception to survey design, pretest, and postsurvey interviews. They provided context and background, as well as many useful ideas for the PAS Survey and follow-up interview questions. These individuals are listed in appendices 3, 4, and 6.
|
Individuals such as James Pfiffner at George Mason University, Gail Johnson at Old Dominion University, John Trattner at the Council on Excellence and Government, and Mark Abramson at Leadership Inc. were also helpful in the early stages. I especially thank the draft reviewers, Jim Pfiffner and Carolyn Ban, at the University of Pittsburgh, who offered perceptive and very helpful criticism that did much to shape the final form
|
|