The Secret Knowledge (33 page)

The Left is atheist, and, simply because it is atheist, its religious fanaticism is worse than any of the other fanaticisms of history. For the romantic of the past has sometimes, if all too rarely, been restrained by the memory that God is Truth. But the atheist fanatic has no reason for such restraint. There is no reason in principle why the revolutionary atheist should regard truth, and it does not seem that he does so in practice.

—Christopher Hollis,
Foreigners Aren't Fools,
1936

 

 

America is a Christian country. Its Constitution is the distillation of the wisdom and experience of Christian men, in a tradition whose codification is the Bible.

I will not say this Christian country has been good to the Jews, for this suggests an altruism or acceptance, neither of which exist. But America has been good
for
the Jews, as it has been, eventually, good for every immigrant group whether fleeing oppression, seeking prosperity, or, indeed, brought here in chains. The result of a 230-year-long experiment is the triumph of Judaeo-Christian values. We have created peace and plenty for more citizens over a greater period of time than that enjoyed by any other group in history.

This triumph is not due to altruism, nor to empathy, nor to compassion, but to adherence to those practicable, rational rules for successful human interaction set out in the Bible.

These rules and precepts amount, in their totality, as much to a legal philosophy as to a theology.

Practically, they assert the existence of God not as a magical force, making all men good (all men are not good), but as the
a priori
condition of human interaction: accountability. This irreducible understanding, which is the basis of Judaeo-Christian civilization, is that all human beings possess both a conscience and that free will necessary to allow them to either reject its dictates or to formulate them into habit. It is the codification of this conscience as Law, which allows us to adjudicate between both its conflicting claims, and its absence or presence in differing individuals.

The laws, derived from the Bible, and finding their most demonstrably perfect form in the Constitution, assert not man's perfection, but his imperfectibility, and, thus, the inevitability of conflict.

Our Judaeo-Christian teachings acknowledge conflict (between individuals, between them and the State, between them and God) and proceed to suggest (through narrative in the Old and through parable in the New Testament) mechanisms for its most peaceful resolution.

This tradition does not refer, overtly or by implication, to any possible perfect state of Man or of his associations, but, rather, acknowledges his weakness both before his imperfections and before that Power, however named, which gave him both a conscience, and the desire for law.

This power may be understood as metaphysical, and called God, or as a mere cosmic accident, gifting the human species with a unique formation of intellect impelling them to create Law as the most obviously utilitarian path toward effective civilization.

The Bible is an acknowledgment of human individuality. Human society has thrived, historically, as we see in our diverse society, because of the liberty to exploit a random distribution of talents, flaws, and proclivities.

Those States which have, in the name of productivity, racial purity, or, indeed, equality, attempted to limit human individuality have reverted from the civilization of the Judaeo-Christian state to savagery; for they have rejected the teachings of the Bible. One need not even say they died because they rejected God; they died because they rejected reason.

There is no secret knowledge. The Federal Government is merely the zoning board writ large.

One may find, in either place, able and even dedicated public servants, but there are no beneficent “experts.” For such an expert must be, essentially, but a skilled manipulator of people (the electorate or the legislature). He must be, therefore, a politician (that is, a perpetual candidate), bureaucrat, or demagogue; or he may be a lobbyist or a theoretician, skilled in manipulating or conspiring with the other named groups.

Our jury trial admits the testimony of experts. But the jury, faced with each side's expert but opposed opinion, usually discards both, judging the experts suborned or misled by either their stipend or their theories. They then retire to their deliberations, realizing that, though each side's evidence is presented as beyond the power of the common individual's understanding, they, the jury, are going to have to figure it out for themselves.

So it is with the rest of our self-government. The problems facing us, faced by all mankind engaged in Democracy, may seem complex, or indeed insolvable, and we, in despair, may revert to a state of wish-fulfillment—a state of “belief” in the power of the various experts presenting themselves as a cure for our indecision. But this is a sort of Stockholm syndrome. Here, the captives, unable to bear the anxiety occasioned by their powerlessness, suppress it by identifying with their captors.

This is the essence of Leftist thought. It is a devolution from reason to “belief,” in an effort to stave off a feeling of powerlessness. And if government is Good, it is a logical elaboration that more government power is Better. But the opposite is apparent both to anyone who has ever had to deal with Government, and, I think, to any dispassionate observer.

It is in sympathy with the first and in the hope of enlarging the second group that I have written this book.

My son asked me to explain the difference between a Conservative and a Liberal. I went on at some length. He thought for a while and said, “Then, basically, it's the difference between the Heavenly Dream and the God-Awful Reality”—a succinct and accurate compression of those views which I have, at somewhat greater and, I hope, excusable length, endeavored to express here.

I had never knowingly talked with nor read the works of a Conservative before moving to Los Angeles, some eight years ago.

I am indebted to very patient friends and teachers I met here, who inspired me to seek some understanding of the political process.

I would particularly like to thank Endre Balogh and Rabbi Mordecai Finley. They introduced me to the works of Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek, Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, and, so, began my efforts at self-education; and to Jon Voight, who, among other acts of kindness, gave me Whittaker Chambers's
Witness
.

As my reading broadened, I became aware of various nexuses of Conservative thought: I discovered that my radio had an AM band, and that the news and commentary on KCLA from Dennis Prager, Hugh Hewitt, Michael Medved, and Glenn Beck made more sense to me than the bemused and sad paternalism which had previously filled my drivetime.

I am very grateful to my wife and children, for putting up with my virtual monomania as I wrestled with what had become, for me, a new way of considering human interaction; to Sloan Harris for his forbearance, encouragement, and championship of the project; and to my assistant Pam Susemiehl for her patience, good humor, and much appreciated suggestions during the writing of this book.

Alinsky, Saul D.
Reveille for Radicals
. New York: Vintage, 1969.

———.
Rules For Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals
. New York: Vintage, 1971.

Assagioli, Roberto.
The Act of Will
. London: Wildwood House, 1974.

Bagehot, Walter.
Physics and Politics: or Thoughts on the Application of the Principles of ‘Natural Selection' and ‘Inheritance' to Political Society
. London: Henry S. King & Co., 1873.

Bagehot, Walter and Mrs. Russell Barrington.
The Works and Life of Walter Bagehot.
1914. 10 vols. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1915.

Bard, Mitchell.
Myths and Facts: A Guide to the Arab-Israeli Conflict.
Chevy Chase, MD.: American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise, 2002.

Beauvoir, Simone de.
The Long March: An Account of Modern China.
1957. Phoenix: Phoenix Press, 2002.

Butler, Samuel.
Erewhon: or, Over the Range.
1872. Ed. and introd. Peter Mudford. London: Penguin, 1985.

Chambers, Whittaker.
Witness.
1952. Preface. Robert Novak. Washington, DC.: Regnery, [1987].

Chomsky, Noam.
A Hated Political Enemy.
Interview. Allen Bell. Victoria: Flask, 2005.

———.
Chomsky on Anarchism.
Comp. and ed. and Introd. Barry Pateman. Pref. Charles Weigl. Edinburgh: AK Press, 2005.

———. “Israel, Lebanon, and the ‘Peace Process'.”
Z Magazine,
April 23, 1996.

———.
Middle East Illusions: Including Peace in the Middle East? Reflections on Justice and Nationhood.
Lanham, MD.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.

———. “Obama on Israel-Palestine.”
Z Magazine,
January 24, 2009.
http://chomsky.info/articles/20090124.htm
.

———. “On the US-Israeli Invasion of Lebanon.”
Al-Adab,
August 19, 2006.

———.
Secrets, Lies and Democracy.
1994. Interview. David Barsamian. Comp. and ed. Arthur Naiman.
The Real Story Series.
Chicago, IL.: Common Courage Press/LPC Group, 1998.

———.
Selected Readings on Transformational Theory.
1971. Ed. and preface. J.P.B. Allen and Paul Van Buren. Mineola, NY.: Dover, 2009.

Competitive Enterprise Institute.
Global Warming and Other Eco-Myths: How the Environment Movement Uses False Science to Scare Us to Death.
Ed. Ronald Bailey. Roseville, CA.: Prima Lifestyles, 2002.

Darwin, Charles.
On Natural Selection: From So Simple a Beginning Endless Forms Most Beautiful and Most Wonderful Have Been, and Are Being, Evolved.
1859. London: Penguin, 2005.

Dunne, Finley Peter.
Mr. Dooley in the Hearts of His Countrymen.
1899. n.p.: Bib-liobazaar, 2006.

Emerson, Ralph Waldo.
Essays & Lectures.
New York, Library of America, 1983.

Fallaci, Oriana.
The Force of Reason (La Forza della Ragione)
. 2004. New York: Rizzoli International, 2006.

Fanon, Frantz.
The Wretched of the Earth.
1961. Pref. Jean-Paul Sartre. trans. Constance Farrington. New York: Grove, n.d.

Ferguson, Niall.
Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power.
2002. New York: Basic, 2004.

Forster, E. M.
Howards End.
1910. Introd. David Lodge. London: Penguin, 2000.

Friedman, Milton.
Capitalism and Freedom.
Chicago, IL.: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

Friedman, Milton and Rose Friedman.
Free to Choose: A Personal Statement.
1980. Foreword. Milton and Rose Friedman. Orlando: Harvest-Harcourt, 1990.

Garrett, Garet.
The People's Pottage.
Ed. and introd. Jon Cook. Caldwell, ID.: The Caxton Printers, 1965.

Gibbon, Edward.
The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.
1781–1788. Ed. David Womersley. 4 vols. London: Penguin, 1995.

Gide, André et al.
The God that Failed.
1950. Introd. Richard Crossman, M.P. New York: Bantam, 1959.

Glazov, Jamie.
United in Hate: The Left's Romance with Tyranny and Terror.
Foreword. R. James Woolsey. Los Angeles, CA.: WorldNetDaily, 2009.

Goldberg, Jonah.
Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning.
New York: Doubleday, 2007.

Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah.
A Moral Reckoning: The Role of the Catholic Church in the Holocaust and Its Unfulfilled Duty of Repair.
New York: Vintage, 2003.