Read Blind Allegiance to Sarah Palin Online
Authors: Frank Bailey
Colberg's resignation triggered embarrassing fallout. Sarah did not want anyone to suspect she might have pressured the AG to resign.
Within hours, Ivy shot off an email to Fairbanks attorney Joe Miller asking if he'd help deflect potential rumors.
Joe:
Are you guys still running your website? If so, can you get some information out today? Or do you have friendlies in the media up there I or you can talk to?
The AG Talis Colberg resigned today. He truly did resign on his own, but I fear the spin will be the governor asked for his resignation, which she had absolutely nothing to do with! Talis is a great, hard working guy, but the work at the dept has come to a grinding hault because of relentless FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] requests and ethics violation inquiries . . . There is no end in sight to these frivolous requests . . . Not to mention an under current from some legislators who want Talis gone. Thanks.
As events would unfold, Ivy's concerns over Talis Colberg were wasted. Sarah would do what Sarah does best: take a bad situation and manage to have everyone forget it by pushing the pendulum off the grid in the opposite direction. Sarah's office had released the promise “I will look for someone with the same strong moral character as Talis.” As far as Sarah was concerned, the replacement was an easy decision. She chose somebody who would fight to the death for her, no matter what. The choice boiled down to only one man, Wayne Anthony Ross. Regarded as equally loyal but smarter and infinitely more aggressive, the person who helped push Talis Colberg out the door was perfect. We'd replace a poodle with a pit bull.
Only one small problem. The slice of support for WAR was small, confined mainly to the religious right. In a world requiring legislative confirmation of the selection, the nickname fit perfectly, and the bloody WAR began.
31
Â
Clowns to the Left,
Jokers to the Right
So what do we do? And who is going to do it?
âSARAH PALIN, TO IVY FRYE AND
FRANK BAILEY, MAY 27, 2009
S
arah and Todd Palin may have disliked Levi Johnston, the eighteen-year-old father of Bristol's unborn child, but during the campaign they needed him. Originally summoned from a sheep hunt in the Alaskan wilderness, Levi was fitted for a suit, received a hundred-dollar haircut, had someone teach him how to speak only when spoken to (keeping his comments to “yes, sir” and “no, sir”), and was then jetted off to the campaign trail as Bristol's fiancé. While not an ideal situation, the lipstick on this pig was thick and expertly applied by a PR machine with, by now, a tremendous amount of porcine makeup experience. The storyline went: while they might've made a mistake, make no mistake that these kids are heading toward a happily-ever-after life together. Amazingly, the vast majority of supporters found this an inspiring fairy tale, and the couple was enthusiastically cheered whenever trotted on stage to stand with Sarah and/or John McCain.
Once the campaign ended, however, Levi Johnston instantly became an ex-fiancé with a penchant for publicity. In early April 2009, he appeared on the nationally syndicated
The Tyra Show
and hung out a load of dirty laundry about his relationship with the Palin family, including the assertion that Sarah was probably aware the young couple
were having sexual relations, he was not allowed to take his son out of the house, and he and Bristol did not always get along.
This interview landed Levi on a list of unfavorable persons that was already lengthy and about to become seriously long.
Through spokesperson Meg Stapleton, the governor responded:
Unlike Levi, we feel that the very private details of any personal relationship should be held within the sanctity of the family. We will not walk word for word through the inaccuracies in the spotlight of the media or tabloids. Suffice it to say, the interview is quite troubling. Again, it is clear to me that Levi does not have the best interest of the child in mindâonly his own.
Naturally, we individually and collectively did
walk word for word
through Levi Johnston's statements despite pledging not to do so. Sarah kicked off the process by writing us,
I did not, and would never, let two teenagers “live together” . . . and either Levi is lying, Tyra Banks is erroneously teasing her show with that claim, or they got Levi to say that, somehow taking it out of context. Todd and I are sick about that claim. Levi stayed at the house those first nights after Tripp was born, with the purpose of helping the baby and Bristol through the night.
That lasted perhaps a weekâhe did not live with Bristol, we would have never permitted it, and bristol would never have wanted such a thing.
In July Sarah continued to monitor her almost son-in-law. When someone filed an ethics complaint against her, alleging she illegally received payment for granting interviews, we did opposition research on the complainant and managed to tie him back to Levi. Sarah wrote to her ghost biographer Lynn Vincent, copying her inner circle for support:
Lynn . . .
Levi-the-puppet had a press conference yest in his attorney's office, then today one of his attorney's clients (a James Brown impersonator,
I kid you not) filed a charge that I am getting paid for radio and tv interviews. Levi lied in his comments, too, re: a Palin reality show and other things (btw he's trying to go by the name “Ricky Hollywood” now-it's even on his answering machine his friends say)
Lots of craziness lately-straight out of “The Thumpin” [
Chapter Five
in
Going Rogue
] and Saul Aulinsky's “Radical” book (that Michelle Obama recently publicly quoted). Your investigator should be put to work connecting these dots to prove this is a scheme that's orchestrated from afar, and they're successful in some respects re: destroying their opposition.
Sarah was developing her own plan to do something she did quite well: she'd seek to destroy her opposition from afar.
When two days later Levi was interviewed by Ann Curry on NBC's
Today
show, Sarah pledged, from that day forward to boycott all major news outlets except Fox. In finalizing this decision, she wrote:
Sickening, sickening. I watched levi this morning. Journalism ethics are non-existent. They sat there and let the coached puppet spew one lie after another, starting with “when I lived there . . .”
Sarah then continued,
“What good does it do to ignore FOX and keep talking to networks?”
She pledged, from that day forward, to boycott all major news outlets except Fox. In finalizing this decision, she wrote:
Every time we participate with the bad guys we are telling viewers/ readers: “go watch them! Tune in to what they have to say to bash us today!” I can't do that anymore. I am through with the idiots who use and abuse usâwe can NOT win them over, I hate giving them ratings boosts. . . .
Lesson learned. Final one. Networks are not our friends. Talking to them harms my family, admin, record, reputation, Tripp, etc.
No more.
We came to employ a strategy we referred to as “reaching out to surrogates with our talking points.” That surrogate list included
Weekly Standard
editor and Fox News contributor Bill Kristol, GOP advisor Mary Matalin, former special assistant to President Bush Jason Recher, former Bush aide Steve Biegun, GOP executive director Nick Ayers, chairman of the GOP Michael Steele, Rush Limbaugh, and Fox News hosts Glenn Beck, Greta Van Susteren, and Sean Hannity. We could normally expect them to repeat any coordinated message we sent. In a scramble, the mainstream media often picked up on the message in an attempt to catch up on our Fox News scoops.
The strategy of selective media access spread from networks to local media and online reporters. For a time, Anchorage television station KTUU was put in the penalty box for a series of unfavorable comments that began with Chuck Kopp's resignation. Certain reporters at the
Anchorage Daily News
were also excluded from access, while others, who were labeled “friendlies,” could count on the occasional exclusive. At one point, Sarah decided to temporarily withhold all comment to the paper when she disliked a story about her opposition to President Obama's pick of Katherine Sebelius to head the Department of Health and Human Services. She wrote,
“More bullshit headline grabbing unethical journalism at work.”
As for Levi Johnston, despite the valuable media insight she gained from dealing with his treacheryâspeak only to surrogate outletsâhe joined Sarah's two-eyes-for-an-eye list. Furthermore, with Sarah's return to Alaska, this was just the beginning. For all of us, the trials and tribulations were about to become Job-like.
Some enemies faded for a time, never discarded butâwith the list as long as it was becomingâplaced into a kind of cretinous cold storage. Others remained intact, never quite as oppressive as Trooper Wooten, but near enough. The most persistent new thorn was a formerly fervent supporter, Andree McLeod.
McLeodâwho, for the sake of full disclosure, filed a complaint with the Alaska attorney general's office, seeking to derail this bookâ
had tried and failed to secure a position with the state shortly after Sarah's gubernatorial victory. At the time, we attributed her incessant attacks as sour grapes. Sarah wrote of McLeod's efforts:
Created: 5/6/2009 10:59:10 PM
Subject: Re: labor team
[Andree] verbalized to me, many times, the “you can bend the rules” plea, when I would tell her to go through the system to get a job. Bizarre encounters at the capt Cook and other places, following me around.
And the preoccupation with McLeod wasn't a short-lived thing. Two months later, Sarah was increasingly disturbed:
From: gshp
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:22:27
Subject: Andre. Fw: Ethics charges Re: David Horowitz
Krisâpls make Meg take no prisoners on this one . . . Need to publicize Andree . . . begged for job. I know we tried it once, but must prove it this time. What are they going to do, fire me? WAR should give quote, I'll give one too.
Whatever McLeod's gripes, she correctly understood that campaign reformer Sarah Palin had not upheld that promise once in office. McLeod took it upon herself to become a watchdog of an administration run by a woman who said repeatedly, “Hold me accountable.” Arguably going overboardâand I believe she didâMcLeod took on the hold-accountable challenge with massively more energy than Sarah exhibited in managing government.
McLeod filed requestsâtechnically, an Alaska Public Records Request (PRR)âfor documents and emails she felt would show that Ivy Frye and I had illegally campaigned for Sarah on state time. In January 2009 she filed a formal complaint with the state, alleging that persons, including Kris Perry, while working on state time had also
participated in Sarah's vice presidential campaign. She even sent informal complaints about the dress code in state offices after being “astounded at the amount and magnitude of cleavage being exhibited by female employees.”
In what I can describe only as a growing pattern of petty counterattacks, we latched onto this last item in an attempt to bring disgrace to a persistent critic: leaking this story, via our spokesperson, to the
Anchorage Daily News
political gossip column, The Ear. In Sarah's book
Going Rogue
(page 354), she discusses this incident in the broader scale of ethics charges:
We tried to keep a sense of humor about the fact that the media took Andree seriously after Mike Nizich, my chief of staff, received a fresh complaint from her, this time alleging that women in state service wore their clothes too tight. Breasts were apparently spilling from blouses all over the 49th state and Andree demanded I do something about it. After the string of nutty complaints she'd already hit us with, this one just cracked us up. I told Nizich and Kris: “yep, that's my job. I'm the state Cleavage Czar. I'll get right on it.”