Read Choices and Illusions Online
Authors: Eldon Taylor
Compensation
Compensation is a psychological mechanism identified first
by pioneering psychiatrist H. S. Sullivan. When individuals lack
confidence and esteem, they often compensate by extracting their
worth from another. An unconscious nonsense belief seems to
propel them into behavior that ridicules, offends, and hurts others.
Physical violence is just another way of acting out pain or fear—not that it’s really any different in an emotional sense. The abuses they 25
Choices and Illusions Interior.indd 25
6/20/13 3:41 PM
CHOICES AND ILLUSIONS
dish out can be thought of as their own inner insecurities being
compensated for by making someone else feel insecure—as they
do. It’s all a rapid downward spiral that leads to anything but true happiness and success.
like nina, the female eagle in Chapter 1, it is easy to outsmart
those who may offer an alternative to the known or the comfort-
able. Small minds condemn what they do not understand. like
nina, most people do not accept that within themselves is a power
that can change all of those self-limiting, self-destructive beliefs, a power that can indeed result in manifesting a person so self-responsible that he or she walks and lives above the fray—in the
world but not of the world. This is truly your birthright. life is not designed to be only struggle.
Mark Twain tells a story in his work
Letters from the Earth.
In the story, the archangels are deciding where to hide God. It is
suggested that they hide Him on the moon or deep beneath the
surface of the sea, and so forth. Each suggestion, however, eventu-
ally leads the archangels to conclude that humankind is too smart
for that—sooner or later they would find God. So where do they
decide to hide Him? Within every human being—for “the last place
mankind will look is within,” they conclude.
Within every human being exists a propensity for greatness.
The gifts may vary, and the greatness may be manifested in a vast
array of alternatives—say, from carpentry to rocket ships—but the
gift that gives us true self-respect and lifts the spirit from “same old, same old” resides within. These are not just words or some
lofty notion. This potential resides within each one of us—but if
so, then why is it so often denied?
The Four Selves
Every individual essentially has a self-representation that is
rehearsed and eventually actualized. The process begins by fanta-
sizing at a very early age. We fantasize a script, perhaps similar to one of those from some Hollywood production. We begin rehearsing it, and we either abandon it to take up a new one or practice it 26
Choices and Illusions Interior.indd 26
6/20/13 3:41 PM
Creating Self
until we role-play that script as who we are. Practicing the script sooner or later automates the behavior. Our imprinting environment plays a significant role in the alternative scripts available to us. If parents are uncaring and abusive, so are their children, and so forth. If warmth and friendliness lead to embarrassment, then
coldness and aloofness compensate. If honesty gets us into trouble, then deception becomes a defense strategy, and so forth.
It is much more complicated than expressed here, and it is also
just this simple. In fact, every one of us divides the self among four essential views of ourselves:
1. Our actual self
2. Our ideal self
3. Our ought-to-be self
4. Our desired self
These categories were originally developed by Jerome l. Singer,
professor of psychology at Yale University, to show how the differ-
ent selves conflict with each other.4 I will use them differently, as we shall see.
Our actual Self
Most of us are aware of a so-called actual self. This is the self
that has failed in ways we often will not share with others. This
is the private self. This self holds the thoughts we wish we did
not have, the acts we wish we had not done, our beliefs about
our worth, our attractiveness, and so forth. It is the self of our
secrets and our ambitions. It is the self that most people try to
change in some way or another at some time in their life—perhaps
even perpetually.
27
Choices and Illusions Interior.indd 27
6/20/13 3:41 PM
CHOICES AND ILLUSIONS
Our Ideal Self
The actual self pales by comparison to our ideal self. The ideal
self is often a construct built by our culture. This self would live a perfect life without error—but therefore without room for growth.
Our Ought-to-Be Self
Then there is our “ought-to-be self.” This is the self full of
all our learned “shoulds” and “oughts.” This self differs from our
ideal self in the sense that many of the oughts are not ours—they
are the oughts of our culture, our society—but deep down inside
they do not belong to us. Sometimes these oughts are the result of
rules that make little or no sense to us; sometimes the oughts are
of co dependent negotiations such as those implied when Mom said
such things as, “If you loved me, you would not behave that way,”
or “If you loved me, you would do what I said,” and so forth. Still, even when we recognize the source and the nature of the relationship from which the oughts arise, they often persist.
Our Desired Self
Finally, there is the desired self. Somewhere among all of our
other selves is a self that we believe we could be. This is the self we long for, especially when we are young and planning our future. It
is also the source of much discontent in our later life if the desires have not been fulfilled—and they rarely, if ever, are.
Believe the Impossible
The ought-to-be self, desired self, and ideal self share certain
commonalities, but they also differ remarkably. There is psychic
tension among them and in their totality, substantial tension
between them and our so-called actual self.
28
Choices and Illusions Interior.indd 28
6/20/13 3:41 PM
Creating Self
now, there’s one more thing I wish to add before continuing.
What we believe is the actual self is seldom the
true
actual self.
The actual self is the result of self-perception and therefore par-
takes of every believed limitation that accompanies our private
self-perception.
If we think back to nina in the chicken yard, some additional
clarity can be added that translates directly to most human eagle/
chickens. Within each of us is an almost unlimited possibility—the
eagle potential. Within each of us is the sum of all those conflicts, failures, negative message units, and the like—the sum of self-imposed, albeit typically culturally imposed, limitations. Within
each of us exists the need to be accepted and also the fear of loss—
loss of friends, respect, acceptance, love, and so forth. Within all of us is a cry to soar, in the vernacular of the eagle, and at the same time, a fear of leaving the comfort of our little chicken houses.
Within all of us are the secret failures, low or base desires, deeds, and so forth that constitute our perceived actual selves. All of this tension usually holds us almost rigid and stiff, nearly cataleptic, if a change truly threatens any of our four self-images. To add fuel to the fire, change is what most of us truly desire. A true catch-22—
damned if we do and damned if we don’t.
So how do we safely discover, or uncover, our true potential?
What are the limits to our potential—or how high is up?
Innumerable biographies of great people share at least one
common denominator—these individuals believed they could do
something everyone else, or at least nearly everyone, thought was
impossible. These people are the heroes of our world. What made
them so convinced they could succeed, despite the crowds that
argued to the contrary? That’s the next question. If every one of us possessed that conviction and power, would we not all succeed? If
the solution was so obvious as to negate choice—that is, if we saw
so clearly our direction, ambition, goal, and purpose that there
was nothing to choose between—what could stop us from real-
izing that path?
let us now look a little deeper into the nature of mind and
perception, and then perceptual defense mechanisms—indeed,
29
Choices and Illusions Interior.indd 29
6/20/13 3:41 PM
CHOICES AND ILLUSIONS
defense mechanisms in general, but remember and think about
this popular notion:
There are three C’s in life: Choice, Chance, and
Change. You can choose to take a chance and change!
30
Choices and Illusions Interior.indd 30
6/20/13 3:41 PM
whaT we PerCeive
and fail To PerCeive
“The only way to discover the limits of the
possible is to go beyond them, to the impossible.”
— A r t h u r C . C l A r k e
If choice can be an illusion, what other illusions might we live
with? This is such a large subject that we won’t even try to take on the question in a comprehensive way. We will, however, look at it
sufficiently to clarify for our purposes the most relevant illusions.
Our first illusion is due to language. language labels every-
thing, and once that is done, that which is labeled is “diminished,”
in the words of philosopher and theologian Søren Kierkegaard.1
nouns are the names of persons, places, and things, yet many
nouns refer to things that do not exist. For example, take the noun
griffin.
Arguably, a mythical creature matches this word, but no such creature actually exists. Further, some nouns are really about form, not about things themselves. Take the word
chair.
In the Platonic sense,
chair
refers to a form, that of “chairness.” When we attempt to describe a chair, we can be surprised at the definitional ambiguities. not all chairs have arms or four legs, are stationary, or even are meant to be sat upon, yet somehow when we see a chair,
we recognize it as a chair.
31
Choices and Illusions Interior.indd 31
6/20/13 3:41 PM
CHOICES AND ILLUSIONS
Our first illusion is due to language.
Years ago I wrote a piece titled “Sticks and Stones Will Break
My Bones but Words Will Slice and dice Me.” The article laid bare
a penetrating conclusion: words do more damage to most people in
our culture than things do. It’s not the words themselves or even
Webster’s definitions that are damaging or fearsome; rather, the
damage is inflicted by the emotive value attached to the words.
It’s easy to note the fear of many when they hear words of
rejection; words that make fun or are inappropriately critical; words that condemn; and words that negatively label, such as
ugly, stupid, loser,
or
failure
. Words, however, have still other emotional domains that they anchor, or they function like search words in a
web browser. When input, they trigger a host of related sites stored deep in our memory. Indeed, due largely to our educational system
and culture, most words can be said to have values. Think about
it. Even seemingly innocuous descriptors such as color have value
attached. Some colors are preferred over others, some colors are
simply obnoxious, and for some individuals an emotional distur-
bance or trauma can be connected to a particular hue.
Knowing and Learning
Our thinking system is such that we have all been taught rela-
tive values and judgments. They are reflected in our description
of everything we know about ourselves and our surroundings.
For most in our culture, words are generally thought to be capable
of accurately describing at least the world around us, including
ourselves, our feelings, our thoughts, and, of course, our reasons.
Our world is so dependent upon words, semantics, that it’s
hard to imagine thinking without them. Indeed, thinking seems
to presuppose semantic possibilities; after all, how else would we be able to communicate or understand our thinking? Even the images
in our dreams are thought to be better understood when we can
explain them. So dominant is this thinking priority, this semantic
communication necessity, that a failure to be able to communicate
32
Choices and Illusions Interior.indd 32
6/20/13 3:41 PM
What We perceive and Fail to perceive
linguistically an idea, a feeling, an urge, an intuition, an image, or a sense is thought to be the result of either inadequate education
or inadequate basic genetic equipment. After all, where would we
be if we couldn’t ask such meaningful questions as,
What did that
mean to you? How did that make you feel? What do you mean by that?
Can you describe the sense, the feeling, the image—or how do you know
an intuition is valid and not just fanciful thinking?
not only is our world known through semantics—linguistic
communication with self and others—but it is modeled by each of
us in just this same way. To say that knowing the world through
words is quite different from knowing the world through actual
sensing participation is obvious and trite. To say that we know
ourselves—or better still, model ourselves and our behaviors—