"Edward Teller, Father of the Bomb. Innovator. Saviour" (p. 110), but of Sandra herself, the Astronomer Royal, his fellow-scientist and thus, in a double way, heir to his "genuine spirit of scientific enquiry" (p. 105). "I'm my father's daughter" (p. 105), owing to him not only atrocity, but in a more important way, intelligence and distinction. Acknowledging herself as ''a perfect little replica of my father" (p. 111) thus, unexpectedly, normalizes Sandra's previously unique monstrosity: "We are all misbegotten, by one form of monster or another" (p. 111).
|
As she struggles to recuperate her family history in all its horror, Sandra recuperates her own genetic complexity, and her innocence in cooperating with its continuity. Her achievement parallels Orestes' release from the Furies through the divine establishment of the Athenian justice system. In this frivolous novel, however, enfranchisement comes not from submission to a transcendently mandated political order but by the self's pleasure-saturated realization of her own accidental, fortuitous, and therefore innocent identity. This is the way everyone's life is. There's nothing to be angry at, and plenty to laugh about. Sandra may be Byronically "the point where the mad, the bad, and the infamous meet." But that means she is also a nexus of scientific genius, extraordinary sexual energy, and a marked ability at fiction (p. 137). Her new sense of self and the self's history maintain her clear right to continue her own scientific and sexual experimentation, including carrying "this baby" she has conceived with Jack, to "allow it its passage into daylight" (p. 155).
|
Nevertheless, in taking from her own father's and from Jack's potential for paternity as much as she needs and no more, Sandra sublates, she does not replicate, patriarchy and the male voice. Even a reputable patriarchal genetics, for example the Nobel Prize-winner François Jacob's The Logic of Life: A History of Heredity, insists, despite its emphasis on flexibility, that "A genetic code is like a language: even if they are only due to chance, once the relations between 'sign' and 'meaning' are established, they cannot be changed" (p. 316). For Jacob, history moves "In spite of errors, of dead ends, of false starts." But Leader of the Band comes to rejoice in a frivolous history, history that moves accidentally, luckily, because of errors, dead ends, false starts. Running away from a dull marriage, Sandra finds herself for the first time pregnant with a child she wants to have, while at the same time happily able to send her lover back to his dull wife. So much for unchanged and unchanging relations. This is a history that breaks off with a question"Who doesn't, these days?" (p. 155)that is, who doesn't these days worry whether a fetus will turn out he, she, or it? And then, leaving that question open-ended, goes on to append three stories that deconstruct the novel's primary narrative. So much for "established" meaning.
|
|