Authors: Alfred W. Blumrosen
MacLeod, Duncan, 212
Madison, James
acknowledges at Constitutional Convention that two houses of Congress might have different principles of representation, 181–2
concludes that differences between states are based on slavery, not size, 178–82
organizes “Virginia Plan” featuring strong central government, 172
participation in development of three-fifths rule, 172–3
records of the Convention, 178-182, 185-187, 198-202, 229, 233
Maier, Pauline, 139, 195-196
Mansfield, Lord 7-12, 21, 30, 35, 106
cases of runaway slaves prior to
Somerset
, 7–8
decision in
Somerset
case, 11-12, 142
later denial that he freed slaves, 35
reacts to 1774 Declaration of Independence from Parliment, 106
Mason, George, 130-131, 172
proposes Virginia Constitutional provision that all men are born free, 125–6
McCullough, David, 92
McGaughy, J. Kent, 192, 193
McKitrick, Eric, 43
Miller, John C., 122
Monroe, James and the northwest territory, 167-168, 188, 239
Morgan, Edmund, 46
Morris, Gouverneur, 232
vigorous opponent of slavery in Constitutional Convention, 198–9
Natural law, 118, 125-126
John Locke, 118
Nicholas, Robert Carter, 49
opposition to Mason’s “born free” resolution language, 126, 128
Northwest Ordinance, 195, 208-209, 211-224, 225, 227, 234, 235-236, 237, 238-244, 245, 251
draft of July 9, 1787, 203–5
concepts developed during Constitutional Convention in New York, 190–3, 204–5
Oakes, James, 33
Ohio Company, 168, 189, 204, 208, 236
Otis, James, 39, 84
Parliment, British
adopst Declaratory Act of 1766, 19
Galloway plan to include colonies rejected, 114
imposes Stamp Act in 1765, 17–18
repeals Stamp Act, 19
Pendleton, Edmund, 49-50, 129
Pickering, Timothy, 159, 163-164, 183, 184, 211
Pinckney, Charles, 173, 231, 232
Quarles, Benjamin, 286
Rakove, Jack, 94, 99
Randolph, Edmund, 172-173, 186, 227-228
Randolph, Peyton, 49, 87
Reid, John Phillip, 110
Repugnancy clauses in colonial charters, 21, 58, 70
Robinson, Donald, 40, 88, 94
Rush, Dr. Benjamin, 76, 89, 117
Rutledge, John, 81, 102-104, 147-149, 228-229, 230, 236
Sharp, Granville, 5, 7
Shays’s Rebellion, 160, 171-172, 187, 218
Slavery
declared “odious” by Lord Mansfield, See Mansfield distinguished from slave trade, 44, 46–8
former slaves in Union army in Civil War, 251–2
impact on white wages, 26, 158, 160, 183–4, 213, 226–7
lawful in colonies until legislative or judicial change, 163–4
legality confused in England before
Somerset
, 6–8
unlawful in Northwest Ordinance, 207–8
Smith, Melancton, 204
Somerset
decision, 12
in colonial papers, 15-16
colonial slaves’ awareness, 24
impact on the colonies, 27, 48, 142, 151-155
London papers, 12
prohibited under Articles of Confederation, 145–155
see Lord Mansfield
viewed as freeing slaves in England, 12–14
Somerset, James, 1-14
Stamp Act, 17, 30, 48, 50
Stewart, Charles, 1-3, 5-6, 9
Strong, Jonathan, 5
Sutton, Robert, 194
Territorial ordinances, 1784,1785, 160–3, 165–9
Three-fifths formula of representation, 173-174, 188, 213, 225, 227-230
Townshend taxes, 19
Treaty of Paris, 1783, 155, 157–9
Virginia
committees of correspondence, 57, 63, 66, 69
reaction against George Mason’s draft declaration of rights, 126–7 reaction to
Somerset
decision, 33, 35, 37-38
response to Lord Dunmore’s call for slaves to help put down
rebellion, 123–4
slave trade, 46-48, 141
validates Northwest Ordinance, including antislavery clause, 239–40
Virginia Resolution of 1773, 57-58, 64
Washington, George, 115-117, 172, 197
West Indian planters, 9
Whately, Thomas, 52
Wills, Gary, 273
Wages of white workers as affected by slavery, 26, 158, 160, 183–4, 213, 226–7
Wood, Gordon, 192
Courtesy Dickinson College
While slave owners may not have wanted their slaves to hear about the
Somerset
decision, it was impossible for them to keep it secret. Slaves learning of it may have sought to take ships to freedom in England, or their masters might have thought that this is what they would do. In either case, the masters blamed Britain for encouraging slaves to escape as a result of the
Somerset
decision. Slave owner Gabriel Jones thought that Bacchus, who ran away, had been motivated by the
Somerset
decision, as the bottom of his ad makes clear.
John Dickinson, author of the famous “Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania,” was asked to prepare a draft for Articles of Confederation of the colonies. His draft proposed a powerful central government, with states required to follow federal policies. His proposal ran into stiff opposition and was rejected in favor of a much more limited federal authority.
Thomas Burke opposed Dickinson’s proposed strong central government. Burke prevailed; the Articles created a weak government with no taxing power and no chief executive.
Henry Laurens, a leading South Carolina slave holder, stated in 1776 that “I abhor slavery.” He was president of the Continental Congress in 1777, which ensured that slaves could not gain their freedom by being taken into a “free” state, as had Somerset. As a commissioner at the Paris Peace Treaty ending the Revolutionary War, Laurens insisted that Britain return the slaves who had joined the British forces.