Spy: The Inside Story of How the FBI's Robert Hanssen Betrayed America (30 page)

Read Spy: The Inside Story of How the FBI's Robert Hanssen Betrayed America Online

Authors: David Wise

Tags: #Non-Fiction, #History, #Biography

BOOK: Spy: The Inside Story of How the FBI's Robert Hanssen Betrayed America
12.01Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub

Moreover, Hanssen needed money again; at least that was the explanation he offered to government debriefers after his arrest. At the time he resumed spying, he said, he was “running up credit card debt,” had refinanced his house twice, and his mortgage payments had grown so steep that he “was losing money every month and the debt was growing.” He claimed to have set a “financial goal” for himself of obtaining $100,000 from the Russians to pay down his debt.
*
It was time to get into the phone booth, change costume, and—faster than a speeding bullet—become Ramon Garcia.

On July 25, he went into the FBI’s computers, typed in his user ID and password, and accessed the bureau’s secret and highly sensitive case files. Hanssen was now logged into the FBI’s Automated Case Support System (ACS), a collection of computerized databases of investigative files and their indexes. ACS had only existed for two years. Hanssen went immediately to the largest database in the system, known as the Electronic Case File. This is truly the bureau’s inner sanctum, because it contains electronic messages and other documents from current, ongoing FBI investigations and indexes. It amounts to the FBI’s own private Internet.

On this day, Hanssen typed in his own name. He was looking to see whether he was the subject of an FBI investigation. He found nothing. But the following year, on March 20, he went back into the computer and tried to find a reference to himself under
DEAD DROP AND KGB
. Over the next nine months, Hanssen searched eight times for various keywords. Among the different words he searched for were
DEAD DROP AND RUSSIA, 9414 TALISMAN, AND ROBERT P. HANSSEN
.

In April 1999, he was at it again, entering his name and address, and even searching for
WHITECEDAR COURT
, where he had not lived since 1985, the first year he contacted the KGB. In August, he searched for F
OXSTONE
, the park that was the site of dead drop
ELLIS
. He was back into the ACS files nine more times that year, entering keywords that might point to him.

By the fall of 1999, Hanssen, after eight years, was ready to resume his career as a Russian spy. Emboldened at having found nothing worrisome in the FBI computer files, he once more contacted the KGB—which had become the SVR after the fall of the Soviet Union. He proposed an exchange in Foxstone Park in mid-November.

The evidence suggests that Hanssen—except for his failed attempt to recontact the GRU in 1993—had been inactive during the eight years from 1991 to 1999. After his arrest, some intelligence officials speculated that Hanssen might not have been dormant during the entire period. But on October 6, Hanssen received a reply from the SVR which, from its content and almost ecstatic tone, clearly was welcoming him back after a long absence.

“It’s good to know you are here,” the SVR wrote. “Acknowledging your letter to V.K. we express our sincere joy on the occasion of resumption of contact with you.
*
We firmly guarantee you for a necessary financial help. Note, please, that since our last contact a sum set aside for you has risen and presents now about 800.000 dollars. This time you will find in a package 50.000 dollars. Now it is up to you to give a secure explanation of it.”

Further evidence that Hanssen was being embraced after a long absence was provided by the growth of the escrow account and by the next sentence in the SVR’s letter: “As to communication plan, we may have need of some time to work out a secure and reliable one.” Here again, the language indicates that Hanssen had been long out of contact.

The SVR’s message reviewed the signals, the strips of white adhesive tape that they and Hanssen were to use on the post by the park sign. Hanssen’s tape was to be vertical, the SVR’s horizontal, just as before. Then, in case he had become rusty from lack of practice, his handlers added: “After you will clear the drop don’t forget to remove our tape that will mean for us—exchange is over.”

The SVR also proposed a new signal site in one of Washington’s most exclusive residential neighborhoods, an electric utility pole at the intersection of Foxhall Road and Whitehaven Parkway. In the same letter, the Russians also suggested it was time to move on from adhesive tape to thumbtacks, and they went into extraordinary detail about the
size and color, even telling Hanssen what drugstore chain carried the right ones:

At any working day put a white thumb tack (1 cm in diameter, colored sets are sold at CVS) into the Northern side of the pole at the height of about 1.2 yards. The tack must be seen from a car going down Foxhall Road. This will mean for us that we shall retrieve your package from the DD [dead drop] Foxstone Park at the evening of the nex [sic] week’s Tuesday (when it’s getting dark).

In case of a threatening situation of any kind put a yellow tack at the same place. This will mean that we shall refrain from any communication with you until further notice from your side (the white tack).

Apparently, five months went by before Hanssen heard from the Russians again, and judging by the letter he sent on March 14, 2000, he was becoming unglued.

“I have come about as close as I ever want to come to sacrificing myself to help you, and I get silence. I hate silence.… Conclusion: One might propose that I am either insanely brave or quite insane. I’d answer neither. I’d say, insanely loyal. Take your pick. There is insanity in all the answers.

“I have, however, come as close to the edge as I can without being truly insane. My security concerns have proven reality-based. I’d say, pin your hopes on ‘insanely loyal’ and go for it. Only I can lose.”

On the same day, he went back into the FBI computer and searched for the keywords
DEAD DROP AND SVR
. Again, he found nothing. But clearly Hanssen had persuaded himself that time was running out on his career as a spy, as evidenced not only by his desperate words but also by his repeated searches in the FBI computer, which continued throughout the year.

The searches were dangerous, because at any time the computer systems operators might spot his excessive and highly suspicious usage by auditing the retrieval logs. FBI counterintelligence agents do not normally enter their own names and addresses in the ACS. They are expected to be the hunters, not the hunted.

Finally, in his letter to the SVR in March 2000, Hanssen added, dubiously, that he had made his decision to become a spy as a teenager, inspired
by the autobiography of Kim Philby, the Soviet mole inside British intelligence.

I decided on this course when I was 14 years old. I’d read Philby’s book. Now that is insane, eh! My only hesitations were my security concerns under uncertainty. I hate uncertainty. So far I have judged the edge correctly. Give me credit for that.

Set the signal at my site any Tuesday evening. I will read your answer. Please, at least say goodbye. It’s been a long time my dear friends, a long and lonely time.

Ramon Garcia

Were Hanssen not a traitor to his country, the last words of his letter would be poignant. And his claim that Philby’s memoir influenced him to spy was bogus. Philby’s book was not published until 1968, when Hanssen was twenty-four.
*

Half a dozen times during 2000, Hanssen continued to search the FBI database for his name, as well as for
TALISMAN DRIVE
and, several times, the keywords
DEAD DROP
. Once he entered
SVR AND DEAD DROP NOT GRU
. And as he had done before, he searched
DEAD DROP AND RUSSIA
.

On June 8, Hanssen wrote the SVR a long letter in which he said, “Enclosed, once again, is my rudimentary cipher.” Hanssen was probably referring to a system of letter substitution that he had used in some of his messages to Moscow. He apologized for reusing it many times—repetition is a laxity that opens a window for code-breakers—but explained that he did so in case Moscow had lost the key, further evidence that he had been in hibernation for some time.

Hanssen’s dependence on the Russians, his apparent psychological need for their approval, was obvious from his next sentence: “Thank you for your note. It brought me great joy to see the signal at last.”

He went on to say, however, that they required better and faster ways of contacting each other. Hanssen now proposed that the Russians leave the era of tape and thumbtacks behind and switch to a Palm VII organizer. He owned a Palm III, he said, which wasn’t a bad little handheld computer. But “the VII version comes with wireless internet capability built in. It can allow the rapid transmission of encrypted messages, which if used on an infrequent basis, could be quite effective.…
Such a device might even serve for rapid transmittal of substantial material in digital form.”

If Hanssen sounded a little like a Palm Pilot salesman pitching a reluctant customer, it was at least consistent with his geeky, albeit knowledgeable, fascination with computers and the latest technology.

As his letter reflected, the tone of Hanssen’s communications with the Russians had changed after he resumed spying in 1999. He was at once more desperate—“I am either insanely brave or quite insane”—and less deferential.

For example, he not only lectured the Russians about the need for wireless transmissions, he chided the SVR for bugging a State Department conference room without letting him know. If he had been told in time, he said, he could have warned Moscow that the operation had been detected by the FBI.

On December 8, 1999, the bureau’s agents had arrested Stanislav Gusev outside the State Department. Gusev, who was listed as an “attaché” in the Russian embassy, had arrived in March. FBI counterintelligence agents had spotted Gusev hanging around the State Department. He was seen sometimes sitting on a bench, and at other times moving his car around the building, parking at different locations and taking care to feed the meters to avoid a ticket.

The FBI concluded that Gusev was conducting an electronic eavesdropping operation. A tiny battery-powered transmitter had been planted in a conference room on the seventh floor, the inner sanctum of the State Department. The bug was concealed inside a piece of molding about three feet above the floor, the sort of wooden strip that keeps chair backs from scuffing the wall.

The transmitter, the FBI said, had been “professionally introduced,” which meant that the Russian spies had cut away a piece of the molding and then replaced it with an identical matching piece containing the bug. That suggested that the Russians, or a confederate on the inside, had access to the room more than once, to case and photograph it, and probably to take a paint chip so their technicians could match the color of the molding.

Gusev activated the bug by remote control, and it broadcast to a tape recorder in his car. The Russians used low-power batteries to make the bug more difficult to detect, but that also meant that its range was limited, and someone had to be outside the building to turn on the bug and record the signals.

Once the FBI realized what Gusev was up to, the State Department security staff, using sophisticated equipment borrowed from the CIA and other agencies, electronically swept the entire building, until finally, after months of searching, the device was found in the conference room just down the hall from Secretary of State Madeleine Albright’s office. Although the room was assigned to the Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental Scientific Affairs, other officials also used it for meetings, some of them sensitive. As many as one hundred meetings may have been overheard and recorded, officials said.

When the FBI arrested Gusev, he had the remote control on his person. Since he had diplomatic immunity, he was turned over to his embassy but ordered expelled from the country.

The FBI, of course, wanted very much to know how the Russians managed to get the bug inside the building and how long it had been in place, broadcasting secrets. Several batteries were found inside the piece of molding, so the gadget might have been active for as long as four years, according to one intelligence source.

“The Gusev affair didn’t help you any,” Hanssen wrote to the Russians. “If I’d had better communications I could have prevented that.

“I was aware of the fact that microphones had been detected at the State Department. (Such matters are why I need rapid communications. It can save you much grief.) … I had knowledge weeks before of the existence of devices, but not the country placing them.… I only found out the gruesome details too late to warn you through available means including the colored stick-pin call.
*
(Which by the way I doubted would work because of your ominous silence.) Very frustrating.”

He added:

“The U.S. can be errantly likened to a powerfully built but retarded child, potentially dangerous, but young, immature and easily manipulated. But don’t be fooled by that appearance. It is also one which can turn ingenius
[sic]
quickly, like an idiot savant, once convinced of a goal. The purple-pissing Japanese (to quote General Patten [sic] once again) learned this to their dismay.…”

Then, buttering up his handlers, Hanssen said he greatly appreciated the “highly professional” references in their messages to information they had exchanged in the past as a subtle way of reassuring him “that the channel remains unpirated. This is not lost on me.” In other words, the prior references were a way to prove to Hanssen that the FBI was not running a sting against him—a favorite bureau tactic in spy cases—and that the messages he was receiving were really coming from Moscow.

Hanssen’s mood was mercurial, because he switched in an instant from flattery to a Bogartian, tough-guy, don’t-try-to-con-me stance. All that money the Russians said they had put in escrow for him, now $800,000, was a fable.

Other books

The Body Hunters by Sonia Shah
Pediatric Primary Care Case Studies by Catherine E. Burns, Beth Richardson, Beth Richardson, Dns, Rn, Cpnp, Margaret Brady
What's Really Hood!: A Collection of Tales From the Streets by Wahida Clark, Bonta, Victor Martin, Shawn Trump, Lashonda Teague
Paradise Revisited by Norman Filler
Study Partner by Rebecca Leigh
Internal Affair by Samantha Cayto
Promises I Made by Michelle Zink
Fragmented by Fong, George
Clouds In My Coffee by Andrea Smith
Flesh 02 Skin by Kylie Scott