Read SS Brotherhood of the Bell: The Nazis’ Incredible Secret Technology Online
Authors: Joseph P. Farrell
22
Moray B. King,
The Energy Machine of T. Henry Moray: Zero-PointEnergy and Pulsed Plasma Physics,
p. 99. See also p. 103.
23
Ibid., p. 107.
24
King,
The Energy Machine of T. Henry Moray: Zero-Point Energy andPulsed Plasma Physics,
pp. 134-135.
25
Ibid, p. 81.
26
Ibid.
27
Ibid., p. 154.
28
Ibid.
29
And these in turn may have been calculated to be in resonance to the ion acoustic resonance of the mysterious “Xerum 525”.
30
In
Reich of the Black Sun
I originally reported the date of this last book as being 1939. However, after much searching to obtain copies of Dr. Hilgenberg’s papers I finally managed to obtain a copy of this work, which is dated 1959. Close comparison of this work with Krafft’s books, however, demonstrates that the vortex model was fully developed during the war, up to and including its modeling of quantum mechanics and atomic structure.
31
Carl Frederick Krafft,
Ether and Matter
(Richmond, Virginia: The Dietz Printing Company, 1945), p. 26.
32
Ibid., p. 8.
33
Karl Frederick Kraft,
Ether and Matter,
p. 6, citing an unpublished manuscript by Hermann Fricke.
34
Ibid., pp. 8-9.
35
It should be obvious that by positing a
vorticular structure
of the aether underlying matter and energy, these scientists were very far removed from the classic nineteenth century concept of a static, inert, incompressible aether that inspired the Michelson-Morley experiment.
36
Krafft,
Ether and Matter,
p. 26.
37
Ibid., p. 25.
38
Ibid., p. 29.
39
Krafft,
Ether and Matter,
pp. 45-46, emphasis in the original. For further thoughts on the relationship of system memory, topological descent, and the aether, see my
The Giza Death Star Destroyed,
pp. 108-110, 222-245, 272-276.
40
Krafft, op. cit., p. 46, emphasis added.
41
Krafft,
Ether and Matter,
p. 53, emphasis added.
42
Krafft,
Ether and Matter,
pp. 54-55. It will be noted that Krafft’s experimental design partakes of the same conceptual error as that which underwrote the original Michelson-Morley experiment, namely, the configuration of the experiment in neatly rectilinear space, and not a rotating one, as had Georges Sagnac.
43
Witkowski,
The Truth About the Wunderwaffe,
p. 233, emphasis added.
44
Ibid., p. 284, emphasis Witkowski’s.
45
David Hatcher Childress,
Vimana Aircraft of Ancient India and Atlantis
(Kempton, Illinois: Adventures Unlimited Press, 1999), p. 251, emphasis added.
46
Whirlwind: vortex!
47
Bill Clendenon,
Mercury: UFO Messenger of the Gods,
reprinted in David Hatcher Childress,
Atlantis and the Power System of the Gods: Mercury Vortex Generators and the Power System of Atlantis
(Adventures Unlimited Press, 2000), pp. 96-97, italics in the original.
48
Brooks,
Hitler’s Terror Weapons
, p. 137. Brooks remarks on the pervasive Oriental and Hermetic influence on Nazism throughout his work, even providing the following little known information about the interrogation of Rudolf Hess: “Rudolf Hess, interrogated in the Tower of London under the effect of a truth serum, stated that National Socialists valued the occult sciences highly and might even be, under Hitler, the puppets of a clandestine Dicrectorate in the Orient.” (pp. 26-27, citing OSS Interrogation Archive document #12678,
Nazi Occult Organizations
) Brooks also states that Hitler personally received a copy of Bulwer-Lytton’s celebrated novel about the ancient Ayrans and their knowledge of the so-called “Vril” force, which may be seen as analogous to the energy of the aether, or vacuum flux(p. 179),
provided that one understands this aether to be of a vorticular structure, with a definite scalar signature in particular zero-summed cases, and as also being the common substrate not only of energy and matter, but of mind.
(Q.v. my
The Giza Death Star Destroyed: The Ancient War for Future Science,
pp. 222-245, 272-276, and my
Giza Death Star Deployed,
ch. 7, where I also discuss the Egyptian Hermetic basis of this type of physics). Brooks notes Schopenhauer’s Orientalism and Hermeticism, and its influence on Hitler, and its underlying Egyptian basis, and thus “for the second time….we found ourselves confronted by the spectre of Ancient Egypt in connection with National Socialism.” (p. 27). Of course, anyone familiar with the immensely learned work of Revisionist Egyptologist and Hermeticist Rene Schwaller de Lubicz will recall his gravitation during the war towards the Nazis.
49
Consider again the different types of internal stresses represented by the simplistic vorticular structures on page 208.
50
That this has profound applications for weaponization and propulsion should be obvious.
“Gerlach’s New Alchemy:”
The Mysterious Serum 525
“Although the principal compound is almost completely undocumented, the metallic elements involved (in red mercury) loom large in the history of alchemy and the descriptions of it bear an uncanny resemblance to those of the Philosopher’s Stone, right down to its being a form of ‘fixed’, i.e., thermally stable, mercury which can then be ‘projected upon’, i.e., amalgamated with, liquid mercury.”
S.M.Shires
1
A. An Article in the Evening Newspaper
On Friday, July 18, 1924, Nobel laureate physicist, Prof. Dr. Walther Gerlach, published an interesting article in the evening edition of the
Frankfurter Zeitung
newspaper entitled “The Transmutation of Mercury into Gold” (see picture page 274). The article, though brief, opens a Pandora’s box of possibilities and speculations dark with abysmal promise. The editorial introduction begins innocently enough:
To yesterday’s telegraphically transmitted note on “Modern Alchemy”, we present the following report as a welcome supplement and commentary.
And with that short notice, Gerlach’s main text follows in all its significant concision:
In no. 29 of the weekly magazine “Physical Science,” Prof. A. Miethe from the Technical Higher School in Charlottenburg together with Dr. Staumreich
apprises us (of the fact) that it might be possible to induce the disintegration of mercury with relatively simple physical methods
and to clearly identify gold as one of the chemical and physical products of the disintegration. Until now we have known of two types of atomic bonding: spontaneous decay that occurs through no sort of external influence, and that through such external radioactive disintegration process such as was first carried out by the English physicist Rutherford, and as was shortly thereafter repeated in the Vienna Radium Institute by disintegrating lighter atoms (for example, lithium, boron, silicon, aluminum and so on) through bombardment with “rays”. The general possibility of an “alchemy” is no longer in need of proof, since atomic research has demonstrated that all atoms are constructed from very simple building blocks, from hydrogen and helium, the lightest things…; various chemical elements may hereafter be distinguished by the number of components and perhaps through the types of atoms they (most readily) bind to.
The point of origin of Miethe’s (investigation) was the observation that mercury lamps … by means of very powerful and fast bombardment formed a dark incrustation on their interior winding. The research obtained greater amounts of such incrustation in the mercury lamps - it was made certain that such mercury lamps were free of any gold material, in the course of 70 – 200 hours with 70 volts potential and loaded with 400-2000 watts
- yielding a measurable quantity of gold!....The amounts are small, but they are always between 1/10 and 1/100 milligrams, but tangibly weighable and analyzable. …
A larger scientific exploration is to be hoped for, because there is every indication these authors have made a singular and thoroughgoing breakthrough, especially when one considers the astonishingly low
stability of mercury when it is stressed.
2
On first reading, the article appears like so many other popular science articles of that era when nuclear physics was on the verge of the discovery of fission (by Otto Hahn fourteen years later in 1938): full of promise, yet naively unaware of the complexities of quantum mechanics that lurked just around the corner. A modern day physicist would most likely dismiss it as the type of “wishful thinking” that so often accompanies scientific discovery, before the “reality” of subsequent observation sets in.
But there are problems with that viewpoint too, not the least of which is that the article is by Gerlach, and that it
does
occur before the discovery of nuclear fission. Simply put, the transmutation being observed by professors Miethe and Straumreich appears to be induced precisely by “electrolytical” methods, since the “bombardment” being referred to is expressed in conventional terms of “volts” and “watts.” Yet, the context also indicates that radioactive bombardment – most likely by electrically generated x-rays – is also in mind.
Gerlach’s 1924
Frankfurter Zeitung
Newspaper Article on the
Transmutation of Mercury into Gold
And there are other peculiarities about the article not to be missed, and that is the name of the professor supposedly who made the discovery: A. Miethe. Readers familiar with the Nazi Legend of the UFO will recognize the name of Miethe as being one of those allegedly involved with Schriever, Habermol, Epp, Schauberger, and Bellonzo in flying saucer research for the Nazis. Could this be the same Miethe, or even a relation?
And finally, does Gerlach’s call for “a larger effort” to investigate the phenomenon represent the factual basis behind Jan Van Helsing’s allegations that actual work in radical field propulsion craft began in the secret societies that swarmed in 1920s Germany long before the Nazis came to power?
Whatever the answer to these questions may turn out to be, one thing is clear from Gerlach’s article, and that is that he is not thinking in terms of the standard models of transmutation via
neutron
bombardment that would obtain
after
the discovery of nuclear fission simply because those models do not yet exist, yet, he
is
thinking in terms of
some
form of transmutation via radioactive and electromagnetic bombardment, or rather,
stress.
Indeed, for Gerlach, whose 1921 experiment in magnetic resonance and electron spin won him the Nobel prize in physics, these results must have set his own mind buzzing with the possibilities of what spin and resonance, under extreme conditions, might be able to achieve, given enough funding, interest, and research. This, I believe, is what must have actually been in his mind.
These insights make his final two comments darkly revealing.“ A larger scientific exploration is to be hoped for,” Gerlach urges, “because there is every indication these authors have made a singular and thoroughgoing breakthrough, especially when one considers the astonishingly low stability of mercury when it is stressed.” It is the familiar cry of a scientist making a plea for research funding. And given his notoriety and that of the newspaper in which he presents his plea, there can be only one intended target of his remarks: the German government and its many corporate financial backers.
But notice the final remark concerning “
the astonishingly low stability of mercury when it is stressed.”
Gerlach here enunciates in a few words the line of investigation he wishes such research to take: subject a high density, viscuous low stability metal such as mercury to
stress.
And given the context, we know what kind of stress he intends to subject it to:
radioactive and electrical.
Gerlach has deduced the obvious: if such simple means can cause minute amounts of mercury to transmute into gold, then this must mean that these conditions induce a kind of instability in mercury. And with that, a whole new world of possibilities opened up before him, a world he himself calls “alchemical.”