Authors: William Urban
Tags: #History, #Non-Fiction, #Medieval, #Germany, #Baltic States
Acre
Adalbert of Prague
Advocates
Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini
Albert von Buxhoevden
Albert Suerbeer
Albrecht of Hohenzollern-Ansbach
Albrecht von Habsburg
Aldona
Alexander of Moldavia
Alexander IV
Alexander, Bishop
Alexander Nevsky
Alexandra
Algirdas
Alle River
Andreas
Andreas von Felben
Andrew of Hungary
Anna, wife of Vytautas
Anno von Sangerhausen
Archbishop of Gniezno
Archbishop of Hamburg-Bremen
Archbishop of Riga
Architecture
Art
Aurochs
Austria, Austrians
Avignon, Avignon popes
Balkans
Bad Mergentheim
Baptism
Bartia
Bartenste in
Basil of Moscow
Batu
Bavaria, Bavarians
Bela of Hungary
Belgrade
Bernard of Clairvaux
Birutė
Bishop of Cracow
Bishop of Culm
Bishop of Dorpat
Bishop of Ermland
Bishop of Kujavia
Bishop of Oesel-Wiek
Bishop of Olmütz
Bishop of Płock
Bishop of Pomesania
Bishop of Prussia
Bishop of Riga
Bishop of Samland
Bishop of Vilnius
Blue Waters
Blumenau
Bohemia
Bohemian mercenaries
Boleslas III
Boleslas the Pious
Boleslas of Masovia
Boniface VIII
Boyars
Brandenburg
Bremen
Brzesc
Bruno of Querfurt
Bug River
Bulgaria
Burchard von Schwanden
Burgundy
Burzenland
Byzantine empire
Calixtus III
Cannon
Capistrano
Casimir the Great
Casimir IV
Castles
Castellans
Caupo
Celestine III
Charles IV
Charles V
Charles Robert
Chaucer
Chivalry
Christburg
Christiansen, Eric
Christmemel
Christopher von Münchhausen
Churchmen
Cistercians
Clans
Clara of Zać
Clement VII
Coinage
Conrad of Masovia
Conrad of Masovia-Czerski
Conrad of Thuringia
Conrad von Feuchtwangen
Conrad von Jungingen
Conrad von Landsberg
Conrad von Thierberg
Conrad von Thierberg the younger
Conrad von Wallenrode
Conrad Zöllner
Conspiracies
Constantinople
Conversion
Council of Basel
Council of Constance
Council of Pisa
Council of Vienne
Counter-Reformation
Cracow
Crimean Tatars
Crusades
Crusaders
Culm
Cumans
Damietta
Danzig
Daugava River
Daumantas
David of Gardinas
Denmark, Danes
Dietrich von Altenburg
Dietrich von Grüningen
Dietrich von Schönberg
Dietrich von Werthern
Diplomacy
Dirschau
Długosz
Dmitri of Perejslavl
Dobrin
Dobriner Order
Dominicans
Dorpat
Drang nach Osten
Drinking
Düna (see Daugava)
Dünaburg
Dzewa River
East Central Europe
East Prussia
Egypt
Eisenstein, Sergei
Elbing
England
English crusaders
Eric IX
Ermes
Ermland
Estonia
Fellin
Feudal society
First Peace of Thorn
First Prussian Insurrection
Fifth Crusade
Fourth Crusade
Fourth Lateran Council
France
Franciscans
French Crusaders
Friars
Friedrich Barbarossa
Friedrich von Habsburg
Friedrich von Hohenstaufen
Friedrich II 24 – 28
Friedrich III
Friedrich of Saxony
Galicia
Galindia
Gardinas
Gediminid dynasty
Gediminas
Genghis Khan
Georg of Saxony
Gerhard von Mansfeld
German churchmen
German language
German master
German Order
Gniezno
Golden Bull of Rimini
Golden Horde (see Tatars)
Gotland
Gotthard Kettler
Grand Chapter
Grand Commander
Grand Master
Great Poland
Great Prince
Great Schism
Gregory IX
Gregory X
Guerrilla warfare
Guillaume de Machaut
Grunwald; see Tannenberg
Gunzelin of Schwerin
Gunther von Arnstein
Habsburg dynasty
Half-brothers
Hanseatic League
Hartmann von Heldrungen
Heidenreich Vincke von Overberg
Heilsburg
Heinrich VI
Heinrich von Plauen
Heinrich von Plötzke
Heinrich of Bavaria
Heinrich Reuss von Plauen
Heinrich Reffle von Richtenberg
Heinrich von Schwerin
Henry of Derby
Henry of Lancaster
Henry of Livonia
Henryk of Płock
Henryk of Silesia
Heralds
Herkus Monte
Hermann Balk
Hermann von Buxhoevden
Hermann von Salza
Hermann von Thuringia
Hiob, bishop of Pomesania
Historians
Hitler
Hohenstaufen dynasty
Hohenzollern dynasty
Holland, Netherlands
Holstein
Holy Land
Holy War
Holy woods
Holy Roman Emperor
Holy Roman Empire
Honorius III
Hospitaller Order
Humanism
Hundred Years War
Hungary
Hunting
Hussites
Imperialism
Interdict
Italy, Italians
Ivan III
Ivan IV
Ivan of Galschan
Jadwiga
Jagiełło
Jaroslaw
Jerusalem
Jesuits
Jews
Jodokus von Hohenstein,
Jogaila(see Jagiełło)
Johann von Posilge
Johann von Tiefen
John of Bohemia
John XXII
Juliana
Junker class,
Just war
Kalish
Karabutas
Karl Birger
Karl von Trier
Karlstejn
Kaunas
Kęstutis
Khans
Kiev
Königsberg
Konitz
Kremlin
Kriavas
Kujavia
Kurland Bay
Kurland, Kurs
Labiau
Ladislas of Oppeln
Ladilas the Short
Ladislas of Masvoia
Ladoga, Lake
Lady Mary
Latin
Leal
Lekno
Leopold of Austria
Lev of Galicia
Leszek the Black
Liegnitz
Lithuania
Lithuanian nobles
Livonia
Livonian Confederation
Livonian Crusade
Livonian master
Livonian Order
Louis IV
Louis the Great
Louis Jagiellon
Louis of Brandenburg
Louis of Thuringia
Louis von Erlichshausen
Louis von Leibenzelle
Louis von Wittelsbach
Louis de Silves
Lübeck
Ludolf König
Luther, Lutheran
Luther von Braunschweig
Magnates and Palatines
Magnus of Holstein
Mangold von Sternberg
Marburg
Marger
Marienburg
Marienwerder
Marco Polo
Marquard von Salzbach
Marshal
Martin von Golen
Martyrdom
Masovia
Master of the Robes
Matejko, Jan
Matthias Corvinus
Maximilian
Mecklenburg
Meinhard
Meissen
Memel (for Memel River see Nemunas)
Men-at-arms
Mercenaries
Merchants
Mestwin
Mewe
Michael Küchmeister
Military Orders
Militia
Mindaugas
Ministerial es
Missionaries
Mitau
Moldavia
Mongols (see Tatars)
Moravia
Moscow
Music
Napoleon
Narew River
Nationalism
Narva
Nattangia
Navy
Nemunas River
Neumark
Neva River
Nicholas von Jeroschin
Nicholas Traba
Nicholas V
Nicopolis
Nobles
Novgorod
Nuremberg
Nurses
Oleśnicki
Orthodox Christians
Oesel
Ossa River
Osterode
Otto
Ottokar II
Paganism
Papal legate
Paul II
Paul Watt
Paulus Vladimiri
Peasant uprisings
Peasantry
Peipus, Lake
Peter von Dusburg
Peter von Suchenwirt
Peter’s Pence
Philipp de Mézières
Piast dynasty
Piccolomini (Aeneas Silvius, Pius II)
Piracy
Plague
Płock
Plowce
Pogesania
Poland
Polish Church and churchmen
Polish nobles, knights
Polotsk
Pomerania
Pomerellia
Pomesania
Poppo
Pregel River
Priests
Propaganda
Protestants
Prussia
Prussians
Prussian Estates, Prussian nobles
Prussian League
Prussian master
Przemysł
Pskov
Racibor
Ragnit
Racianz
Ransom
Reform movements
Reformation
Renaissance
Reval
Rhinelanders
Riga
Ringailé
Roman Catholic
Royal Prussia
Rudau
Rudolf von Habsburg
Ruprecht
Russia, Rus’
Sallinwerder
Sambor
Samland
Samogitia
Samogitian Crusade
Sandomir
Saracens
Saule
Saxony, Saxons
Scalovia
Schwerin
Schwetz
Scotland, Scots
Scouts
Scumand
Second Peace of Thorn
Second Prussian Insurrection
Secularization
Semgallia
Serbia, Serbs
Serfs, Serfdom
Sieghard von Schwarzburg
Siegfried von Feuchtwangen
Sigismund of Hungary
Sigismund, king of Poland
Sigismund Augustus
Silesia, Silesians
Skirgaila
Slaves
Smolensk
St.Augustine
St.Barbara
St.Dorothea
St.George
St.Wenceslas
Stefan Batory
Stensby
Stuhm
Sudovia
Superstition
Sventopełk
Svidrigailo
Sweden
Swenca
Swordbrothers
Tannenberg
Tapiau
Tatars
Taxes
Templars
Teutonic Order
Theodoric, missionary
Theodoric of Samland
Third Crusade
Third Prussian Insurrection
Thirteen Years War
Thomas, Bishop
Thorn
Thuringia
Tilsit
Timur
Tokhtamysh
Toleration
Tournaments
Trade
Traidenis
Trakai
Transylvania
Treasurer
Tribes
Tribute
Turcopoles
Turks
Ukraine
Ulrich von Jungingen
Urban II
Urban VI
Vassals
Venice
Victimisation
Vienna
Vikings
Vilnius
Virgin Mary
Visegrad
Vistula River
Vogelsang
Volhynia
Volquin
Vorskla River
Vytautas
Vytenis
Waldemar II
Wallachia
Warmia
Weissenstein
Welf
Welun
Wenceslas II
Wenceslas IV
Wendish Crusade
Werner von Orseln
Wesenberg
West Prussia
Westphalia, Westphalians
Wilderness
Wilhelm von Fürstenburg
Wilhelmine Germany
William of Modena
Winrich von Kniprode
Wizna
Wolter von Plettenberg
Women
Zantir
Žygimantas
See Bibliography.
Eric Christensen,
The Northern Crusades
(Penguin, London and New York, 1998). Christensen is not only a solid scholar, but his pithy comments are often very witty as well.
The reasons for this nomenclature are not particularly clear, although it may have something to do with the traditional insular unwillingness of Englishmen to take the time to tell
Deutsch
from Dutch. More likely there was a bit of modern intellectual snobbery involved –
Teutonic
was a more refined word than German, with its implications of fat old men sitting in a dark tavern, smoke spilling out of their long pipes, and tankards of beer on the tables.
Men-at-arms fought in units of ten mounted warriors under the direction of a knight. Since these men traditionally followed a knight’s flag, the unit was called a banner. Sometimes men-at-arms were equipped with heavy armour and rode a trained war-horse, but for scouting duties and raiding lighter equipment was more appropriate (and cheaper). In the Holy Land these men were called Turcopoles, and dressed for the hot climate – with light arms, less armour, and faster horses, like their Arab and Turkish foes. Later the Teutonic Order’s men-at-arms were usually Germans, though, unlike the knights, they could be born in Prussia or Livonia. Advancement of a man-at-arms into the ranks of the knights was extremely rare. They ate and slept in their own barracks, but observed the same daily religious services as knights and priests.
As a symbol of his friendship the emperor issued the Golden Bull of Rimini in 1226, granting the order extensive lands and privileges in Prussia should the Teutonic Knights choose to accept the invitation from Duke Conrad of Masovia to send knights there.
Rus’ is the name Western historians use for medieval Russia, with its centre in Kiev but its authority widely scattered among the descendants of the early grand princes. This usage minimises confusion with the very different Russian state that formed in the sixteenth century, with its centre in Moscow.
By ‘Mongol’ scholars generally mean the empire of the grand khan, with its centre in Mongolia, from which the khanate’s wars against China, Persia and the Near East could be directed most effectively. By ‘Tatar’ we refer to the lesser khans living in the west, from Turkestan to Kazan. By ‘Golden Horde’ we mean the westernmost Tatars, with their centre at Sarai on the lower Volga. Some lived as far west as the Crimea. In practice, these names are used interchangeably.
Nora Berend,
At the Gate of Christendom: Jews, Muslims and ‘Pagans’ in Medieval Hungary, c.1000 – c.1300
(Cambridge University Press, 2001); Norman Davies,
God’s Playground: A History of Poland in two volumes
(Columbia, New York, 1982).
Much scholarly ink has been spilled over the nature of Baltic paganism. Recent opinions range from Marija Gimbutas,
The Balts
(Thames & Hudson, London, 1963) and Algirdas Greimas,
Of Gods and Men: Studies in Lithuanian Mythology
(Indiana University Press, 1992), who see a complete pantheon of gods and spirits, to Endre Bojtár,
Foreword to the Past: A Cultural History of the Baltic People
(Central European University Press, Budapest, 2000), who argues that the deities and most of Baltic folklore are nineteenth-century inventions, similar, perhaps, to currently fashionable neo-paganism and the goddess cult. The oldest descriptions of pagan practices were collected in their original languages by Wilhelm Mannhardt,
Letto-Prussische Götterlehre
(Lettisch-Literärische Gesellschaft, Riga, 1863).
One can hardly take a firm stand on nothing, but nationalists of all types rarely hesitate to put their feet down wherever they believe a solid foundation should exist. And other than the experts in the less well-known languages of the region, past and present, who would know to what degree their accounts are reliable? Abundant records exist for later centuries, when Poles, Germans and papal legates were writing letters, reports and treaties, and chroniclers were composing works of surprising quality. In the nineteenth century well-trained historians began to compose competent histories of this era and to publish edited editions of primary sources. Alas, some political histories were little more than polemics, but in the late twentieth century scholars had begun to overcome some of their most obvious political biases, at least to the extent of recognising alternative interpretations of events.
Modern historians have sought to identify the Teutonic Knights as the spearhead of the medieval
Drang nach Osten
(the German push to the East); with imperial Germany’s expansionist plans; and with Nazism. In the Cold War period a crude hostility to all Slavs was attributed to the entire West. In reality this important medieval migration is better associated with the peaceful settlement of German knights and peasants in eastern lands (as in the legend of the Pied Piper of Hamelin) by invitation. Across Europe landowners and clergymen were opening forests and swamps to farming and herding; Polish peasants and gentry were on the move eastward; and Jews and German artisans and merchants were creating towns.
Conrad created his own military order, the Dobriners, which he hoped to control fully; it was later wiped out fighting in Volhynia. The Templars and Hospitallers accepted estates in Pomerellia and Poland, but their contributions to later military expeditions were too small to be significant.
Native nobles rarely had sufficient income to allow them to function full-time as warriors and administrators. Nor did the Teutonic Order want to disperse its potential incomes by creating a class of secular knights. The masters gave away few fiefs, and most of those were small grants in Culm, given to Polish knights. The masters appointed members of the Teutonic Order to train and lead the native troops. Known as advocates, these lived with their charges, so they were usually fluent in Prussian and understood their customs well.
Mindaugas did promise the Livonian master Samogitia, but he could do this easily, since the Samogitians did not recognise him as their ruler anyway.
The Chronicle of Henry of Livonia
(trans. James A. Brundage, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1961). This lively, intelligent account of the period 1180 – 1227 ranks as one of the better medieval chronicles. Apparently written for the benefit of William of Modena, the papal legate who arrived in Riga in 1225, it is more thorough and more reflective than all but a very few contemporary works.
There were no serfs in Livonia in these early days, though there were a few slaves – prisoners taken in raids upon pagan lands. Serfdom became widespread only in the fifteenth century.
A
hide
was the amount of land needed to support one family. This varied according to locality, from as little as 60 acres to as many as 240; most commonly it was 120 acres.
Chronicle of Novgorod
,
1016 – 1471
(trans. Robert Michell and Nevil Forbes, Camden Society 3rd series XV, London, 1914). This is not the easiest text to read, but it conveys vividly the flavour of the Orthodox faith.
The Livonian Rhymed Chronicle
(trans. Jerry C. Smith and William Urban, new and expanded second edition, Lithuanian Research and Studies Center, Chicago, 2001). A naïve, lively, informative narrative.
Quoted in David Nicolle,
Lake Peipus 1242: The Battle on the Ice
(Osprey, London, 1996).
As it turned out, only World War Two seems to have provided a solution – a very brutal one, involving as it did the forced removal of most of the German-speaking population of East and West Prussia, including most descendants of the original Prussian population.
After World War Two it was renamed Kaliningrad by its Soviet conquerors to honour a Stalinist party hack. Most evidence of the German past that survived the fighting was destroyed, thus eliminating the visual reminders that Emmanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) and Johann Gottfried Herder (1744 – 1803) had lived there, along with the monuments built by the Teutonic Knights and the dukes of Prussia.
Some historians have interpreted this document as a grant of all of Russia and Lithuania. This is unlikely – the Teutonic Order was ambitious, but it was also extremely realistic.
Christoph Maier,
Preaching the Crusade: Mendicant Friars and the Cross in the thirteenth century
(Cambridge University Press, 1994). Since bishops were often unable to support themselves in their Baltic dioceses, they travelled from one German bishopric to another, assisting fellow prelates in special celebrations, collecting pious donations, and preaching the crusade.
An excellent account is S.C. Rowell,
Lithuania Ascending: A Pagan Empire within East-Central Europe
(Cambridge University Press, 1994).
An exception is Harvard scholar Samuel Huntington, whose 1993 article ‘Clash of Civilizations’, in
Foreign Affairs
, has been widely discussed.
Modern men and women are by no means above scheming and backbiting, but few modern states disintegrate when hereditary leaders change their allegiance.
The Hungarians objected to having Sigismund as their ruler, too, but he used his brother’s Czech and German troops to repress the nobles’ repeated uprisings.
In 1429 Vytautas sought to be crowned king of Lithuania, an honour cleverly offered by Sigismund, but his ambition was frustrated by Jagiełło, who arranged for the crown and other regalia to be stolen. The aged Vytautas was riding incredible distances through winter weather to prevent the coronation from being cancelled when his horse slipped and he was fatally injured.
Timur did not follow up his victory. Instead, he turned on the Ottoman Turks, beginning a two-year campaign that culminated in smashing their army at Angora in 1402. This left him master of Central Asia, the Golden Horde, Persia, and parts of India and Asia Minor.
The French supported the Avignon pope, the English and many Germans the Roman pope, and the Council of Pisa provided a third candidate for universal recognition. The situation in Germany became somewhat clearer after the death of Ruprecht of the Rhine. Germans, despairing of King Wenceslas ever amounting to anything, began to discuss whether his brother, Sigismund of Hungary, would be an effective Holy Roman emperor. Sigismund linked his candidacy with efforts to resolve the problems of the Church.
Historians remember Wenceslas mainly for his drunkenness. Britons and Americans remember him for the Christmas carol dating from the marriage of his daughter to King Richard II, ‘Good King Wenceslas’. Czechs remember him for throwing the archbishop of Prague from Charles Bridge to drown.
French and Hungarian crusaders were massacred by the Turks because they had lacked battlefield discipline. It was an experience that made Sigismund of Hungary extremely cautious for the rest of his long career.
On behalf of the Prussian merchants and the Hanseatic League, the Teutonic Knights had destroyed a major pirate base at Visby, then held the island for several years against Danish efforts to retake it.
A fraternal/chivalrous order of knights in Culm. ‘Lizard’ meant dragon.
The Hussites can be considered early Protestants, since they emphasised communion in both kinds (bread and wine for the congregation) and hymns and sermons in the local language. But they were also Czech nationalists who resented the German domination of Bohemia. The Teutonic Knights supplied many knights to Sigismund’s efforts to crush them, but they were almost always beaten badly.
The churchmen, unhappy at papal reluctance to turn the Church into a more representative body, refused to dissolve the council when ordered to go home. Instead, they declared the pope deposed and elected an anti-pope. It took years to restore unity.
Most peasants in Central Europe were poor. There were degrees of poverty, of course, but those reflected more than the condition of servitude. Climate, weather, war, disease, and price fluctuations were important too. Livonia was far to the north, with poor soil and a short growing season. Moreover, the loss of personal freedom was occurring throughout the region at this time – in Poland, Lithuania, and Russia. In contrast, serfdom was disappearing in the West.
Even knights who preferred Roman Catholicism could see that the need for church reform was pressing, and since the Council of Trent had not yet been called there was general despair that the papacy would begin to deal with the Church’s most pressing problems. Worse, no one could see how conservative ecclesiastical reforms in Germany would help Livonia politically.
Almost no knights had ever been recruited in Prussia or Livonia, lest they find ways to foster the interests of their secular relatives. This policy was relaxed in Livonia in the fifteenth century, but even there the few recruits were usually from families recently brought east from Westphalia by relatives who held high office and could promise them swift advancement.
Readers may wish to consult: William Urban, ‘Rethinking the Crusades’,
Perspectives
(the newsletter of the American Historical Association) 36/7, October 1998, pp.25 – 9; and ‘Victims of the Baltic Crusade’,
Journal of Baltic Studies
29/3, Autumn 1998, pp.195 – 212. The latter was awarded the Vitols Prize of the AABS for best article published in the
JBS
that year.