The Beautiful Tree (46 page)

Read The Beautiful Tree Online

Authors: James Tooley

BOOK: The Beautiful Tree
2.45Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
World Education Forum. 2000.
The Dakar Framework for Action, Education for All: Meeting Our Collective Commitments.
Paris: UNESCO.
Zymelman, M., and J. Destefano. 1989. “Primary School Teachers Salaries in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Division Paper no. 45, World Bank, Washington.
Notes
Chapter 2
1
Quotes are, in order, from J. Drèze and A. Sen,
India: Development and Participation
, 2nd ed. (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 286, 172-73, 59, 172, 161, and fn. 72, p. 172.
2
Quotations are, in order, from PROBE Team
Public Report on Basic Education in India
(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 103, 47, 48, 63, and 102.
3
Ibid., p. 64 (emphasis added).
4
Drèze and Sen,
India: Development and Participation
, p. 173.
5
Quotations are, in order, from K. Watkins,
The Oxfam Education Report
(Oxford: Oxfam in Great Britain, 2000), pp. 1, 333, 346, 230, 229, 6, 230, and 106.
6
Data on Hyderabad and Mahbubnagar are from Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, “City Development Strategy,” Conference on City Development Strategies: From Vision to Growth and Poverty Reduction, November 24-26, 2004, Hanoi; and Government of Andhra Pradesh, “Census of India 1991, Series 2, Andhra Pradesh: District Census Handbook Hyderabad,” Government of Andhra Pradesh, 1997. Data on Delhi are from Census of India, “Primary Census Abstract: Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Lakshadweep,” CD-ROM, Office of the Registrar General, New Delhi, 2001.
Chapter 3
1
Data are from LASEEDS, 2004, pp. 29, 5, and 7.
Chapter 4
1
A native or inhabitant of Newcastle upon Tyne, England, or its environs.
2
Data are from Ga District Assembly, “Ghana Poverty Reduction Strategy: Three-Year Medium Term Development Plan 2002-2004,” District Planning Co-Ordinating Unit, Amasaman, Ghana, 2002; and Ga District Assembly, “Poverty Profile, Maps and Pro-Poor Programmes,” Amasaman, Ghana, 2004.
3
For further information on all the research data here and in following chapters, see J. Tooley and P. Dixon, “An Inspector Calls: The Regulation of ‘Budget’ Private Schools in Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India,”
International Journal of Educational Development
25 (2005a): 269-85; J. Tooley and P. Dixon, “Is There a Conflict between Commercial Gain and Concern for the Poor? Evidence from Private Schools for the Poor in India and Nigeria,”
Economic Affairs
25, no. 2 (2005b): 20-27; J. Tooley and P. Dixon,
Private Education Is Good for the Poor: A Study of Private Schools Serving the Poor in Low-Income Countries
(Washington: Cato Institute, 2005c); J. Tooley and P. Dixon, “‘De Facto’ Privatisation of Education and the Poor: Implications of a Study from Sub-Saharan Africa and India,”
Compare
36, no. 4 (2006): 443-62; J. Tooley and P. Dixon, “Private Schooling for Low-Income Families: A Census and Comparative Survey in East Delhi, India,”
International Journal of Educational Development
27, no. 2 (2007): 205-19; J. Tooley, P. Dixon, and I. Amuah, “Private and Public Schooling in Ga, Ghana: A Census and Comparative Survey,”
International Review of Education
53, no. 3-4 (2007): 389-415; J. Tooley, P. Dixon, and S. V. Gomathi, “Private Schools and the Millennium Development Goal of Universal Primary Education: A Census and Comparative Survey in Hyderabad, India,”
Oxford Review of Education
33, no. 5 (2007): 539-60; J. Tooley, P. Dixon, and O. Olaniyan, “Private and Public Schooling in Low-Income Areas of Lagos State, Nigeria: A Census and Comparative Survey,”
International Journal of Educational Research
43, no. 3 (2005): 125-46; J. Tooley, L. Qiang, and P. Dixon, “Private Schools for the Poor in Gansu Province, China” (in Chinese),
Private Education Research
6, no. 2 (2007): 25-28; and J. Tooley, P. Dixon, and J. Stanfield, “The Impact of Free Education in Kenya: A Case Study in Private Schools in Kibera,”
Educational Management, Administration and Leadership
36, no. 4 (2008): 449-69.
Chapter 5
1
Statistics are from Asia Development Bank, “Technical Assistance to the People’s Republic of China for Preparing the Gansu Roads Development Project,” TAR:PRC 33470, 2003, pp. 2-3,
www.adb.org/Documents/TARs/PRC/tar_prc_33470.pdf
; Gansu Statistics Bureau, “The Fifth Gansu Population Census Report” (in Chinese), 2001,
www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/rkpcgb/dfrkpcgb/t20020331_15402.htm
(2001); and National Bureau of Statistics, “Important Data of Population Census of Gansu Province,” 2006,
www.gansu.gov.cn/Upload/ZH/G_ZH_0000000899_22.htm
.
2
For further details of the research method and findings, see James Tooley, Liu Qiang, and Pauline Dixon, “Private Schools for the Poor in Gansu Province, China” (in Chinese),
Private Education Research
6, no. 2 (2007): 25-28.
3
Gansu Statistics Bureau, “Fifth Census Report,” p. 738.
4
Katarina Tomasevski,
Education Denied: Costs and Remedies
(London: Zed Books, 2003).
5
China Education and Research Network, “China Education and Research Network (2005) Outline and Actions of China’s Education Reform and Development in 2005,” 2005.
Chapter 6
1
Peter Jennings,
Primetime,
ABC Television, November 18, 2004.
2
References for this paragraph are G. Brown, “Our Final Goal Must Be to Offer a Global New Deal,”
Guardian
(UK), January 11, 2006; and J. Lauglo, “Basic Education in Areas Targeted for EFA: ASAL Districts and Urban Informal Settlements in Kenya,” World Bank, Washington, 2004.
3
References for the quotations in this paragraph are, in order, J. D. Sachs,
The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time
(London: Penguin Books, 2005); UNDP,
Human Development Report 2003
(New York: UNDP, 2003), p. 115; Oxfam International,
Paying the Price: Why Rich Countries Must Invest Now in a War on Poverty
(Oxford: Oxfam International, 2005), p. 72; Save the Children UK, “Private Sector Involvement in Education,” submission to “The Private Sector as Service Provider and Its Role in Implementing Child Rights,” Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva, 2002, p. 5; Save the Children UK, South and Central Asia, “A Perspective from Nepal and Pakistan,” submission to “The Private Sector as Service Provider and Its Role in Implementing Child Rights,” Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva, 2002, p. 7; World Bank,
World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People
(Washington: World Bank, 2003); and Oxfam International,
Paying the Price
, p. 17.
4
The reference for this section is P. Rose, “Is the Non-State Education Sector Serving the Needs of the Poor? Evidence from East and Southern Africa,” paper prepared for DfID seminar in preparation for
World Development Report 2004
, 2002, pp. 6, 16, and 7 (cited with the author’s permission, [email protected]).
5
The reference for this section is Lauglo, “Basic Education in Areas Targeted for EFA.” For further details on the research method and findings, see J. Tooley, P. Dixon, and J. Stanfield, “The Impact of Free Education in Kenya: A Case Study in Private Schools in Kibera,”
Educational Management, Administration and Leadership,
36, no. 4 (2008): 449-69.
6
References for this paragraph are Save the Children, submission to the
World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People
(Washington: World Bank, 2003), p. 34; and Action Aid, “Response to World Development Report 2004,” submission to the
World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People
(World Bank, Washington, 2003), p. 5.
Chapter 7
1
Sources cited in this section are, in order, UNESCO,
Education for All: The Quality Imperative
, EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005 (Paris: UNESCO, 2004), p. 18; UNDP,
Human Development Report 2003
(New York: UNDP, 2003), p. 112; P. Glewwe, N. Illias, and M. Kremer, “Teaching Incentives,” working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 2004; UNESCO,
Education for All
, pp. 29 and 26; World Bank,
World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People
(Washington: World Bank, 2003), pp. 24, 4, and 112; and G. B. Nambissan, “Educational Deprivation and Primary School Provision: A Study of Providers in the City of Calcutta,” IDS Working Paper no. 187, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, 2003, p. 31.
2
Sources cited in this section are, in order, World Bank,
World Development Report 2004
, p. 25; and Nambissan, “Educational Deprivation and Primary School Provision,” pp. 29 and 35.
3
Sources cited in this section are, in order, World Bank,
World Development Report 2004
, p. 24; Nambissan, “Educational Deprivation and Primary School Provision,” pp. 20 and 21; and DfID, “The Challenge of Universal Primary Education,” London, 2001, p. 23.
4
Sources cited in this section are, in order, World Bank,
World Development Report 2004
, p. 112 (emphasis added); DfID, “The Challenge of Universal Primary Education,” p. 21; and Nambissan, “Educational Deprivation and Primary School Provision,” p. 35.
5
UNDP,
Human Development Report 2003
; Save the Children UK, South and Central Asia, “A Perspective from Nepal and Pakistan,” submission to “The Private Sector as Service Provider and Its Role in Implementing Child Rights,” Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva, 2002, p. 5; and World Bank,
World Development Report 2004
, p. 3.
6
World Bank,
World Development Report 2004
, p. 182; and Action Aid, “Response to World Development Report 2004,” submission to the
World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People
(World Bank, Washington, 2003), p. 1.
7
Sources cited are, in order, Action Aid, “Response to World Development Report 2004,” p. 2; and World Bank,
World Development Report 2004
, pp. 113, 1, 10, 11, and 6.
8
Sources cited in this section are, in order, Save the Children UK, South and Central Asia, “A Perspective from Nepal and Pakistan,” pp. 8, 9, 13, and 9; Nambissan, “Educational Deprivation and Primary School Provision,” p. 52; Commission for Africa, “Our Common Interest: Report of the Commission for Africa,” 2005, p. 179,
www.commissionforafrica.org/english/report/introduction.html
; P. Rose, “Is the Non-State Education Sector Serving the Needs of the Poor? Evidence from East and Southern Africa,” paper prepared for DfID seminar in preparation for
World Development Report 2004
, 2002, pp. 16, 5, 6-7, 6, Box 1, and 6-7 (cited with the author’s permission, [email protected]); M. Adelabu and P. Rose, “Non-State Provision of Basic Education in Nigeria,” in
Nigeria: Study of Non-State Providers of Basic Services
, ed. G. Larbi, M. Adelabu, P. Rose, D. Jawara, O. Nwaorgu, and S. Vyas, commissioned by Policy Division, Department of International Development (DfID), UK, Country Studies, International Development Department, University of Birmingham, 2004, pp. 47, 47-48, 57, 64 (emphasis added), and 49; K. Watkins,
The Oxfam Education Report
(Oxford: Oxfam in Great Britain, 2000), p. 230; and UNDP,
Human Development Report 2003
, p. 115 (emphasis added).
9
See, for example, studies by G. Kingdon (“The Quality and Efficiency of Private and Public Education: A Case Study in Urban India,”
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
58, no. 1 [1996]: 57-81); E. Jimenez, M. E. Lockheed, and N. Wattanawaha (“The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Schools: The Case of Thailand,”
World Bank Economic Review
2, no. 2 [1988]: 139-64); E. Jimenez and others (“School Effects and Costs for Private and Public Schools in the Dominican Republic,”
International Journal of Educational Research
15, no. 5 [1991]: 393-410); and E. Jimenez, M. E. Lockheed, and V. Paqueo (“The Relative Efficiency of Private and Public Schools in Developing Countries,”
World Bank Research Observer
6, no. 2 [1991]: 205-18) that concluded that, in general, private schools outperform public schools for lower unit costs, although studies by S. Bashir (“The Cost Effectiveness of Public and Private Schools: Knowledge Gaps, New Research Methodologies and an Application in India,” in
Marketizing Education and Health in Developing Countries: Miracle of Mirage?
ed. C. Colclough, pp. 124-64 [Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997]) and G. Lassibille and J. Tan (“Are Private Schools More Efficient than Public Schools? Evidence from Tanzania,”
Education Economic
9, no. 2 [2001]: 145-72) came to contrary conclusions.
10
Watkins,
The Oxfam Education Report
, p. 230.
Chapter 8
1
Sources cited in this section are, in order, Save the Children, submission to the
World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People
(Washington: World Bank, 2004), p. 6; Save the Children UK, “Private Sector Involvement in Education,” submission to “The Private Sector as Service Provider and Its Role in Implementing Child Rights,” Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva, 2002, p. 8 (emphasis added); P. Rose, “Is the Non-State Education Sector Serving the Needs of the Poor? Evidence from East and Southern Africa,” paper prepared for DfID seminar in preparation for
World Development Report 2004
, 2002, p. 15 (emphasis added; cited with the author’s permission, [email protected]); UNICEF, submission to “The Private Sector as Service Provider and Its Role in Implementing Child Rights,” Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva, 2002, p. 6; and Save the Children UK, South and Central Asia, “A Perspective from Nepal and Pakistan,” submission to “The Private Sector as Service Provider and Its Role in Implementing Child Rights,” Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva, 2002, p. 9.

Other books

The Union Quilters by Jennifer Chiaverini
Generation A by Douglas Coupland
A Merry Little Christmas by Melanie Schuster
7 Sorrow on Sunday by Ann Purser