The Cleansing Flames (17 page)

‘What do you make of that?’ asked Porfiry as they stepped into the yard. He breathed deeply for a few moments and then lit a cigarette.

Virginsky answered with a question of his own: ‘Did he really not interest you at all?’

‘Oh, perhaps a little. But I did not want to give him the satisfaction of knowing it. There is something rather infantile about his desire to scandalise. He is like a little boy who wishes to be thought very wicked.’

‘So you do not consider him capable of any great crime?’

‘I consider him capable of great idiocy, which may well amount to the same thing. You noticed that he knew our man in the canal?’

‘Can you be sure?’

‘Oh absolutely. He is a bad liar. A simple “no” would have been more persuasive. Instead he had to work himself up over nightmares of the Devil and such like. He as good as confessed.’

‘
You think he killed our man?
’ Virginsky was astonished.

‘I think he may have had something to do with it, yes. As I think that Kozodavlev had something to do with it too.’

‘And what of this manifesto of crimes?’

‘It’s hard to say, without having seen it. But I would not be surprised if it turned out to catalogue every crime he has dreamed of committing but to omit the one crime of which he is actually guilty.’

‘I wonder that you can speak with such confidence on something that is necessarily a matter of conjecture.’

‘There is something cowardly and weak about him, I sensed. And yet also, a vileness that he is fully conscious of himself – and disgusted by. He plays with the idea of confession, as he does with that of wickedness. I would say he is torn by two contradictory impulses. The first, the desire to plumb the depths of his own evil, to commit the worst crime of which he can conceive. The second, the need for redemption, to achieve which he must confess his crimes – his true crimes, I mean. But before he is able to reach that point, his cowardice intervenes and subverts his intention. He has the boldness for wickedness but lacks the courage for salvation. At heart, he is a Christian, I think. And we must not forget that he is a Russian too. Yes. That is all it comes down to in the end. In many ways, he reminded me of myself. All investigation is ultimately self-investigation.’

Virginsky’s mouth gaped, but he was so far from formulating a response that all that came out was a strangulated gasp.

*

When they returned to Stolyarny Lane, Porfiry found Lieutenant Salytov waiting outside his chambers.

‘You wish to see me, Ilya Petrovich?’ Porfiry opened the door to admit them all.

‘I have seen him before,’ declared Salytov, intensely.

Porfiry and Virginsky exchanged a quizzical glance. ‘Seen . . . whom, exactly?’

‘Him.’ Salytov pointed at the waxen face on the poster pinned to the wall.

‘Our drowned rat? Please, tell me more.’

‘Four years ago, I was investigating a revolutionary cell based in a confectioner’s on Nevsky Prospect. Ballet’s, the shop was called.’

‘But there was no revolutionary cell at Ballet’s!’ objected Virginsky, who was for some reason suddenly agitated.

Salytov directed the full force of his loathing towards the junior magistrate. ‘Is it not strange that my investigations were cut short by the bomb blast which accounted for this?’ Salytov swept a hand in front of his own face. It was the gesture of a stage magician, summoning up the disfigurement.

‘But that atrocity had nothing to do with the confectionery shop, as you know,’ insisted Virginsky. ‘You were following a false trail.’

‘This man.’ Salytov’s conjuring hand stabbed towards the poster emphatically. ‘I once saw this man in Ballet’s. He was mixed up in something, I am sure.’

‘
Mixed up in something!
’ mocked Virginsky.

Salytov’s stare snapped onto him once again. ‘My instincts have been proven correct, have they not? He would not have been killed and dumped in the canal if he were not mixed up in something.’

‘If it is the same fellow,’ muttered Virginsky sceptically.

‘Do you know his name?’ asked Porfiry, his tone smoothly appeasing.

Salytov hesitated. His gaze drooped, abashed. ‘No.’

‘But you are sure you saw him in Ballet’s?’

‘Yes. It was clear that he was an associate of the individual I was investigating, the lad Tolya. If you remember, Porfiry Petrovich, he was found with illegal manifestos in his possession.’

Porfiry wrinkled his face as he squeezed out his memory. ‘I do vaguely remember something about it. But I fear that Pavel Pavlovich is right. There was nothing in it. The boy had nothing to do with any revolutionary cell.’

‘That we could discover. At the time.’ Salytov’s doggedness was wearingly impressive.

Porfiry’s expression became momentarily pained. ‘Very well. Look into it. Talk to this Tolya. He may be able to supply a name, at least.’

Salytov clicked his heels and left the room in a series of quasi-military spins and steps.

‘That man . . .’ began Virginsky.

‘. . . is, at the moment, the only chance we have of identifying our corpse,’ completed Porfiry.

‘But do you not see, Porfiry Petrovich? The confectioner’s was an obsession with him. Is there not a danger that the same thing will happen again? Indeed, is it not simply the resurfacing of that old obsession that has prompted him to make this connection? I defy anyone to make a credible identification based on that photograph! Perhaps if it was someone you knew well, a husband, or a brother, or a close friend. But he is talking about a man he saw once in a confectionery shop four years ago. Are you not concerned that you are encouraging him in an unhealthy fixation?’

‘I repeat. At the moment, he is the only chance we have.’

*

Once again, the tallow candle was lit and the tin trunk pulled out from under the bed. Virginsky sat with his copy of ‘God the Nihilist’ in his hands. Its celebration of human reason rang hollow, as did its faith in the ascendancy of the human conscience. It seemed to assume that the two were identical, that if a man acted in accordance with his conscience it went without saying that he would be acting reasonably, and vice versa. But Virginsky had come to realise that they were very much at odds. One could reason out a course of action against which one’s conscience screamed rebellion.

Without knowing that he would do it, he tipped the tin trunk up, emptying the contents onto the floor. He stared sullenly at the unruly sprawl of ideas. Words and names jumped out at him, as if in retaliation for his childish petulance: ‘Saint-Simon’, ‘utopia’, ‘communism’, ‘phalanstery’, ‘freedom’, ‘the woman question’, ‘atheism’, ‘Bakunin’, ‘organisation’, ‘revolutionary’, ‘freedom’, ‘destruction’, ‘nihilist’, ‘Nechaev’. He sensed an escalation of intent, a hardening of resolve, leading right up to the ultimate phrase, the ruthless encapsulation of all the other radical concepts:
the end justifies the means
. It was a supremely reasonable formula.

The stove in his room was a fat white pillar bulging out from the corner. Two black cast iron doors were set into it close to the floor, one for access to the firebox, the other for cleaning beneath the grate. Virginsky knelt down and opened the larger door.

It was almost as if the flames were waiting for him. They lapped out towards his face as he opened the stove, their eagerness spilling out with a hungry crackle.

Generally, he kept the fire low. The stove was efficient. As long as he maintained it, a small flame was enough to keep the chill from his room, even in winter. The days were warmer now, but a night frost could still surprise.

But the fire in his stove was more than the means by which he warmed his room. It was a small, intense fragment of the greater fire. Staring into it, he imagined himself back in the time of that first revolution, when fire had just been discovered, and those who knew how to create and control it had power over their fellows. One could share or withhold. In the same way, one could use it benignly or destructively. Human nature being what it was, the jealous, destructive choice would always prevail. There was something, too, in the nature of fire that demanded this.

Virginsky moved his copy of ‘God the Nihilist’ towards the aperture of the stove and fed the handbill quickly into the consuming flames.

He put the rest of the manifestos back into the trunk and pushed it under his bed. A moment later, he put on his overcoat and went out.

*

Instinct drew Virginsky to the filthiest, darkest drinking dens on and around Haymarket Square. That is not to say that he narrowed his search down to any meaningful degree. It would have been hard to find taverns in the district that did not fit that description.

He bought a five-kopek measure of vodka in each place he visited, which he drank quickly. After six taverns, he gave up all hope of finding the man. Frankly, it was a relief to do so, as he had no clear idea what he would say to him if he did find him. The more the evening wore on, the more likely it was that he would say something inept and revealing, thereby making a fool of himself, and also, possibly, placing himself in danger.

His plan, such as it was, had been flawed from the outset. After all, it was perfectly possible for the man to enter a tavern he had already visited, the moment after he had left it. Their paths need never cross. As an investigative technique – if that was what it was – it was hardly more sophisticated than stumbling around aimlessly.

And so Virginsky gave himself up to drinking and abandoned any pretence of looking for the hatchet-headed man who had given him the manifesto.

Then it came: the hand on the shoulder, the voice in the ear, the plunging vertiginous lurch of fate – or something worse, doom – and he realised that he had never wanted to find this man, who had now found him.

‘My friend, we meet again.’

Virginsky hid his panic with feigned blankness.

The man’s mouth spiked on one side sarcastically; the suddenly familiar expression took Virginsky back to the night of Easter Sunday. ‘You mean to say, you were not looking for me?’

‘I . . .’ But Virginsky was at a loss for a convincing lie.

‘Still and all, you found me.’ The man increased the angle of his sarcasm.

‘Very well,’ said Virginsky. ‘Let’s say I was looking for you. Now I have found you. What next?’

‘Come over and join me. I have a table in the corner. Away from prying ears.’

‘Are you here alone?’

‘Are you here as a magistrate?’

‘You remembered.’

‘It would be hard to forget. I was here with some friends, but . . .’ The man looked around, scanning the scattered drunks, indistinguishable with their expressions of glassy-eyed stupor. ‘They have gone. Come on. I will introduce you to their shadows.’

On the way to the corner, Virginsky almost fell over as his foot caught against some obstacle on the floor. He looked down and in the dim candlelight could just about make out a man sprawled face-down, unconscious.

As he took a seat on a rickety chair, he felt but could not see the layer of grime on the table. ‘To answer your question . . . no. I am not here as a magistrate.’

‘Then what?’

‘I was very interested in the poem you gave me.’

‘Yes. Go on.’

‘And what you said, about hunger . . . the hunger you saw in my eyes. I think it’s true. I do have that hunger.’

‘And what would you do with it?’

‘I wish to serve the cause.’

‘The cause?’ The man’s mocking laughter scythed the air. He became abruptly serious: ‘Do you even know what the cause is?’

‘Revolution.’

‘Just a word. Is it not?’

‘At the moment, perhaps. But it is my earnest desire to turn that word into an act.’

‘So? What do you want from me?’

‘You . . . are close to those directing this great . . . endeavour . . . are you not? I am not wrong in thinking that?’ There was a pleading note to Virginsky’s question.

The man did not immediately reply. Behind the circular lenses of his spectacles, his eyes narrowed in assessment. At last he said, ‘Have you changed your views?’

‘My views?’

‘The last time we met, you said that you could not condone the loss of life.’

‘There are other means of achieving destabilisation, are there not?’

‘What do you have in mind?’

‘The circulation of manifestos, such as that you handed to me. Education, in other words.’

‘That is just the beginning. Words can only convey so much. There is a point at which it is necessary to translate them into deeds.’

‘But must they necessarily be violent deeds?’

‘Not all will be violent. There is a range of action in the revolutionist’s repertoire. Vandalism, sabotage, the desecration of churches. One method that we have used with some success is the introduction of counterfeit banknotes. It all falls under the rubric of propaganda. Even acts of violence. Everything carries a message – the message being that the Tsar is losing his grip on power. But we must use all means. You cannot pick and choose. If you are called upon to act for the cause, you are not at liberty to discriminate on the grounds of squeamishness.’

‘But surely it makes sense to use each according to his abilities, and opportunities.’

The hatchet-headed man considered this, and finally nodded in agreement.

‘I am a magistrate,’ went on Virginsky. ‘I work for the Ministry of Justice. I have access to official documents. Briefings, reports . . . orders.’

The man nodded thoughtfully. ‘Bring us something. Something useful. Then we will see.’

‘What?’

‘I will leave it to your discretion.’

‘How will I get in contact with you again?’

‘You found me now, didn’t you? You will find me again.’

‘But it’s . . . that’s . . .’ Virginsky wanted to give in to the vodka swoon that was making it hard for him to string his words together.

‘What?’

A great effort of concentration led to sudden clarity: ‘Surely we cannot afford to leave it to chance like that?’

‘Don’t worry your head, my magistrate friend. If you can’t find me, I know where to find you.’ Although the man was smiling, it was his usual one-sided leer of sarcasm, which only served to accentuate the hint of a threat in his words.