a's and R
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)
dh
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)
's love-making in terms of the secular poetic conventions, later mystics and religious movements have treated it as a religious, mystical work.
A second factor in the evolution of R
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)
dh
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)
as central religious figure was evidently the teaching of the theologian
Nimb
rka
(14th/15th cent.?). By him K
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00023.jpg)
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00014.jpg)
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00026.jpg)
a is regarded as identical with
Brahman
, and R
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)
dh
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)
as co-natural with him. Similar ideas are expressed by many subsequent theologies.
The poetry about K
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00023.jpg)
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00014.jpg)
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00026.jpg)
a's love for R
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)