nak described the true ud
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)
s
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00013.jpg)
or renunciant in V
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)
r R
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)
mkal
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00013.jpg)
,
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)
di Granth, p. 952.
3
In the
janam-s
kh
s
, ud
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)
s
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00013.jpg)
refers to the travels of Gur
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00005.jpg)
N
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00006.jpg)
nak, perhaps because during these he assumed the appearance of travelling mendicants.
Udayana
(1025–1100 CE)
. A Hindu theologian of the
Ny
ya
-Vai
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00004.jpg)
e
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00014.jpg)
ika tradition who established arguments for the existence of God (
![](/files/02/59/75/f025975/public/00013.jpg)
vara
) by means of the Indian syllogism. The main argument in his
‘Handful of the Flowers of Logic’
(
Ny
yakusum
ñjali
) is a form of the
cosmological argument
that the universe must have a maker as its cause because it has the nature of an effect.