The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (124 page)

Actually, in July 2011 I did make another visit to see a doctor – accompanied with and on behalf of my recently-bereaved 86 year old father who is registered blind and extremely frail.
 
I went along with an open-mind and prepared to be conciliatory and non-confrontational although I had more than an inkling of what to expect.
 
The reason for our visit was that I had been concerned for a long time that the doctor had been prescribing medication on medication to my father until it had reached the point where he was taking multiple doses of sixteen, yes sixteen different medications every day including 3 different anti-depressants, 3 different pain-killers and 2 different cholesterol-lowering drugs!
 
Is it not absolutely staggering, that a supposedly intelligent, highly-skilled medical practitioner could actually believe that this situation could possibly be in anyone’s best health interests?
 

Anyway, I began by asking him the obvious question and that was… “How could the drug companies actually know that taking all these medications in combination would be guaranteed to be safe?
 
Surely it would be impossible for them to clinically trial every combination of all these drugs and in any case these drugs were provided by many different companies?”
 
If I had not been there to hear his answer in person, I would not have believed it possible, although actually thinking about it; maybe I would, knowing what I know now about how these absolute charlatans in suits operate.

He sat in his expensive leather chair in front of us mere mortals, wearing his £1000 suit, his Rolex watch and his £300 shoes and with a smug, supercilious smile on his 30-something year old face actually said, pointing at his computer screen... “We don’t need clinical trials.
 
These days we have a piece of software that tells us whether drug combinations are safe.”
 
Pardon me?
 
To be honest, at this point I was dumb-struck.
 
Did I actually hear him correctly?
 
Does he actually believe or even understand the implications of what he just said or was it simply a fob-off for those imbeciles like me who just don’t have the intellectual capacity to comprehend these things.
 
My somewhat delayed reply was a little abrupt to be honest.
 
I said, “Have you never heard of an acronym from the IT world, garbage in, garbage out?”
 
(Meaning that a computer programme is only as reliable as the data that it has input to it?
 
How can a ‘piece of software’ possibly come to a reliable conclusion unless the data with which it was working was accurate and how could that data possibly be accurate unless clinical trials had been performed in the first place?)
 

I could now see by his face that I had definitely outstayed my welcome in his office.
 
This beautifully coiffured, smartly-dressed, ‘highly-educated’, ‘intelligent’ young professional whom I dare bet has never had a single independent or semi-radical thought in his entire life was actually being questioned by some scruffy, late-middle-aged oik wearing denim jeans, a T shirt and trainers and worse yet was actually disputing ‘facts’ upon which he had based virtually all of his highly lucrative career, if not his whole life.
 
I don’t believe for a minute he had ever questioned this scenario in his own mind and nor was he prepared to start discussing it now with someone with no medical training whatsoever.
 
We were more or less dismissed with a wave of the hand and an instruction to make an appointment on the way out for a formal ‘medication review’.
 
‘Bye then’!

The ‘formal medication review’ which took place the following week and which I also attended, given by another doctor in the same medical practice incidentally, literally consisted of the following exchange (in its entirety):

Doctor to my father:
 
Hello, please sit down.
 
You are here for a medication review I believe?

Me (after a short silence):
 
Yes. (My father did not hear what he had said).

Doctor (briefly perusing his computer screen):
 
Yes, that’s all fine.

Me:
 
Is that it?

Doctor:
 
Yes, goodbye and thank you.

The total elapsed time of the meeting from entering his room to leaving it was approximately 30 seconds.
 
I simply could not be bothered questioning this process as to do so would no doubt have antagonised him and possibly jeopardised his professional relationship with my father, whom I judged that at that time of his life, would not have benefitted from conflict with his doctor.
 
So we shuffled out of his office and back to the extreme drugs regimen to which my father has now been subjected for the last five or so years.
 
In this time, I have watched him change from someone with a sound mental and physical constitution (for his age) into a frail, bewildered, partially blind and deaf, wreck of a man.
 
Although I concede that some of the deterioration in his condition could be put-down to the natural aging process, the extreme changes in him would seem in every way possible to belie that conclusion, definitively.
 
For my own part, I will never, ever allow myself to ingest a pharmaceutical drug of any kind, ever again, whilst still in possession of my full mental faculties.

Please do not misunderstand me.
 
The vast majority of doctors are extremely well-trained, professional, thoroughly competent and knowledgeable in the area of physical, bodily issues such as fractures, sprains and muscular problems, in other words mending physical ‘broken’ bodies.
 
I would not hesitate to return should I find myself in need of a ‘physical’ remedy but the track record of first-world doctors in treating or preventing general bodily ailments and diseases is nothing short of scandalous and a disgrace to a so-called civilised society.

We have become so conditioned and propagandised to regard pharmaceutical solutions to health issues as being the ‘norm’ or the ‘only way’, that we now regard the treatment or prevention of disease through nutrition and balanced vitamin-rich diets as a form of ‘quackery’ or witchcraft.
 
Indeed this is how Big Pharma attempts to portray natural health solutions, putting them on a par psychologically with the mediaeval practices of using leeches and the ‘bleeding’ of patients.

“...doctors and health ‘experts’ have astonishing gaps in knowledge that should be considered basic health information in any first-world nation.
 
Parents, too, lack any real literacy in nutrition and health.
 
That's largely because medical journals, health authorities and the mass media actively misinform them about health and
nutrition
issues, hoping to prevent people from learning how to take care of their own health using simple,
natural
remedies and cures.”
 
Natural News, 2009
 

Pharmaceutical companies are certainly not in business to maintain human health at its optimum levels.
 
They are there to make money for their Elite owners and shareholders and maintain health levels at an appallingly low level in order to further their drug sales agendas.
 
They certainly excel at both of these activities.
 
Big Pharma companies are among the richest if not actually the richest organisations in the world.
 
In recent research conducted to determine the top 100 wealthiest organisations world-wide, 51 were corporations and only 49 were countries, which in itself is truly staggering information.
 
Included in the top 10 were the ‘big 4’ pharmaceutical companies.
 

So, here we have a situation where companies that have more disposable income than most countries and are concerned with profits to the detriment of all else are dictating to the medical profession how to conduct a successful health regime and in the process are making colossal profits based on that philosophy.
 
What is wrong with this picture?

“The medical practice of today is anything but a healing modality.
 
It is geared toward maximum profit generated by those for whom disease is a growth industry.
 
They poison the environment and encourage you to eat bad food, simply because they are invested in your becoming sick.”
 
Les Visible, musician and researcher.

Your body never becomes ill because it lacks artificial, pharmaceutical, allopathic drugs.
 
It becomes ill through lack of proper, correct nutrition or because it has become infected with an outside agent such as a bacteria or a virus, often exacerbated by incorrect nutrition.
 
So why do we rush to dose ourselves with more often than not, harmful chemicals at the first sign of any problems or anything untoward with our bodies?
 
I suggest that it is because both we and our doctors alike are conditioned by ‘the system’ engendered by Big Pharma, so to do.

Sadly, I have to remind you that as I stated in the introduction to this book, that the giant, multi-national pharmaceutical companies have completely infiltrated all of the important healthcare organisations from cancer research charities such as the hugely corrupt American Cancer Society (ACS) to the equally corrupt American Food and Drug Administration (FDA), to the British and American Medical Associations (BMA and AMA) and even medical education establishments across the Western world with the primary intention of deceiving the world about healthcare.
 
Indeed the FDA is provably culpable for allowing highly-profitable yet highly-toxic, substances into the food chain in what can only be described as at best, irresponsible and at worst, criminal activities.

Our healthcare system does not exist to make you well.
 
It exists to profit from your illnesses and keeps you just well enough to stay alive so it can continue to push drugs on you.
 
The last thing the Elite want is a healthy, well-nourished, physically and mentally strong population able to think clearly and look after themselves and their families.
 
What they actually do want is a sickly, malnourished society, totally dependent on them and their poisons and unable to act and think freely for ourselves, so they can exploit our helpless situations to the maximum in the cause of reaping their huge annual profits.
 
Unfortunately, over time, this is exactly what they have managed to achieve.
 
As a main thrust of this policy, they also do not want you to understand nutritive disease prevention as there is little or no profit to be had from prevention, but plenty from ‘cures’.

When I say ‘cures’, please be advised that I use the term very loosely.
 
In actual fact most cures to be derived from pharmaceuticals, only treat the symptoms and not the underlying cause of the problem.
 
For example if you have a severe headache, then Big Pharma says you should take a strong painkiller or their migraine formulas.
 
This may well remove the pain, but this ignores the extremely important fact that pain exists for a reason and that is to let us know that there is something amiss somewhere.
 
Simply eliminating the pain does not make the reason for the pain go away and could actually be dangerous as it removes the ‘alarm call’ that pain is designed to be.
 
To use an analogy, imagine your car engine develops a fault and a red warning light appears on the console.
 
Would you remove or cover-up the small red light-bulb to cure the fault and declare it fixed when the light can no longer be seen or would you use that warning signal to actually check under the bonnet (hood) for the real problem?