The Illicit Happiness of Other People (36 page)

Read The Illicit Happiness of Other People Online

Authors: Manu Joseph

Tags: #Contemporary

BOOK: The Illicit Happiness of Other People
6.66Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub

‘Thoma, when Unni died, where were you?’

‘I was sleeping in my room. I sleep till late morning on holidays because I don’t sleep well most nights.’

‘Did Unni come into your room?’

‘I think so but I am not sure. I think he kissed my forehead, but I am not sure.’

‘You’re not sure?’

‘I am not sure. He always kissed me on my forehead when he saw me sleeping, so he might have done that. All I remember clearly is that I had a dream.’

‘What was your dream?’

‘I dreamt that a woman was running away from a giant sea wave.’

‘Who was the woman?’

‘She did not have a face. Does it make sense?’

‘Yes, that’s not unusual.’

‘But she was screaming as she ran.’

‘You heard her scream?’

‘Yes.’

‘Was it a voice you have heard before?’

‘I don’t know. A scream is a scream.’

THE SILENCE IN SOMEN’S room is deep and ordained, and filled with indecipherable meaning. It feels like marriage. When Somen Pillai finally raises his gaze from the floor, he smiles and rotates the index finger of his right hand as if to stir the air.

‘You may have realized,’ the boy says, ‘as you were recounting
the many bits of information you have so painstakingly gleaned, you may have realized the problem with your story. What you need is a chronology. When you understand the chronology you understand a lot.’

‘That’s true, Somen.’

‘So let me begin at the beginning. Wouldn’t that be nice?’

‘Without a doubt.’

‘In the beginning, Ousep, there was nothing. There were no stars, there was no space, there was no matter, there was no time.’

Ousep rests his chin on his fingers and tries to achieve an impassive face. The boy bursts out laughing. ‘Don’t worry. I am just playing with you.’

‘I must admit, my heart did sink.’

Somen leans back, puts his arms behind his large head and studies his visitor with a relaxed superiority, which is not very different from the arrogance of doctors when they face their patients. It would be useful to puncture his confidence, see him collapse. Something always comes of that, but for the moment, though, the boy looks formidable as he speaks in his slow, scholarly way.

‘What I know about Unni is what he told me and what I observed in the classroom sitting in my corner and later in my home, which he visited very often. As you have so competently gathered from your sources, I came to know him well only when we were seventeen, just months before he died. There are many things he did not tell me. But what I know I will tell you.’

It is disturbing for a father, even if the father is Ousep Chacko, to hear the story of his son’s childhood from a stranger. He can accept the fact that he did not know the life of Unni the adolescent. But Unni the child is a different matter.

Ousep never hugged his son, never carried him on his shoulders, never took him to the circus or did any of the things that fathers do these days. Like the other fathers from a pastoral time and place, from the golden age of men, he had imagined that he had appointed his wife to do all those things. But now, as Somen speaks of Unni’s childhood, Ousep feels a fierce ownership towards his little boy. It offends him that an odd young man in exile in his own room is telling him things about Unni that he did not know. He feels a great desperation inside him to touch his child, hold his little fingers and walk with him, put him on the table and somehow charm out of him the strange world that he claimed he saw in his head.

‘Unni was normal most of the time,’ Somen says. ‘Normal means that the world he saw was identical to what others saw with their senses. Are you offended that I described the meaning of normal to you?’

‘I am not offended.’

‘Normal is a majority state.’

‘That’s a reasonable definition.’

‘Unni was normal most of the time. But he was born with a condition. His earliest memory of the phenomenon was when he was around five. It probably started much earlier but he realized that it was a condition and that it was odd only when he was five. What happened to him was that there were moments when one or more of his senses shut down. For a few minutes or even an hour some days, he would go deaf, or he would go blind, or both. Sometimes he would lose his ability to tell the difference between faces, everyone would look identical to him. On rare occasions he would not feel anything even if he pricked himself with a pin or hurt himself in another way, which he often tried to do to understand what was happening to him.’

‘He was not just imagining all this?’

Somen lets out a gentle infuriating laugh, but he does not react to Ousep’s question. He continues to tell his story as if the question is not important.

Unni is not terrified by what is happening to him. As he is just a child he considers it a game. He imagines there is a person inside him, a friend whom he calls Abu, who is playing with his senses – switching things on, switching things off. Unni would shed Abu around the age of seven.

By the time he is ten, something else begins to happen. The sporadic shutdown of his senses continues, but there are also moments when his senses are enhanced. He claims that he can see the textures on the skin of an ant, see the details of people standing hundreds of metres away, claims that he can hear things others cannot hear. But there is nothing special about Unni’s sense of smell or taste, which are actually a shade below normal. His nose does not easily differentiate between coffee and tea.

The collapse and escalation of the senses visit him for short bursts of time. There are phases when they occur every day, times when they do not appear for days. He tells his mother about what is happening to him but she finds it hard to take him seriously because he tells her about his condition in a happy, excited way and not as a complaint. In time he decides not to tell his mother or anyone else about his condition. He is happy in his weird state, even eagerly waiting for things to happen to him.

Unni goes through an enchanted boyhood, losing his senses sometimes, seeing more than he is meant to at other times. But when he is around fourteen the condition disappears.

‘He became normal. All his senses became consistent. He
waited for weeks, for months, but his condition did not return. But his experience left him with an insight that would never leave him, that the world is a charade created by a combination of senses. His was not a philosophical view. It is important that you understand this, Ousep. As I get deeper into the story of Unni, it is natural that you should form your own explanations in your mind, and many times you will imagine that Unni was pursuing an abstract philosophical line of thought. But the fact is that he was merely converting experience into understanding. As a boy whose reality kept changing depending on what was turned on and turned off inside his brain, he could see more clearly than others that reality is merely the myth of the senses. When you do not experience but accept a phenomenon, it is philosophy, which is a form of religion. But when you experience it, it is different. An experience is a plain fact, experience is truth.’

This boy overrates experience but Ousep is not here to argue. He wants to extract all that he can before his situation changes and he is asked to leave. The boy is not as stable as he had appeared when Ousep entered the room. Somen falls silent often, as if distracted by ghostly strands of thought. At times he studies his own hand or his bare feet and looks very surprised that they exist. But when he speaks he is coherent.

‘That’s why Unni was drawn to cartoons,’ the boy says. ‘He loved their distortion, their caricature of reality. He could not take the world and its preoccupations seriously. If the world is the myth of the senses, there is something pointless about all arts. Whom will you read, what will you write, what music will you listen to, what can move you, what can you adore when nothing is true? But cartoons are different. In a farcical world, farce is the true art.’

Unni at fourteen is slowly consumed by an idea. He begins
to believe that what has happened to him is a glitch in a subterranean process of nature. In his magical moments as a child, when his senses were enhanced, he had seen beyond what a human is supposed to see. He believes that he has either seen far into the past of human evolution or deep into the future. He does not know which. In him are the remains of an extinct species or the portents of what is to come. He is convinced that nature creates a huge quantity of life so that, through trial and error, through the extinction and the evolution of billions of lumps of flesh over a vast period of time, it will finally attain its goal – a particular kind of neurological system.

‘He believed that the aspiration of nature is to achieve a type of brain. And that this ultimate brain is supposed to receive a set of information, which would fulfil the very purpose of nature.’

But, two years later, when Unni is sixteen, he begins to believe that the very opposite is true. That the very purpose of nature, the evolutions it has managed through the vast ages, is to prevent a particular kind of neurological condition. It is as if the system of life is a devious force that does not want any organism to look too deep.

‘Ousep, now you are thinking that your son was probably delusional, that he was making up concepts so that the world appeared more and more extraordinary than it is in reality. But then, the fact is that when you begin to see the world more clearly, what you first contradict are the very ideas that were once dear to you. Isn’t that true, Ousep?’

At some point when Unni is sixteen, a more powerful version of his childhood condition returns. Unni begins to blank out for short periods of time. ‘A few seconds maybe, a minute sometimes, as perceived through the standard measure of time in the material world.’

In these periods, all his senses collapse but he sees flashes in
his mind. It is an extraordinary vision, according to him, but he is unable to describe it. He claims that what he sees is the true nature of reality.

‘In your mind, Ousep, you are trying to imagine what Unni may have seen. You are seeing a colour. You are imagining a giant black night, or you are imagining a spectacular white sky, depending on your personality type. But these are the myths of storytellers. Unni does not see a black vacuum or a giant white sun. I have not seen what he has seen. I am only repeating what he has told me. He has not told me what he saw because what he saw is meant to be beyond the medium of language. He could not even begin to draw it.

‘How convenient, you think. A boy claims to have seen something paranormal, but he is unable to describe it. But is that so hard to accept? You and a dog see a car passing by, Ousep. Now imagine, the dog has to describe the scene to other dogs. It cannot. The dog saw an ordinary sight, even to a dog the moment is simple, but its neurological system has been devised in such a way that it is not meant to convey the thought, it is meant to be trapped in its own communication channels.’

Unni feels trapped in the austerity of human communication, ‘he is trapped in language’. He wonders whether there is a way he can convey what he has seen to others. Convey the message that reality is very different from what people imagine. According to Unni, all of nature is a timeless contest between two forces – absolute reality, which is the true state of all matter, and the ‘syndicate of life’, which does not want its organisms to see the truth.

‘Because, if you see the truth, you will be in a perpetual state of ecstatic trance, you won’t fuck, you won’t sustain life, you won’t be desperate to live inside a carbon body. If you see
reality you will not want to be a part of the syndicate of life. The purpose of the syndicate is to sustain itself, to exist for ever in the minds of its organisms. Therefore, from the beginning of conscience, it has eliminated any neurological network that has the potential to see nature in its true form. It has done this through a process of natural selection, through trial and error, by rewarding species that are delusional and by terminating those that are awakened. What is left of this process is what you see around you – beings that are programmed to survive and multiply but cannot think too deeply, which includes almost all of humanity.’

‘Whose view is all this?’ Ousep asks. ‘Did Unni say this or is it your view?’

‘Both of us had this view, the same view.’

‘A shared view of the world?’

‘Yes,’ Somen says, ‘a shared view.’

‘But who said it first? Who came up with the expression “syndicate of life”? You or Unni?’

‘What is more important is that you understand the rogue brain.’

‘The rogue brain?’

‘Over the ages, the syndicate of life has exterminated all types of brain that have the capacity to see too much. But now and then, by pure chance, nature accidentally creates human brains that can see more than they are meant to. So, the syndicate has inserted some safeguards – one of them is that the brain can perceive a lot more than it can describe to other brains through language and visual arts. That way, even if a rogue brain is accidentally able to grasp the truth, it will not be able to describe it. It would start behaving in a manner that would be considered abnormal or unstable.’

‘This was Unni’s view?’

Somen ignores the question. It is as if he has not heard him, but he looks Ousep in the eye when he speaks.

‘The syndicate also responds to the rogue brain by inflicting a condition that is widely known as depression – the idea is to switch off all the delusions of pleasure and make life itself seem so dull and meaningless that the organism will be influenced to self-terminate. The syndicate tries many other methods of quelling the rebellion of potential rogue brains. In most brains, including conformist brains, the system has seeded the delusions of many philosophies and the delusion of enlightenment. The idea here is to satisfy the curiosity of the brain by providing a false sense of intellectual quest. Through philosophy, God and rationality, the syndicate efficiently ensures that the curiosity of almost every neurological system is satisfied.’

Who is left, then? No one, except Unni and Somen?

Other books

Naked Cruelty by Colleen McCullough
Blood of My Blood by Barry Lyga
MacKenzie's Lady by Dallas Schulze
La Superba by Ilja Leonard Pfeijffer
La Vie en Bleu by Jody Klaire
Life's A Cappella by Yessi Smith
Trouble In Triplicate by Barbara Boswell
Hot & Cold by Susannah McFarlane
Ecstasy by Louis Couperus