NAPA report, ''Relatively youthful upstarts in the Executive Office of the President have stolen some of the glamour from the cabinet secretaries. Such Level II luminaries as the director of OMB wield more power and receive a greater press coverage than the heads of most executive departments" (1986, 265).
|
These luminaries, of course, are the political "amateurs" who run the United States government. As discussed above, the difficulty of recruiting those amateurs is caused by, among other factors, low salary, high stress, little actual power, high visibility, the long-term residual effect of the antigovernment rhetoric of the Carter and Reagan campaigns, the media's coverage of personnel recruiting efforts, private sector reluctance to lend employees to government service, and poor management of new appointees. To counter these trends, the NAPA study recommends:
|
| | 1. Broadening the pool of willing, able, and competent people from which presidential appointees are selected; 2. Managing the recruiting and appointing process by reaching out to those in that pool; 3. Clarifying the rules, especially those concerning conflicts of interest and standards of conduct, that apply to federal officials; and 4. Easing the two-way transition between private and public sector employment, especially for younger and first-time presidential appointees. (Macy et al. 1983, xiii)
|
Ongoing concerns about the quality of political appointments led to NAPA's 1985 study of the presidential appointment system in which it surveyed more than five hundred present and former presidential appointees. Building on its earlier counsel to expand the pool of eligible applicants, NAPA made recommendations designed to improve the ability of the selection system to provide capable political appointees for government leadership. It focused on policy knowledge and administrative experience as the primary criteria for appointees; transition planning that begins shortly after the nominating conventions; streamlining of Senate examinations, FBI investigations, and OPM processes; simplification and liberalization of financial disclosure requirements; and a ban on discussions of private sector employment while in office.
|
To encourage longer tenure, NAPA recommends pay increases, severance pay to ease the transition out of government service, bonuses for those who stay more than three years, promotion within the ranks of appointees, reimbursement for job-related expenses, and support for networking and team-building efforts for appointees' spouses and families, as well as for the appointees themselves.
|
As did other studies, this NAPA report recommended a scaling back
|
|