The Source Field Investigations (34 page)

As bizarre as this must sound, some people appear to have developed technologies that use these principles on a scale much larger than the quantum world. As reported in a 1977 issue of the
Vancouver Sun Times,
Toronto inventor Sid Hurwich apparently discovered a way to change the flow of time in a given “local” area—by a technological process.
⁴
Given the remarkably weird effects that would occur when he used the device, Hurwich realized his invention could have practical value—after a rash of bank robberies in 1969.

Hurwich was friends with the police, and called a group of bank security staff and officers over to his house one night to demonstrate his new invention. The
Sun Times
article quoted the eyewitness testimony of Inspector Bill Bolton.

Imagine the defense implications of a technology like this. The December 1977 article also alleges that earlier that June, Hurwich was given the “Protectors of the State of Israel [award] on behalf of the Zionist Organization of Canada for a secret military device he had given Israel seven years earlier.”
⁶
To me, the most interesting part of the article was this: “Hurwich insists his device is not really an invention. He says he simply ‘took one of the oldest BASIC principles of electricity and put it to a different use.’
⁷
How is it possible that the police couldn’t pull the trigger on their revolvers—or even pick them up off the table? Again, this forces us to think in an entirely new way, which most people would consider to be pure science fiction. As crazy as this may sound, one explanation is that time was flowing so slowly in the world around them that any attempt to move the weapon may have taken place within mere microseconds of normal time. The pressure they put on the gun may have seemed perfectly normal to them, but may not have lasted long enough in conventional time to overcome the normal inertia that would keep the weapon sitting on the table. In their own frame of reference, everything appeared to be normal—but when they checked their watches, they were in for quite a surprise. They may have had to push on the gun for quite some time in order to get it to move at all, since conventional time had hardly changed in what they and their watches measured as twenty-five minutes.

This, of course, naturally offends our rational mind. We automatically take it for granted that linear time is nice and stable. We are conditioned to believe there is no evidence that the rate of time could speed up or slow down. We believe it is a scientific fact that time must move forward at a constant speed. If you still think this is true, then you might want to check out Albert Einstein. According to
Discover
magazine, “The trouble with time started a century ago, when Einstein’s special and general theories of relativity demolished the idea of time as a universal constant.”
⁸

What exactly does this mean? Einstein predicted that when you move through space, you’re not simply moving through something that is empty and has no effect on you. Instead, as you move through space, you move through time as well. Ultimately, that means that time doesn’t just happen on its own, as if by magic. Time is actually being powered by some form of energy, or what’s called a fabric, that exists throughout all of space. The faster we move through space, the faster we move through time. This was actually proven by Hafele and Keating in October 1971. They flew four atomic clocks on commercial jet flights around the world, both east and west, and compared them to clocks at the U.S. Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C. The flying clocks were predicted to lose about 40 nanoseconds going east, and gain 275 nanoseconds going west. And believe it or not, it worked—within about 90 percent of what they expected.
⁹
Further experiments in 1976 proved it worked to within 99 percent of Einstein’s original predictions.
¹⁰

Would we experience any time at all if the earth were not moving? Maybe not. There are a variety of movements all happening at the same time that we have to think about. The earth rotates on its own axis and revolves around the Sun. There are longer-terma cycles in the earth as well, including the 25,920-year precession. The Sun revolves around the center of the galaxy in about 250 million years, and the galaxy is also moving toward the so-called Great Attractor—a giant zone of gravitational pull in the constellation Virgo. All of these movements drive us through what Einstein called “space-time,” and what I prefer to call the Source Field—the basic stuff the Universe is made of. Since we are moving along at a constant speed, more or less, our experience of time remains stable and consistent.

However, Einstein also concluded that once you begin traveling near the speed of light, you are now traveling through time much faster than everyone else back on earth. You could take a simple two-week trip away from the earth and back, at near–light speed, only to find out that five hundred years had gone by on earth while you were gone, let’s say. If you could somehow beam a television signal back to the earth from inside your ship, then as soon as you started traveling near light speed, you would appear completely frozen to everyone who was watching you.

This is not speculation, crackpot science or foolishness—this is a commonly accepted fact within modern physics. Hurwich appears to have discovered a way to accelerate the flow of time like this in a local area. Of course, mainstream science would strongly disagree with these amazing new concepts I’m sharing with you. This started back in 1910, when Einstein rejected the idea that empty space actually had any actual energy in it, which most scientists of his day called “aether.” Einstein’s space-time was more of an abstract mathematical concept at that time; he didn’t expect to see any actual energy appearing in space. This is still what almost all Western scientists believe—namely, that Einstein completely ruled out the idea that there is an aether of energy out there in empty space. A typical attitude is expressed in Robert Youngson’s
Scientific Blunders:
“By 1930, younger physicists would smile in a supercilious fashion at any reference to the aether. All scientists now agree that, in the words of the American homespun philosopher: ‘There ain’t no such critter.’ ”
¹¹

All scientists now agree there is no aether in space? Then apparently Einstein is not a scientist. You see, by 1918, Einstein contradicted his earlier opinion.

In 1920, Einstein said it even more strongly.

What Einstein is saying here is that without some sort of aether in space, there could be no “time intervals” as we now know them. Our clocks would appear to be completely frozen—if their atoms could even hold together at all. Thus, in Einstein’s own words, time is powered by an energy in space. And this energy is not all smooth and even wherever you go—it “varies continuously from point to point.” The more space we move through, the more of this time energy we move through. And depending on how fast we go, the rate of time will speed up or slow down along the way. If we can accelerate the flow of this energy in a given local area, then we may well be able to create effects similar to those allegedly discovered by Sid Hurwich. Unfortunately, no additional information on Hurwich or his discoveries can be found. Most likely, he was either paid very well, ordered to keep his mouth shut, or permanently silenced.

If time is an energy in space that we move through, then how can we be so sure it only travels forward—into what we think of as the future? Einstein assumed that time is one-dimensional, meaning it can only move forward—in a single, straight line. That may have been his single biggest mistake. Is it possible that when the earth returns to the same orbital position it had been in before, relative to the Sun, that it could be returning to an area of time—a structured region within the Source Field—that has similar properties and influences as it had before?

That’s exactly what Professor Shnoll discovered. Graph out any physical, chemical, biological or radioactive reaction and study the fingerprint you get from it. Now come back exactly one rotation of the earth—twenty-four hours—later . . . and your graph will be almost identical to the one you saw twenty-four hours before. Then check again one year later—and a very similar fingerprint again shows up.

This means that the forward-and-backward racing movement of time that Shnoll discovered is not random or haphazard. Though we don’t yet know exactly why the graphs race forward and backward the way they do, we do know that the patterns repeat themselves according to the earth’s basic cycles. In short, every molecule on earth, down at the quantum level, is somehow being directly affected by the earth’s movement through space—in repeating patterns. If this is really true, then we have to rewrite almost every scientific law we now take for granted. We’re already well on our way, thanks to our ancient inheritance—so I say let’s go for it.

Professor Shnoll found these repeating patterns in the following intervals: “at approximately 24 hours, at 27.28 days [the Moon’s orbit around the earth’s relative to the center of the galaxy] . . . and at three time intervals close to a year: 364.4, 365.2 and 366.6 days.”
¹⁴
The earth takes 365.2422 days to revolve around the Sun, and one of Shnoll’s cycles was 365.2 days—so it’s a very, very close fit.

Shnoll obviously didn’t have enough data to witness these cycles unfolding over much longer periods of time—like the 25,920-year precession of the equinoxes. All he did was study the behavior of matter and energy, and found it was doing very strange things—and these patterns repeated in cycles. Further research is necessary to see if the movements of the other planets also create the same effects Shnoll discovered, but it seems very foolish to think it would only work with the earth and the Moon. The flow of time is likely getting pushed and pulled by the movements of the earth, the Moon and the planets in reliable, consistent ways that will repeat, nicely and neatly, from one orbital cycle to the next.

Once we bring in the evidence from chapters 9 and 10, we realize that time may have cyclical effects. Time appears to have structure in it, and that structure in turn influences the biological cycles discovered by Burr and Popp, as well as our conscious minds—as we’re now seeing with the Flynn Effect and human evolution as we head toward the end of the 25,920-year cycle. These time cycles may not be arbitrary—some are directly related to the earth’s movements through space. Now, thanks to the work of Professor Shnoll, we’re seeing that this structure in time is actually affecting the basic behavior of physical matter.

Skeptics might say that Shnoll’s discoveries are just “statistical noise,” and have no real relevance to our large-scale world. Or, they may write it off as some interesting, little-known new effect in quantum physics. Maybe in another twenty-two years, enough scientists will believe Shnoll that his discovery is then taught in schools. Either way, any reputable scientist would expect that if all atoms, molecules and energy waves on earth were speeding up and slowing down, then we would need to see it happening to normal-size objects as well—speeding up or slowing down as they travel through space.

It is common knowledge that satellite probes we’ve sent out into deep space are doing just that—slowing down—even though they’re not supposed to. Gravity should get weaker, not stronger, as we head out of the solar system. In 2001, David Whitehouse of BBC News reported that four different space probes were slowing down, including Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11—which are on opposite ends of the solar system. This also included Galileo as it sped out to Jupiter, and Ulysses as it orbited the Sun. Dr. John Anderson from NASA’s JPL said, “It is almost as if the probes were not behaving according to the known law of gravity. . . . We’ve been working on this problem for several years, and we have accounted for everything we could think of.”
¹⁵

The plot thickened in 2008, when the same NASA scientist added three more space probes to the puzzle—bringing it up to a total of seven. Galileo was again mentioned, but we also learned that the NEAR mission to the asteroid Eros, the Cassini mission to Saturn and the Rosetta mission to rendezvous with a comet all experienced changes in their traveling speed that could not be explained. In this case, as each of them flew past the earth in order to pick up speed for their trips into space, they would either slow down or speed up—depending on the direction they were traveling in. Dr. Anderson, now working as a retiree, said, “I am feeling both humble and perplexed by this. . . . There is something very strange going on with spacecraft motions. We have no convincing explanation for either the Pioneer anomaly or the flyby anomaly.”
¹⁶