Authors: Ross Laidlaw
When he heard the distant, muffled clang of the church's great bronze doors closing, Zeno knew no help was going to come. Alone, in the blackness of the tomb, despite having abandoned hope, the emperor began to scream . . .
Â
*
Serious disfigurement was held to debar accession to the purple. Hence blinding, or amputation of the nose, was sometimes inflicted, as an alternative to execution, on those deemed unacceptable as Eastern Emperor.
Where is God?
John of Antioch (quoting Odovacar's protest as Theoderic prepared to murder him, 15 March 493),
Fragmenta Historicorum Graecorum
, seventh century
âWe who are Rome pledge our lives for her peace, our strength for her own, and our honour for her citizens.' With the other standing senators, dignified in their archaic togas, Magnus Aurelius Cassiodorus chanted the words of the oath â old, old words which had echoed here down the long centuries of the republic, then the empire, and now, even when the empire was no more, in these strange new days of the
Regnum Italiae
under German kings. Barbarians might reign, but without the co-operation of the Senate â that repository of power, expertise and influence â they could not rule.
Recently enough elected to the august assembly to be awed by the atmosphere of Rome's Senate House, Aurelius, young for a senator, resumed his seat. This building was charged with the weight of history: it had witnessed speeches which had changed the course of world events. Here, in Rome's darkest hour, the Senate had resolved to carry on the fight against Hannibal even when the flower of her manhood had perished on the field of Cannae. Here had been voted the funds enabling Rome's legions to build an empire extending from Hispania in the west to Persia in the east, from Caledonia in the north to Aethiopia in the south. In this spot, Christianity had been confirmed as the official creed of Rome. In the days of chaos and uncertainty following the murder of the great Aetius, who had held the crumbling fabric of the West together, the Senate alone had kept the machinery of state functioning. And now, with the fate of Italy being decided by rival barbarians in far-off Ravenna, this same assembly must decide which of the two to support.
The
Caput Senatus
,
*
Flavius Rufius Postumius Festus, venerable consul from imperial times, and fresh from a mission to Constantinople to argue the legitimacy of Theoderic's claim, rose stiffly to address the House. Banging his staff of office on the marble floor to command attention, he announced in a reedy quaver, âThe first and principal motion to put before you, this Nones of Februarius in the year of the consuls Eusebius and Albinus, and from the Founding of the City the twelve hundred and forty-sixth,
â
concerns the future rule of Italy. Its substance is known to you all: whose cause shall we decide to champion, Theoderic's or Odovacar's? Theoderic arrived in Italy with Zeno's backing, but Zeno's successor, Anastasius, perhaps because he was preoccupied with insurgency in Isauria, declined to commit himself when I pressed him for his views. Gentlemen, the floor is yours.'
First to speak was Anicius Acilius Aginantius Faustus
albus
, consul ten years previously, and a member of the powerful family of the Anicii. He, like Festus, had recently returned from a mission to the Eastern capital, ostensibly on behalf of Odovacar. A swarthy individual despite his cognomen, he looked round the packed marble benches with an ingratiating smirk. âThe choice is obvious,' he drawled, with the easy confidence bestowed by generations of wealth and privilege. âWe back the winner.'
âDo, pray, enlighten us,' sneered an elderly senator. âClearly you must have contact with the Sibyl â unlike the rest of us benighted souls.'
âDo I really have to spell it out?' sighed Faustus, raising his hands in a calculated gesture of exasperation. âIt's Theoderic, of course. Anyone with a smidgen of perception can see that. You've only to look at the man's record. Through a mixture of persistence, leadership and sheer guts, he's managed to unite all the Goths in the Eastern Empire, transforming them from a collection of squabbling marauders to the most powerful nation in Europe. As the hereditary monarch of an ancient royal house â one, moreover, with the backing of the late Eastern Emperor â Theoderic has the sort of influence and personality that attend success. What does Odovacar amount to? An adventurer from a minor tribe whose rise owes more to luck them ability, elected king
by a rabble of rebellious soldiery, whose allegiance is precarious at best. His rule was never recognized officially by Zeno, just not contested, as being the least bad option. Then there's the question of age. Odovacar's a worn-out old man in his sixties; not yet forty, Theoderic's in his prime. If you've any sense, like me you'll vote for Theoderic.'
A ground-swell of approving murmurs â loudest from the Anicii and another leading family, the Decii (normally their rivals, but in this instance allies) â arose from all across the benches, drawing angry protests from those supporting Odovacar.
A tall senator with patrician features rose to his feet and pointed an accusing finger at the Anician. This was Quintus Aurelius Memmius Symmachus, Roman patriot, one-time consul and City Prefect, from the most illustrious family of Rome, whose great-grandfather had in this very Senate House led the campaign against the removal of the (pagan) Altar of Victory by Bishop Ambrose of Milan and his Christian zealots. That fight might have been lost, but the honour of the family had gained immeasurably, the name of Symmachus coming to stand for freedom of speech and thought, against bigotry and intolerance.
âShame on you, Faustus!' declared Symmachus. âYou went to Constantinople to plead Odovacar's cause. Now you stab him in the back and tell us we should do the same.'
Faustus smiled, and shrugged. âPolitical necessity,' he murmured.
âCynical expediency, more like!' shouted Symmachus. His gaze swept round the assembly, now tense and expectant. âHas it come to this: that we, the Senate, the very voice of Rome, stand for nothing more than cowardly self-interest? There was a time when senators were not afraid to speak out for what was right. Odovacar has proved himself a good and just ruler â a great deal better than many of our emperors. He rewarded his soldiers, which he was compelled to do, with public land as far as possible, keeping confiscation from Romans to a minimum, something for which we should be eternally grateful. We owe him loyalty, not betrayal.'
âHear, hear!' This from Marius Manlius Boethius,
*
another former consul from a rich and famous family, who had risen from a sick-bed to attend the meeting.
Speaker after speaker rose to express their views, most siding (some shamefacedly) with Faustus. When the vote was taken, it was overwhelmingly in favour of Theoderic. The names of those who, like Boethius and Symmachus, supported Odovacar were noted, as were those abstaining. Among the latter was Cassiodorus, who was genuinely confused. Instinctively, he sympathized with Symmachus' stance defending Odovacar, yet he was reluctant to believe that so many of Rome's great and good could be wrong.
Exactly a month later, the Porta Aurea, Ravenna's main gate, opened to admit Theoderic. Bishop John, his features gaunt with hunger from the long siege, came forward, smiling and uttering assurances that Odovacar now wished only to be friends with the Amal king and hoped that, from this moment on, they could rule jointly in amicable concord. Kissing the bishop's hand, Theoderic gladly concurred, telling himself that this was perhaps the best possible outcome of the bitter four-year struggle.
It had been a hard war, Theoderic reflected as, accompanied by the captains of his host together with the bishop's train, he made his way to the Imperial Palace, where Odovacar had his headquarters. In his mind he reviewed the sequence of events: a series of bloody clashes in the Padus
*
flood-plain, with fortunes swinging like a wild pendulum between the opposing sides. Gradually, however, the initiative had passed to Theoderic, with Odovacar pinned down in Ravenna â thought to be impregnable behind its screen of marshes and lagoons. But by capturing the port of Ariminum,
â
thus preventing supplies getting through to the besieged capital, Theoderic was able to tighten the blockade dramatically. With famine imminent, Bishop John at last came forth to make terms on behalf of Odovacar.
In the course of the campaign, one unfortunate incident had occurred which was to cast a cloud over Theoderic's mood for many months to come. Frederick, the young Rugian prince, had proved unable to control his followers. They had gone on the rampage, mistreating the local Roman population. On hearing about this, Theoderic had taken it upon
himself to discipline the offenders and take Frederick to task, probably, in hindsight, speaking more harshly than intended. Angry and humiliated, the young man had stormed off and switched allegiance to Odovacar, only to be killed in a subsequent engagement. Theoderic, who had felt a strong affection for the young prince, regarding him almost as a son, took the news badly â both hurt by his betrayal and deeply saddened by his loss.
Meeting the Scirian king, Theoderic was put in mind of a sick old lion. Thin and hollow-eyed from the privations of the siege, the grizzled monarch greeted the Amal courteously, and with as much warmth as the situation allowed. Theoderic liked him immediately, this impression being confirmed when, on further acquaintance, he found him to be frank, down-to-earth, and not without a sense of humour. They discovered, to their mutual surprise, that they had more in common than dividing them. Apart from being fellow Germans, though from different tribes, both had fought for Rome, been commended by the venerable Severinus, and, at different times, received the backing of the Eastern Emperor.
Here was a man he could work with, Theoderic decided, finding Odovacar's suggestion of co-rule increasingly attractive. Together, they would govern Italy efficiently and well. With supplies now flowing into the city, he planned a feast to set the seal on their burgeoning friendship. For too long Germans had allowed Romans to divide and manipulate them. It was now obvious that, in sending him against Odovacar, Zeno had hoped they would wipe each other out, thus clearing the way for Roman re-occupation. That Anastasius had so far failed to renew Zeno's mandate reinforced this conclusion. Well, this time things would be reversed. Instead of destroying each other as Rome hoped, the two German peoples would show the Romans that together they could rule in peace and concord. It would be sweet revenge for the slights and rejection that, as a despised barbarian, he had suffered at the hands of Romans from his schooldays on.
âIt won't work, Deric.' Timothy and Theoderic were seated in the latter's spacious quarters assigned to him by Odovacar, in the Imperial Palace.
âI don't see why it shouldn't,' objected Theoderic, realizing that he sounded angry and defensive. âOdovacar's a good man. We like and respect each other, as well as seeing eye to eye about many things.'
âI daresay, but that's irrelevant. I don't doubt you could be bosom friends with Odovacar, but as for ruling with him . . .' Timothy shook his head emphatically. âIn any group there can only be one boss. It's a basic law of nature. You'll never find a wolf pack with two leaders, or a herd with two herd bulls. Your mandate from Zeno said nothing about power-sharing, and it's doubtful if Anastasius would take a different line. I'll tell you a story from my own past; you're the first to hear it. And since you're offering, yes, I will have some of that local vinegar they call wine.'
The two men sipped in silence for a time, then Timothy resumed.
âAs you know, I grew up as a street kid in Tarsus. My grandfather was head of the family, and he ran the family business with a rod of iron. I guess some would call that business extortion â âprotection' for a fee, although my grandfather did make sure that no outsider ever fleeced his clients. He died handing over to his sons, my father and my uncle. My father, as the elder, was supposed to be the boss. Although a crook, he was at heart a decent man, and bent over backwards to involve my uncle in decision-making and the running of the business.
âBut, as well as being lazy and incompetent, my uncle was jealous. One day he picked a quarrel with my father. Tempers flared, then my uncle drew a knife and stabbed him to death. It was judged a fair fight by the neighbourhood, who made sure no word leaked out to the authorities; in the Tarsus back streets, society makes its own rules. But
I
knew it was murder, callous and deliberate: my father would never have pulled a knife on his brother.
âMy uncle continued to run things â badly â on his own, while I bided my time. He never suspected that the quiet lad who went round collecting the subscriptions was secretly planning revenge. Then one dark night, my uncle had, let's say, an “accident”. They fished his body out of the Cydnus two days later â the victim of a desperate client fallen behind with his dues, so everyone said.
âNot wishing to be the focus of a family vendetta if anyone became suspicious, I left home to set up my own concern, an import/export business. At sixteen, I was running an empire: handling all the portering
of goods coming into and out of Tarsus, the chief emporium for traffic between Syria and Anatolia. I was the boss, and I made sure everyone knew it. No one got a job as a porter or a middleman without my sayso, plus the down-payment of a “registration fee”, as it was known. Anyone trying to muscle in got warned off. Broken fingers for a first offence, smashed kneecaps for a second. That normally worked, but if it didn't . . . Well, we won't go into that.'
Timothy held out his cup and, when Theoderic had refilled it, continued, âYou see, I'd learnt my lesson. I'd seen what happened to my father. From the best of motives, he'd tried to share the running of the business, and ended up dead.' He gave the king an earnest look. âListen to old Timothy; and don't make the same mistake.'