UFOs in Reality (44 page)

App. Sht 6

App. Sht 7

App. 6.3 Consideration of Significant Results.

Referring first to
App. Sht 1:

The first case considered is the Adamski report of 20th November, 1952. As can be seen from the numerical and diagrammatic presentations, both of the signalled sunrise and 21:30 hr R.A. track orientations were very closely marked on that day. In view of Adamski’s claim that his ‘visitor’ had come from Venus, it seems to be very remarkable that the sunrise track orientation was indeed marked by
Venus, in close conjunction with the Moon.
It is also worthy of note that
Comet Gale
was in close opposition in the same alignment. (The expected ‘stargate’ association of the sunrise and 11:00 hr R.A. orientations also becomes very evident.) The 21:30 hr R.A. track orientation was very well marked by
Jupiter
.

The times associated with the two identified orientations suggest an arrival which referenced Venus and a departure referencing Jupiter. As will be seen, this is one of the best results obtained, overall, and seems to provide appreciable validation of the reported event.

The Burnaston (UK) event of 13th May, 1954 is considered next. It involved the reported abduction of a retired naval commander and occurred during an interesting ‘stargate’ date period, when Sunset and 11:00 hr R.A tracks coincided. Uranus provided an excellent marker for that common orientation, as shown.

Next case considered on App. Sht. 1 is the famous Barney and Betty Hill encounter of 19th September, 1961. The minor planet
Juno
, in opposition to the
Sun
, provided a

good marker for a sunset orientated approach track, whilst
Neptune
provided an acceptable marker for a 21:30 hr R.A. orientated departure track.

The departure time for the craft seen at Socorro on 24th April, 1964, had signalled that an 11:00 hr R.A. track had been adopted. A near conjunction of
Venus
and
Comet Gale
and the near opposition of minor planet
Ceres
could have provided the markers referenced for a departure from Earth on that occasion.

Referring
App. Sht 2

The British high-profile case of 14th November, 1976, involved a car-stop and an alleged CE3 experience for the two occupants. This was another ‘stargate’ date, but the timing given did not indicate links with the characteristic sunrise and 11:00 hr R.A. tracks. Instead, a sunset arrival track had been indicated (with possible departure with a 21:30hr R.A. orientation.) It can be seen that
Pluto
and
Juno
were closest to such a required alignment for the sunset orientation and
Juno
in near conjunction with
Uranus
might have provided provisional 21:30 hr R.A. markers. Meanwhile, elsewhere in the sky, Venus and Comet Machholz provided better markers for the 11:00 hr R.A. /sunrise orientation, which was not signalled. This suggests that
perhaps the actual timings given for an encounter do not necessarily mark the true beginning and true end of surface exploration activity.

(Further indications of that kind are observed on
App. Sht 3
, the Hinwil, Switzerland, event, when Mars was in excellent alignment with the un-signalled 11:00 hr R.A. orientation; on
App. Sht 6
, Armadale, Lothian, when Uranus was similarly aligned; and on
App. Sht 7
, Kennoway, Fife, when Jupiter, Gale and Grigg-Skjellerup were also all closely linked with that 11:00 hr R.A. line.)

Referring
App. Sht 4

Another high profile British case producing excellent alignments with the signalled orientations is that of 19th August, 1979, at East Didsbury. This was a CE4 involving a woman and her two children, and both the arrival and the departure of the craft were witnessed. The timings given were in perfect agreement with those predicted. The arrival and departure seemed to be sunset and 21:30 hr R.A. orientated, respectively. The sunset orientation is seen to have been closely marked by
Saturn
with
Comet Encke
in close opposition. The other (star-linked) orientation was closely marked by
Uranus
, with
Vesta
and
Grigg-Skjellerup
placed in approximate opposition positions.

Mars
and
Comet Halley
seem to have provided the markers for the Todmorden, Yorkshire, CE4 event, which involved a police patrolman in an immobilised patrol car.

Referring
App. Sht 5

The alignments obtained for the Atcham, Shropshire, CE4 of 16th July, 1981 are also worthy of note. This was another car-stop event and involved three young women. The estimated times for the happening correlated well with predictions, but as three orientations could have produced those timings, identification of the most likely two was only resolved after numerical processing and by selecting the closest predictions (in minutes) to the times given. This left 21:30 hr R.A. as the arrival orientation (with the sunset orientation discarded) and a sunrise-orientated signalled departure.

Neptune
and
Machholz
were in conjunction and displaced by about ½ hr R.A. from the nominal 53º sunrise orientation, as shown, and they were in close opposition to
Grigg-Skjellerup
.
Uranus
was about 0.8 hr R.A. displaced from 21:30 hr R.A. orientation. This is, therefore, a case which challenges a few assumption – for example, the presumptions made about 53º inclined tracks being always used to define the orientation adopted.

Another puzzle is presented by the Leigh, Lancashire, happening of 10th January, 1982. This involved the stopping of another car with its two women occupants. The retrospective times given for this event were very much in accordance with the predictions, both of which (arrival and departure) were produced by sunset-orientated tracks. However, as the diagram shows,
Uranus
was displaced about ½ hr R.A. from the expected line,
Ceres
was almost exactly aligned with the (un-signalled) 21:30 hr R.A. orientation and
Neptune
was close to the (un-signalled)11:00 hr R.A. orientation. Again, the question is raised as to whether this event was part of a much more extended exploration activity.

Good positions are evident in the diagram for the Richland Center, Wisconsin, event of 20th March, 1988, but only for one of the two orientations signalled.
Uranus
and
Saturn
were in close conjunction and
Comet Gale
was in close opposition along the 11:00 hr R.A. line.

Referring
App. Sht 6.

The Veronez, USSR, event of 27th September, 1989, involved a landing in a public park with many witnesses. The given time linked it with a sunset track prediction. As can be seen from the numbers and diagram provided, the sunset orientation was very closely linked to the position of the
Sun
and
Mars
, in conjunction and, approximately, with
Mercury.

The question arises as to whether that terminator-linked track was established from the direction of the Sun or towards it.

Referring
App. Sht 7.

Finally, the Roswell crash of 2nd July, 1947, will be considered. Assuming that the given information is trustworthy, the object seems to have arrived on a 21:30 hr R.A. orientated track, perhaps an hour before the crash, and was in the process of departing, following a sunrise-linked track, when catastrophe befell it. The numbers and the diagram show that
Jupiter
provided an excellent marker for its arrival and that
Mars
had probably been providing its departure reference point in space.

APP. 7 Closing Summary (Appendix)

From the evidence presented here,
i
t would seem that procedures for exploration activities undertaken by
living ETIs
(rather than the usual automatons) may have been expanded since the 1950s. It could be that as human detection technology improved, more distant and less conspicuous markers had to be adopted, and these have included the minor planets and comets – though there is the indication that
Comet Gale
, at least, was being referenced back in 1952. The presence of that comet in the 6:00 hr R.A. area of the sky, during some of the major events just considered, creates the suspicion that it may be referenced at regular 11 year intervals by
occupied
craft arriving into the solar system from elsewhere in our galaxy. From the findings of the main report, it seems also that the same comet may be used as a marker for activities following the 21:30 hr R.A. tracks in the years between. All this seems to emphasise that Gale is a comet which merits constant and close surveillance. However, the major planets still feature in the activities when they are conveniently placed and, at such times, should also be monitored.

APP. 8 The prediction of future activity periods.

It is now suggested that further study of the results of this exercise, taken together with those from the main report, could provide effective guidelines for predicting the periods of future activities by the ETIs. To facilitate this it will be important to create methods for determining when solar system bodies are positioned in close alignment with the four identified track orientations as each year progresses.

App. Fig. 5
has been created for that task. It provides vital information on the changing 53º terminator-linked track intersections with the Ecliptic Plane and the position of the Sun throughout each year. Also shown are the R.A.s associated with 53º star-linked tracks. All that remains to be done, using this technique, is to superimpose plots of the changing positions of selected solar system bodies. Solar system conjunctions, and dates when the defined tracks and solar system bodies are closely associated, become clearly evident. Recognition of oppositions and their interactions with the track orientations, however, requires very detailed and careful scrutiny of the graph produced for a given year.