Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics (155 page)

Uro, Risto.
Thomas: Seeking the Historical Context of the Gospel of Thomas
. London: T&T Clark, 2003.

Ussher, J.
In Polycarpionam epistolarum Ignationarum syllogen annotations
. Oxford: Leonard Lichfield, 1644.

Valantasis, Richard.
The Gospel of Thomas
. London: Routledge, 1997.

Vallée, Gerard.
A Study in Anti-Gnostic Polemics: Irenaeus, Hippolytus, and Epiphanius
. Studies in Christianity and Judaism, 1. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University, 1981.

Van der Waerden, B. L.
Die Pythagorer: Religiöse Bruderschaft und Schule der Wissenschaft
. Zurich: Artemis, 1979.

Van der Waerden, B. L. “Die Schriften und Fragmente des Pythagoras.”
Realencyclopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft: Supplementband
10 (1965): 843–64.

Van Minnen, Peter. “The Greek
Apocalypse of Peter
.” In
The Apocalypse of Peter
, edited by Jan Bremmer and István Czachesz, pp. 15–39. Leuven: Peeters, 2003.

Van Stempvoort, P. A. “The Protevangelium Jacobi, the Sources of Its Theme and Style and Their Bearing on Its Date.” In Studia Evangelica III., ed. F. Cross, pp. 410–26. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1964.

van Unnik, W. C. “De la règle MHTE IIPOΣΘEINAI MHTE AΦEΛEIN dans l’histoire du canon.”
VC
3 (1949): 1–35.

van Unnik, W. C. “‘Die Formel nichts wegnehmen, nichts hinzufügen’ bei Josephus.” In
Josephus als historischer Schriftsteller
, edited by eidem, pp. 26–49. Heidelberg: Schneider, 1978.

van Unnik, W. C. “Once More St. Luke’s Prologue.”
Neot
7 (1973): 7–26.

Verheyden, Joseph. “The Canon Muratori: A Matter of Dispute.” In
The Biblical Canons
, edited by J.-M. Auwers and H. J. De Jonge, pp. 487–556. Leuven: Peeters, 2003.

Verheyden, Joseph. “Some Reflections on Determining the Purpose of the ‘Gospel of Peter.’” In
Das Evangelium nach Petrus: Text, Kontexte, Intertexte
, edited by Thomas J. Kraus and Tobias Nicklas, pp. 281–99. TU 158. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007.

Vessey, Mark. “The Forging of Orthodoxy in Latin Christian Literature: A Case Study.”
JECS
4 (1996): 495–513.

Vielhauer, P. “On The Paulinisms of Acts.” In
Studies in Luke Acts
, edited by Leander Keck and J. Louis Martyn, pp. 33–50. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1966.

Vögtle, Anton.
Der Judasbrief. Der 2 Petrusbrief
. Düsseldorf: Benzinger Verlag, 1994.

Voss, Isaac, ed.
Epistolae genuinae S. Ignatii martyris
. Amsterdam: Blaev, 1646.

Vouaux, Léon.
Les actes de Paul et ses lettres apocryphes
. Paris: Letouzey et Ané, 1913.

Wacholder, Ben Zion. “The Letter from Judah Maccabee to Aristobulus: Is 2 Maccabees 1:10b–2:18 Authentic?”
HUCA
49 (1978): 89–133.

Wagner, Georg. “Zur Herkunft der Apostolischen Konstitutionen.” In
Méanges liturgiques offerts au R. P. dom Bernard Botte à l’occasion du cinquantième anniversaire de son ordination sacerdotale (4 juin 1972
), edited by J.-J. von Allmen, pp. 525–37. Louvain: Abbaye du Mont César, 1972.

Wedderburn, A. J. M. “The ‘We’-Passages in Acts: On the Horns of a Dilemma.”
ZNW
93 (2002): 78–98.

Wehnert, Jürgen.
Die Wir-Passagen der Apostelgeschichte: Ein lukanisches Stilmittel aus jüdischer Tradition
. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989.

Wehrli, F.
Die Schule des Aristoteles
, Hefte VII,
Heracleides Pontikos
, 2nd ed. Basel: Schwabe, 1969.

Weijenborg, Reinoud. “Is Evagrius Ponticus the Author of the Longer Recension of the Ignatian Letters?”
Anton
44 (1969): 339–47.

Weijenborg, Reinoud.
Les lettres d’Ignace d’Antioche
. Leiden: Brill, 1969.

Westcott, Brooke Foss.
A General Survey of the History of the Canon of the New Testament
, 4th ed. London: Macmillan, 1875.

Whiston, William.
Collection of Authentic Records Belonging to the Old and New Testament
,
Part II
. London: William Whiston, 1727.

White, Benjamin L. “Reclaiming Paul? Reconfiguration as Reclamation in 3 Corinthians.”
JECS
17 (2009): 497–523.

Wikenhauser, A.
Einleitung in das Neue Testament
, 6th ed., revised by Josef Schmid. Freiburg: Herder, 1973.

Wilder, Terry L.
Pseudonymity, The New Testament, and Deception: An Inquiry into Intention and Reception
. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2004.

Wilken, Robert.
John Chrysostom
and the Jews: Rhetoric and Reality in the Fourth Century. Berkeley: University of California, 1983.

Williams, Rowan.
Arius: Heresy and Tradition
, rev. ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001. Wilson, R. McL.
Colossians and Philemon
. London: T&T Clark, 2005.

Wimsatt, W. K.
The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry
. Lexington: University of Kentucky, 1954.

Wischmeyer, Wolfgang. “Die Epistula Anne ad Senecam: Eine jüdische Missionsschrift des lateinischen Bereichs.” In
Juden und Christen in der Antike
, edited by J. Van Amersfoort and J. van Oort, pp. 72–93. Kampen: Kok, 1990.

Wiseman, T. P. “Lying Historians: Seven Types of Mendacity.” In
Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World
, edited by C. Gill and T. P. Wisemann, pp. 122–46. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1993.

Wisse, Frederik. “The Epistle of Jude in the History of Heresiology.” In
Essays on the Nag Hammadi Texts in Honour of Alexander Böhlig
, edited by Martin Krause, pp. 133–43. Leiden: Brill, 1972.

Wisse, Frederik. “The Nag Hammadi Library and the Heresiologists.”
VC
25 (1971): 205–23.

Wood, Michael. “Prologue.” In
Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World
, edited by C. Gill and T. P. Wisemann, pp. xiii–xviii. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1993.

Woollcombe, K. J. “The Doctrinal Connexions of the Pseudo-Ignatian Letters.”
StPatr
6 (1962): 269–73.

Wrede, W.
Die Echtheit des zweiten Thessalonicherbriefs
. TU n.s. 9.2. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1903.

Yoshiko Reed, Annette. “Heresiology and the (Jewish-)Christian Novel: Narrativized Polemics in the Pseudo-Clementine
Homilies
.” In
Heresy and Identity in Late Antiquity
, edited by Eduard Iricinschi and Holger M. Zellentin, pp. 273–98. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.

Yoshiko Reed, Annette. “‘Jewish Christianity’ after the ‘Parting of the Ways’: Approaches to Historiography and Self-Definition in the Pseudo-Clementines.” In
The Ways That Never Parted: Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages
, edited by Adam H. Becker and Annette Yoshiko Reed, pp. 189–231. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003.

Yoshiko Reed, Annette. “‘Jewish Christianity’ as Counter-history? The Apostolic Past in Eusebius’
Ecclesiastical History
and the Pseudo-Clementine
Homilies
.” In
Antiquity in Antiquity: Jewish and Christian Pasts in the Greco-Roman World
, edited by Gregg Gardner and Kevin L. Osterloh, pp. 173–216. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.

Yoshiko Reed, Annette. “Pseudepigraphy, Authorship, and the Reception of “The Bible’ in Late Antiquity.” In
The Reception and Interpretation of the Bible in Late Antiquity: Proceedings of the Montréal Colloquium in Honour of Charles Kannengiesser, 11–13 October 2006
, edited by Lorenzo DiTommaso and Lucian Turcescu, pp. 467–90. Leiden: Brill, 2008.

Zahn, Theodore.
Geschichte des Neutestamentlichen Kanons
II/2. Leipzig: A. Deichert, 1892.

Zahn, Theodore.
Ignatius von Antiochien
. Gotha: Perthes, 1873.

Zembaty, Jane S. “Plato’s Republic and Greek Morality on Lying.”
Journal of the History of Philosophy
26 (1988): 517–45.

Zervos, George. “Prolegomena to a Critical Edition of the Genesis Marias (Protevangelium Jacobi): The Greek Manuscripts.” Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, 1986.

Zhmud, Leonid.
Wissenschaft, Philosophie und Religion im frühen Pythagorismus
. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1997.

Zmijewski, Josef. “Die Pastoralbriefe als pseudepigraphische Schriften—Beschreibung, Erklärung, Bewertung.”
SNTSU
4 (1979): 97–118.

Zohrab, J.
Astuatsashunch’ Matean Hin Ew Nor Ktakarants
’ (= Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments). Venice: Srboyn Ghazaru, 1805; reprinted Delmar: Caravan Books, 1984.

This index includes only
Ancient Sources.

For general concepts, including a topical guide to ancient sources, refer to the
Subject
Index found on pages 591-622.

For modern scholars, refer to the
Modern Scholars
index found on pages 623-628.