 | ani
, 2d ed., vol. 1 (Florence: S. a. G. Barbera, 1941) p. 55. See Lewis and Reinhold,
Roman Civilization
, vol. 1, pp. 42122.
|
| 58. Or possibly "no one is to be dispossessed against his will."
|
| 59. Berlin papyrus 628 =
Fontes iuris Romani antejustinani
1.56; see Lewis and Reinhold,
Roman Civilization
, vol. 1, pp. 42324.
|
| 1.
Lopez v. United States
, 373 U.S. 427, 454 (1963) J. Brennan, dissenting).
|
| 2. György Diósdi,
Ownership in Ancient and Preclassical Roman Law
(Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1970), pp. 4042, 132.
|
| 3.
Tabula
VII.9.a; Ulpian (71
ad edictum
),
Digest
43.27.1.8. Also Pliny,
Natural History
16.5.15:
Cautum est praeterea lege XII tabularum, ut glandem in alienum fundum procidentem liceret colligere
.
|
| 4. Kunkel,
Introduction to Roman Legal and Constitutional History
, pp . 2425.
|
| 5. For references, see Egon Weiss, "Lance et licio,"
Zeitschrift der Savigny Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Romanistische Abteilung
43 (1922), p. 457.
|
| 6. Theodor Mommsen,
Römisches Strafrecht
(Leipzig, 1899), pp. 74849 and notes.
|
| 7. See Jolowicz,
Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law,
pp. 17172, for fuller discussion.
|
| 8. Nicholas,
Introduction to Roman Law
, p. 212. and n. 2. See also Francis de Zulueta,
Institutes of Gaius
, pt. 2 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 194653), pp. 2013, who suggests that the ceremonial search may have had magical elements.
|
| 9. Nelson B. Lasson,
The History and Development of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
(Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1937), pp. 1517.
|
|
