pression, especially after López's time, was surely one of the factors that led to the Pueblo Revolt.
|
In the sixteenth century, Franciscan missionaries in central Mexico had thrown themselves into the learning of the native Aztec or Nahuatl language, and this idea of preaching to converts in their own tongues was quickly extended into other parts of Mexico; for example, the Tarascan region. By the time of the New Mexican missionaries, however, the emphasis was on teaching of Spanish to the native groups. Because New Mexico has several very different languagesZuni, Hopi, Northern and Southern Tiwa, Tewa/Tano, Towa, Piro/Tompiro, and two branches of Keresanand the missionaries moved around quite a bit, it was undoubtedly simpler to concentrate on Spanish. Still, it did mean that interaction between a missionary and a parishioner had to be through an interpreter. In an auto , or edictin this case, a questionnaire dated September 4, 1699Governor Pedro Rodriguez Cubero asked a number of old settlers in pre-revolt New Mexico their understanding of the mission effort. There seemed to be a general agreement that, with very few exceptions, the Franciscans depended on Spanish and on interpreters.
|
What were these New Mexico Franciscans like? It seems probable on the basis of the evidence we have today that most of the missionaries were humane men, dedicated to their Indian neophytes, albeit only on Franciscan terms. There were exceptions, to be sure. For example, a number of individual missionaries were accused of seducing their female Pueblo parishioners. One recent scholar has claimed that the Pueblo women readily made themselves sexually available to the Spaniards in order to ''cool their passions'' and to transform and domesticate them. This sort of female behavior does not really fit the Pueblo pattern, at least not in later historic times. In any case, as far as the missionaries are concerned, the claims of sexual irregularity mostly focused on outlying pueblos like Taos and the Salinas area. The Franciscans emphasized celibacy, and sexual misconduct does not seem to have been a regular thing. Certainly it was not acceptable behavior in the eyes of the provincia officials in Mexico.
|
More serious was the charge of cruelty. One notorious example was that of Salvador de Guerra at Hopi, who was charged with having a man flogged to death and who administered whippings followed by applications of hot turpentine to boys and girls, often for very flimsy offenses. Guerra was condemned in 1655 to be sent to Mexico City for disciplinary action, although the major chargesfirst, that he was "incorrigible, overbearing and arrogant and a revealer of the secrets of the Order," and second, that he lacked "modesty and decorum"seem to ignore the main issue of the case. It is unclear if Guerra actually went to Mexico. If so, he soon returned to the province, his sadism apparently
|
|