Mary Tudor (60 page)

BOOK: Mary Tudor

10.76Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub

ads

^{^[255]}Cal. Span
., XIII, pp. 63-4. Loades,
Mary Tudor
, p. 236. For a full discussion of this negotiation, see Rodriguez Salgado,
The Changing Face of Empire
, p. 97.

^{^[256]}Cal. Span
., XIII, pp. 92-5.

^{^[257]}House of Lords Records Office, Original Act, 1 & 2 Philip and Mary, c.18. Loach,
Parliament and the Crown
, p. 106.

^{^[258]}The text of Pole’s address is preserved in Biblioteca Vaticana, Rome, MS Vat. Lat. 5968, which is available on microfilm. A translation was printed by J. Collier,
An Ecclesiastical History of Great Britain
(1714), II, pp. 372-3.

^{^[259]}Donato Rullo to Cardinal Seripando, 1 December 1554. Carlo de Frede,
La Restaurazione Cattolica in Inghilterra sotto Maria Tudor
(Naples, 1971) p. 57.

^{^[260]}Cal. Span
., XIII, p. 117.

^{^[261]}Feckenham had urged that, no matter what the dispensation might say, the possessioners were in conscience bound to surrender their gains. He was interviewed by an embarrassed council on 29 November.
Cal. Span
., XIII, p. 108.
APC
, V, p. 85.

^{^[262]}Priuli had no knowledge of English law, and sometimes missed the point of the discussions. BL Add. MS 41577, ff. 161-6. Loach,
Parliament and the Crown
, pp. 109-111.

^{^[263]}1 & 2 Philip and Mary, c. 8. Loach
, Parliament and the Crown
, p. 111.

^{^[264]}Loades,
Reign of Mary
, pp. 167-8.

^{^[265]}Machyn,
Diary
, p. 76.

^{^[266]}Ibid., p. 80.

^{^[267]}Ibid., p. 79.

^{^[268]}Loades,
Mary Tudor
, p. 248.

^{^[269]}Cal. Span
., XIII, pp. 165-6.

^{^[270]}Loades,
Mary Tudor
, p. 249.

^{^[271]}Machyn,
Diary
, p. 81.

^{^[272]}Ibid., p. 82. Renard to Philip, 5 February 1555, wrote: ‘Some of the onlookers wept, others prayed God to give him strength … not to recant … others threatening the bishops …’
Cal. Span
., XIII, p. 138.

^{^[273]}D. Loades, ‘The Marian Episcopate’, in Duffy and Loades,
The Church of Mary Tudor
, pp. 33-56.

^{^[274]}The submission of John Barret, Norwich’s leading evangelical preacher under Edward VI, took all the stuffing out of Protestant resistance in Norwich. Ralph Houlbrooke, ‘The Clergy, the Church Courts and the Marian Restoration in Norwich’, ibid., pp. 124-48.

^{^[275]}The Displaying of the Protestants
(1556), p. 51.

^{^[276]}Jose Ignacio Tellecehea Idigoras (trans. Ronald Truman), ‘Fray Bartolome Carranza: A Spanish Dominican in the England of Mary Tudor’, in J. Edwards and R. Truman (eds),
Reforming Catholicism in the England of Mary Tudor: The Achievement of Fray Bartolome Carranza
(2005), pp. 21-32.

^{^[277]}See (for example) Patrick Collinson, ‘The Persecution in Kent’, in Duffy and Loades,
The Church of Mary Tudor
, pp. 309-33.

^{^[278]}A Short Treatise of Politike Power
(1556), f. E v.

^{^[279]}Thomas F. Mayer, ‘The Success of Cardinal Pole’s Final Legation’, in Duffy and Loades,
The Church of Mary Tudor
, pp. 149-75.

^{^[280]}Machyn,
Diary
, p. 86.

^{^[281]}John Foxe,
Acts and Monuments
(1583), p. 1,597. Foxe claimed to have been told this story ‘by the woman herself’. Her son was called Timothy.

^{^[282]}Federico Badoer to the Doge and Senate, 21 July 1555.
Cal. Ven
.,VI, pp. 138-9. According to Badoer several members of the council wrote at the same time, distancing themselves from her instruction.

^{^[283]}One contemporary report states that she had been delivered of a shapeless mass of flesh, which would suggest a tumour, but there is no proper corroboration. Her physicians seem to have expressed no opinion.

^{^[284]}Rodriguez Salgado,
The Changing Face of Empire
, pp. 92-3, 101.

^{^[285]}Machyn,
Diary
, p. 93. The English gentlemen stayed only to witness the handover of power on 25 September and then returned home.

^{^[286]}Redworth, ‘“Matters Impertinent’’’.

^{^[287]}Redworth says, on Spanish authority, that Mary discussed some matters of state with the select council rather than the privy council, but is not clear what these matters were. Probably the reference is to Philip’s Continental affairs in so far as these affected England.

^{^[288]}Rodriguez Salgado,
The Changing Face of Empire
, p. 101.

^{^[289]}Loach,
Parliament and the Crown
, pp. 129-58. It was during this session that some members held illicit meetings with the French ambassador to discuss oppositional tactics, and the Commons rejected a government measure for the recall of religious refugees.

^{^[290]}A Machiavellian Treatise by Stephen Gardiner
, trans. and ed. P. S. Donaldson (1975). On Gardiner’s authorship, see also D. Fenlon in
Historical Journa1
, 19 (1976), p. 4; to which Donaldson replied in the same journal, 23 (1980), pp. 1-16.

^{^[291]}Redworth, ‘“Matters Impertinent”’.

^{^[292]}Loades,
Mary Tudor
, pp. 258-9.

^{^[293]}Typical, although unusually explicit, was John Bradford’s
Copy of a letter … sent to the Earls of Arundel, Derby, Shrewsbury and Pembroke
(1556).

^{^[294]}Rodriguez Salgado,
The Changing Face of Empire
, pp. 149-51.

^{^[295]}Loades,
Two Tudor Conspiracies
, pp. 176-27. Henry was the second son of John Sutton de Dudley, and the younger brother of Edmund Sutton, 4th Baron Dudley. He is always called by the name of his brother’s title.

^{^[296]}TNA SP11/7, no. 47. Third confession of Thomas White, 30 March 1556.

^{^[297]}D. Loades,
The Tudor Navy
(1992), pp. 164-5.

^{^[298]}There are several lists of ‘suspect persons’ in the State Papers, e.g. TNA SP11/7, nos. 23, 24, 25.

^{^[299]}Cal. Ven
., VI, p. 285.

^{^[300]}Pole to Philip, 5 October 1555.
Cal. Ven
., VI, pp. 205-6. Renard was not replaced for the obvious reason that Philip’s servants were seen to be discharging his function, but Renard had always been the Emperor’s ambassador, not the king’s.

^{^[301]}For a full discussion of Cranmer’s fate and its implications, see Diarmaid MacCulloch,
Thomas Cranmer
(1996), pp. 573-91.

^{^[302]}Bradford,
Copy of a letter
. Other works in a similar vein include
A Supplication to the Queen’s Majesty
(1555) and
A Warning for England
(1555).