Read Taking People With You: The Only Way to Make Big Things Happen Paperback Online
Authors: David Novak
When these things happen—and if you’re taking risks by pursuing Big Goals, they
will
almost surely happen—the best thing to do is simply acknowledge and explain. I explained what happened with our multibranding strategy to investors before they even asked me about it. But an explanation in situations like these is not enough. You also have to answer the question, “What are you going to do now?” In this case, I talked about our intent to focus 100 percent on our stand-alone brands and build new incremental sales layers with beverages and new day-parts, like breakfast.
If you fail, that’s part of business, just as it’s part of life. Don’t sweep it under the rug. Talk about it with your team and diagnose the problems. Come up with a new plan, and then go public, both about why the last idea didn’t work and about how the new one will be different. It’s the best way to save your credibility.
Self-reflection
Assess yourself on the following items related to chapter 11 , “Market the Change”: | Personal Opportunity | Personal Strength |
1. I work to find ways of breaking through the clutter with my messages. | ||
2. I use emotional word pictures whenever possible to engage and inspire people around me. | ||
3. I go public with commitments and don’t back away from them. | ||
4. My actions consistently reinforce the message I am sharing with my team and the organization. |
Exercise
Shock the system! Consider the ways in which you will communicate your vision and write them down. The questions below may prompt some ideas:
In the last section, I talked about how to gain the alignment of your target audience, but in order to see your Big Goal through to the end, you can’t just gain alignment once and be done with it. You have to keep sniffing out that conflict and come to terms with the fact that there may be some people who will never be fully convinced of your vision, no matter what you say or do.
I’ve had some learning to do myself in this area, even after I started giving my Taking People with You program. At this point, I used to talk about how you have to have courage and stick to your guns to see something through in spite of all the naysayers. But then, during one of my programs, someone raised his hand and asked me, “But what if the naysayers are right?”
It was a good question, and it brought to mind some of the biggest failures of my career, like Crystal Pepsi. If I had listened to the voices telling me the product wasn’t ready yet and addressed their concerns, Crystal Pepsi could have had a real shot and might even still be on store shelves today. Those naysayers could have been my most important advisers back then, if I had just paid closer attention to them and adjusted my plan as a result.
The best thing about the Crystal Pepsi debacle is that it made me a better and more open-minded listener. People have saved me from myself over and over again during the course of my career. They have told me things I didn’t know, stopped me from doing or saying the wrong thing, and helped me see where I needed to make adjustments to my thinking
or course of action. In fact, I rely on certain people, like my chief legal counsel, Chris Campbell, to tell me things that I don’t want to hear, and he does our company and me a world of good almost every time he does. I even changed this entire section of my program as a result of that one guy’s insightful question. And the program, as well as my leadership abilities, are better as a result. Because, guess what? That guy was right.
I still believe it’s important to have the courage to move forward with intentionality to achieve your Big Goal, but it’s just as important that you don’t do it until you’ve listened to everyone’s concerns and considered all the potential barriers to success. This requires patience, maturity, and confidence in your own judgment, but if you do this step right, opening yourself up to the possibility that the naysayers might be right shouldn’t lead to self-doubt. Instead, it will expand your knowledge and perspective, which, in the end, will make you even more confident about the path you’re on.
Listening to criticism is important, but it isn’t always easy, because we really don’t like to be told we’re wrong. In order to do this, you may need to adopt a more powerful mind-set.
Refer to the tool for Choosing Powerful versus Limiting Mind-sets on page 28 and think about how you handle it when someone expresses doubt about your plan or vision. Do you take in what people say and really consider it? Or do you push back, certain that those people are wrong or, worse, that they’re trying to sabotage you?
Consider the differences in the mind-sets that follow and ask yourself which one is more likely to help you be successful. Always remember that this isn’t about being right; it’s about getting done what you’ve set out to do.
I might learn something new if I listen.
versus
These guys don’t get what I mean … it’s useless to talk to them.
They are trying to make sure we are on the right track.
versus
They are trying to undermine my authority and make me look bad.
The thing you
don’t
want to do when someone expresses doubts is to plow ahead as if it never happened. But sometimes we do this without even realizing it, because we’re so sure of ourselves, so sure that we have a good idea. The following is a checklist of what you should do to make sure you really are seeing all sides and considering all valid opinions and objections.
When someone says, “It can’t be done,” Scott Bergren, CEO of Pizza Hut, uses a technique he calls the flip. After listening to the person’s objection, he asks, “What would
you
do to solve that problem?” This question drives home the idea that doing nothing is not the answer; instead people should work together to find solutions.
I once heard a story about architect I. M. Pei’s using this same technique to get the unusual, triangle-shaped East Building of the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., built just the way he envisioned it. He designed the museum with such an acute angle in one part that the engineers and stonemasons working to construct it told him that an angle like that had never been done before because it just wasn’t possible. So Pei did the flip on them and asked how
they
would solve the problem. They didn’t have an answer offhand, but they did work together to figure it out. Now that angle is one of the most notable aspects of the museum, and visitors frequently walk over just to touch it. What’s more, the building has won numerous awards as a result of the team effort.
You need to listen to the concerns of your target audience with your mind open to the possibility that they might be right, but when making a decision about how to move forward, you also have to consider the fact that they might
not
be. A few years ago, I read David McCullough’s biography of Harry Truman and learned more about the fact that practically no one thought he would win his bid for reelection in 1948 against the popular Republican candidate, Thomas E. Dewey. Every media outlet that mattered predicted his loss, and one respected sampler of public opinion announced that his organization would stop polling, because the outcome was such a sure thing. Famously, the front page of the
Chicago Tribune
even sported the banner headline D
EWEY
D
EFEATS
T
RUMAN
in big bold letters on the day after the election
because they had had the paper printed
before all the results were in. Of course, they were all wrong. The story makes me think about what a loss it would have been if Truman had not followed his own gut instincts.
The idea here is to not cave in to people’s ideas to make them feel validated or to avoid conflict. Instead, you need to seriously consider what people are saying and then make the right call. My great friend, my mentor, and the cofounder of Home Depot, Ken Langone, found himself in this sort of position in 2003 when he became entangled in a lawsuit brought by New York attorney general Eliot Spitzer. Spitzer claimed that the CEO of the New York Stock Exchange, Dick Grasso, had received excessive compensation when he was paid $187.5 million for his position and that Ken, as head of the exchange’s compensation committee, had played a role by misleading the board about Grasso’s pay package.
Many people close to Ken encouraged him to settle the case, especially as it dragged on for nearly five years, but Ken stuck to his guns against tremendous pressure. He did it, first off, because he believed Grasso had been an exceptional leader. Just a couple of years before the lawsuit, Grasso had been widely praised for his quick reopening of the exchange in the aftermath of September 11. Second and more important, Ken simply believed he’d done no wrong. As he explained to me, “[Grasso] was part of a system that was created twenty years before I, or that board, showed up. It turned out that Dick was there for thirty-seven years and by virtue of that longevity, his formula kicked in big time for him. But there wasn’t a person that sat on that board that wasn’t apprised extensively on his pay. And every single time that Dick Grasso’s pay package was voted on, it was always a unanimous
vote.”
People may have different points of view about whether Grasso was overpaid, but there’s no doubt that Ken followed his conscience. When it was all over and the claims against him and Grasso had been thrown out by an appellate court, he told me, “First of all, I had to live with myself. I had to look at myself in the mirror every morning and say, at a point in time when the bullets were flying, did you stand up to be counted? Now that sounds altruistic, but that’s the way I am.”
Ken Langone knew instinctively what he needed to do despite advice he was getting to the contrary, but it’s not always the case that we’re so sure of ourselves. If you
don’t have full faith in your decision, then you have to do whatever is necessary to gain confidence. Before Indra Nooyi became CEO of PepsiCo, she made the bold decision to do a major overhaul of the company’s IT systems. It was a $1 billion project, and there were a lot of skeptics. People weren’t just saying it couldn’t be done; they were saying she was downright crazy to even attempt it.