The Bogleheads' Guide to Retirement Planning (23 page)

Read The Bogleheads' Guide to Retirement Planning Online

Authors: Taylor Larimore,Richard A. Ferri,Mel Lindauer,Laura F. Dogu,John C. Bogle

Tags: #Business & Economics, #Investing, #Personal Finance, #Business, #Business & Money, #Financial, #Non-Fiction, #Nonfiction, #Retirement, #Retirement Planning

BOOK: The Bogleheads' Guide to Retirement Planning
12.04Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
A third unavoidable expense for someone investing in a taxable account is individual tax liability on any fund distributions. Even low-turnover funds that distribute few capital gains to shareholders will probably have to distribute dividends. Bond funds distribute an especially high level of dividends. And in a taxable account, these dividends are subject to tax in the year you receive them, even if you reinvest them. Although receiving these dividends is generally unavoidable, it may be possible to minimize the tax implications by holding the fund in a tax-advantaged account.
Avoidable Expenses
With the thought in mind that your investment profit is reduced by every expense, there are several that are avoidable. Here is a list:
Sales loads:
You can divide mutual funds into two overall segments: pure no-load funds and load funds. Pure no-load funds can be purchased directly from the fund company without paying a commission. Load funds are purchased from a broker or other financial services salesperson by paying a so-called load. The load is simply a commission paid to the salesperson. It may be a front-end load, which is taken out of your initial investment amount when you buy, or a back-end load, which is deducted from your proceeds when you sell. There are some funds with front-end loads as high as 8.5 percent. That means that if you make a $10,000 investment in that fund, only $9,150 actually makes it into your account and $850 goes as a commission to the salesperson. That means you need to earn more than 9 percent on your $9,150 investment just to get back to even. Avoid the salesperson, invest directly with the fund company in pure no-load funds, and keep all of your investment money working for you.
12b-1 fees:
A mutual fund with a 12b-1 fee charges an extra expense to fund holders to use for advertising and promotion of the fund. This fee is paid by current shareholders in order to gather new shareholders. Although new shareholders would mean more money flowing into the fund, resulting in more profit for the fund managers, it’s generally not beneficial to the current shareholders. In fact, when a fund gets too big, it may start to resemble an index fund and move along with the market, negating any special advantage the fund may claim to have had when it was smaller. A 12b-1 fee is essentially another expense that further lowers the fund return that the individual shareholder gets to keep. Especially egregious are the mutual funds that are closed to new investors yet continue to charge shareholders the 12b-1 fee for advertising. Many load funds also come in a no-load version, but the no-load version charges a 12b-1 fee. That is the difference between a no-load fund and a pure no-load. The pure no-load fund has no 12b-1 fee.
Abnormally high expense ratios:
High expense ratios are inversely related to fund performance. The higher a fund’s expenses, the lower the investment gains the shareholders get to keep. A low expense ratio is the single most important reason a fund outperforms similar funds. For the long-term investor, these higher expenses can be very significant. Consider two funds that both return 10 percent a year before expenses. The low-cost fund with expenses of 0.2 percent would then have a net return of 9.8 percent. But the high-cost fund with expenses of 2.2 percent would have a net return of only 7.8 percent. Over a 30-year investment horizon, that would mean $10,000 invested in the low-cost fund would grow to $165,000 while in the high-cost fund it would grow to only $95,000. That’s a difference of $70,000, or seven times the original investment. Costs definitely matter.
Direct brokerage commission trading costs:
Buying mutual funds directly from the fund provider is the cheapest route. But many people hold funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) through a brokerage account of some kind. This has the advantage of allowing you to hold funds from multiple fund families, while still keeping everything consolidated in one account. The drawback is being charged a commission every time you buy or sell something. Purchasing ultra-low-expense ETFs through a brokerage account may seem like a sure way to savings, but if you are paying a commission for every transaction, it can quickly get expensive. That $9.99 commission may seem reasonable, but on a $1,000 transaction it adds another full percentage point to your costs. And don’t forget you have to pay the $9.99 to sell, too. So while the 0.1 percent expense ratio of that ETF looks cheap, after paying the two commissions, your actual expense looks more like 2.1 percent, making it no bargain. Many brokers are now advertising commission-free transactions to bring in new customers. However, no-commission trading is not the same as no-cost trading. These brokers often earn a handsome profit from the trading spread and reciprocal trading agreements with other brokerage firms.
DIFFERENT STROKES FOR DIFFERENT FOLKS
Many investors transitioning into retirement also transition their expectations of their portfolio from growth to providing income. After decades of growing a portfolio to be as large as possible in anticipation of retirement, retirees often focus on having their portfolio generate as much income as possible. But completely abandoning growth for income overlooks the capital growth aspect of investing that can be as beneficial in a retirement portfolio as it was in the preretirement portfolio.
Income Portfolio
An income-oriented portfolio focuses on incoming dividends and interest and is generally viewed as a lower-risk retirement portfolio. The goal is often to construct a portfolio where one can spend just the income and leave the principal amount intact. This can be a viable strategy if your withdrawals are small in relation to your portfolio size. However, many people find that the yield on a 100 percent bond portfolio may be less than their desired withdrawal—especially in a low interest rate environment. Yield can often be increased by trading some investment-grade bonds for high-yield bonds. But while these bonds may increase the yield, they are also likely to increase the overall portfolio volatility and risk. They don’t call them junk bonds for nothing.
Many people would be surprised to know that an all-bond portfolio does not have the lowest long-term risk as measured by year-to-year volatility. Historically, a portfolio with 10 to 15 percent stocks has lower year-to-year volatility of returns than one made up of 100 percent bonds. Some stocks in a portfolio also increase the longevity of a portfolio by adding growth that the all-bond portfolio does not provide. The differing correlations between stocks and bonds, as well as the greater long-term growth potential of stocks—even a relatively small amount—both increase the return and decrease the volatility. Depending on your tax status, an all-bond portfolio may also increase your tax liability, as bond dividends are less tax-efficient than capital gains.
Total-Return Portfolio
In contrast to an income-focused portfolio, a total-return portfolio maintains a balance of both stocks and bonds and focuses on income as well as the appreciation of asset values. Although it assumes spending principal as well as dividends, the growth potential of a more balanced portfolio has historically been better than an all-bond portfolio, more than making up for having a lower overall portfolio yield. An investor who reduces exposure to stocks is making a trade-off. Increasing bonds means having higher income now, but because of lower growth potential and the relentless advance of inflation, it means higher risk to your future spending power.
Philip L. Cooley, Carl M. Hubbard, and Daniel T. Walz are professors of finance in the Department of Business Administration, Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas. In the February 1998
AAII Journal
, they published “Retirement Savings: Choosing a Withdrawal Rate That Is Sustainable.” The article highlighted their findings in a comprehensive study on sustainable withdrawal rates in retirement.
Chapter 12 has much more on withdrawal rates. However, the Trinity University study did stress the importance of retaining some growth focus in retirement. Using actual historical stock and bond returns from 1926 through 1995, the study determined that at a 4 percent inflation-adjusted withdrawal rate, an all-bond portfolio had only a 20 percent chance of surviving over a 30-year retirement period. On the other hand, a total-return portfolio made up of half bonds and half stocks had a 95 percent chance of survival. Clearly, focusing solely on generating income from your portfolio significantly decreases your portfolio’s ability to sustain that income over the long run.
COMMON INVESTING MISTAKES
The Bogleheads believe that people can enhance their investment portfolio with some simple changes. Some of those changes involve avoiding common investing mistakes. Here are a few mistakes to avoid.
No Written Plan or Investment Policy Statement (IPS)
Just as a cross-country car trip should start with planning a route, long-term investing should start with planning a strategy. Investing without a plan means you’re more likely to make many financial wrong turns. Creating an investment policy statement means putting your investment strategy in writing and committing to a disciplined plan. The plan should be reviewed and updated annually, or as events in your life change that may change your plan. See Chapter 9 for more information on investment policy statements.
Investing Too Conservatively
Many people are afraid to incur any loss in their investment portfolio at any time. Consequently, their investments tend toward low-risk certificates of deposit, money market mutual funds, or savings accounts, where principal values do not fluctuate. This is quite common in 401(k) plans. Participants tend to choose the lowest risk option, even though that is a high-risk selection from a retirement-planning standpoint. Cash-type investments provide short-term security, but over the long term, they are risky because they do not grow at the rate of inflation. Low-risk investors often find their purchasing power declining each and every year, although they never experience a loss of principal. Doing everything you can to avoid a loss may seem like the sensible thing to do, but you also may be cheating yourself out of any chance for real long-term growth.
Ignoring the Impact of Total Cost
Investment costs erode investment returns. But most people don’t see what they’re missing because expenses aren’t specifically broken out on monthly statements. How much of a drag on performance costs really are can be easy to overlook.
Calculate your total investment costs. Total investment costs include the expense ratio of your mutual funds, all trading costs, and your adviser’s fee if you choose to hire an adviser. If you are paying more than 1 percent in total costs, then it might be time for a change.
Chasing Performance
Nothing attracts assets like last year’s winning strategies, and nothing destroys wealth as fast. Don’t chase the performance of funds that have had great recent returns. Last year’s hot fund is just as likely to do poorly this year. There is a strong tendency for poor performance to follow good performance, as investment styles tend to rotate over time. Selecting a fund based on its recent short-term performance has historically been a losing proposition. Instead of chasing performance, simply own the entire market through an ultra-low-cost index fund, and hold for the long term.
Trying to time your investments by switching frequently between different funds is also a losing plan. That strategy leaves you open to buying a fund too soon or too late. You can guess correctly some of the time, but that does not prove you to be smart or skilled, just lucky. Successful investing involves leaving your money in place long enough to benefit from the long-term average of the asset class.
Allowing Emotions to Control Your Investment Decisions
People become very brave in a bull market and scared to death in a bear market. After stocks go up in value, people want to buy, and after stocks go down in value, people want to sell. Both of these emotional decisions are quite common and understandable, but they are also counterproductive to your investment wealth. Buying after the market has had big gains means you are buying at more expensive prices. And selling after the market has had big losses means you are selling at cheaper prices. So, you are buying high and selling low. That is the exact opposite to rational decision making.
Instead of reacting to market moves, create an investment plan appropriate for your situation and risk tolerance. Follow a rebalancing plan to keep your allocations at your target levels. Rigorously following this rebalancing plan will mean you will be buying asset classes low and selling them high—a much surer way to increase your overall long-term portfolio return.
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

The Bogleheads’ Guide to Investing
by Taylor Larimore, Mel Lindauer, and Michael LeBoeuf (Wiley, 2006). The first book in the Bogleheads series provides easy-to-understand guidance on investing.

The Little Book of Common Sense Investing
by John Bogle (Wiley, 2007). The investing wisdom of Vanguard founder John Bogle distilled into one small, easy-to-read volume.

The Smartest Investment Book You’ll Ever Read
by Daniel Solin (Perigee, 2006). Create a low-cost, widely diversified investment portfolio with just three Vanguard index funds.

The Lazy Person’s Guide to Investing
by Paul Farrell (Business Plus, 2006). Easy-to-understand and simple-to-start investment portfolios, using low-cost mutual funds.

Making the Most of Your Money
by Jane Bryant Quinn (Simon & Schuster, 1997). Reliable and practical advice on virtually every financial topic.

The New Coffeehouse Investor
by Bill Schultheis (Penguin Group, 2009). Solid financial advice presented in a casual and easy-to-read format.

Serious Money, Straight Talk about Investing for Retirement
by Richard Ferri. This free online book can be found at
www.PortfolioSolutions.com
.

Other books

The Last of His Kind by Doris O'Connor
Hateland by Bernard O'Mahoney
Spell Check by Ariella Moon
Gotcha by Shelley Hrdlitschka
A Simple Lady by Carolynn Carey
Key Lime Pie by Josi S. Kilpack