bestiality that is itself an uncontrollable mystery, the rites of the sacred god eros.
|
Yeats, then, displays a religious courage of a kind long absent from English literature. It is Romantic in its embrace of nonhuman forces, but its hunger for a ferocious turbulence surpasses that of the English Romantics (Emily Brontë comes nearest to it). It is offered as the harshest of cures to a humanity gone rigid from adherence to principles, rather than freed for a disorderly immediacy. It is also the rediscovery of the divine as a terrifying powerthe burden of Rudolph Otto's book of 1917, Das Heilige . By the second decade of the century it was apparently time "at last" for the sacred to re-present itself to, if not altogether to win over, the Western psyche.
|
A more consistent and explicit radical of life than Yeats was, Lawrence, too, opposed "an assertive newspaper-parcel of ego," social dolls that squeak "when you squeeze them." He respected only what he called "the true self," one not held "according to a picture" but, instead, like a bird that, "as it sings, sings itself'' yet "has no idea of itself." This "original individuality" has many enemies: Socrates, Christ, love, democracy, Bolshevism . . .
|
Lawrence dreamed the return of the human to the verge of a "royal" animality. Connected and in the flow: that, for him, was "life." Desire itself is purity"a pure thing, like sunshine, or fire, or rain. It is desire that makes the whole world living to me, keeps me in the flow connected . . . not shut outside of the natural paradise." "The element of wonder," he said when noting the power of "rather banal Nonconformist hymns" to penetrate his childhood, is "fundamental to life":
|
| | Plant consciousness, insect consciousness, fish consciousness, all are related by one permanent element, which we may call the religious element inherent in all life, even in a flea: the sense of wonder. That is our sixth sense. And it is the natural religious sense.
|
Religion is the capacity to be openthe Pan spirit. Pan is the All in every sentient thing.
|
Lawrence, too, wants wonder's burn, its utter transformations. Yet, like Yeats, he's ambivalent; the practical advantages of being human check his devotion to the sacred. In fact, far more than Yeats, Lawrence
|
|