The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (131 page)

Anything that breaks down the immune system causes AIDS and that includes so-called recreational drugs.
 
The vast majority of AIDS deaths in the United States involve homosexuals and this perpetuates the myth that it has something to do with sex.
 
But homosexuals in the US are among the biggest users of drugs which genuine doctors have linked to AIDS.
 
Prostitutes who take drugs often get AIDS; prostitutes who do not take drugs invariably do not get AIDS.
 
The rise in the AIDS figures in the United States corresponds perfectly with the increase in the use of drugs - most of which are made available to people on the streets by elements within the US Government, including Bill Clinton and George Bush.
 
In Africa, the breakdown of the immune system, now known as AIDS, is caused by ill health - lack of good food, clean water and the general effects of poverty.
 
Haemophiliacs do not die from HIV-infected blood; they die, as they did before the AIDS scam, from a quirk in their own immune system.
 
Their immune system locks into foreign proteins in the infused blood and on rare occasions it can become confused during this process and attack itself. Their immune system, in effect, commits suicide.
 
HIV is irrelevant to that.
 
Yet how many people today who have been diagnosed HIV positive are having their lives blighted by the fear that the symptoms of AIDS will start any moment?

AZT is the killer. There is not a single case of AZT reversing the symptoms of AIDS.
 
How can it?
 
It's causing them, for goodness sake.
 
The AIDS industry is now worth billions of pounds a year and makes an unimaginable fortune for the drug industry controlled by the Rockefellers and the rest of the Global Elite.”
 
David Icke, geo-political researcher, 2007

Interesting is it not, that the AIDS industry refers to those who try to expose the truth as being ‘deniers’ which has shades of the other great ‘denial’, that of the holocaust industry?
 
So in effect they are psychologically likening doctors who try to tell the world what is really happening, with Nazis.

“I reported that in early 1987 I had received a telephone call from a researcher for a TV company who had told me that his company (Thames TV) was planning a documentary about AIDS. ‘What do you think about AIDS?' he asked me.
 
I told him that I thought that the threat had been exaggerated by some doctors, a lot of politicians and most journalists.
 
The researcher was silent for a moment or two.
 
I could tell by the silence that he was disappointed.
 
It wasn't quite what he'd hoped to hear.

We're planning a major documentary,' he said. `We want to cover all the angles.
 
Haven't you got anything new to say about AIDS?'
 
‘I don't think AIDS is a plague that threatens mankind,' I insisted.
 
I then pointed out that I believed that the evidence about AIDS had been distorted and the facts exaggerated.
 
‘We really wanted you to come on to the programme and talk about some of the problems likely to be caused by the disease,' persisted the researcher.
 
‘I'm happy to come on to the programme and say that I think that the dangers posed by the disease have been exaggerated,' I told the researcher.

The researcher sighed.
 
‘Quite a few doctors have said that to me,' he said sadly.
 
‘But it really isn't the sort of angle we're looking for.'
 
Very gently I put down the telephone.
 
I didn't expect to hear from the researcher again and I didn't.
 
His company produced a networked television programme about AIDS that appeared on our screens a short time after that conversation.
 
And I suspect that most of those who viewed it went to bed believing that AIDS is the greatest threat to mankind since the Black Death.
 
That was by no means an isolated incident.
 
The facts about AIDS were carefully selected to satisfy the public image of the disease - and to satisfy those with vested interests to protect.”
 
Dr. Vernon Coleman, former British ‘TV Doctor’, dropped from the networks because of his non-compliant views

And whilst we still argue and debate the issues, people are literally dying to know the truth.

Cancer

Everyone should know that the 'war on cancer' is largely a fraud." Linus Pauling, Nobel Laureate

“I keep telling people to stop giving money to ‘cancer research’ because no one is frigging looking for a cure.
 
We have several and they have been carefully hidden away from public view...this is a multi-billion dollar per year industry and a ‘cure’ would put a lot of people out of work.”
 
Geraldine Phillips, cancer research worker, 2011

"The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination" Dr. Robert Bell, former Vice President, International Society for Cancer Research

Dr. James Watson won a Nobel Prize along with Dr. Francis Crick for discovering and describing the double helix shape of DNA at Cambridge University in the early 1950s and during the early 1970s he served two years on the US National Cancer Advisory Board.
 
In 1975, he was asked his thoughts about the American National Cancer Programme.
 
He declared, “It's a bunch of shit.”
 
Blunt and crude though his assessment may be, it also happens to be true.

Cancer, that ‘life-threatening disease’ and ruthless killer of countless millions of mothers, fathers, sons and daughters in the last 100 years or more, is relatively easy to cure and even easier to prevent.
 

I am acutely aware of the emotive subject that cancer has become and do not make this glib-sounding statement lightly, but with due deference to the millions who have lost loved ones and / or suffered terribly and had their own lives cruelly cut short for what amounts to no reason at all, unless of course you consider the vast, unimaginable profits made by the purveyors of this great criminal racket, for criminal racket is exactly what it is.
 

In 1953, a United States Senate investigation reported in its initial findings that there was the strong suspicion of an ongoing conspiracy to suppress and destroy effective cancer treatments.
 
The Senator in charge of the investigation died suddenly in unexplained circumstances, the usual MO (modus operandus or operating method) in these cases, which was obviously very convenient for those with much to lose from his revelations.
 
As a result of his death, the investigation was subsequently, suddenly disbanded without further ado and was never resumed.
 
Unsurprisingly, the good Senator was neither the first nor the last of literally hundreds if not thousands of strange, unexplained deaths involving people in positions to threaten the interests of those running the Elite controlled cancer programmes and indeed the Elite-controlled anything else.
 
Ethical people who attempt to disrupt the flow of profits into the Elite’s coffers have to be silenced one way or another, after all.

But this is only the small tip of a very large and extremely dangerous iceberg.
 
In 1964, the FDA spent millions of dollars to suppress and bury an ‘alternative’ cancer treatment which had cured hundreds, if not thousands of cancer patients according to well-documented sources.
 
It became apparent and was later disclosed that in the subsequent court proceedings, the FDA had falsified the testimony of witnesses, to suit its own ends.
 
The FDA lost the court case because the jury found the defendants innocent and recommended that the substance be evaluated, objectively.
 
In fact it never was evaluated but instead all the evidence was totally suppressed and then conveniently ‘lost’.

For many years (and still to this day), the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Cancer Society (ACS) co-ordinated their own ‘blacklists’ of cancer researchers who were regarded as threats to their cancer monopoly and who were to be singled-out for smear campaigns and ostracised by the mainstream.
 
One investigative reporter declared the AMA and ACS to be “a network of vigilantes prepared to pounce on anyone who promotes a cancer therapy that runs against their substantial prejudices and profits.”
 
The ACS, believe it or not actually makes political donations!
 
A ‘charitable organisation’ that makes political donations?
 
What does this tell us about them and the system within which they operate?

In the late 1950s, it was learned that Dr. Henry Welch, head of the FDA's Division of Antibiotics, had secretly received $287,000 (a colossal sum in those days) from the drug companies he was supposed to regulate.
 
In 1975, an independent government evaluation of the FDA still found massive ‘conflicts of interest’ among the agency's top personnel.

And In 1977, an investigative team from the prominent newspaper ‘Newsday’ found serious ‘conflicts of interest’ at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and in 1986, an organized cover-up of an effective alternative cancer therapy, orchestrated by NCI officials, was revealed during Congressional hearings.
 
The list goes on and on and I strongly suggest to the reader that they should perform their own Internet research on this topic and not simply take my word for it.

The cancer ‘industry’ now has a more than 60-year history of vast corruption, incompetence and organised terror against its many detractors and a shameful track record of suppression of cancer therapies which are actually beneficial.
 
Millions, if not billions of people have suffered terrible torture and death because those in charge took bribes, had closed minds to the innovative, or simply were afraid to do what was obviously and ethically correct.
 
Instead, the corporate and individual greed and the desire of the few to profit from the many, as always takes precedence.

“The doctor's union (AMA), the cancer bureaucracy (NCI), the public relations fat-cats (ACS) and the cancer cops (FDA) are conspiring to suppress a cure for cancer... It would be easy for any Congressional committee, major newspaper, television network or national magazine to confirm and extend the evidence presented here in order to initiate radical reform of the critical cancer areas--the hospitals, the research centres, the government agencies, and especially state and local legislation regarding cancer treatment.

But that will not happen without a struggle.
 
Neither Congress nor the media desire to lift the manhole cover on this sewer of corruption and needless torture.
 
Only organized, determined citizen opposition to the existing cancer treatment system has any hope of bringing about the long-needed changes.
 
I expect the struggle to be a long, difficult one against tough, murderous opposition.
 
The odds against success are heavy.
 
The vested interests are very powerful... ".
 
Barry Lynes, ‘The Healing of Cancer’

There is a veritable mountain of overwhelming evidence and examples which support the theory of collusion between activities of Western governments, especially the United States, along with other prominent members of the ‘medical Elite’ to prevent an effective cancer treatment being promulgated.

Surgery is a massive shock to the system, uses carcinogenic anaesthesia and increases the risk of cancer in the scar tissue.
 
It has value only where the threat to life processes is immediate, as in digestive obstruction etc.
 
The routine removal of every malignant or sometimes even benign lump, surrounded, by the body with a defensive shield, can be virtually a death sentence, especially in the elderly.

Chemotherapy involves the use of extremely toxic petrochemical drugs in the hope, which is often never realised, of killing the disease before killing the patient.
 
The drugs are designed to kill all fast growing cells, cancerous or not and all cells caught in the act of division are systematically poisoned.
 
The effects include hair loss, violent nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, cramps, impotence, sterility, extreme pain, fatigue, immune system destruction, cancer and death.
 
According to the government's own figures, around 2 percent of chemotherapy recipients are still alive after 5 years.
 
The term ‘alive’ is used here in its literal sense, ie. not yet clinically dead.
 
One of chemotherapy’s less well-known side-effects is pneumonia.
 
Many cancer patients die of this after undergoing chemo treatment and their cause of deaths are not recorded as ‘cancer’.

"Toxic chemotherapy is a hoax.
 
The doctors who use it are guilty of premeditated murder.
  
I cannot understand why women take chemotherapy and suffer so terribly for no purpose."
 
Oncologist, Channel 4 TV, 2010