Authors: David Lindahl,Jonathan Rozek
Tags: #Business & Economics, #Entrepreneurship
monster tree to make a dam with. Instead it looks for branches and limbs it can
conveniently find, fashioning each one to fit.
At first the dam isn’t much to look at, but with steady effort it begins to work. Once the
beaver dam is built the main effort is done and now only a bit of maintenance is needed
to keep things working.
By al means keep your eyes open for the next technology that can make your life
easier—whatever that might be. Then, instead of dumping everything else in favor of that
shiny object, simply look for how it might fit into what you already have in place in that
money-dam of yours.
Whew! We’ve succeeded in busting through lots of false barriers to your success and
then making sure you’re aware of the biggest real dangers to that second income we’re
about to build for you.
Can you see why this opportunity is not too good to be true? It takes some effort to
ignore the false barriers and avoid the real dangers. I’l say it again: Al these barriers
and dangers are great for you because they mean less competition.
I hope you had your pen out and have underlined the sections of this chapter that had
particular relevance to you, because I suggest you review those sections regularly. It’s so
easy to be lul ed back into thinking in those old, counterproductive ways.
The next chapter is the opposite of counterproductive—I’m going to turn you into a
product machine so that you see opportunity and potential profits just about everywhere
you look.
How to Build a Quick and Profitable Product
Did you get a chance to watch the TV show Pitchmen on The Discovery Channel before
it was cancel ed? If not, maybe you can find episodes on the Internet. I suggest you
watch a few shows because it wil make you feel so very good about what you’re about
to discover in the book you’re holding.
The show starred two long-time marketers or pitchmen, Bil y Mays and Anthony “Sul y”
Sul ivan. (The show was canceled after Bil y unexpectedly died.) You probably have seen
Bil y pitch stuff like cleaners and gadgets on television for years. He was very
entertaining and sold a ton.
Though the show was entertaining, it was also sad in a way. Here’s how a typical
segment of the show worked:
An inventor whom we’l cal Gus worked for years designing a new-and-improved
gizmo like a cup holder for the car or perhaps a pocket fishing rod. He sank his life-
savings into designing the product and having it manufactured. Now pal et after pal et of
them sits in a warehouse. It seems that his own version of Uncle Moe had plenty of
advice on how to sel them but nothing worked.
Through hit and miss, Gus became aware of the Pitchmen show and he wrangled an
appointment. He got to stand at one end of a conference table while he demonstrated
his cup holder to Bil y and Sul y for perhaps 60 seconds. The guys asked two or three
questions and formulated an instant impression of the product.
In the vast majority of cases both Bil y and Sul y looked at each other—then, as politely
as they could, they thanked Gus for his interesting product and ushered him out of the
room. Another inventor’s dreams dashed. In a handful of cases Bil y and Sul y took on
the new product and cut a deal where they financed the next phase in exchange for a
very healthy cut of the profits.
The next phase involved making sure the product didn’t infringe on someone else’s
trademark or patent, and they reviewed how easily and cheaply it could be mass-
produced. Final y, they made a test commercial and ran it in several markets.
The cost of this next phase was always in the five figures and sometimes into six
figures. Judging from comments on the show only a fraction of those product candidates
ever broke even, never mind making a substantial profit.
I found the process sad because the odds were so stacked against these people
making it to the Big Time. They usual y mortgaged their houses and sank their life-
savings into the project, in most cases only to be rejected by Bil y and Sul y.
Even when they made it to the final test round, their chances of breaking even were
slim and the chances of realizing their dreams and making a fortune seemed to be
about as likely as winning the lottery.
In my opinion, that’s no way to build a second income. You’re betting too much money
and time against too many factors that are way out of your control. Let’s look at al the
bad things about this approach:
• You toil for years to perfect your product in secret with no income to show for it.
• You must spend more money to try to protect your idea through patents,
nondisclosure agreements, memorandums of understanding, and contracts, while
your lawyer’s bil ing clock spins and spins.
• You must pray that you know someone who knows someone who can get you
an introduction to someone.
• Then you must pray that your 60-second presentation goes wel .
• When it most likely does not go wel , you lick your wounds. If the honchos like
your product you gulp as you sign away most of your future profits.
• Now you pray some more that the product does wel .
Look, if you’re a hobbyist/tinkerer and just enjoy making gadgets, then more power to
you. Obviously a few people do get their inventions to market from time to time and
maybe even make a nice profit from them.
My point is that, if you’re going down that route, do it for the excitement of the unknown
or for the miniscule chance that you’l be on television someday. Don’t do it because you
think that’s the only way to make money from sel ing a product.
THE TYPICAL DREAM IS USELESS
We met Uncle Moe in the last chapter. He has an ego even bigger than his beer bel y
and is a know-it-al when it comes to your life and everyone else’s. Moe likes you and
tel s you that this whole idea of sel ing stuff is for the birds. He’s tried it and it simply
won’t work.
Believe it or not, in one sense I agree with Uncle Moe. That’s because the typical
dream of making it big is so extremely unrealistic, as people pitching the Pitchmen
usual y discovered. Here are the underlying requirements that make this conventional
approach so very difficult to pul off:
1. I must have a fortress to protect my idea from knockoff artists.
2. I must reach mil ions of people.
3. I want to be famous.
4. I want to be as rich as King Midas from this first invention of mine.
5. I need to invent something revolutionary.
6. Inventions are things that are manufactured in factories.
I would agree with Uncle Moe that you, or I, or anyone else are exceedingly unlikely to
meet al six requirements in a lifetime.
Fortunately, a far superior method exists for building a substantial income. Let’s look
at each of those requirements and replace it with something better:
“I Must Have a Fortress to Protect My Idea from Knockoff Artists”
Unless you want to pay for an army of lawyers, it’s unrealistic to expect effective
protection. Even if you prevailed in the United States, what are you going to do about
Asian countries where intel ectual-property piracy has been rampant, despite even U.S.
government actions? You’re much better off remembering the quote in the last chapter
about what McDonald’s chairman Ray Kroc said: “We can invent faster than they can
steal.”
Did I just hear you think to yourself, “My situation’s different and I don’t have the
resources
of Ray Kroc
”? That wasn’t you? Oh good. That must have been someone
else thinking that, because you now know better. Besides, even if you didn’t invent faster
than the thieves could knock you off, you could always claim to be the genuine article, the
first-ever, and urge customers to accept no substitutes.
“I Must Reach Millions of People”
No, Proctor and Gamble must reach mil ions of people for a new toothpaste to be
profitable. You only need to find hundreds or perhaps a few thousand people worldwide
for your product to make you a very nice pile of dough, as you’l soon see.
“I Want to Be Famous”
Okay, if that’s what you’re after, I can’t argue with that. But you can work up to being
famous, can’t you? First, make a bunch of money with a product and then you’l have
plenty of resources to go after fame.
“I Want to Be as Rich as King Midas from the First Invention of Mine”
Again, think more about the trajectory you’re on than the ultimate destination. You’re
setting yourself up for failure if every time you are at bat in a basebal game, you must
uncork a grand slam or you regard it as a failure. Even the mighty Mississippi River
starts as a few trickles and then combines over time to become something impressive.
“I Need to Invent Something Revolutionary”
No, you don’t. Think back to your last 10 purchases. How many of them are one-of-a-
kind revolutionary, versus products you just liked? If you bought light bulbs, then yes the
invention of the light bulb was revolutionary, but you bought Acme brand because they
were a good value. Acme got your business even though dozens of other companies
make light bulbs. It’s the same with coffee, computers, cars, and almost al other
products. You can make a bundle of money by carving out your corner of an existing
product category.
“Inventions Are Things that Are Manufactured in Factories”
Of course it’s true that some inventions fit that description, but it doesn’t mean yours has
to be one of them. When I think of factories, al I see are employees, buildings, rules,
regulations, red tape, headaches, and big expenses.
Similar to the fame discussion above, let’s start smal , nimble, and cheap, and, after
you have a pile of money in front of you, only then think about building that giant plant
with your name over the door.
We’ve just talked about the classic, slow, painful, and costly way of making money with
a product. Now let’s talk about the superior way.
YOUR FIRST PRODUCT SHOULD BE ONE OF THESE
Your first moneymaker should be an information product. I’m not saying that al other
types of products are bad or unworkable—I’m simply focused on getting you the most
money in the shortest time for the least amount of effort on your part. Here’s how an
information product stacks up against the classic type of product we just discussed.
You may be reading this book while you already have a physical product and just want
to know how to market it more effectively. That’s fine, and I’l definitely boost your
marketing power in later chapters. But if you do not yet have a product, I hope you see
that the choice is clear—go for the information product, or info product for short.
TABLE 2.1 Physical Products or Information Products: Which sounds better to you?
CHARACTERISTIC
PHYSICAL PRODUCTS
INFORMATION PRODUCTS
Relatively long process to
Time it takes from
design and manufacture
Relatively short process. Can be
idea to first sale
—typical y months or even
as short as days.
years.
Ability of someone
Pretty good.
Pretty good. Pretty good.
to swipe your idea
Ability to come out
with another
Relatively difficult.
Relatively easy.
product quickly
Not bad if you like lawyers,
Hoops to jump
paperwork, contracts,
Very few hoops.
through
permits, and red-tape.
Maybe okay if you’re a
cottage industry, but slim if
Large when you start out and large
Profit margin
you try to scale to the bigtime,
as you grow.
because your investment wil
go way up.
Likelihood of a
first- timer pulling
Relatively slim.
Relatively good.
it off
No prestige to speak of, and your
Great feeling of having your
relatives won’t understand what
name on the door, but you’l
Prestige
business you’re in. They’l just
pay big bucks for that honor.
know you have more money you
than
than
did before.
John Lennon, the Beatles band member, once said, “I’m going to write a swimming
pool.” He understood that he was in the info product business. If he sat down and wrote a
single song, he could pay for a swimming pool. Now don’t you go saying, “Oh, my
situation’s different—John Lennon was a world-famous musician.” Yes, he was, and
perhaps from a standing start you can only put something together that can buy a bicycle
or a dinghy. So what? Lennon’s first song wouldn’t have earned himself a swimming