The Source Field Investigations (26 page)

Popp then learned that many biological lab experiments have proven you can destroy 99 percent of a cell with ultraviolet light, but if you then give it a very weak pulse of the same wavelength, it almost completely recovers—in a single day. This is known as “photo repair,” and no one really understands why it works. To Popp’s amazement, the best photo-repair effects were already known to occur at 380 nanometers—even though none of these scientists knew anything about his discovery.
²⁰

Therefore, it appears that as the Source Field flows into our own measurable reality, its electromagnetic signature is the strongest at the 380-nanometer wavelength. The Source Field also has fluidlike properties—a very important point we will go into more detail about later on. This means you can create a rhythmic pulsation, or what most people would call a vibration, within the field itself and get much stronger effects. Think about how Roman soldiers had to change the speeds they were marching as they went over a bridge, in different groups. Otherwise, if they all marched at the same speed, the entire bridge would start shaking—and could even completely come apart. All those little vibrations kept on resonating, and pretty soon they would build up to much larger effects. The same thing applies to the Source Field—except that here it’s a good thing.

So, in the photo-repair experiments, those weak pulses of 380-nanometer light apparently created a vibration in the Source Field that actually caused a much higher amount of healing, 380-nanometer energy to start flowing in. This, in turn, bathed the dead cells with a splash of rejuvenating, life-giving energy in a short period of time—and they enjoyed a remarkable healing effect.

Popp was hooked on the idea of finding out if the human body was indeed storing and giving off light. He challenged a student named Bernard Ruth to set up an experiment that could prove our bodies were giving off this light—in order for Ruth to finish out his Ph.D. dissertation. Ruth was a skeptic and thought the whole idea was ridiculous, so Popp challenged him to disprove the concept instead. Ruth then went to great lengths to design equipment that could count light—one photon at a time. His device is still considered one of the best light detectors out there. Ruth’s equipment was ready for the first test in 1976, and they decided to start out with cucumber seeds. To their amazement, the seedlings were giving off photons—and these light pulses were significantly stronger than Popp had expected.
²¹
Ruth was skeptical, and felt it had to be due to the presence of chlorophyll—so they switched over to potatoes, which do not have chlorophyll or go through any photosynthesis. Nonetheless, the potatoes gave off even more light than the cucumber seeds. Furthermore, their light emissions were extremely coherent—meaning they were highly structured, just like a laser beam’s.

Next, they tried hitting DNA with a chemical called ethidium bromide, which causes the molecule to unwind and die. Not surprisingly, the more Popp blasted DNA with this chemical, the more light burst out of it.
²²
This led Popp to conclude that the ability to store and release light was a key aspect of how DNA works—just as Gariaev later discovered. Mainstream science still hasn’t caught up with these breakthroughs yet, nor to how Gariaev proved that the energy field responsible for storing this light isn’t electromagnetic—and doesn’t even require DNA to be there for it to work.

As Popp’s research went on, he found that all living things were continuously emitting photons—ranging from only a small number to many hundreds. Interestingly, rudimentary animals or plants give off significantly more light—some one hundred photons per square centimeter per second—than humans do, at only ten photons per second in the same-size area. This was high-frequency light, ranging between two hundred to eight hundred nanometers—well above the visible range. And again, it was coherent light—just like a laser beam.

Popp also discovered that if he shined light on living cells, they would first absorb it, and then release an intense burst of new light after a brief period of time. He called this “delayed luminescence.” This is exactly what we would have expected to see after Gariaev’s discovery that the DNA molecule stores light. Obviously, the DNA is doing something with the light—not just storing it indefinitely. This also fits in perfectly with Gurwitsch’s observation of the energy emerging from the tip of an onion—including the fact that the effect could be blocked by shielding off ultraviolet light. In short, our DNA apparently stashes away light as if it were a direct source of energy and vitality. If the DNA gets too much light, it sends it back out—perhaps like an organism might excrete waste products it no longer needs. However, Popp believed that, unlike waste, these light emissions were serving a very useful purpose—they contained information. Specifically, these light pulses carried the codes to reestablish order and balance throughout the body.

Popp also found that we give off significantly more of these photons when we are going through stress, even though we are not taking in additional light. I consider this a very significant point. We know that many illnesses are enhanced or even caused by stress—and it could be that when we get stressed out or go through negative emotions, we’re giving away some of our own vitality by shedding the light stored in our DNA, all throughout our cells. Why do our bodies end up doing this? It appears that these extra bursts of light contain the information our cells need to heal themselves—from all the damage we’ve been causing them through negative emotions.

Therefore, in order to get healthy again, we’re going to have to charge our DNA back up—and get more light. This raises another interesting question. Obviously, the vast majority of our cells are not being exposed to outside light of any kind—other than the very top layer of our skin. So how exactly do we get more light? How does the light make its way through to the deepest, most internal parts of our bodies? Is all this light strictly coming from visible sources all around us? (Obviously, we don’t die if we are kept in a totally dark room—but our DNA clearly seems to be using light all the time.) Indeed, could these photons be emanating directly out of the Source Field itself? And if the Source Field and its energy is fundamentally interconnected with consciousness, as the Russian pyramid research suggests, then could our minds and emotions be affecting how much light can get in—and where it gets in? Do we have to be open to the Source Field in order for its healing effects to move into our bodies? Could this explain the placebo effect, where simply believing we will be healed actually helps us get better? In short, is it possible that our attitude determines how well our DNA and our cells can absorb light?

Dr. Glen Rein, a biochemist who graduated from the University of London, made stunning discoveries that reveal how DNA behaves in direct response to human consciousness. For starters, DNA unwinds when a cell is about to divide, or has been damaged (i.e., when it is dead), and it winds when it is working to repair and heal itself. The amount of winding or unwinding in DNA can be directly measured by how well it absorbs light at 260 nanometers. In these remarkable experiments, Dr. Rein started out by taking living DNA from a mix of human placentas, putting it in deionized water, and then storing the whole mixture inside a beaker. Then various people attempted to either wind or unwind the DNA—by nothing more than the power of their own thoughts, in heavy concentration. The control samples, where no one tried to do anything to them, changed by only 1.1 percent—but the treated samples changed by anywhere between 2 to 10 percent. This meant that our thoughts alone have, at the very least, a two-fold effect on the winding of human DNA.
²³

Even more interesting, the senders with the most coherent brain wave patterns had the strongest ability to change the structure of DNA. And on the flipside of the coin, “one individual who was particularly agitated (and had a very incoherent [brain wave pattern,]) produced an abnormal shift in the UV,” or ultraviolet light, that the DNA was absorbing. The change occurred at a wavelength of 310 nanometers, which is close to Popp’s magic value of 380 nanometers—that same frequency that can cause cancer when it is scrambled.
²⁴
This angry person also caused the DNA to coil up tighter in its winding. Both of these are very unusual effects. According to Rein, this change in the 310-nanometer light could only mean that “an alteration in the physical/chemical structure of one or more of the bases in the DNA molecule has occurred.”
²⁵
That means our thoughts can actually create physical and chemical changes in the structure of the DNA molecule—as well as winding and unwinding it. This is the microbiological proof for the connection between angry thoughts and cancerous tissue growth that we’ve been waiting for—and the implications are just as profound for healing effects as well. Let’s not forget how we can project significant bursts of photons into an electromagnetically shielded area when we are accurately remote-viewing that location, as we learned in chapter 4. Those photons may well have genetic information in them that can restructure others’ DNA to restore health—such as the 380-nanometer light frequency.

In another case, when DNA was placed in front of people who were generating coherence in their brain wave patterns, but were not trying to change the DNA, there was no change in the winding or unwinding of the DNA sample. It was only when they wanted it to change that it actually did. This strongly suggests that the conscious intent of the people was causing these effects to occur. Dr. Lew Childre was able to wind or unwind DNA in the laboratory from a half a mile away. Valerie Sadyrin was able to wind DNA in Dr. Rein’s California lab from his home in Moscow, thousands of miles away, during one thirty-minute period of time. According to Rein, the key quality of this energy that can generate coherence in the brain waves and directly affect DNA is love: “Although the techniques used by the different healers are quite varied, they all appear to require a heart focus.”
²⁶

The implications of this are tremendous. The Source Field appears to be responsible for creating the DNA Phantom, and storing light in the DNA molecule. It would appear that our thoughts change the DNA Phantom in Dr. Rein’s experiments first, and only later do we see any changes in the physical DNA molecule. Best of all, we now know that the most important emotional quality of the Source Field is love. Dr. Rein proved that love has a direct, measurable effect on DNA—very likely through the same energetic process that creates the DNA Phantom.

Greater coherence, greater organization, greater structure and greater crystallization—all these effects show us that the energy fields, molecules and cells of our bodies are working in greater harmony and Unity. For the first time, this actually gives us a scientific definition of love. It is not strictly an abstract emotional and biological concept—like the chemicals fired off in the brain when we eat chocolate, or the genetic urge to reproduce. Love can now be seen as a basic principle of universal energy. The more coherence, the more structure, the more harmony we have, the more love there is. And as the Russian pyramid studies show, this also has a direct effect on the behavior of the earth—again suggesting we may all be living in a collective Lucid Dream, to some degree.

Now let’s return to Dr. Fritz-Albert Popp, as some of his results are now being rediscovered by others. Popp found out that our bodies had a variety of different cycles—where the intensity of light would increase and decrease over time. This included biorhythms of 7, 14, 32, 80 and 270 days, which held true even after a year. He also found similarities by day and by night, and by the week and the month—suggesting our rhythms were somehow tapped into the movements of the earth as well. The basics of this phenomena were found again by Japanese scientists in a 2009 study. They were using extremely sensitive cameras that can detect single photons within very dark rooms—similar to the device Ruth developed for Popp’s experiments. To their surprise, the Japanese scientists found our bodies were indeed glowing. The lowest intensity of light was at ten A.M., and the strongest point was at four P.M.—and it then dropped off gradually after that.
²⁷
Another interesting discovery was that our faces glowed more than the rest of our bodies. The Japanese scientists firmly believe this light can help us understand the condition of a person’s health—but they are seemingly not aware of all the other research that has already made great strides in these areas.

Dr. Fritz-Albert Popp found that cancer patients had lost their natural, cyclical human biorhythms. Furthermore, the light they were emitting was not anywhere near as coherent as a healthy person’s.
²⁸
It was as if the overall level of light stored in their bodies were significantly reduced. Multiple sclerosis seemed to be an exception to this rule of ill health, though. In this case, Popp found that people were absorbing too much light, and it appeared to be scrambling and confusing the cells’ natural ability to function.

Popp wanted to find out whether the level of light stored in the body could indeed reveal how healthy the organism was—so he kept on doing more experiments. In one case, he found that free-range chicken eggs had significantly more coherent light than factory-raised eggs. When he examined various types of food, he found that the healthiest food consistently had the lowest and most coherent intensity of light.
²⁹
That’s an interesting point, as it truly suggests that it is quality, not quantity, that counts with this bioenergy system.

Popp made another significant breakthrough when he studied a common water flea known as
Daphnia.
To his amazement, he found that as one flea emitted light, other fleas reabsorbed it. They were drawing vitality directly from each other. This obviously implies that when we absorb too much light, the photons we give away are not waste products—they still contain all the vitality our bodies need. Sure enough, Popp found that small fish were also absorbing light from each other, sunflowers would position themselves to where the most number of photons could be absorbed, and bacteria would soak up light from their surroundings.
³⁰
It is frankly quite amazing that this natural, biological system has eluded our mainstream scientific thought for so long—but once this knowledge spreads, the effects will be tremendously positive.