The Source Field Investigations (59 page)

This is direct confirmation of what I expected—namely, that we can prove there are layers of energy in the galaxy that can completely transform the earth and solar system as they sweep through, causing measurable changes. Geomagnetic pole reversals are not what we’re looking for—it’s the effects on life that seem to be jumping out at us, since many evolutionary events did not involve any cataclysmic activity.

Tifft himself also theorized about what was creating these strange effects—and given everything we’ve been discussing, the results are astonishing. Tifft has obviously never read Dewey Larson’s physics, but he came up with the exact same thing to explain what he was seeing: “In summary, we have examined a model based upon two coexisting 3-D spaces, one of time, one of space.”
¹⁴
I was thrilled when I realized Tifft had independently discovered this on his own. Let’s read a little more.

The word
tau
means “time”—so Tifft is almost using the exact same language as the term
time-space
, only with the Greek letter for time instead. In this same paper, he says, “At a given cosmic radius in tau space, a galaxy occupies a specific temporal state. It must change that temporal state in discrete steps.”
¹⁶
I was amazed at how well all of this fit together. The model is extremely elegant. When we combine Tifft and Aspden’s conclusions, we know that at least at some point, we could enter into a new space domain of tau space, where matter and energy as we know it “locks into a slightly different set of fundamental physical constants,” and “changes its temporal state” in a “discrete step.” Neither of these great scientists seem to be aware of how well their model extends to explain the 26- and 62-million-year cycles that were found in the fossil record—showing that these changes in the flow of time also affect biological life as well as the “fundamental physical constants” of matter and energy.

We’ve almost got a perfect model at this point. The last thing we need to find out is whether our solar system is already going through a change in its temporal state where we indeed enter into a new space domain that will lock in a slightly different set of fundamental physical constants. In simple terms, if we’re at the boundary of one of these domains right now, complete with all the coherence-increasing, DNA-evolving properties that come along with it, we should expect to see measurable changes in the Sun and planets. This would provide “smoking gun” proof that the ancient prophecies were indeed correct. As Dmitriev already suggested, these changes would be the direct result of an increasing flow of time through the solar system—or as he put it, an increase in the number of vacuum domains, or vortexes into time-space, coming in. And, lo and behold, once we begin seeking evidence for interplanetary climate change, we find many solid data points from reputable NASA and ESA scientists.

Since at least the late 1970s, the Sun’s overall radiation emissions have increased by 0.5 percent per decade.
¹⁷
Between 1901 and 2000, the Sun’s magnetic field increased in size and strength by 230 percent.
¹⁸
As of 1999, high increases in the amount of helium and heavier charged particles coming out of the Sun were observed.
¹⁹
One NASA scientist said in 2003 that the Sun was “more active than in living memory.”
²⁰
A mainstream geophysical team recently proved that the Sun has been more active since the 1940s than in the previous 1,150 years combined.
²¹
The new brightening all started in the last 150 years.
²²
As of November 2004, this same group proved that the Sun is more energetic than it has been in at least eight thousand years.
²³

Then in 2006, NASA announced that the Sun’s “great conveyor belt,” a massive circulating current of hot plasma, had slowed down from a normal walking speed of 1.0 meters per second to 0.75 meters per second in the north—and only 0.25 meters per second in the south.
²⁴
Prior to recent times, the speed had stayed consistent since the nineteenth century, and it took about forty years—two katuns
—
to complete a circuit. This may be a sign that the “flow of time” within the Sun is changing, as we discussed earlier. In 2008, NASA said this was a “substantial . . . historic and important” change—“the sun’s surface flows have slowed dramatically.”
²⁵
In 2009, NASA reported that “this is the quietest sun we’ve seen in almost a century” due to the surprising lack of sunspots and flares on the surface.
^26
-
27
BBC News admitted that astronomers were baffled by this—particularly because, as Dr. Mike Lockwood explained, the Sun’s overall activity peaked in about 1985 and has been on a noticeable downtrend since then, even as overall global temperatures have risen: “If the Sun’s dimming were to have a cooling effect, we’d have seen it by now.”
²⁸
At the same time, scientists also fear there might be a massive new peak of solar activity that could potentially fry electronics on earth—and gave a surprisingly familiar-sounding target date of September 2012 for when this may happen.
²⁹
A LiveScience article in 2007 seriously considered the social anthropologist Dr. Benny Peiser’s suggestion that the Sun could be responsible for measurable “global warming” on Mars, Jupiter, Neptune’s moon Triton and Pluto, as well as the earth.
³⁰
Surprisingly, this is one of very few mainstream media articles to have ever made this obvious connection—but the data in Peiser’s analysis is only a small part of the story.

Despite supposedly high surface temperatures, Mercury seems to have ice in its polar regions.
³¹
It also has an unexpectedly dense core and strong magnetic field. Scientists would like to know how these anomalies are possible.
³²
In 2008, Mercury was found to have “several signatures indicating significant pressure within the magnetosphere” that it didn’t have in the 1970s.
³³
By 2009, it had gotten much more intense—the Messenger probe was now seeing “magnetic twisters,” and the scientists were surprised at how strongly it changed.
³⁴
These tornadoes were ten times as strong as any ever seen on earth.
³⁵

The amount of sulfur in Venus’s atmosphere decreased dramatically between 1978 and 1983.
³⁶
Venus’s overall night-side brightness increased by a whopping 2,500 percent between 1975 and 2001.
³⁷
Scientists cannot explain this sudden change in brightness, though it suggests that the oxygen content of Venus’s atmosphere may have substantially increased.
^38
39
A tail of charged plasma trailing behind Venus was measured to be 60,000 percent longer in 1997 than in the late 1970s.
⁴⁰
Both the northern and southern hemispheres of Venus dramatically brightened in January 2007, and a strange, unusual and mysterious bright spot appeared in July 2009.
⁴¹
Regarding this sudden new bright spot, Dr. Sanjay Lamaye said, “It’s fair to say something unusual happened on Venus. Unfortunately, we don’t know what happened.”
⁴²

Between the mid-1970s and 1995, Mars developed clouds, had an overall reduction in atmospheric dust content, and revealed a “surprise . . . abundance” of ozone in its atmosphere.
⁴³
The Mars Surveyor probe was damaged in 1997 by an unexpected 200 percent increase in the density of Mars’s atmosphere.
⁴⁴
In 1999, a hurricane appeared on Mars for the first time in more than twenty years, and was 300 percent larger than any previously seen.
⁴⁵
The biggest global dust storm in “several decades” engulfed the entire planet very rapidly in 2001, “something quite unheard of in previous experience.”
⁴⁶

Interestingly, this storm peaked directly before 9/11—suggesting the possibility, however remote, that the massive stress everyone felt on earth from that event actually reflected back through time-space and had profound energetic effects upon our nearest neighboring planet. In 2001, mainstream media announced global warming on Mars, including dramatic year-to-year losses of snow at the south pole and rapid erosion of ice features at the south pole.
⁴⁷
NASA described this as “recent global climate change” in 2003. In 2005, European astronomers noticed a glow on the night side of Mars for the first time.
⁴⁸

The atmosphere of Mars erupted into an unprecedented global dust storm between July and September 2001, shocking NASA scientists.

Hot plasma was observed in Jupiter’s magnetic field in 1979, though it was not visible in 1974.
⁴⁹
Jupiter’s atmosphere was discovered by NASA scientists to be hundreds of degrees hotter than anticipated.
⁵⁰
The amount of heavy elements (such as oxygen) in Jupiter’s atmosphere decreased by a stunning 10 percent between 1979 and 1995, which is equivalent to twenty earth-masses of oxygen “embarrassingly” disappearing in sixteen years.
^51
52
Radiation emissions from Jupiter increased by about 25 percent between 1973 and 1995.
⁵³
In April 2004, a major new study announced the surprise merging of three different oval formations in Jupiter’s atmosphere, two of which were quite large. Without these vortexes in place, heat would not be released as efficiently and Jupiter might experience substantial global warming within the following ten years—a whopping temperature increase of 18 degrees Fahrenheit, or 10°C.
⁵⁴
The same scientist also notes that the Great Red Spot has changed from its traditional red to “something more like salmon,” and that this color change may be due to an overall increase in temperature.
⁵⁵
These changes are theorized to be part of a seventy-year cycle, which is believed to have started when the three largest ovals first appeared in 1939.

In 2006, the three ovals that had merged together in 2004 were now becoming a huge storm rivaling the Great Red Spot, further indicating a “global change” in Jupiter’s climate.
⁵⁶
In 2008, two massive new storms emerged in Jupiter’s atmosphere that were hotter than any ever observed before. NASA announced that this was part of a “dramatic, planet-wide disturbance on Jupiter that is ongoing. The cause of the disturbance has yet to be explained.”
⁵⁷
In order to properly model this “global upheaval” in computer simulations, NASA scientists had to increase the water vapor in Jupiter’s atmosphere to “very high levels—about three hundred times that measured by the Galileo spacecraft . . . in 1995.”
⁵⁸

In 1995, Jupiter’s moon Io had a huge, bright, two-hundred-mile-wide feature show up in only sixteen months, which was a “more dramatic change than any seen in the previous fifteen years.”
⁵⁹
Io’s ionosphere became 1,000 percent higher between 1973 and 1996.
⁶⁰
Io’s entire surface became over 200 percent hotter between 1979 and 1998.
⁶¹
New colors were seen in Io’s aurorae in 1998.
⁶²
Yet additional new colors were discovered in 2001.
⁶³
A doughnut-shaped tube of glowing plasma energy fills the entire path of Io’s orbit of Jupiter. Scientists think this tube is caused by charged particles spewing from Io’s volcanoes. The charged particles in this tube became 50 percent denser between 1979 and 1995.
⁶⁴
The overall density of the tube increased by 200 percent between 1979 and 1995.
⁶⁵
A ribbon-like cold portion separated out and significantly brightened between 1999 and 2000.
⁶⁶