The Three-Body Problem (16 page)

Mr Bexheath:
Please give your name, age and occupation.

Vanessa:
Vanessa Duncan, twenty, schoolteacher.

Mr Bexheath:
Miss Duncan, I have spoken to your landlady, and she has told me that you have rooms on the ground floor of her house, and the prisoner’s rooms were just above yours. Is this true?

Vanessa:
(
through clenched teeth, and determined to be as monosyllabic as possible
) Yes.

Mr Bexheath:
She tells me that you spoke to her of your upstairs neighbour’s habit of continually pacing back and forth at night. Is this true?

Vanessa:
Yes.

Mr Bexheath:
The prisoner paced a great deal, alone in his rooms at night?

Vanessa:
Well, he paced sometimes.

Mr Bexheath:
It is well-known, of course, that sleeplessness and nocturnal pacing are signs of a troubled conscience.

Vanessa:
(
forgetting to speak in monosyllables
) What nonsense! He paced because he was thinking about mathematics.

Mr Bexheath:
Quite. So, Miss Duncan, eventually you became acquainted with the prisoner socially?

Vanessa:
Yes. We met at a dinner party given by the mother of one of my pupils.

Mr Bexheath:
Did you once have tea in Grantchester with the prisoner?

Vanessa:
Yes.

Mr Bexheath:
You went alone together to Grantchester?

Vanessa:
Yes.

Mr Bexheath:
You are aware that this constitutes very suggestive behaviour?

Vanessa:
No.

Mr Bexheath:
Oh, you are not aware. Then perhaps you should become aware, for your good name is threatened by such behaviour. Did you ever visit the prisoner in his rooms?

Vanessa:
Never.

Mr Bexheath:
Did the prisoner ever visit you in your rooms?

Vanessa:
Yes. Once he came down to my rooms to give me a magazine edited by Mr Oscar Wilde and to invite me to the theatre in London with a party of friends.

Mr Bexheath:
Did he enter your rooms?

Vanessa:
No, he stood at the door.

Mr Bexheath:
Very correct, I am sure. And that is the only time he ever visited you in your rooms?

Vanessa:
No.

Mr Bexheath:
There were other times?

Vanessa:
One other time. He briefly took tea in my rooms after returning from the theatre where we had been, as I said, with a party of friends.

Mr Bexheath:
Your friends of course joined you for this tea?

Vanessa:
No.

Mr Bexheath:
Only the prisoner came into your rooms?

Vanessa:
Yes.

Mr Bexheath:
What time of day was it?

Vanessa:
It was near midnight.

Mr Bexheath:
You and the prisoner were alone in your rooms together at midnight?

Vanessa:
Yes, for a short time. We only—

Mr Bexheath:
I AM LEARNING
most interesting facts about the prisoner’s attitudes in his personal life. Nocturnal pacing is now followed by nocturnal visits to the rooms of young ladies living alone. You, Miss Duncan, hail from the countryside, and may be unaware of the social consequences of such actions as you have been engaging in, but Mr Weatherburn is most certainly aware of them. If you did not previously, do you at least now realise how he has compromised you?

Vanessa:
No.

Mr Bexheath:
You would do better to realise it, and modify your future behaviour accordingly, if it is not already too late. However, Miss Duncan, you are not on trial here. You are young and inexperienced, and I give you this advice in a fatherly and not in a judgemental spirit. The case of the prisoner is an entirely different one. Your testimony paints a most relevant picture of the prisoner’s very personal manner of flouting noble feelings in the pursuit of his own pleasure and advantage.

Vanessa:
No, it does not!

Mr Bexheath:
Miss Duncan, I counsel you to abandon your stubborn attitude, and to reflect carefully and deeply on what I have told you. I have no more questions for you. This was my last witness, my Lord. It is unfortunate that there are no witnesses to the actual deeds of which the prisoner is accused, but that is only to be expected. One tends to avoid committing murder in front of people. The witnesses I have questioned here have attested, as you have heard, my Lord, and gentlemen of the jury, to a mass of details which build up to form a coherent picture which I will summarise fully and completely in my closing speech.

Mr Justice Penrose:
Thank you. Would counsel for the defence like to cross-examine?

Mr Haversham:
Most certainly, my Lord.

Mr Haversham: Miss Duncan, what day was the fatal midnight visit to your rooms upon which my learned colleague has made so many insinuations?

Vanessa:
It was on the 7th of April.

Mr Haversham:
And how long did Mr Weatherburn remain in your rooms at that time?

Vanessa:
About fifteen minutes.

Mr Haversham:
How did he come to enter your rooms?

Vanessa:
We came in from outside, where we had stopped in a hansom. It was raining extremely hard. We were wet. I invited him in for a cup of tea.

Mr Haversham:
What did you do during his visit?

Vanessa:
We sat in front of the fire and had tea and talked a little about the play we had just seen and the friends we had just left.

Mr Haversham:
How did Mr Weatherburn come to take his leave?

Vanessa:
He jumped up quite suddenly and said that some mathematical proof had suddenly struck him, and dashed off upstairs, almost forgetting his overcoat.

Mr Haversham:
It does not strike me that such a brief neighbourly call can be considered to destroy anybody’s reputation, nor to constitute a flouting of noble feelings nor a defiance of social conventions, I am glad to say. Furthermore, I take it that the mathematical discovery which caused the prisoner to precipitately leave Miss Duncan’s room is one and the same as that which he mentioned to Mr Withers on the following day. There are no grounds to conclude that it had any relation whatsoever to the famous n-body problem; it is more likely to be related to his own personal research. We will return to this question later. In the meantime, Miss Duncan, I would like, if I
may, to ask you some questions about serious matters. Do you recall the garden party following Professor Cayley’s lecture on the teaching of mathematics, which took place on the 23rd of April?

Vanessa:
Yes, very well.

Mr Haversham:
Did you hear some words exchanged between Mr Beddoes and Mr Crawford?

Vanessa:
Yes.

Mr Haversham:
Can you recall them?

Vanessa:
There weren’t many. First, Mr Crawford was standing with the group of people around Mrs Beddoes, and when Mr Beddoes came up, Mr Crawford simply said something like ‘Here’s Beddoes, I haven’t seen you for a week, how have you been?’

Mr Haversham:
That seems normal enough. How did Mr Beddoes respond?

Vanessa:
He seemed extremely surprised. I did not know then that they had quarrelled, but that would explain his surprise. He only said ‘Quite well’. Then the mathematicians standing about went on arguing, and then Mr Crawford left, but just as he was leaving, he turned to Mr Beddoes and said that he needed to see him soon, and that they should dine together, and that he would let him know. Mr Beddoes seemed surprised and rather pleased at this invitation.

Mr Haversham:
So Mr Beddoes had quarrelled with Mr Crawford and they had not spoken until the garden party at which Mr Crawford appeared to wish for a reconciliation, and spoke of a dinner invitation. Might he not have been actually preparing the dinner invitation which he did extend to Mr Beddoes a week later, as part of a plan to murder him?

Mr Bexheath:
I object to all this, my Lord! A flighty young lady’s interpretations of the moods of those around her cannot be introduced as evidence, and neither can my learned colleague’s unsubstantiated hypotheses!

Mr Haversham:
Everything the witness has described was observed by several people, some of whom will be called as witnesses for the defence. For that matter, it can be confirmed by Mrs Beddoes, my Lord, who was also present. But I do not wish to trouble her unnecessarily in her distress.

Mr Justice Penrose:
Quite so. We accept the witness’s statements subject to corroboration by subsequent witnesses for the defence.

Mr Haversham:
In that case, I have no further questions.