If you've read the City Watch miniseries (
Guards! Guards!, Men at Arms, Feet of Clay, Jingo, The Fifth Element, Night Watch, Thud!
) within the Discworld series, maybe you consider the watchmen the few, the proud, but ultimately, the ineptâa far cry from the forensics experts of
CSI
(and its thousands of spin-offs) or other law enforcement agents in
Law and Order
(another show with multiple spin-offs). But that's not so far from reality, particularly in England and Australia in the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries!
Before 1674, depending on where you wereâwithin the sprawling metropolis of London or the countryâyou would probably find the same amateur, unskilled form of peacekeeping taking place since the Middle Ages. But after 1674, the duty of keeping the peace fell
upon the shoulders of the justice of the peaceâthe magistrates. In country settings, this was probably the largest landowner in the area. Justices were part of a larger Commission of Peace body. But untrained constables did the legwork of keeping the peace. After all, there was no police force as such with rules in place. And the constables were men from the area who rotated the duty.
The justice of the peace had the authority to hold a trial and carry out a judgment. Depending on the offense, the sentenced person might be whipped, placed in the stocks, or fined. Needless to say, justice wasn't always served.
In London, justices weren't the wealthy landowners. They were the tradesmenâalso known as “trading justices”âwho received a fee every time a criminal was brought before them. So, some “administered justice,” as often as possibleâsometimes by inventing reasons to have people brought before them.
Also, in many of the parishes of London, watchmen were on patrol from 9:00 P.M. until sunrise. Some parishes also hired thief takersâbounty hunters like Stephanie Plum of Janet Evanovich's seriesâsome of whom were thieves themselves (unlike Stephanie Plum)! Before the passing of the Watch Acts, watchmen were selected from the homeowners in the area and served for a year. They could question individuals out on the streets at that hour (“Up to no good? Push off home, you!”), but couldn't do much about stopping crime. Also, they were part-timers. They rotated with men who, like them, had other employment. And there's something about not getting paid that puts a damper on one's enthusiasm.
Constables, during the daytime, had more authority to question and detain minor criminals. But, alas, they were few and could do little to deter major criminalsâlike those of the Carcer (
Night Watch
) variety.
When Charles I allowed for watchmen to be hired, the low salary kept away more qualified applicants. Many watchmen were
poor or poorly chosen. Picture a frail, elderly man holding a stick and a lantern. There's something about the sight that doesn't ensure confidence in the justice system. Unfortunately, many also were corrupt (like Quirke or Sergeant Knock in
Night Watch
) and unskilled. (Bet you're thinking of Fred Colon and Nobby Nobbs right about now ⦠. )
So, two brothers (half brothers really)âHenry and John Fieldingâset out to set up a system of policing the city and its environs. Their dream began because Henry Fielding decided not to be the kind of trading justice he observed. Instead, thanks to his training as a journalist and a lawyer, he wanted to reform the office of magistrate and the laws concerning the poor. Having set up his magistrate's office at Bow Street, Henry also established a criminal law journal in the mid-eighteenth century. So, in a way, he was like William de Worde, the journalist in
The Truth
and
Monstrous Regiment.
Henry's journal later became known as the
Police Gazette.
The advent of the Bow Street Runnersâthief takers used by Henry and later John, who were rewarded due to the criminals they apprehendedâhelped in the later establishment of a regular police force. But during their lifetimes, the brothers could not get the government to agree on the necessity of having a regularly employed police force. John's plan for expanding the role of the Bow Street Runners was continually thwarted.
In the nineteenth century, the Watch Acts (particularly, the Metropolitan Police Act of 1829) were passed, allowing a tax to be levied to hire full-time watchmen. Sadly, it took the deaths of eleven people and the injury of five hundred (the Peterloo massacre of 1819), after an altercation between soldiers and unarmed civilians at a
protest rally, for the government to see the need for a better-trained peacekeeping unit. These were London's first police officersâa group which Sir Robert Peel, the home secretary at the time (the Vetinari of his day), helped set up. Richard Mayne and Charles Rowan, the first joint police commissioners in the formation of the police, are predecessors in a way of Commander Sam Vimes and Carrot Ironfoundersson. Ex-soldier Rowan (the Vimes), who was older than Mayne and had military training, was considered slightly more senior in rank. Mayne, like Carrot, had a strong sense of civic duty as well as knowledge of the law.
No longer would these peacekeepers be called watchmen. They would be patrolmen. But they earned a nickname as wellâbobbies, after Sir Robert Peel. The first policeâa group of about three thousandâwore uniforms and patrolled like Ankh-Morpork's watchmen.
At the time this book is published, Vimes's counterpart in the Metropolitan Police Service is Sir Ian Blair, a man who rose in the ranks just like Vimes, from constable to commissioner.
In
Men at Arms,
Vimes is forced to bend with the times by hiring practices represented by significant segments of the population (e.g., a werewolf, a dwarf, a gnome, and a trollâmost of whom moved up the promotion ladder faster than Nobby). However, as you know, Vimes draws the line at hiring vampires until forced to do so in
Thud!
when Sally (Salacia Deloresista Amanita Trigestatra Zeldana Malifee ⦠von Humpedingâvampires have incredibly long names) comes on the scene.
The City Watch hiring practices mirror the Race Relations Act 1976 and the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 in Great Britain (acts of Parliament), as well as such U.S. laws as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and its subsequent amendments and Title 42. Read for yourself:
British Law
Part II: Discrimination in the Employment Field
Discrimination by employers â¦
(1) It is unlawful for a person, in relation to employment by him at an establishment in Great Britain, to discriminate against anotherâ
(a) in the arrangements he makes for the purpose of determining who should be offered that employment; or
(b) in the terms on which he offers him that employment; or
(c) by refusing or deliberately omitting to offer him that employment.
Race Relations Act 1976, 1976 CHAPTER 74
135
Â
U. S. Law
SEC. 2000e-2. [Section 703]
(a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employerâ
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-352) (Title VII)
136
In Britain, the Race Relations Acts were passed starting in 1965. But further revisions were needed, making necessary the Race Relations
Acts of 1968, 1976, and the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000. Third time's the charm, apparently.
Lately, however, with affirmative action under fire in the United States, reverse discrimination cases have had their day in court in some states, with demands for the end of quota-hiring systems, especially in regard to promotions on the force. It will be interesting to see whether the hiring quotas will come under fire in Discworld as well.
In the meantime, the Watch keeps on ticking.
Ripped from the Headlines?
I
f you watch the original Law and Order and its trillions of spin-offs, you know that their cases are “ripped from today's headlines.” In other words, they mirror many real-life cases.
While the news hasn't featured any golem or werewolf killings (at least to our knowledge), there have been real-life criminals who could have served as inspiration for the criminals the Watch tries to apprehend. For instance, such serial killers as Jack the Ripper, Ted Bundy, and John Wayne Gacy were the “bogeymen” who haunted police just as double-murderer Carcer has haunted the Watch.
Although there have been serial killers who killed more people, Jack the Ripper remains larger than life because he was never caught or identified, unlike Carcer. He (and police aren't entirely sure that only one person was involved) operated in Whitechapel in 1888, killing five prostitutes (possibly more; again, the police
aren't sure of the number) in a grisly way that gained him his nickname.
These real-life killers helped spawn such twisted fictional serial killers as “Buffalo Bill” of The Silence of the Lambs by Thomas Harris (the book; the 1991 movie screenplay was by Ted Tally).