Essence and Alchemy (21 page)
Read Essence and Alchemy Online
Authors: Mandy Aftel
The primal, almost off-putting earthiness of the erotogenic base notes points to a little-acknowledged truth about the relationship of scent to sexuality: sexy smells are subliminally reminiscent of the smell of sweat and of the hairy regions of the human body. The odor of our species at its most animal is at the heart of eros.
Human beings were not always so uncomfortable with this truth.
In ancient Egypt, notes Iwan Bloch
106
in
Odoratus Sexualis,
his peculiar, obsessive 1934 scientific and cultural catalog of sexual scents and erotic perfumes, both men and women perfumed their genitalia, not to mask their odors but to enhance and even to exaggerate them. Women rolled the unguent
kyphi
into little balls and placed them in the vulva. He cites the Renaissance physician Prospero Albini, who spent three years in Egypt studying medicine, as observing, “The Egyptian women anoint the vulva with amber and civet, thus increasing the pleasure of coitus. Just as the women of Italy and other nations pay great attention to the care of their face and hair so do the Egyptian women, neglecting entirely the interests of their European sisters, pay exclusive attention to the pudenda and the regions thereunto adjacent.”
In ancient Egypt, notes Iwan Bloch
106
in
Odoratus Sexualis,
his peculiar, obsessive 1934 scientific and cultural catalog of sexual scents and erotic perfumes, both men and women perfumed their genitalia, not to mask their odors but to enhance and even to exaggerate them. Women rolled the unguent
kyphi
into little balls and placed them in the vulva. He cites the Renaissance physician Prospero Albini, who spent three years in Egypt studying medicine, as observing, “The Egyptian women anoint the vulva with amber and civet, thus increasing the pleasure of coitus. Just as the women of Italy and other nations pay great attention to the care of their face and hair so do the Egyptian women, neglecting entirely the interests of their European sisters, pay exclusive attention to the pudenda and the regions thereunto adjacent.”
The Hindus, Bloch claims, were equally preoccupied with the odor of the female genitals, and used it to classify women into four distinct types:
The lotus smelling
: Their two breasts are like the bilva fruit. They are distinguished by the fact that the love secretion flows without cessation and can be compared to the odor of the Tamarei, which has lovely blossoms. Their sexual organ is like the flower of the red water-rose, and is compared to a holy mystery.
: Their two breasts are like the bilva fruit. They are distinguished by the fact that the love secretion flows without cessation and can be compared to the odor of the Tamarei, which has lovely blossoms. Their sexual organ is like the flower of the red water-rose, and is compared to a holy mystery.
The merry
: Their breasts are thick, and their thighs have the color of gold. Their love secretion has an odor like that of honey or the sap of the palm tree. Their sexual part is beautiful because it possesses a copious foliage of hair. Their love-secretion is mild and flows abundantly for their sexual organ is drawn apart as with a pulley.
: Their breasts are thick, and their thighs have the color of gold. Their love secretion has an odor like that of honey or the sap of the palm tree. Their sexual part is beautiful because it possesses a copious foliage of hair. Their love-secretion is mild and flows abundantly for their sexual organ is drawn apart as with a pulley.
The snail-like:
They are very thin and meager. They have long black hair on their sexual organ which is compressed; hence their love secretion tastes and smells salty.
They are very thin and meager. They have long black hair on their sexual organ which is compressed; hence their love secretion tastes and smells salty.
The elephant-like
: Their body is large and rich. Their vulva is exceedingly broad because the dry and protruding Mani (Clitoris, the middle pearl of the rose-wreath) stands therein. Their love secretion has the penetrating odor of the fluid which is discharged from the ear of the rutting elephant.
: Their body is large and rich. Their vulva is exceedingly broad because the dry and protruding Mani (Clitoris, the middle pearl of the rose-wreath) stands therein. Their love secretion has the penetrating odor of the fluid which is discharged from the ear of the rutting elephant.
The use of body odor as an aphrodisiac is recorded in the ancient literature of nearly all languages. Garments impregnated with a would-be lover's perspiration were smuggled into the proximity of the desired sexual partner, and sweat also played an important role in the preparation of elixirs. During Shakespeare's time, a woman in love would place a peeled apple in her armpit to saturate it with her scent and then present it to her beloved as a token of her desire. Napoleon famously sent advance word to Josephine, “I will be arriving in Paris tomorrow evening. Don't wash.” And Walt Whitman, celebrant of earthy delights, called sweat an “aroma finer than prayer.”
Still, a streak of evasiveness, if not ambivalence, runs through the record of our fascination with the way the body smells. The Greeks were fascinated with the panther, which they believed to have exceptionally sweet breath and a lovely body odor. Aristotle and several others described its hunting techniques: it would hide and, like a courtesan, allow its natural fragrance to enchant its victims, drawing them ever nearer until the panther pounced on them and killed them. But the panther is not only deadly; among creatures of nature it is also seen as exceptional in its pleasant scent.
“When she opens her red lips, her breath fills all of Tientsin with perfume,” goes a Chinese love poem. “I send thee sweet perfume, ministering to scent with scent,” writes the Roman epigrammatist Martial. But how does the beloved's enticing perfume actually smell? Often the focus of the sentiment is diverted from scent altogether, following the displacement of the olfactory by the visual that
is humans' evolutionary lot. The beloved was as lovely as a flower, never mind what she smelled like.
is humans' evolutionary lot. The beloved was as lovely as a flower, never mind what she smelled like.
It took a poet of Baudelaire's daring and genius to write about erotic scent in an entirely frank way. He reminded the world that women smelled like a lot of things, good and bad. And it wasn't their perfume per se that was a turn-on. It was the smell of the body
beneath
the perfumeâthe base note under the base note. With Baudelaire, observes the French social historian Alain Corbin in
The Foul and the Fragrant
, “The scented profile
107
of the woman was transformed.”
beneath
the perfumeâthe base note under the base note. With Baudelaire, observes the French social historian Alain Corbin in
The Foul and the Fragrant
, “The scented profile
107
of the woman was transformed.”
She was no longer delineated beneath filmy gauze. The perfume of bare flesh, intensified by the warmth and moistness of the bed, replaced the veiled scents of the modest body as a sexual stimulus. The visual metaphor died out. The woman stopped being a lily; she became a perfume sachet, a bouquet of odors that emanated from the “odorous wood” of her unbound hair, skin, breath, and blood. The woman's perfume set the seal on the erotic intimacy of the chamber and the bed. She was the “censer” in the alcove, exhaling a whole cluster of scentsâthe negative equivalents of which were stale tobacco and, even more, the musty odor of rooms, which attested to her absence. The emanations of the flesh gave life to the home and made it the theater of ceaselessly clashing smells. The atmosphere of the alcove generated desire and unleashed storms of passion.
After Baudelaire, the scent of the body could be celebrated for itself, inferior to nothing else in nature and, from the lover's standpoint, the sine qua non of all the rest. As Rainer Maria Rilke would write:
You feel how external fragrance stands
Upon your stronger resistance?
Upon your stronger resistance?
There is no question that typically unmentionable bodily smells are the bedrock of olfactory arousal. With characteristically unflinching candor, Havelock Ellis
108
classified these odors in increasing order of erotogenic effect: “The most important of these are: (1) the general skin odor, a faint, but agreeable, fragrance often detected on the skin even immediately after washing; (2) the smell of the hair and scalp; (3) the odor of breath; (4) the odor of the armpit; (5) the odor of the foot; (6) the perineal odor; (7) in men, the odor of preputial smegma; (8) in women, the odor of the mons veneris, that of vulvar smegma, that of vaginal mucus, and menstrual odor.” A penchant for the last two, Ellis scandalously suggested, could be why some people are more inclined to giving oral sex.
108
classified these odors in increasing order of erotogenic effect: “The most important of these are: (1) the general skin odor, a faint, but agreeable, fragrance often detected on the skin even immediately after washing; (2) the smell of the hair and scalp; (3) the odor of breath; (4) the odor of the armpit; (5) the odor of the foot; (6) the perineal odor; (7) in men, the odor of preputial smegma; (8) in women, the odor of the mons veneris, that of vulvar smegma, that of vaginal mucus, and menstrual odor.” A penchant for the last two, Ellis scandalously suggested, could be why some people are more inclined to giving oral sex.
No one brought this idea better to light than Henry Miller, who dared to break the code of silence about what Baudelaire called “the muskiness of fur”âthat is, the seductive smell of a woman's genitals. “With the refinements
109
that come from maturity the smells [of childhood] faded out, to be replaced by only one other distinctly memorable, distinctly pleasurable smellâthe odor of the cunt. More particularly the odor that lingers on the fingers after playing with a woman, for if it has not been noticed before, this smell is more enjoyable, perhaps because it already carries the perfume of the past tense, than the odor of the cunt itself.”
109
that come from maturity the smells [of childhood] faded out, to be replaced by only one other distinctly memorable, distinctly pleasurable smellâthe odor of the cunt. More particularly the odor that lingers on the fingers after playing with a woman, for if it has not been noticed before, this smell is more enjoyable, perhaps because it already carries the perfume of the past tense, than the odor of the cunt itself.”
Nor does our fascination stop there. A further reminder of our animal nature is our eternal interest in feces and its scented connection to sexuality. An unsent letter from Benjamin Franklin to the Royal Academy of Brussels, proposing an attempt to “discover some Drug
110
, wholesome and not disagreeable, to be mixed with our common food, or sauces, that shall render the natural discharges of Wind from our Bodies not only inoffensive, but agreeable as Perfumes,”
displays the mixture of attraction and repulsionâand hilarityâthat fecal odors inspire.
110
, wholesome and not disagreeable, to be mixed with our common food, or sauces, that shall render the natural discharges of Wind from our Bodies not only inoffensive, but agreeable as Perfumes,”
displays the mixture of attraction and repulsionâand hilarityâthat fecal odors inspire.
Let it be considered of how small importance to Mankind, or to how small a Part of Mankind have been useful those Discoveries in Science that have heretofore made Philosophers famous. Are there twenty men happier, or even the easier for any knowledge they have pick'd out of Aristotle? What comfort can the Vortices of Descartes give to man who has Whirlwinds in his Bowels! ⦠The Pleasure arising to a few Philosophers, from seeing, a few times in their lives, the threads of light untwisted, and separated by the Newtonian Prism into seven colors, can it be compared with the ease and comfort every man living might feel seven times a day, by discharging freely the wind from his Bowels? Especially if it be converted into a Perfume â¦
But it is truly the fecal essence of our most pungent bodily odors that draws us, even as it repels us. The precarious balance between arousal and disgust is sexual in its very nature, creating erotic tension and heightening arousal. It manifests itself in the pervasiveness of scatological references in folklore, superstition, and literature, and in the universality of coprolagniaâsexual practices that link human excretion with eroticism.
The intensely earthy scents of the body that trigger libido are not, however, erotic in themselves, any more than the blatant, unmodulated come-on of a “sexy” synthetic blend is. Scent can be sexual without being erotic. In our sexuality, we are purely in the domain of nature; in our eroticism, we are specifically human. As Paul Jellinek puts it,
“Sexuality
is the totality
111
of characteristics and reaction patterns through which the sexual nature of the individual manifests itself. It is the biological link between the individual and
the community, and links the biological interests of the individual (self-preservation) with those of the species (procreation).
Eroticism
, which in a larger sense includes the entire universe of bodily and spiritual sexual experience, is here taken to mean the sensual and spiritual love life, in contrast to sexuality which in the sense of the procreation drive aims at the bodily coupling of the sexes.”
“Sexuality
is the totality
111
of characteristics and reaction patterns through which the sexual nature of the individual manifests itself. It is the biological link between the individual and
the community, and links the biological interests of the individual (self-preservation) with those of the species (procreation).
Eroticism
, which in a larger sense includes the entire universe of bodily and spiritual sexual experience, is here taken to mean the sensual and spiritual love life, in contrast to sexuality which in the sense of the procreation drive aims at the bodily coupling of the sexes.”
While lust can be easily triggered, eroticism is subtle, complex, and, above all, dependent on context. Eroticism, like perfume itself, is a constructed reality. Women do not want to smell like a flower; they want their perfume to radiate an aura that is sexually alluring. So a truly aphrodisiac perfume is one that triggers our unconscious memory of our animal nature in all its erotic manifestations. It is neither a return to our animal nature nor an attempt to cover it up, but rather an exalting of it. And it celebrates not the lowest-common-denominator sexual response that we have in common with other creatures but the individual's unique sexualityâwhat Rilke spoke of when he referred to one's ability to achieve “out of your own experience
112
and childhood and strength ⦠a relation to sex wholly your own (
not
influenced by convention and custom).”
112
and childhood and strength ⦠a relation to sex wholly your own (
not
influenced by convention and custom).”
The body has a scent as singular as a face. H. G. Wells, not a particularly handsome man, was a notorious womanizer. Was it his great mind, his literary talent, or his celebrity that drew so many women to him? No, a former lover confessed, it was the scent of his skin; he smelled of honey. Even the same body smells different from time to time, its complex odors varying with health, diet, emotion, and age. An erotic perfume mingles with the body's distinctive smell, heightening and enhancing it rather than masking it, just as sexy lingerie accentuates rather than conceals the contours of the body. It cannot be traced to any specific odor, but it is an artful construction of scents
based on
the impolite smells of the human body.
based on
the impolite smells of the human body.
As befits a zoologist
113
, Michael Stoddart, a pioneer in researching mammalian olfactive biology, neatly sums up the components of
perfume as follows: the sexual secretions of flowers, “produced to attract animals for the purpose of cross pollination and often formulated as mimics of the animals' own sex pheromones,” many of which “contain compounds with a fecal odor”; “resinous materials which have odors not unlike those of sex steroids”; and “mammalian sex attractants with a distinctly urinous or fecal odor,” which “accentuate the wearer's odorous qualities in the same way that well-cut clothes accentuate the wearer's frame. In offering to the perceiver a cocktail of sex attractant odors at a low concentration in the base notes they subconsciously reveal what consciously the strident top notes seek to hide. The perceiver's attention is drawn to the more volatile and active ⦠notes much as one is drawn to a newspaper by its headlines. The real message is carried in the small print.”
113
, Michael Stoddart, a pioneer in researching mammalian olfactive biology, neatly sums up the components of
perfume as follows: the sexual secretions of flowers, “produced to attract animals for the purpose of cross pollination and often formulated as mimics of the animals' own sex pheromones,” many of which “contain compounds with a fecal odor”; “resinous materials which have odors not unlike those of sex steroids”; and “mammalian sex attractants with a distinctly urinous or fecal odor,” which “accentuate the wearer's odorous qualities in the same way that well-cut clothes accentuate the wearer's frame. In offering to the perceiver a cocktail of sex attractant odors at a low concentration in the base notes they subconsciously reveal what consciously the strident top notes seek to hide. The perceiver's attention is drawn to the more volatile and active ⦠notes much as one is drawn to a newspaper by its headlines. The real message is carried in the small print.”
Other books
UNCOMMON DUKE, AN by BENSON, LAURIE
de Sang: Embrace Your Blood Lust by Hussey, C.D.
The Yellow Packard by Ace Collins
Eden's Outcasts by John Matteson
Southern Charm by Leila Lacey
Hopeless by Cheryl Douglas
The Devil's Orchard by Ali Vali
The Other Side of Midnight by Simone St. James
Claiming His Fire by Ellis Leigh
Harvest Earth by J.D. Laird
